P. 436 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 43501-43600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	onmaxnelsup 43501*	Two ways to say the maximum element of a class of ordinals is also the supremum of that class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	onsupneqmaxlim0 43502	If the supremum of a class of ordinals is not in that class, then the supremum is a limit ordinal or empty. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝐴))
Theorem	onsupcl2 43503	The supremum of a set of ordinals is an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	onuniintrab 43504*	The union of a set of ordinals is the intersection of every ordinal greater-than-or-equal to every member of the set. Closed form of uniordint 7748. (Contributed by RP, 28-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∪ 𝐴 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	onintunirab 43505*	The intersection of a non-empty class of ordinals is the union of every ordinal less-than-or-equal to every element of that class. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦})
Theorem	onsupnmax 43506	If the union of a class of ordinals is not the maximum element of that class, then the union is a limit ordinal or empty. But this isn't a biconditional since 𝐴 could be a non-empty set where a limit ordinal or the empty set happens to be the largest element. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (¬ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝐴))
Theorem	onsupuni 43507	The supremum of a set of ordinals is the union of that set. Lemma 2.10 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 19-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	onsupuni2 43508	The supremum of a set of ordinals is the union of that set. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 On → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	onsupintrab 43509*	The supremum of a set of ordinals is the intersection of every ordinal greater-than-or-equal to every member of the set. Definition 2.9 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	onsupintrab2 43510*	The supremum of a set of ordinals is the intersection of every ordinal greater-than-or-equal to every member of the set. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 On → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	onsupcl3 43511*	The supremum of a set of ordinals is an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥} ∈ On)
Theorem	onsupex3 43512*	The supremum of a set of ordinals exists. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥} ∈ V)
Theorem	onuniintrab2 43513*	The union of a set of ordinals is the intersection of every ordinal greater-than-or-equal to every member of the set. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 On → ∪ 𝐴 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	oninfint 43514	The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals is the intersection of that class. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝐴, On, E ) = ∩ 𝐴)
Theorem	oninfunirab 43515*	The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals is the union of every ordinal less-than-or-equal to every element of that class. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝐴, On, E ) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦})
Theorem	oninfcl2 43516*	The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals is an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦} ∈ On)
Theorem	onsupmaxb 43517	The union of a class of ordinals is an element is an element of that class if and only if there is a maximum element of that class under the epsilon relation, which is to say that the domain of the restricted epsilon relation is not the whole class. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (dom ( E ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	onexgt 43518*	For any ordinal, there is always a larger ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	onexomgt 43519*	For any ordinal, there is always a larger product of omega. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (ω ·o 𝑥))
Theorem	omlimcl2 43520	The product of a limit ordinal with any nonzero ordinal is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ Lim 𝐵)) ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) → Lim (𝐵 ·o 𝐴))
Theorem	onexlimgt 43521*	For any ordinal, there is always a larger limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (Lim 𝑥 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	onexoegt 43522*	For any ordinal, there is always a larger power of omega. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑥))
Theorem	oninfex2 43523*	The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals exists. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦} ∈ V)
Theorem	onsupeqmax 43524*	Condition when the supremum of a set of ordinals is the maximum element of that set. (Contributed by RP, 24-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	onsupeqnmax 43525*	Condition when the supremum of a class of ordinals is not the maximum element of that class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (∪ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	onsuplub 43526*	The supremum of a set of ordinals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑧))
Theorem	onsupnub 43527*	An upper bound of a set of ordinals is not less than the supremum. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	onfisupcl 43528	Sufficient condition when the supremum of a set of ordinals is the maximum element of that set. See ordunifi 9194. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	onelord 43529	Every element of a ordinal is an ordinal. Lemma 1.3 of [Schloeder] p. 1. Based on onelon 6343 and eloni 6328. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)
Theorem	onepsuc 43530	Every ordinal is less than its successor, relationship version. Lemma 1.7 of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 E suc 𝐴)
Theorem	epsoon 43531	The ordinals are strictly and completely (linearly) ordered. Theorem 1.9 of [Schloeder] p. 1. Based on epweon 7722 and weso 5616. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ E Or On
