P. 436 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 43501-43600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	naddgeoa 43501	Natural addition results in a value greater than or equal than that of ordinal addition. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 +no 𝐵))
Theorem	naddonnn 43502	Natural addition with a natural number on the right results in a value equal to that of ordinal addition. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = (𝐴 +no 𝐵))
Theorem	naddwordnexlem0 43503	When 𝐴 is the sum of a limit ordinal (or zero) and a natural number and 𝐵 is the sum of a larger limit ordinal and a smaller natural number, (ω ·o suc 𝐶) lies between 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by RP, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((ω ·o 𝐶) +o 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((ω ·o 𝐷) +o 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (ω ·o suc 𝐶) ∧ (ω ·o suc 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	naddwordnexlem1 43504	When 𝐴 is the sum of a limit ordinal (or zero) and a natural number and 𝐵 is the sum of a larger limit ordinal and a smaller natural number, 𝐵 is equal to or larger than 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((ω ·o 𝐶) +o 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((ω ·o 𝐷) +o 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	naddwordnexlem2 43505	When 𝐴 is the sum of a limit ordinal (or zero) and a natural number and 𝐵 is the sum of a larger limit ordinal and a smaller natural number, 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((ω ·o 𝐶) +o 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((ω ·o 𝐷) +o 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	naddwordnexlem3 43506*	When 𝐴 is the sum of a limit ordinal (or zero) and a natural number and 𝐵 is the sum of a larger limit ordinal and a smaller natural number, every natural sum of 𝐴 with a natural number is less that 𝐵. (Contributed by RP, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((ω ·o 𝐶) +o 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((ω ·o 𝐷) +o 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐴 +no 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	oawordex3 43507*	When 𝐴 is the sum of a limit ordinal (or zero) and a natural number and 𝐵 is the sum of a larger limit ordinal and a smaller natural number, some ordinal sum of 𝐴 is equal to 𝐵. This is a specialization of oawordex 8481. (Contributed by RP, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((ω ·o 𝐶) +o 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((ω ·o 𝐷) +o 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = 𝐵)
Theorem	naddwordnexlem4 43508*	When 𝐴 is the sum of a limit ordinal (or zero) and a natural number and 𝐵 is the sum of a larger limit ordinal and a smaller natural number, there exists a product with omega such that the ordinal sum with 𝐴 is less than or equal to 𝐵 while the natural sum is larger than 𝐵. (Contributed by RP, 15-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((ω ·o 𝐶) +o 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((ω ·o 𝐷) +o 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐶 +o 𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)((𝐶 +o 𝑥) = 𝐷 ∧ (𝐴 +o (ω ·o 𝑥)) ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 +no (ω ·o 𝑥))))
Theorem	ordsssucim 43509	If an ordinal is less than or equal to the successor of another, then the first is either less than or equal to the second or the first is equal to the successor of the second. Theorem 1 in Grzegorz Bancerek, "Epsilon Numbers and Cantor Normal Form", Formalized Mathematics, Vol. 17, No. 4, Pages 249–256, 2009. DOI: 10.2478/v10037-009-0032-8 See also ordsssucb 43442 for a biimplication when 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	insucid 43510	The intersection of a class and its successor is itself. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ suc 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	om2 43511	Two ways to double an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 𝐴) = (𝐴 ·o 2o))
Theorem	oaltom 43512	Multiplication eventually dominates addition. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((1o ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐵 +o 𝐴) ∈ (𝐵 ·o 𝐴)))
Theorem	oe2 43513	Two ways to square an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ·o 𝐴) = (𝐴 ↑o 2o))
Theorem	omltoe 43514	Exponentiation eventually dominates multiplication. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((1o ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ·o 𝐴) ∈ (𝐵 ↑o 𝐴)))
21.36.3  Surreal Contributions
Theorem	abeqabi 43515	Generalized condition for a class abstraction to be equal to some class. (Contributed by RP, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	abpr 43516*	Condition for a class abstraction to be a pair. (Contributed by RP, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑌, 𝑍} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑍)))
Theorem	abtp 43517*	Condition for a class abstraction to be a triple. (Contributed by RP, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑍)))
Theorem	ralopabb 43518*	Restricted universal quantification over an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by RP, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    &   ⊢ (𝑜 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑜 ∈ 𝑂 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	fpwfvss 43519	Functions into a powerset always have values which are subsets. This is dependant on our convention when the argument is not part of the domain. (Contributed by RP, 13-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝒫 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	sdomne0 43520	A class that strictly dominates any set is not empty. (Suggested by SN, 14-Jan-2025.) (Contributed by RP, 14-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≺ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	sdomne0d 43521	A class that strictly dominates any set is not empty. (Contributed by RP, 3-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	safesnsupfiss 43522	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	safesnsupfiub 43523*	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝑅𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ if (𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	safesnsupfidom1o 43524	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵) ≼ 1o)
Theorem	safesnsupfilb 43525*	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 3-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ if(𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵))∀𝑦 ∈ if (𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	isoeq145d 43526	Equality deduction for isometries. (Contributed by RP, 14-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐷)))
Theorem	resisoeq45d 43527	Equality deduction for equally restricted isometries. (Contributed by RP, 14-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐷)))
Theorem	negslem1 43528	An equivalence between identically restricted order-reversing self-isometries. (Contributed by RP, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, ◡𝑅(𝐴, 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Isom 𝑅, ◡𝑅(𝐵, 𝐵)))
Theorem	nvocnvb 43529*	Equivalence to saying the converse of an involution is the function itself. (Contributed by RP, 13-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹) ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = 𝑥))
Theorem	rp-brsslt 43530*	Binary relation form of a relation, <, which has been extended from relation 𝑅 to subsets of class 𝑆. Usually, we will assume 𝑅 Or 𝑆. Definition in [Alling], p. 2. Generalization of brsslt 27735. (Originally by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.) (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝑅𝑦)))
Theorem	nla0002 43531*	Extending a linear order to subsets, the empty set is less than any subset. Note in [Alling], p. 3. (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ < 𝐴)
Theorem	nla0003 43532*	Extending a linear order to subsets, the empty set is greater than any subset. Note in [Alling], p. 3. (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < ∅)
Theorem	nla0001 43533*	Extending a linear order to subsets, the empty set is less than itself. Note in [Alling], p. 3. (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ < ∅)
Theorem	faosnf0.11b 43534*	𝐵 is called a non-limit ordinal if it is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.) Alling, Norman L. "Fundamentals of Analysis Over Surreal Numbers Fields." The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics 19, no. 3 (1989): 565-73. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44237243.
