Theorem lsmmod2 19890

Description: Modular law dual for subgroup sum. Similar to part of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
lsmmod.p	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmmod2	⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈))

Proof of Theorem lsmmod2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl3 1212	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺))
2		eqid 2761	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (oppg‘𝐺) = (oppg‘𝐺)
3	2	oppgsubg 19577	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (SubGrp‘𝐺) = (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺))
4	1, 3	eleqtrdi 2871	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)))
5		simpl2 1211	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺))
6	5, 3	eleqtrdi 2871	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)))
7		simpl1 1210	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺))
8	7, 3	eleqtrdi 2871	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)))
9		simpr 490	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆)
10		eqid 2761	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺)) = (LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))
11	10	lsmmod 19889	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺))) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)) = ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆))
12	4, 6, 8, 9, 11	syl31anc 1400	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)) = ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆))
13	12	eqcomd 2767	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆) = (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)))
14		incom 4155	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆) = (𝑆 ∩ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇))
15		incom 4155	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑆) = (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)
16	15	oveq2i 7431	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)) = (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑆 ∩ 𝑇))
17	13, 14, 16	3eqtr3g 2819	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇)) = (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)))
18		lsmmod.p	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
19	2, 18	oppglsm 19856	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) = (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)
20	19	ineq2i 4163	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∩ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇)) = (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈))
21	2, 18	oppglsm 19856	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)) = ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈)
22	17, 20, 21	3eqtr3g 2819	1 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ∩ cin 3898   ⊆ wss 3899  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7420  SubGrpcsubg 19330  opp_gcoppg 19559  LSSumclsm 19848

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7751  ax-cnex 11256  ax-resscn 11257  ax-1cn 11258  ax-icn 11259  ax-addcl 11260  ax-addrcl 11261  ax-mulcl 11262  ax-mulrcl 11263  ax-mulcom 11264  ax-addass 11265  ax-mulass 11266  ax-distr 11267  ax-i2m1 11268  ax-1ne0 11269  ax-1rid 11270  ax-rnegex 11271  ax-rrecex 11272  ax-cnre 11273  ax-pre-lttri 11274  ax-pre-lttrn 11275  ax-pre-ltadd 11276  ax-pre-mulgt0 11277

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-nel 3063  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3366  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-int 4908  df-iun 4953  df-iin 4954  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5546  df-eprel 5551  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-fr 5604  df-we 5606  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-pred 6304  df-ord 6365  df-on 6366  df-lim 6367  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-riota 7377  df-ov 7423  df-oprab 7424  df-mpo 7425  df-om 7878  df-1st 8001  df-2nd 8002  df-tpos 8243  df-frecs 8299  df-wrecs 8330  df-recs 8379  df-rdg 8418  df-1o 8476  df-2o 8477  df-er 8717  df-en 8974  df-dom 8975  df-sdom 8976  df-fin 8977  df-pnf 11345  df-mnf 11346  df-xr 11347  df-ltxr 11348  df-le 11349  df-sub 11543  df-neg 11544  df-nn 12336  df-2 12405  df-sets 17342  df-slot 17360  df-ndx 17372  df-base 17388  df-ress 17409  df-plusg 17441  df-0g 17612  df-mre 17756  df-mrc 17757  df-acs 17759  df-mgm 18816  df-sgrp 18908  df-mnd 18924  df-submnd 18979  df-grp 19147  df-minusg 19148  df-subg 19333  df-oppg 19560  df-lsm 19850

This theorem is used by:  lcvexchlem3  40093  lcfrlem23  42622