Theorem	epirron 43532	The strict order on the ordinals is irreflexive. Theorem 1.9(i) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ¬ 𝐴 E 𝐴)
Theorem	oneptr 43533	The strict order on the ordinals is transitive. Theorem 1.9(ii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 E 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 E 𝐶) → 𝐴 E 𝐶))
Theorem	oneltr 43534	The elementhood relation on the ordinals is transitive. Theorem 1.9(ii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. See ontr1 6365. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	oneptri 43535	The strict, complete (linear) order on the ordinals is complete. Theorem 1.9(iii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 E 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 E 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	ordeldif 43536	Membership in the difference of ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)))
Theorem	ordeldifsucon 43537	Membership in the difference of ordinal and successor ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ suc 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	ordeldif1o 43538	Membership in the difference of ordinal and ordinal one. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 1o) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))
Theorem	ordne0gt0 43539	Ordinal zero is less than every non-zero ordinal. Theorem 1.10 of [Schloeder] p. 2. Closely related to ord0eln0 6374. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∅ ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ondif1i 43540	Ordinal zero is less than every non-zero ordinal, class difference version. Theorem 1.10 of [Schloeder] p. 2. See ondif1 8430. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) → ∅ ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	onsucelab 43541*	The successor of every ordinal is an element of the class of successor ordinals. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏})
Theorem	dflim6 43542*	A limit ordinal is a non-zero ordinal which is not a successor ordinal. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏))
Theorem	limnsuc 43543*	A limit ordinal is not an element of the class of successor ordinals. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏})
Theorem	onsucss 43544	If one ordinal is less than another, then the successor of the first is less than or equal to the second. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. See ordsucss 7762. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	ordnexbtwnsuc 43545*	For any distinct pair of ordinals, if there is no ordinal between the lesser and the greater, the greater is the successor of the lesser. Lemma 1.16 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))
Theorem	orddif0suc 43546	For any distinct pair of ordinals, if the set difference between the greater and the successor of the lesser is empty, the greater is the successor of the lesser. Lemma 1.16 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∖ suc 𝐴) = ∅ → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))
Theorem	onsucf1lem 43547*	For ordinals, the successor operation is injective, so there is at most one ordinal that a given ordinal could be the successor of. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃*𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏)
Theorem	onsucf1olem 43548*	The successor operation is bijective between the ordinals and the class of successor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴) → ∃!𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏)
Theorem	onsucrn 43549*	The successor operation is surjective onto its range, the class of successor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ran 𝐹 = {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏}
Theorem	onsucf1o 43550*	The successor operation is a bijective function between the ordinals and the class of successor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:On–1-1-onto→{𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏}
Theorem	dflim7 43551*	A limit ordinal is a non-zero ordinal that contains all the successors of its elements. Lemma 1.18 of [Schloeder] p. 2. Closely related to dflim4 7792. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	onov0suclim 43552	Compactly express rules for binary operations on ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ⊗ ∅) = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊗ suc 𝐶) = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ Lim 𝐵) → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐸) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐹)))
Theorem	oa0suclim 43553*	Closed form expression of the value of ordinal addition for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.3 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See oa0 8445, oasuc 8453, and oalim 8461. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = suc (𝐴 +o 𝐶)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 +o 𝑐))))
Theorem	om0suclim 43554*	Closed form expression of the value of ordinal multiplication for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.5 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See om0 8446, omsuc 8455, and omlim 8462. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ∅) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐶) +o 𝐴)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ·o 𝑐))))
Theorem	oe0suclim 43555*	Closed form expression of the value of ordinal exponentiation for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.6 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See oe0 8451, oesuc 8456, oe0m1 8450, and oelim 8463. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = 1o) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ↑o 𝐶) ·o 𝐴)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = if(∅ ∈ 𝐴, ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ↑o 𝑐), ∅))))
Theorem	oaomoecl 43556	The operations of addition, multiplication, and exponentiation are closed. Remark 2.8 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See oacl 8464, omcl 8465, oecl 8466. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ On))
