Theorem ispsmet 24536

Description: Express the predicate "𝐷 is a pseudometric." (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Feb-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ispsmet	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐷 ∈ (PsMet‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐷𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑋   𝑥,𝐷,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ispsmet

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑑 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3474	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑋 ∈ V)
2		id 23	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑋 → 𝑢 = 𝑋)
3	2	sqxpeqd 5691	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑋 → (𝑢 × 𝑢) = (𝑋 × 𝑋))
4	3	oveq2d 7433	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑋 → (ℝ* ↑m (𝑢 × 𝑢)) = (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
5		raleq 3318	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑋 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦))))
6	5	raleqbi1dv 3331	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑋 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦))))
7	6	anbi2d 642	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑋 → (((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦))) ↔ ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)))))
8	7	raleqbi1dv 3331	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑋 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)))))
9	4, 8	rabeqbidv 3432	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑋 → {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑢 × 𝑢)) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)))} = {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)))})
10		df-psmet 21583	. . . . . 6 ⊢ PsMet = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑢 × 𝑢)) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)))})
11		ovex 7450	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ∈ V
12	11	rabex 5307	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)))} ∈ V
13	9, 10, 12	fvmpt 6990	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ V → (PsMet‘𝑋) = {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)))})
14	1, 13	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (PsMet‘𝑋) = {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)))})
15	14	eleq2d 2848	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐷 ∈ (PsMet‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)))}))
16		oveq 7423	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (𝑥𝑑𝑥) = (𝑥𝐷𝑥))
17	16	eqeq1d 2764	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ↔ (𝑥𝐷𝑥) = 0))
18		oveq 7423	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (𝑥𝑑𝑦) = (𝑥𝐷𝑦))
19		oveq 7423	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (𝑧𝑑𝑥) = (𝑧𝐷𝑥))
20		oveq 7423	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (𝑧𝑑𝑦) = (𝑧𝐷𝑦))
21	19, 20	oveq12d 7435	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)) = ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
22	18, 21	breq12d 5120	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → ((𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))
23	22	2ralbidv 3228	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))
24	17, 23	anbi12d 644	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦))) ↔ ((𝑥𝐷𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))))
25	24	ralbidv 3187	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐷𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))))
26	25	elrab 3648	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝑑𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝑑𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝑑𝑦)))} ↔ (𝐷 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐷𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))))
27	15, 26	bitrdi 290	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐷 ∈ (PsMet‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐷𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))))
28		xrex 13041	. . . 4 ⊢ ℝ* ∈ V
29		sqxpexg 7758	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 × 𝑋) ∈ V)
30		elmapg 8842	. . . 4 ⊢ ((ℝ* ∈ V ∧ (𝑋 × 𝑋) ∈ V) → (𝐷 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ↔ 𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ*))
31	28, 29, 30	sylancr 599	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐷 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ↔ 𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ*))
32	31	anbi1d 643	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐷 ∈ (ℝ* ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐷𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))) ↔ (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐷𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))))
33	27, 32	bitrd 282	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐷 ∈ (PsMet‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐷𝑥) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3078  {crab 3414  Vcvv 3453   class class class wbr 5107   × cxp 5657  ⟶wf 6533  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7417   ↑_m cmap 8830  0cc0 11128  ℝ^*cxr 11270   ≤ cle 11272   +_𝑒 cxad 13165  PsMetcpsmet 21575

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740  ax-cnex 11184  ax-resscn 11185

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7420  df-oprab 7421  df-mpo 7422  df-map 8832  df-xr 11275  df-psmet 21583

This theorem is used by:  psmetdmdm  24537  psmetf  24538  psmet0  24540  psmettri2  24541  psmetres2  24546  xmetpsmet  24580