Theorem ispautN 41302

Description: The predicate "is a projective automorphism". (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
pautset.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
pautset.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ispautN	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑀 ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐹   𝑥,𝐾   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐾(𝑦)   𝑀(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ispautN

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pautset.s	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
2		pautset.m	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	pautsetN 41301	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑀 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)))})
4	3	eleq2d 2850	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑀 ↔ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)))}))
5		f1of 6835	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 → 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆)
6	1	fvexi 6910	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
7		fex 7242	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ V) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
8	5, 6, 7	sylancl 598	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
9	8	adantr 486	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
10		f1oeq1 6823	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ↔ 𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆))
11		fveq1 6895	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
12		fveq1 6895	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
13	11, 12	sseq12d 3946	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
14	13	bibi2d 345	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
15	14	2ralbidv 3230	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
16	10, 15	anbi12d 644	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))))
17	9, 16	elab3 3643	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)))} ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
18	4, 17	bitrdi 290	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑀 ↔ (𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146  {cab 2741  ∀wral 3080  Vcvv 3454   ⊆ wss 3900  ⟶wf 6543  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6546  ‘cfv 6547  PSubSpcpsubsp 40699  PAutcpautN 41190

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7761

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6501  df-fun 6549  df-fn 6550  df-f 6551  df-f1 6552  df-fo 6553  df-f1o 6554  df-fv 6555  df-ov 7433  df-oprab 7434  df-mpo 7435  df-map 8863  df-pautN 41194

This theorem is used by: (None)