Theorem clsneif1o 44863

Description: If a (pseudo-)closure function and a (pseudo-)neighborhood function are related by the 𝐻 operator, then the operator is a one-to-one, onto mapping. (Contributed by RP, 5-Jun-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
clsnei.o	⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑖 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑘 ∈ (𝒫 𝑗 ↑m 𝑖) ↦ (𝑙 ∈ 𝑗 ↦ {𝑚 ∈ 𝑖 ∣ 𝑙 ∈ (𝑘‘𝑚)})))
clsnei.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑛 ∈ V ↦ (𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 𝑛 ↑m 𝒫 𝑛) ↦ (𝑜 ∈ 𝒫 𝑛 ↦ (𝑛 ∖ (𝑝‘(𝑛 ∖ 𝑜))))))
clsnei.d	⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑃‘𝐵)
clsnei.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵)
clsnei.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐷)
clsnei.r	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾𝐻𝑁)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
clsneif1o	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐵,𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑙,𝑚   𝐵,𝑛,𝑜,𝑝   𝜑,𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑙   𝜑,𝑛,𝑜,𝑝

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑚)   𝐷(𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑜, 𝑝, 𝑙)   𝑃(𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑜, 𝑝, 𝑙)   𝐹(𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑜, 𝑝, 𝑙)   𝐻(𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑜, 𝑝, 𝑙)   𝐾(𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑜, 𝑝, 𝑙)   𝑁(𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑜, 𝑝, 𝑙)   𝑂(𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑜, 𝑝, 𝑙)

Proof of Theorem clsneif1o

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		clsnei.d	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑃‘𝐵)
2		clsnei.h	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐷)
3		clsnei.r	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾𝐻𝑁)
4	1, 2, 3	clsneibex 44861	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
5		clsnei.o	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑖 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑘 ∈ (𝒫 𝑗 ↑m 𝑖) ↦ (𝑙 ∈ 𝑗 ↦ {𝑚 ∈ 𝑖 ∣ 𝑙 ∈ (𝑘‘𝑚)})))
6		pwexg 5354	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → 𝒫 𝐵 ∈ V)
7	6	adantl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝒫 𝐵 ∈ V)
8		simpr 490	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
9		eqid 2766	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵) = (𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵)
10	5, 7, 8, 9	fsovf1od 44775	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵):(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵))
11		clsnei.p	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑛 ∈ V ↦ (𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 𝑛 ↑m 𝒫 𝑛) ↦ (𝑜 ∈ 𝒫 𝑛 ↦ (𝑛 ∖ (𝑝‘(𝑛 ∖ 𝑜))))))
12		eqid 2766	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑃‘𝐵) = (𝑃‘𝐵)
13	11, 12, 8	dssmapf1od 44780	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑃‘𝐵):(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵))
14		f1oco 6851	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵):(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃‘𝐵):(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)) → ((𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵) ∘ (𝑃‘𝐵)):(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵))
15	10, 13, 14	syl2anc 596	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵) ∘ (𝑃‘𝐵)):(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵))
16	4, 15	mpdan 700	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵) ∘ (𝑃‘𝐵)):(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵))
17		clsnei.f	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵)
18	17, 1	coeq12i 5854	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐷) = ((𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵) ∘ (𝑃‘𝐵))
19	2, 18	eqtri 2789	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵) ∘ (𝑃‘𝐵))
20		f1oeq1 6815	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐻 = ((𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵) ∘ (𝑃‘𝐵)) → (𝐻:(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵) ↔ ((𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵) ∘ (𝑃‘𝐵)):(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵)))
21	19, 20	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (𝐻:(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵) ↔ ((𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵) ∘ (𝑃‘𝐵)):(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵))
22	16, 21	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝒫 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  {crab 3419  Vcvv 3458   ∖ cdif 3905  𝒫 cpw 4567   class class class wbr 5114   ↦ cmpt 5197   ∘ ccom 5670  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6542  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7423   ∈ cmpo 7425   ↑_m cmap 8833

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-rep 5243  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409  ax-un 7745

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-reu 3373  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-csb 3857  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-iun 4963  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7426  df-oprab 7427  df-mpo 7428  df-1st 7995  df-2nd 7996  df-map 8835

This theorem is used by: (None)