Theorem lsmpropd 19871

Description: If two structures have the same components (properties), they have the same subspace structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Apr-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsmpropd.b1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))
lsmpropd.b2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))
lsmpropd.p	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))
lsmpropd.v1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
lsmpropd.v2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (LSSum‘𝐾) = (LSSum‘𝐿))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐾,𝑦   𝑥,𝐿,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem lsmpropd

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑡 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp11 1222	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝜑)
2		simp12 1223	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
3	2	elpwid 4566	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑡 ⊆ 𝐵)
4		simp2 1155	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑡)
5	3, 4	sseldd 3932	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
6		simp13 1224	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
7	6	elpwid 4566	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑢 ⊆ 𝐵)
8		simp3 1156	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢)
9	7, 8	sseldd 3932	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
10		lsmpropd.p	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))
11	1, 5, 9, 10	syl12anc 850	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))
12	11	mpoeq3dva 7489	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦)))
13	12	rneqd 5920	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦)) = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦)))
14	13	mpoeq3dva 7489	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵, 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦))) = (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵, 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))))
15		lsmpropd.b1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))
16	15	pweqd 4574	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝐵 = 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾))
17		mpoeq12 7485	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝒫 𝐵 = 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝒫 𝐵 = 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾)) → (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵, 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦))) = (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾) ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦))))
18	16, 16, 17	syl2anc 596	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵, 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦))) = (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾) ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦))))
19		lsmpropd.b2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))
20	19	pweqd 4574	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝐵 = 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿))
21		mpoeq12 7485	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝒫 𝐵 = 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿) ∧ 𝒫 𝐵 = 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿)) → (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵, 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))) = (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿) ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))))
22	20, 20, 21	syl2anc 596	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵, 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))) = (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿) ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))))
23	14, 18, 22	3eqtr3d 2804	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾) ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦))) = (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿) ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))))
24		lsmpropd.v1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
25		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
26		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (+g‘𝐾) = (+g‘𝐾)
27		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (LSSum‘𝐾) = (LSSum‘𝐾)
28	25, 26, 27	lsmfval 19832	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → (LSSum‘𝐾) = (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾) ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦))))
29	24, 28	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (LSSum‘𝐾) = (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐾) ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦))))
30		lsmpropd.v2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊)
31		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐿) = (Base‘𝐿)
32		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (+g‘𝐿) = (+g‘𝐿)
33		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (LSSum‘𝐿) = (LSSum‘𝐿)
34	31, 32, 33	lsmfval 19832	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐿 ∈ 𝑊 → (LSSum‘𝐿) = (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿) ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))))
35	30, 34	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (LSSum‘𝐿) = (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝐿) ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))))
36	23, 29, 35	3eqtr4d 2806	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (LSSum‘𝐾) = (LSSum‘𝐿))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  𝒫 cpw 4557  ran crn 5652  ‘cfv 6531  (class class class)co 7412   ∈ cmpo 7414  Basecbs 17367  +_gcplusg 17408  LSSumclsm 19828

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7990  df-2nd 7991  df-lsm 19830

This theorem is used by:  hlhillsm  42981