Theorem lsmmod2 19662

Description: Modular law dual for subgroup sum. Similar to part of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
lsmmod.p	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmmod2	⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈))

Proof of Theorem lsmmod2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl3 1194	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺))
2		eqid 2736	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (oppg‘𝐺) = (oppg‘𝐺)
3	2	oppgsubg 19351	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (SubGrp‘𝐺) = (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺))
4	1, 3	eleqtrdi 2845	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)))
5		simpl2 1193	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺))
6	5, 3	eleqtrdi 2845	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)))
7		simpl1 1192	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺))
8	7, 3	eleqtrdi 2845	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)))
9		simpr 484	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆)
10		eqid 2736	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺)) = (LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))
11	10	lsmmod 19661	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺))) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)) = ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆))
12	4, 6, 8, 9, 11	syl31anc 1375	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)) = ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆))
13	12	eqcomd 2742	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆) = (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)))
14		incom 4189	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆) = (𝑆 ∩ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇))
15		incom 4189	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑆) = (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)
16	15	oveq2i 7421	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)) = (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑆 ∩ 𝑇))
17	13, 14, 16	3eqtr3g 2794	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇)) = (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)))
18		lsmmod.p	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
19	2, 18	oppglsm 19628	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) = (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)
20	19	ineq2i 4197	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∩ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇)) = (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈))
21	2, 18	oppglsm 19628	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)) = ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈)
22	17, 20, 21	3eqtr3g 2794	1 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ∩ cin 3930   ⊆ wss 3931  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  SubGrpcsubg 19108  opp_gcoppg 19333  LSSumclsm 19620

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2708  ax-rep 5254  ax-sep 5271  ax-nul 5281  ax-pow 5340  ax-pr 5407  ax-un 7734  ax-cnex 11190  ax-resscn 11191  ax-1cn 11192  ax-icn 11193  ax-addcl 11194  ax-addrcl 11195  ax-mulcl 11196  ax-mulrcl 11197  ax-mulcom 11198  ax-addass 11199  ax-mulass 11200  ax-distr 11201  ax-i2m1 11202  ax-1ne0 11203  ax-1rid 11204  ax-rnegex 11205  ax-rrecex 11206  ax-cnre 11207  ax-pre-lttri 11208  ax-pre-lttrn 11209  ax-pre-ltadd 11210  ax-pre-mulgt0 11211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-nel 3038  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-rmo 3364  df-reu 3365  df-rab 3421  df-v 3466  df-sbc 3771  df-csb 3880  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-in 3938  df-ss 3948  df-pss 3951  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-pw 4582  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-op 4613  df-uni 4889  df-int 4928  df-iun 4974  df-iin 4975  df-br 5125  df-opab 5187  df-mpt 5207  df-tr 5235  df-id 5553  df-eprel 5558  df-po 5566  df-so 5567  df-fr 5611  df-we 5613  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6295  df-ord 6360  df-on 6361  df-lim 6362  df-suc 6363  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-riota 7367  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-om 7867  df-1st 7993  df-2nd 7994  df-tpos 8230  df-frecs 8285  df-wrecs 8316  df-recs 8390  df-rdg 8429  df-1o 8485  df-2o 8486  df-er 8724  df-en 8965  df-dom 8966  df-sdom 8967  df-fin 8968  df-pnf 11276  df-mnf 11277  df-xr 11278  df-ltxr 11279  df-le 11280  df-sub 11473  df-neg 11474  df-nn 12246  df-2 12308  df-sets 17188  df-slot 17206  df-ndx 17218  df-base 17234  df-ress 17257  df-plusg 17289  df-0g 17460  df-mre 17603  df-mrc 17604  df-acs 17606  df-mgm 18623  df-sgrp 18702  df-mnd 18718  df-submnd 18767  df-grp 18924  df-minusg 18925  df-subg 19111  df-oppg 19334  df-lsm 19622

This theorem is referenced by:  lcvexchlem3  39059  lcfrlem23  41589