Theorem bnj1029 33967

Description: Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1029	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → TrFo( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅), 𝐴, 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem bnj1029

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑖 𝑚 𝑛 𝑝 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
4		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
5		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
6		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
7		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
8		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
9		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
10		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ [(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
11		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ [(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
12		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ [(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
13		eqid 2732	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∖ {∅}) = (ω ∖ {∅})
14		eqid 2732	. 2 ⊢ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))} = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))}
15		eqid 2732	. 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
16		eqid 2732	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})
17	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16	bnj907 33966	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → TrFo( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅), 𝐴, 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106  {cab 2709  ∀wral 3061  ∃wrex 3070  [wsbc 3776   ∖ cdif 3944   ∪ cun 3945  ∅c0 4321  {csn 4627  ⟨cop 4633  ∪ ciun 4996  suc csuc 6363   Fn wfn 6535  ‘cfv 6540  ωcom 7851   ∧ w-bnj17 33685   predc-bnj14 33687   FrSe w-bnj15 33691   trClc-bnj18 33693   TrFow-bnj19 33695

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2703  ax-rep 5284  ax-sep 5298  ax-nul 5305  ax-pr 5426  ax-un 7721  ax-reg 9583

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-sbc 3777  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-pss 3966  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-pw 4603  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-uni 4908  df-iun 4998  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-tr 5265  df-id 5573  df-eprel 5579  df-po 5587  df-so 5588  df-fr 5630  df-we 5632  df-xp 5681  df-rel 5682  df-cnv 5683  df-co 5684  df-dm 5685  df-res 5687  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-fv 6548  df-om 7852  df-bnj17 33686  df-bnj14 33688  df-bnj13 33690  df-bnj15 33692  df-bnj18 33694  df-bnj19 33696

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1125  33991