Theorem bnj1029 32242

Description: Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1029	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → TrFo( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅), 𝐴, 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem bnj1029

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑖 𝑚 𝑛 𝑝 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
4		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
5		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
6		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
7		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
8		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
9		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
10		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ [(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
11		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ [(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
12		biid 263	. 2 ⊢ ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ [(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
13		eqid 2823	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∖ {∅}) = (ω ∖ {∅})
14		eqid 2823	. 2 ⊢ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))} = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))}
15		eqid 2823	. 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
16		eqid 2823	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})
17	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16	bnj907 32241	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → TrFo( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅), 𝐴, 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   ∧ w3a 1083   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  {cab 2801  ∀wral 3140  ∃wrex 3141  [wsbc 3774   ∖ cdif 3935   ∪ cun 3936  ∅c0 4293  {csn 4569  ⟨cop 4575  ∪ ciun 4921  suc csuc 6195   Fn wfn 6352  ‘cfv 6357  ωcom 7582   ∧ w-bnj17 31958   predc-bnj14 31960   FrSe w-bnj15 31964   trClc-bnj18 31966   TrFow-bnj19 31968

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-rep 5192  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pr 5332  ax-un 7463  ax-reg 9058

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ne 3019  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-reu 3147  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-sbc 3775  df-csb 3886  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-pss 3956  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-tp 4574  df-op 4576  df-uni 4841  df-iun 4923  df-br 5069  df-opab 5131  df-mpt 5149  df-tr 5175  df-id 5462  df-eprel 5467  df-po 5476  df-so 5477  df-fr 5516  df-we 5518  df-xp 5563  df-rel 5564  df-cnv 5565  df-co 5566  df-dm 5567  df-rn 5568  df-res 5569  df-ima 5570  df-ord 6196  df-on 6197  df-lim 6198  df-suc 6199  df-iota 6316  df-fun 6359  df-fn 6360  df-f 6361  df-f1 6362  df-fo 6363  df-f1o 6364  df-fv 6365  df-om 7583  df-bnj17 31959  df-bnj14 31961  df-bnj13 31963  df-bnj15 31965  df-bnj18 31967  df-bnj19 31969

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1125  32266