Theorem	onsupsucismax 43557*	If the union of a set of ordinals is a successor ordinal, then that union is the maximum element of the set. This is not a bijection because sets where the maximum element is zero or a limit ordinal exist. Lemma 2.11 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑏 ∈ On ∪ 𝐴 = suc 𝑏 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	onsssupeqcond 43558*	If for every element of a set of ordinals there is an element of a subset which is at least as large, then the union of the set and the subset is the same. Lemma 2.12 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎 ⊆ 𝑏) → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	limexissup 43559	An ordinal which is a limit ordinal is equal to its supremum. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 = sup(𝐴, On, E ))
Theorem	limiun 43560*	A limit ordinal is the union of its elements, indexed union version. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See limuni 6380. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥)
Theorem	limexissupab 43561*	An ordinal which is a limit ordinal is equal to the supremum of the class of all its elements. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 = sup({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}, On, E ))
Theorem	om1om1r 43562	Ordinal one is both a left and right identity of ordinal multiplication. Lemma 2.15 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See om1 8471 and om1r 8472 for individual statements. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((1o ·o 𝐴) = (𝐴 ·o 1o) ∧ (𝐴 ·o 1o) = 𝐴))
Theorem	oe0rif 43563	Ordinal zero raised to any non-zero ordinal power is zero and zero to the zeroth power is one. Lemma 2.18 of [Schloeder] p. 6. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (∅ ↑o 𝐴) = if(∅ ∈ 𝐴, ∅, 1o))
Theorem	oasubex 43564*	While subtraction can't be a binary operation on ordinals, for any pair of ordinals there exists an ordinal that can be added to the lessor (or equal) one which will sum to the greater. Theorem 2.19 of [Schloeder] p. 6. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝑐 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 +o 𝑐) = 𝐴))
Theorem	nnamecl 43565	Natural numbers are closed under ordinal addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. Theorem 2.20 of [Schloeder] p. 6. See nnacl 8541, nnmcl 8542, nnecl 8543. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ ω ∧ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ ω ∧ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ ω))
Theorem	onsucwordi 43566	The successor operation preserves the less-than-or-equal relationship between ordinals. Lemma 3.1 of [Schloeder] p. 7. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵))
Theorem	oalim2cl 43567	The ordinal sum of any ordinal with a limit ordinal on the right is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → Lim (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	oaltublim 43568	Given 𝐶 is a limit ordinal, the sum of any ordinal with an ordinal less than 𝐶 is less than the sum of the first ordinal with 𝐶. Lemma 3.5 of [Schloeder] p. 7. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (Lim 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶))
Theorem	oaordi3 43569	Ordinal addition of the same number on the left preserves the ordering of the numbers on the right. Lemma 3.6 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶)))
Theorem	oaord3 43570	When the same ordinal is added on the left, ordering of the sums is equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the right. Theorem 3.7 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶)))
Theorem	1oaomeqom 43571	Ordinal one plus omega is equal to omega. See oaabs 8578 for the sum of any natural number on the left and ordinal at least as large as omega on the right. Lemma 3.8 of [Schloeder] p. 8. See oaabs2 8579 where a power of omega is the upper bound of the left and a lower bound on the right. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (1o +o ω) = ω
Theorem	oaabsb 43572	The right addend absorbs the sum with an ordinal iff that ordinal times omega is less than or equal to the right addend. (Contributed by RP, 19-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ·o ω) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = 𝐵))
Theorem	oaordnrex 43573	When omega is added on the right to ordinals zero and one, ordering of the sums is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.9 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (∅ ∈ 1o ↔ (∅ +o ω) ∈ (1o +o ω))
Theorem	oaordnr 43574*	When the same ordinal is added on the right, ordering of the sums is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.9 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∃𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 +o 𝑐) ∈ (𝑏 +o 𝑐))
Theorem	omge1 43575	Any non-zero ordinal product is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the left. Lemma 3.11 of [Schloeder] p. 8. See omword1 8502. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	omge2 43576	Any non-zero ordinal product is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the right. Lemma 3.12 of [Schloeder] p. 9. See omword2 8503. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	omlim2 43577	The non-zero product with an limit ordinal on the right is a limit ordinal. Lemma 3.13 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → Lim (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	omord2lim 43578	Given a limit ordinal, the product of any non-zero ordinal with an ordinal less than that limit ordinal is less than the product of the non-zero ordinal with the limit ordinal . Lemma 3.14 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ (Lim 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶)))
Theorem	omord2i 43579	Ordinal multiplication of the same non-zero number on the left preserves the ordering of the numbers on the right. Lemma 3.15 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶)))
