Theorem bnj1029 34961

Description: Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1029	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → TrFo( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅), 𝐴, 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem bnj1029

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑖 𝑚 𝑛 𝑝 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
4		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
5		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
6		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
7		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
8		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
9		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
10		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ [(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
11		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ [(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
12		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ [(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓][𝑝 / 𝑛](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
13		eqid 2735	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∖ {∅}) = (ω ∖ {∅})
14		eqid 2735	. 2 ⊢ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))} = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))}
15		eqid 2735	. 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
16		eqid 2735	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})
17	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16	bnj907 34960	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → TrFo( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅), 𝐴, 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2106  {cab 2712  ∀wral 3059  ∃wrex 3068  [wsbc 3791   ∖ cdif 3960   ∪ cun 3961  ∅c0 4339  {csn 4631  ⟨cop 4637  ∪ ciun 4996  suc csuc 6388   Fn wfn 6558  ‘cfv 6563  ωcom 7887   ∧ w-bnj17 34679   predc-bnj14 34681   FrSe w-bnj15 34685   trClc-bnj18 34687   TrFow-bnj19 34689

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-rep 5285  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pr 5438  ax-un 7754  ax-reg 9630

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-sbc 3792  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-pss 3983  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-pw 4607  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-iun 4998  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-tr 5266  df-id 5583  df-eprel 5589  df-po 5597  df-so 5598  df-fr 5641  df-we 5643  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-res 5701  df-ord 6389  df-on 6390  df-lim 6391  df-suc 6392  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fn 6566  df-fv 6571  df-om 7888  df-bnj17 34680  df-bnj14 34682  df-bnj13 34684  df-bnj15 34686  df-bnj18 34688  df-bnj19 34690

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1125  34985