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
Theorem	dfno2 43535	A surreal number, in the functional sign expansion representation, is a function which maps from an ordinal into a set of two possible signs. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ No = {𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 (On × {1o, 2o}) ∣ (Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ On)}
Theorem	onnog 43536	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∈ No )
Theorem	onnobdayg 43537	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number of that birthday. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → ( bday ‘(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bdaybndex 43538	Bounds formed from the birthday are surreal numbers. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 = ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → (𝐵 × {𝐶}) ∈ No )
Theorem	bdaybndbday 43539	Bounds formed from the birthday have the same birthday. (Contributed by RP, 30-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 = ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → ( bday ‘(𝐵 × {𝐶})) = ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	onno 43540	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 × {2o}) ∈ No )
Theorem	onnoi 43541	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	0no 43542	Ordinal zero maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ No
Theorem	1no 43543	Ordinal one maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (1o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	2no 43544	Ordinal two maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (2o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	3no 43545	Ordinal three maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (3o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	4no 43546	Ordinal four maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (4o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	fnimafnex 43547	The functional image of a function value exists. (Contributed by RP, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 Fn 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝐺‘𝐴)) ∈ V
21.36.4  Short Studies
Theorem	nlimsuc 43548	A successor is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ¬ Lim suc 𝐴)
Theorem	nlim1NEW 43549	1 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 1-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 1o
Theorem	nlim2NEW 43550	2 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 1-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 2o
Theorem	nlim3 43551	3 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 3o
Theorem	nlim4 43552	4 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 4o
Theorem	oa1un 43553	Given 𝐴 ∈ On, let 𝐴 +o 1o be defined to be the union of 𝐴 and {𝐴}. Compare with oa1suc 8455. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 1o) = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}))
Theorem	oa1cl 43554	𝐴 +o 1o is in On. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 1o) ∈ On)
Theorem	0finon 43555	0 is a finite ordinal. See peano1 7828. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	1finon 43556	1 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8564. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 1o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	2finon 43557	2 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8564. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 2o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	3finon 43558	3 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8564. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 3o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	4finon 43559	4 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8564. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 4o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	finona1cl 43560	The finite ordinals are closed under the add one operation. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (On ∩ Fin) → (𝑁 +o 1o) ∈ (On ∩ Fin))
Theorem	finonex 43561	The finite ordinals are a set. See also onprc 7720 and fiprc 8976 for proof that On and Fin are proper classes. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (On ∩ Fin) ∈ V
Theorem	fzunt 43562	Union of two adjacent finite sets of sequential integers that share a common endpoint. (Suggested by NM, 21-Jul-2005.) (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐾 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)) → ((𝐾...𝑀) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzuntd 43563	Union of two adjacent finite sets of sequential integers that share a common endpoint. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝑀) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzunt1d 43564	Union of two overlapping finite sets of sequential integers. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝐿) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzuntgd 43565	Union of two adjacent or overlapping finite sets of sequential integers. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ (𝐿 + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝐿) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
21.36.4.1  Additional work on conditional logical operator
Theorem	ifpan123g 43566	Conjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ∧ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ (((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜏)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜂))))
Theorem	ifpan23 43567	Conjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ∧ if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜏)) ↔ if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃), (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpdfor2 43568	Define or in terms of conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifporcor 43569	Corollary of commutation of or. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜑, 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpdfan2 43570	Define and with conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpancor 43571	Corollary of commutation of and. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpdfor 43572	Define or in terms of conditional logic operator and true. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊤, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpdfan 43573	Define and with conditional logic operator and false. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ⊥))
Theorem	ifpbi2 43574	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜒, 𝜑, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜓, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbi3 43575	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜒, 𝜃, 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜃, 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpim1 43576	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(¬ 𝜑, ⊤, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpnot 43577	Restate negated wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊥, ⊤))
Theorem	ifpid2 43578	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊤, ⊥))
Theorem	ifpim2 43579	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ⊤, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpbi23 43580	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜏, 𝜑, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜏, 𝜓, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbiidcor 43581	Restatement of biid 261. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	ifpbicor 43582	Corollary of commutation of biconditional. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpxorcor 43583	Corollary of commutation of biconditional. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpbi1 43584	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpnot23 43585	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnotnotb 43586	Factor conditional logic operator over negation in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnorcor 43587	Corollary of commutation of nor. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnancor 43588	Corollary of commutation of and. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpnot23b 43589	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpbiidcor2 43590	Restatement of biid 261. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑)
Theorem	ifpnot23c 43591	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnot23d 43592	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpdfnan 43593	Define nand as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ⊤))
Theorem	ifpdfxor 43594	Define xor as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpbi12 43595	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpbi13 43596	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜏, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜏, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbi123 43597	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)))
Theorem	ifpidg 43598	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜃 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓)) ∧ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜃)) ∧ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))))
Theorem	ifpid3g 43599	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpid2g 43600	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)) ∧ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))))