Theorem	omord2com 43580	When the same non-zero ordinal is multiplied on the left, ordering of the products is equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the right. Theorem 3.16 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶)))
Theorem	2omomeqom 43581	Ordinal two times omega is omega. Lemma 3.17 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (2o ·o ω) = ω
Theorem	omnord1ex 43582	When omega is multiplied on the right to ordinals one and two, ordering of the products is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.18 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (1o ∈ 2o ↔ (1o ·o ω) ∈ (2o ·o ω))
Theorem	omnord1 43583*	When the same non-zero ordinal is multiplied on the right, ordering of the products is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.18 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∃𝑐 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 ·o 𝑐) ∈ (𝑏 ·o 𝑐))
Theorem	oege1 43584	Any non-zero ordinal power is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the left. Lemma 3.19 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oewordi 8521. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	oege2 43585	Any power of an ordinal at least as large as two is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the right. Lemma 3.20 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oeworde 8523. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	rp-oelim2 43586	The power of an ordinal at least as large as two with a limit ordinal on thr right is a limit ordinal. Lemma 3.21 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oelimcl 8530. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → Lim (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	oeord2lim 43587	Given a limit ordinal, the power of any base at least as large as two raised to an ordinal less than that limit ordinal is less than the power of that base raised to the limit ordinal . Lemma 3.22 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oeordi 8517. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (Lim 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶)))
Theorem	oeord2i 43588	Ordinal exponentiation of the same base at least as large as two preserves the ordering of the exponents. Lemma 3.23 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶)))
Theorem	oeord2com 43589	When the same base at least as large as two is raised to ordinal powers, , ordering of the power is equivalent to the ordering of the exponents. Theorem 3.24 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶)))
Theorem	nnoeomeqom 43590	Any natural number at least as large as two raised to the power of omega is omega. Lemma 3.25 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ↑o ω) = ω)
Theorem	df3o2 43591	Ordinal 3 is the unordered triple containing ordinals 0, 1, and 2. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 3o = {∅, 1o, 2o}
Theorem	df3o3 43592	Ordinal 3, fully expanded. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 3o = {∅, {∅}, {∅, {∅}}}
Theorem	oenord1ex 43593	When ordinals two and three are both raised to the power of omega, ordering of the powers is not equivalent to the ordering of the bases. Remark 3.26 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (2o ∈ 3o ↔ (2o ↑o ω) ∈ (3o ↑o ω))
Theorem	oenord1 43594*	When two ordinals (both at least as large as two) are raised to the same power, ordering of the powers is not equivalent to the ordering of the bases. Remark 3.26 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ (On ∖ 2o)∃𝑏 ∈ (On ∖ 2o)∃𝑐 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 ↑o 𝑐) ∈ (𝑏 ↑o 𝑐))
Theorem	oaomoencom 43595*	Ordinal addition, multiplication, and exponentiation do not generally commute. Theorem 4.1 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 +o 𝑏) = (𝑏 +o 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ·o 𝑏) = (𝑏 ·o 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ↑o 𝑏) = (𝑏 ↑o 𝑎))
Theorem	oenassex 43596	Ordinal two raised to two to the zeroth power is not the same as two squared then raised to the zeroth power. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (2o ↑o (2o ↑o ∅)) = ((2o ↑o 2o) ↑o ∅)
Theorem	oenass 43597*	Ordinal exponentiation is not associative. Remark 4.6 of [Schloeder] p. 14. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∃𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ↑o (𝑏 ↑o 𝑐)) = ((𝑎 ↑o 𝑏) ↑o 𝑐)
Theorem	cantnftermord 43598	For terms of the form of a power of omega times a non-zero natural number, ordering of the exponents implies ordering of the terms. Lemma 5.1 of [Schloeder] p. 15. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o))) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((ω ↑o 𝐴) ·o 𝐶) ∈ ((ω ↑o 𝐵) ·o 𝐷)))
Theorem	cantnfub 43599*	Given a finite number of terms of the form ((ω ↑o (𝐴‘𝑛)) ·o (𝑀‘𝑛)) with distinct exponents, we may order them from largest to smallest and find the sum is less than (ω ↑o 𝑋) when (𝐴‘𝑛) is less than 𝑋 and (𝑀‘𝑛) is less than ω. Lemma 5.2 of [Schloeder] p. 15. (Contributed by RP, 31-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝑁–1-1→𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑁⟶ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐴, (𝑀‘(◡𝐴‘𝑥)), ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom (ω CNF 𝑋) ∧ ((ω CNF 𝑋)‘𝐹) ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑋)))
Theorem	cantnfub2 43600*	Given a finite number of terms of the form ((ω ↑o (𝐴‘𝑛)) ·o (𝑀‘𝑛)) with distinct exponents, we may order them from largest to smallest and find the sum is less than (ω ↑o suc ∪ ran 𝐴) when (𝑀‘𝑛) is less than ω. Lemma 5.2 of [Schloeder] p. 15. (Contributed by RP, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝑁–1-1→On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑁⟶ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ suc ∪ ran 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐴, (𝑀‘(◡𝐴‘𝑥)), ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (suc ∪ ran 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom (ω CNF suc ∪ ran 𝐴) ∧ ((ω CNF suc ∪ ran 𝐴)‘𝐹) ∈ (ω ↑o suc ∪ ran 𝐴)))