Theorem ispautN 40935

Description: The predicate "is a projective automorphism". (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
pautset.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
pautset.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ispautN	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑀 ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐹   𝑥,𝐾   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐾(𝑦)   𝑀(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ispautN

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pautset.s	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
2		pautset.m	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	pautsetN 40934	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑀 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)))})
4	3	eleq2d 2851	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑀 ↔ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)))}))
5		f1of 6824	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 → 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆)
6	1	fvexi 6899	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
7		fex 7231	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ V) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
8	5, 6, 7	sylancl 598	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
9	8	adantr 486	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
10		f1oeq1 6812	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ↔ 𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆))
11		fveq1 6884	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
12		fveq1 6884	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
13	11, 12	sseq12d 3971	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
14	13	bibi2d 345	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
15	14	2ralbidv 3231	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
16	10, 15	anbi12d 644	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))))
17	9, 16	elab3 3647	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)))} ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
18	4, 17	bitrdi 290	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑀 ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  {cab 2743  ∀wral 3081  Vcvv 3457   ⊆ wss 3906  ⟶wf 6536  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6539  ‘cfv 6540  PSubSpcpsubsp 40332  PAutcpautN 40823

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7422  df-oprab 7423  df-mpo 7424  df-map 8832  df-pautN 40827

This theorem is used by: (None)