Theorem bnj579 35311

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 35318. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj579.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj579.2	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj579.3	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj579	⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → ∃*𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑖   𝐷,𝑓   𝑅,𝑓,𝑖   𝑓,𝑛,𝑖   𝑥,𝑓   𝑦,𝑓,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑛)   𝐷(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝑅(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj579

Dummy variables 𝑘 𝑔 𝑗 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj579.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2		bnj579.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
4		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜑 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜑)
5		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜓 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜓)
6		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑔 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
7		bnj579.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
8		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ [𝑔 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑓‘𝑗) = (𝑔‘𝑗)) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ [𝑔 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑓‘𝑗) = (𝑔‘𝑗)))
9		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑘 E 𝑗 → [𝑘 / 𝑗]((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ [𝑔 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑓‘𝑗) = (𝑔‘𝑗))) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑘 E 𝑗 → [𝑘 / 𝑗]((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ [𝑔 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑓‘𝑗) = (𝑔‘𝑗))))
10	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	bnj580 35310	1 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → ∃*𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1102   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  ∃*wmo 2564  ∀wral 3078  [wsbc 3743   ∖ cdif 3901  ∅c0 4285  {csn 4588  ∪ ciun 4955   class class class wbr 5108   E cep 5559  suc csuc 6362   Fn wfn 6531  ‘cfv 6536  ωcom 7860   predc-bnj14 35086

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1103  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-pss 3924  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-tr 5218  df-id 5555  df-eprel 5560  df-po 5568  df-so 5569  df-fr 5613  df-we 5615  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-lim 6365  df-suc 6366  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-fv 6544  df-om 7861  df-bnj17 35085

This theorem is used by:  bnj600  35316