Theorem ispautN 40901

Description: The predicate "is a projective automorphism". (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
pautset.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
pautset.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ispautN	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑀 ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐹   𝑥,𝐾   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐾(𝑦)   𝑀(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ispautN

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pautset.s	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
2		pautset.m	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	pautsetN 40900	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑀 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)))})
4	3	eleq2d 2849	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑀 ↔ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)))}))
5		f1of 6820	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 → 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆)
6	1	fvexi 6895	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
7		fex 7224	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ V) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
8	5, 6, 7	sylancl 597	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
9	8	adantr 485	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
10		f1oeq1 6808	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ↔ 𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆))
11		fveq1 6880	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
12		fveq1 6880	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
13	11, 12	sseq12d 3970	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
14	13	bibi2d 345	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
15	14	2ralbidv 3229	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
16	10, 15	anbi12d 643	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))))
17	9, 16	elab3 3645	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)))} ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
18	4, 17	bitrdi 290	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑀 ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  {cab 2741  ∀wral 3079  Vcvv 3455   ⊆ wss 3905  ⟶wf 6532  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6535  ‘cfv 6536  PSubSpcpsubsp 40298  PAutcpautN 40789

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pow 5336  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-map 8822  df-pautN 40793

This theorem is used by: (None)