ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  opprsubrngg Unicode version

Theorem opprsubrngg 14519
Description: Being a subring is a symmetric property. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
opprsubrng.o  |-  O  =  (oppr
`  R )
Assertion
Ref Expression
opprsubrngg  |-  ( R  e.  V  ->  (SubRng `  R )  =  (SubRng `  O ) )

Proof of Theorem opprsubrngg
Dummy variables  x  y  z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 subrngrcl 14511 . . . 4  |-  ( x  e.  (SubRng `  R
)  ->  R  e. Rng )
21a1i 9 . . 3  |-  ( R  e.  V  ->  (
x  e.  (SubRng `  R )  ->  R  e. Rng ) )
3 subrngrcl 14511 . . . 4  |-  ( x  e.  (SubRng `  O
)  ->  O  e. Rng )
4 opprsubrng.o . . . . 5  |-  O  =  (oppr
`  R )
54opprrngbg 14383 . . . 4  |-  ( R  e.  V  ->  ( R  e. Rng  <->  O  e. Rng )
)
63, 5imbitrrid 156 . . 3  |-  ( R  e.  V  ->  (
x  e.  (SubRng `  O )  ->  R  e. Rng ) )
74opprsubgg 14390 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( R  e. Rng  ->  (SubGrp `  R )  =  (SubGrp `  O )
)
87eleq2d 2308 . . . . . 6  |-  ( R  e. Rng  ->  ( x  e.  (SubGrp `  R )  <->  x  e.  (SubGrp `  O
) ) )
9 ralcom 2714 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( A. z  e.  x  A. y  e.  x  (
z ( .r `  R ) y )  e.  x  <->  A. y  e.  x  A. z  e.  x  ( z
( .r `  R
) y )  e.  x )
10 vex 2824 . . . . . . . . . 10  |-  y  e. 
_V
11 vex 2824 . . . . . . . . . 10  |-  z  e. 
_V
12 eqid 2238 . . . . . . . . . . 11  |-  ( Base `  R )  =  (
Base `  R )
13 eqid 2238 . . . . . . . . . . 11  |-  ( .r
`  R )  =  ( .r `  R
)
14 eqid 2238 . . . . . . . . . . 11  |-  ( .r
`  O )  =  ( .r `  O
)
1512, 13, 4, 14opprmulg 14376 . . . . . . . . . 10  |-  ( ( R  e. Rng  /\  y  e.  _V  /\  z  e. 
_V )  ->  (
y ( .r `  O ) z )  =  ( z ( .r `  R ) y ) )
1610, 11, 15mp3an23 1370 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( R  e. Rng  ->  ( y ( .r `  O ) z )  =  ( z ( .r `  R ) y ) )
1716eleq1d 2307 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( R  e. Rng  ->  ( ( y ( .r `  O
) z )  e.  x  <->  ( z ( .r `  R ) y )  e.  x
) )
18172ralbidv 2574 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( R  e. Rng  ->  ( A. y  e.  x  A. z  e.  x  ( y
( .r `  O
) z )  e.  x  <->  A. y  e.  x  A. z  e.  x  ( z ( .r
`  R ) y )  e.  x ) )
199, 18bitr4id 199 . . . . . 6  |-  ( R  e. Rng  ->  ( A. z  e.  x  A. y  e.  x  ( z
( .r `  R
) y )  e.  x  <->  A. y  e.  x  A. z  e.  x  ( y ( .r
`  O ) z )  e.  x ) )
208, 19anbi12d 477 . . . . 5  |-  ( R  e. Rng  ->  ( ( x  e.  (SubGrp `  R
)  /\  A. z  e.  x  A. y  e.  x  ( z
( .r `  R
) y )  e.  x )  <->  ( x  e.  (SubGrp `  O )  /\  A. y  e.  x  A. z  e.  x  ( y ( .r
`  O ) z )  e.  x ) ) )
2112, 13issubrng2 14518 . . . . 5  |-  ( R  e. Rng  ->  ( x  e.  (SubRng `  R )  <->  ( x  e.  (SubGrp `  R )  /\  A. z  e.  x  A. y  e.  x  (
z ( .r `  R ) y )  e.  x ) ) )
224opprrng 14382 . . . . . 6  |-  ( R  e. Rng  ->  O  e. Rng )
23 eqid 2238 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( Base `  O )  =  (
Base `  O )
2423, 14issubrng2 14518 . . . . . 6  |-  ( O  e. Rng  ->  ( x  e.  (SubRng `  O )  <->  ( x  e.  (SubGrp `  O )  /\  A. y  e.  x  A. z  e.  x  (
y ( .r `  O ) z )  e.  x ) ) )
2522, 24syl 14 . . . . 5  |-  ( R  e. Rng  ->  ( x  e.  (SubRng `  O )  <->  ( x  e.  (SubGrp `  O )  /\  A. y  e.  x  A. z  e.  x  (
y ( .r `  O ) z )  e.  x ) ) )
2620, 21, 253bitr4d 220 . . . 4  |-  ( R  e. Rng  ->  ( x  e.  (SubRng `  R )  <->  x  e.  (SubRng `  O
) ) )
2726a1i 9 . . 3  |-  ( R  e.  V  ->  ( R  e. Rng  ->  ( x  e.  (SubRng `  R
)  <->  x  e.  (SubRng `  O ) ) ) )
282, 6, 27pm5.21ndd 717 . 2  |-  ( R  e.  V  ->  (
x  e.  (SubRng `  R )  <->  x  e.  (SubRng `  O ) ) )
2928eqrdv 2236 1  |-  ( R  e.  V  ->  (SubRng `  R )  =  (SubRng `  O ) )
Colors of variables:    wff set class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 104    <-> wb 105    = wceq 1402    e. wcel 2209   A.wral 2528   _Vcvv 2821   ` cfv 5377  (class class class)co 6085   Basecbs 13352   .rcmulr 13432  SubGrpcsubg 13970  Rngcrng 14231  opprcoppr 14372  SubRngcsubrng 14505
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1cn 8272  ax-1re 8273  ax-icn 8274  ax-addcl 8275  ax-addrcl 8276  ax-mulcl 8277  ax-addcom 8279  ax-addass 8281  ax-i2m1 8284  ax-0lt1 8285  ax-0id 8287  ax-rnegex 8288  ax-pre-ltirr 8291  ax-pre-lttrn 8293  ax-pre-ltadd 8295
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-fv 5385  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-tpos 6516  df-pnf 8362  df-mnf 8363  df-ltxr 8365  df-inn 9305  df-2 9363  df-3 9364  df-ndx 13355  df-slot 13356  df-base 13358  df-sets 13359  df-iress 13360  df-plusg 13444  df-mulr 13445  df-0g 13612  df-mgm 13676  df-sgrp 13717  df-mnd 13730  df-grp 13808  df-subg 13973  df-cmn 14089  df-abl 14090  df-mgp 14218  df-rng 14232  df-oppr 14373  df-subrng 14506
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator