ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  issubg Unicode version

Theorem issubg 14035
Description: The subgroup predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
issubg.b  |-  B  =  ( Base `  G
)
Assertion
Ref Expression
issubg  |-  ( S  e.  (SubGrp `  G
)  <->  ( G  e. 
Grp  /\  S  C_  B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp ) )

Proof of Theorem issubg
Dummy variables  w  s are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-subg 14032 . . 3  |- SubGrp  =  ( w  e.  Grp  |->  { s  e.  ~P ( Base `  w )  |  ( w ↾s  s )  e. 
Grp } )
21mptrcl 5791 . 2  |-  ( S  e.  (SubGrp `  G
)  ->  G  e.  Grp )
3 simp1 1028 . 2  |-  ( ( G  e.  Grp  /\  S  C_  B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp )  ->  G  e.  Grp )
4 fveq2 5698 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( w  =  G  ->  ( Base `  w )  =  ( Base `  G
) )
5 issubg.b . . . . . . . . 9  |-  B  =  ( Base `  G
)
64, 5eqtr4di 2289 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( w  =  G  ->  ( Base `  w )  =  B )
76pweqd 3693 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( w  =  G  ->  ~P ( Base `  w )  =  ~P B )
8 oveq1 6095 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( w  =  G  ->  (
w ↾s  s )  =  ( G ↾s  s ) )
98eleq1d 2307 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( w  =  G  ->  (
( w ↾s  s )  e. 
Grp 
<->  ( G ↾s  s )  e. 
Grp ) )
107, 9rabeqbidv 2816 . . . . . 6  |-  ( w  =  G  ->  { s  e.  ~P ( Base `  w )  |  ( w ↾s  s )  e.  Grp }  =  { s  e. 
~P B  |  ( G ↾s  s )  e.  Grp } )
11 id 19 . . . . . 6  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  G  e.  Grp )
12 basfn 13469 . . . . . . . . . 10  |-  Base  Fn  _V
13 elex 2833 . . . . . . . . . 10  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  G  e.  _V )
14 funfvex 5715 . . . . . . . . . . 11  |-  ( ( Fun  Base  /\  G  e. 
dom  Base )  ->  ( Base `  G )  e. 
_V )
1514funfni 5486 . . . . . . . . . 10  |-  ( (
Base  Fn  _V  /\  G  e.  _V )  ->  ( Base `  G )  e. 
_V )
1612, 13, 15sylancr 418 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  ( Base `  G )  e. 
_V )
175, 16eqeltrid 2325 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  B  e.  _V )
1817pwexd 4320 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  ~P B  e.  _V )
19 rabexg 4281 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ~P B  e.  _V  ->  { s  e.  ~P B  |  ( G ↾s  s )  e.  Grp }  e.  _V )
2018, 19syl 14 . . . . . 6  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  { s  e.  ~P B  | 
( G ↾s  s )  e. 
Grp }  e.  _V )
211, 10, 11, 20fvmptd3 5802 . . . . 5  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  (SubGrp `  G )  =  {
s  e.  ~P B  |  ( G ↾s  s )  e.  Grp } )
2221eleq2d 2308 . . . 4  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  ( S  e.  (SubGrp `  G
)  <->  S  e.  { s  e.  ~P B  | 
( G ↾s  s )  e. 
Grp } ) )
23 oveq2 6096 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( s  =  S  ->  ( G ↾s  s )  =  ( G ↾s  S ) )
2423eleq1d 2307 . . . . . 6  |-  ( s  =  S  ->  (
( G ↾s  s )  e. 
Grp 
<->  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp ) )
2524elrab 2982 . . . . 5  |-  ( S  e.  { s  e. 
~P B  |  ( G ↾s  s )  e.  Grp }  <-> 
( S  e.  ~P B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp ) )
26 elpw2g 4294 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( B  e.  _V  ->  ( S  e.  ~P B  <->  S 
C_  B ) )
2717, 26syl 14 . . . . . 6  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  ( S  e.  ~P B  <->  S 
C_  B ) )
2827anbi1d 469 . . . . 5  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  (
( S  e.  ~P B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp )  <->  ( S  C_  B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp )
) )
2925, 28bitrid 192 . . . 4  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  ( S  e.  { s  e.  ~P B  |  ( G ↾s  s )  e.  Grp }  <-> 
( S  C_  B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp ) ) )
30 ibar 301 . . . 4  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  (
( S  C_  B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp ) 
<->  ( G  e.  Grp  /\  ( S  C_  B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp ) ) ) )
3122, 29, 303bitrd 214 . . 3  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  ( S  e.  (SubGrp `  G
)  <->  ( G  e. 
Grp  /\  ( S  C_  B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp )
) ) )
32 3anass 1013 . . 3  |-  ( ( G  e.  Grp  /\  S  C_  B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp ) 
<->  ( G  e.  Grp  /\  ( S  C_  B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp ) ) )
3331, 32bitr4di 198 . 2  |-  ( G  e.  Grp  ->  ( S  e.  (SubGrp `  G
)  <->  ( G  e. 
Grp  /\  S  C_  B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp ) ) )
342, 3, 33pm5.21nii 716 1  |-  ( S  e.  (SubGrp `  G
)  <->  ( G  e. 
Grp  /\  S  C_  B  /\  ( G ↾s  S )  e.  Grp ) )
Colors of variables:    wff set class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:    /\ wa 104    <-> wb 105    /\ w3a 1009    = wceq 1402    e. wcel 2209   {crab 2532   _Vcvv 2821    C_ wss 3220   ~Pcpw 3688    Fn wfn 5375   ` cfv 5380  (class class class)co 6088   Basecbs 13410   ↾s cress 13411   Grpcgrp 13864  SubGrpcsubg 14029
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4251  ax-pow 4313  ax-pr 4348  ax-un 4580  ax-cnex 8276  ax-resscn 8277  ax-1re 8279  ax-addrcl 8282
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-br 4132  df-opab 4194  df-mpt 4195  df-id 4440  df-xp 4782  df-rel 4783  df-cnv 4784  df-co 4785  df-dm 4786  df-rn 4787  df-res 4788  df-ima 4789  df-iota 5340  df-fun 5382  df-fn 5383  df-fv 5388  df-ov 6091  df-inn 9314  df-ndx 13413  df-slot 13414  df-base 13416  df-subg 14032
This theorem is used by:  subgss  14036  subgid  14037  subggrp  14039  subgbas  14040  subgrcl  14041  issubg2m  14051  resgrpisgrp  14057  subsubg  14059  opprsubgg  14499  subrngsubg  14621  subrgsubg  14644
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator