P. 436 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 43501-43600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mzpmulmpt 43501*	Product of polynomial functions is polynomial. Maps-to version of mzpmulmpt 43501. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 · 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpsubmpt 43502*	The difference of two polynomial functions is polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpnegmpt 43503*	Negation of a polynomial function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ -𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpexpmpt 43504*	Raise a polynomial function to a (fixed) exponent. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴↑𝐷)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpindd 43505*	"Structural" induction to prove properties of all polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ℤ) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜁)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜎)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑓}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝑓)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑓 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → 𝜌)
Theorem	mzpmfp 43506	Relationship between multivariate Z-polynomials and general multivariate polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (mzPoly‘𝐼) = ran (𝐼 eval ℤring)
Theorem	mzpsubst 43507*	Substituting polynomials for the variables of a polynomial results in a polynomial. 𝐺 is expected to depend on 𝑦 and provide the polynomials which are being substituted. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 𝐺 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐺‘𝑥)))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzprename 43508*	Simplified version of mzpsubst 43507 to simply relabel variables in a polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝑅:𝑉⟶𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ∘ 𝑅))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzpresrename 43509*	A polynomial is a polynomial over all larger index sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑉))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzpcompact2lem 43510*	Lemma for mzpcompact2 43511. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎)))))
Theorem	mzpcompact2 43511*	Polynomials are finitary objects and can only reference a finite number of variables, even if the index set is infinite. Thus, every polynomial can be expressed as a (uniquely minimal, although we do not prove that) polynomial on a finite number of variables, which is then extended by adding an arbitrary set of ignored variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎)))))
21.34.9  Miscellanea for Diophantine sets 1
Theorem	coeq0i 43512	coeq0 6256 but without explicitly introducing domain and range symbols. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴:𝐶⟶𝐷 ∧ 𝐵:𝐸⟶𝐹 ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐹) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	fzsplit1nn0 43513	Split a finite 1-based set of integers in the middle, allowing either end to be empty ((1...0)). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (1...𝐵) = ((1...𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 + 1)...𝐵)))
21.34.10  Diophantine sets 1: definitions
Syntax	cdioph 43514	Extend class notation to include the family of Diophantine sets.
class Dioph
Definition	df-dioph 43515*	A Diophantine set is a set of positive integers which is a projection of the zero set of some polynomial. This definition somewhat awkwardly mixes ℤ (via mzPoly) and ℕ0 (to define the zero sets); the former could be avoided by considering coincidence sets of ℕ0 polynomials at the cost of requiring two, and the second is driven by consistency with our mu-recursive functions and the requirements of the Davis-Putnam-Robinson-Matiyasevich proof. Both are avoidable at a complexity cost. In particular, it is a consequence of 4sq 17030 that implicitly restricting variables to ℕ0 adds no expressive power over allowing them to range over ℤ. While this definition stipulates a specific index set for the polynomials, there is actually flexibility here, see eldioph2b 43522. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ Dioph = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ran (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑛), 𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑘)) ↦ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑘))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑛)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldiophb 43516*	Initial expression of Diophantine property of a set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑘))𝐷 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑘))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldioph 43517*	Condition for a set to be Diophantine (unpacking existential quantifier). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝐾))) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐾))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	diophrw 43518*	Renaming and adding unused witness variables does not change the Diophantine set coded by a polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀:𝑇–1-1→𝑆 ∧ (𝑀 ↾ 𝑂) = ( I ↾ 𝑂)) → {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑎 = (𝑏 ↾ 𝑂) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑆) ↦ (𝑃‘(𝑑 ∘ 𝑀)))‘𝑏) = 0)} = {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑇)(𝑎 = (𝑐 ↾ 𝑂) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑐) = 0)})
Theorem	eldioph2lem1 43519*	Lemma for eldioph2 43521. Construct necessary renaming function for one direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝐴) → ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)∃𝑒 ∈ V (𝑒:(1...𝑑)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (𝑒 ↾ (1...𝑁)) = ( I ↾ (1...𝑁))))
Theorem	eldioph2lem2 43520*	Lemma for eldioph2 43521. Construct necessary renaming function for one direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ∧ ((1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))) → ∃𝑐(𝑐:(1...𝐴)–1-1→𝑆 ∧ (𝑐 ↾ (1...𝑁)) = ( I ↾ (1...𝑁))))
Theorem	eldioph2 43521*	Construct a Diophantine set from a polynomial with witness variables drawn from any set whatsoever, via mzpcompact2 43511. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑆)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eldioph2b 43522*	While Diophantine sets were defined to have a finite number of witness variables consequtively following the observable variables, this is not necessary; they can equivalently be taken to use any witness set (𝑆 ∖ (1...𝑁)). For instance, in diophin 43531 we use this to take the two input sets to have disjoint witness sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ V) ∧ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆)) → (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑆)𝐴 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldiophelnn0 43523	Remove antecedent on 𝐵 from Diophantine set constructors. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eldioph3b 43524*	Define Diophantine sets in terms of polynomials with variables indexed by ℕ. This avoids a quantifier over the number of witness variables and will be easier to use than eldiophb 43516 in most cases. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘ℕ)𝐴 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℕ)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldioph3 43525*	Inference version of eldioph3b 43524 with quantifier expanded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘ℕ)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℕ)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.34.11  Diophantine sets 2 miscellanea
Theorem	ellz1 43526	Membership in a lower set of integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℤ → (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 1))) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)))
Theorem	lzunuz 43527	The union of a lower set of integers and an upper set of integers which abut or overlap is all of the integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ≤ (𝐴 + 1)) → ((ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝐴 + 1))) ∪ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) = ℤ)
Theorem	fz1eqin 43528	Express a one-based finite range as the intersection of lower integers with ℕ. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (1...𝑁) = ((ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1))) ∩ ℕ))
Theorem	lzenom 43529	Lower integers are countably infinite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1))) ≈ ω)
Theorem	elmapresaunres2 43530	fresaunres2 6750 transposed to mappings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐺 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) ↾ 𝐵) = 𝐺)
21.34.12  Diophantine sets 2: union and intersection. Monotone Boolean algebra
Theorem	diophin 43531	If two sets are Diophantine, so is their intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	diophun 43532	If two sets are Diophantine, so is their union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eldiophss 43533	Diophantine sets are sets of tuples of nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐵)))
21.34.13  Diophantine sets 3: construction
Theorem	diophrex 43534*	Projecting a Diophantine set by removing a coordinate results in a Diophantine set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁))} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eq0rabdioph 43535*	This is the first of a number of theorems which allow sets to be proven Diophantine by syntactic induction, and models the correspondence between Diophantine sets and monotone existential first-order logic. This first theorem shows that the zero set of an implicit polynomial is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 = 0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eqrabdioph 43536*	Diophantine set builder for equality of polynomial expressions. Note that the two expressions need not be nonnegative; only variables are so constrained. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 = 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	0dioph 43537	The empty set is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → ∅ ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴))
Theorem	vdioph 43538	The "universal" set (as large as possible given eldiophss 43533) is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐴)) ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴))
Theorem	anrabdioph 43539*	Diophantine set builder for conjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	orrabdioph 43540*	Diophantine set builder for disjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	3anrabdioph 43541*	Diophantine set builder for ternary conjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜒} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	3orrabdioph 43542*	Diophantine set builder for ternary disjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜒} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.34.14  Diophantine sets 4 miscellanea
Theorem	2sbcrex 43543*	Exchange an existential quantifier with two substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑)
Theorem	sbc2rex 43544*	Exchange a substitution with two existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbc4rex 43545*	Exchange a substitution with four existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbcrot3 43546*	Rotate a sequence of three explicit substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbcrot5 43547*	Rotate a sequence of five explicit substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐷 / 𝑑][𝐸 / 𝑒]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐷 / 𝑑][𝐸 / 𝑒][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbccomieg 43548*	Commute two explicit substitutions, using an implicit substitution to rewrite the exiting substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
21.34.15  Diophantine sets 4: Quantification
Theorem	rexrabdioph 43549*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantification. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ (𝑣 = (𝑡‘𝑀) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑢 = (𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	rexfrabdioph 43550*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	2rexfrabdioph 43551*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, two variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐿)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐿)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	3rexfrabdioph 43552*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, two variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐾)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐾)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	4rexfrabdioph 43553*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, four variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐽)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐽)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	6rexfrabdioph 43554*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, six variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐽 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐻)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦][(𝑡‘𝐼) / 𝑧][(𝑡‘𝐻) / 𝑝]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐻)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	7rexfrabdioph 43555*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, seven variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐽 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐻 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐺)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦][(𝑡‘𝐼) / 𝑧][(𝑡‘𝐻) / 𝑝][(𝑡‘𝐺) / 𝑞]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐺)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑞 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.34.16  Diophantine sets 5: Arithmetic sets
Theorem	rabdiophlem1 43556*	Lemma for arithmetic diophantine sets. Convert polynomial-ness of an expression into a constraint suitable for ralimi 3101. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) → ∀𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁))𝐴 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	rabdiophlem2 43557*	Lemma for arithmetic diophantine sets. Reuse a polynomial expression under a new quantifier. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑀)) ↦ ⦋(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢⦌𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑀)))
Theorem	elnn0rabdioph 43558*	Diophantine set builder for nonnegativity constraints. The first builder which uses a witness variable internally; an expression is nonnegative if there is a nonnegative integer equal to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	rexzrexnn0 43559*	Rewrite an existential quantification restricted to integers into an existential quantification restricted to naturals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	lerabdioph 43560*	Diophantine set builder for the "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eluzrabdioph 43561*	Diophantine set builder for membership in a fixed upper set of integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	elnnrabdioph 43562*	Diophantine set builder for positivity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	ltrabdioph 43563*	Diophantine set builder for the strict less than relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 < 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	nerabdioph 43564*	Diophantine set builder for inequality. This not quite trivial theorem touches on something important; Diophantine sets are not closed under negation, but they contain an important subclass that is, namely the recursive sets. With this theorem and De Morgan's laws, all quantifier-free formulas can be negated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsrabdioph 43565*	Divisibility is a Diophantine relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.34.17  Diophantine sets 6: reusability. renumbering of variables
Theorem	eldioph4b 43566*	Membership in Dioph expressed using a quantified union to add witness variables instead of a restriction to remove them. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑊 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ¬ 𝑊 ∈ Fin    &   ⊢ (𝑊 ∩ ℕ) = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(𝑊 ∪ (1...𝑁)))𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑊)(𝑝‘(𝑡 ∪ 𝑤)) = 0}))
Theorem	eldioph4i 43567*	Forward-only version of eldioph4b 43566. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑊 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ¬ 𝑊 ∈ Fin    &   ⊢ (𝑊 ∩ ℕ) = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘(𝑊 ∪ (1...𝑁)))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑊)(𝑃‘(𝑡 ∪ 𝑤)) = 0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	diophren 43568*	Change variables in a Diophantine set, using class notation. This allows already proved Diophantine sets to be reused in contexts with more variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹:(1...𝑁)⟶(1...𝑀)) → {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ (𝑎 ∘ 𝐹) ∈ 𝑆} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀))
Theorem	rabrenfdioph 43569*	Change variable numbers in a Diophantine class abstraction using explicit substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹:(1...𝐴)⟶(1...𝐵) ∧ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐴)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴)) → {𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐵)) ∣ [(𝑏 ∘ 𝐹) / 𝑎]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵))
Theorem	rabren3dioph 43570*	Change variable numbers in a 3-variable Diophantine class abstraction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑎‘1) = (𝑏‘𝑋) ∧ (𝑎‘2) = (𝑏‘𝑌) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = (𝑏‘𝑍)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ (1...𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ (1...𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ (1...𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘3)) → {𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.34.18  Pigeonhole Principle and cardinality helpers
Theorem	fphpd 43571*	Pigeonhole principle expressed with implicit substitution. If the range is smaller than the domain, two inputs must be mapped to the same output. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	fphpdo 43572*	Pigeonhole principle for sets of real numbers with implicit output reordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	ctbnfien 43573	An infinite subset of a countable set is countable, without using choice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ≈ ω ∧ 𝑌 ≈ ω) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝑌)
Theorem	fiphp3d 43574*	Infinite pigeonhole principle for partitioning an infinite set between finitely many buckets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐷 = 𝑦} ≈ ℕ)
21.34.19  A non-closed set of reals is infinite
Theorem	rencldnfilem 43575*	Lemma for rencldnfi 43576. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐵)) < 𝑥) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	rencldnfi 43576*	A set of real numbers which comes arbitrarily close to some target yet excludes it is infinite. The work is done in rencldnfilem 43575 using infima; this theorem removes the requirement that A be nonempty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐵)) < 𝑥) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
21.34.20  Lagrange's rational approximation theorem
Theorem	irrapxlem1 43577*	Lemma for irrapx1 43583. Divides the unit interval into 𝐵 half-open sections and using the pigeonhole principle fphpdo 43572 finds two multiples of 𝐴 in the same section mod 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (0...𝐵)(𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ (⌊‘(𝐵 · ((𝐴 · 𝑥) mod 1))) = (⌊‘(𝐵 · ((𝐴 · 𝑦) mod 1)))))
Theorem	irrapxlem2 43578*	Lemma for irrapx1 43583. Two multiples in the same bucket means they are very close mod 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (0...𝐵)(𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(((𝐴 · 𝑥) mod 1) − ((𝐴 · 𝑦) mod 1))) < (1 / 𝐵)))
Theorem	irrapxlem3 43579*	Lemma for irrapx1 43583. By subtraction, there is a multiple very close to an integer. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (1...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 (abs‘((𝐴 · 𝑥) − 𝑦)) < (1 / 𝐵))
Theorem	irrapxlem4 43580*	Lemma for irrapx1 43583. Eliminate ranges, use positivity of the input to force positivity of the output by increasing 𝐵 as needed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ (abs‘((𝐴 · 𝑥) − 𝑦)) < (1 / if(𝑥 ≤ 𝐵, 𝐵, 𝑥)))
Theorem	irrapxlem5 43581*	Lemma for irrapx1 43583. Switching to real intervals and fraction syntax. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℚ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < 𝐵 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < ((denom‘𝑥)↑-2)))
Theorem	irrapxlem6 43582*	Lemma for irrapx1 43583. Explicit description of a non-closed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ℚ ∣ (0 < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐴)) < ((denom‘𝑦)↑-2))} (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < 𝐵)
Theorem	irrapx1 43583*	Dirichlet's approximation theorem. Every positive irrational number has infinitely many rational approximations which are closer than the inverse squares of their reduced denominators. Lemma 61 in [vandenDries] p. 42. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ+ ∖ ℚ) → {𝑦 ∈ ℚ ∣ (0 < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐴)) < ((denom‘𝑦)↑-2))} ≈ ℕ)
21.34.21  Pell equations 1: A nontrivial solution always exists
Theorem	pellexlem1 43584	Lemma for pellex 43590. Arithmetical core of pellexlem3, norm lower bound. This begins Dirichlet's proof of the Pell equation solution existence; the proof here follows theorem 62 of [vandenDries] p. 43. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2))) ≠ 0)
Theorem	pellexlem2 43585	Lemma for pellex 43590. Arithmetical core of pellexlem3, norm upper bound. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (abs‘((𝐴 / 𝐵) − (√‘𝐷))) < (𝐵↑-2)) → (abs‘((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2)))) < (1 + (2 · (√‘𝐷))))
Theorem	pellexlem3 43586*	Lemma for pellex 43590. To each good rational approximation of (√‘𝐷), there exists a near-solution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → {𝑥 ∈ ℚ ∣ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − (√‘𝐷))) < ((denom‘𝑥)↑-2))} ≼ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2))) ≠ 0 ∧ (abs‘((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2)))) < (1 + (2 · (√‘𝐷)))))})
Theorem	pellexlem4 43587*	Lemma for pellex 43590. Invoking irrapx1 43583, we have infinitely many near-solutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2))) ≠ 0 ∧ (abs‘((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2)))) < (1 + (2 · (√‘𝐷)))))} ≈ ℕ)
Theorem	pellexlem5 43588*	Lemma for pellex 43590. Invoking fiphp3d 43574, we have infinitely many near-solutions for some specific norm. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝑥 ≠ 0 ∧ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2))) = 𝑥)} ≈ ℕ))
Theorem	pellexlem6 43589*	Lemma for pellex 43590. Doing a field division between near solutions get us to norm 1, and the modularity constraint ensures we still have an integer. Returning NN guarantees that we are not returning the trivial solution (1,0). We are not explicitly defining the Pell-field, Pell-ring, and Pell-norm explicitly because after this construction is done we will never use them. This is mostly basic algebraic number theory and could be simplified if a generic framework for that were in place. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2))) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐸↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐹↑2))) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 mod (abs‘𝐶)) = (𝐸 mod (abs‘𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 mod (abs‘𝐶)) = (𝐹 mod (abs‘𝐶)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ ((𝑎↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑏↑2))) = 1)
Theorem	pellex 43590*	Every Pell equation has a nontrivial solution. Theorem 62 in [vandenDries] p. 43. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑦↑2))) = 1)
21.34.22  Pell equations 2: Algebraic number theory of the solution set
Syntax	csquarenn 43591	Extend class notation to include the set of square positive integers.
class ◻NN
Syntax	cpell1qr 43592	Extend class notation to include the class of quadrant-1 Pell solutions.
class Pell1QR
Syntax	cpell1234qr 43593	Extend class notation to include the class of any-quadrant Pell solutions.
class Pell1234QR
Syntax	cpell14qr 43594	Extend class notation to include the class of positive Pell solutions.
class Pell14QR
Syntax	cpellfund 43595	Extend class notation to include the Pell-equation fundamental solution function.
class PellFund
Definition	df-squarenn 43596	Define the set of square positive integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ◻NN = {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ (√‘𝑥) ∈ ℚ}
Definition	df-pell1qr 43597*	Define the solutions of a Pell equation in the first quadrant. To avoid pair pain, we represent this via the canonical embedding into the reals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.)
⊢ Pell1QR = (𝑥 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑦 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝑥) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝑥 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)})
Definition	df-pell14qr 43598*	Define the positive solutions of a Pell equation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.)
⊢ Pell14QR = (𝑥 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ (𝑦 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝑥) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝑥 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)})
Definition	df-pell1234qr 43599*	Define the general solutions of a Pell equation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.)
⊢ Pell1234QR = (𝑥 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ (𝑦 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝑥) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝑥 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)})
Definition	df-pellfund 43600*	A function mapping Pell discriminants to the corresponding fundamental solution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 17-Sep-2020.)
⊢ PellFund = (𝑥 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ↦ inf({𝑧 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝑥) ∣ 1 < 𝑧}, ℝ, < ))