Theorem lsmmod2 19902

Description: Modular law dual for subgroup sum. Similar to part of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
lsmmod.p	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmmod2	⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈))

Proof of Theorem lsmmod2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl3 1212	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺))
2		eqid 2763	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (oppg‘𝐺) = (oppg‘𝐺)
3	2	oppgsubg 19589	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (SubGrp‘𝐺) = (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺))
4	1, 3	eleqtrdi 2873	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)))
5		simpl2 1211	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺))
6	5, 3	eleqtrdi 2873	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)))
7		simpl1 1210	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺))
8	7, 3	eleqtrdi 2873	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)))
9		simpr 490	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆)
10		eqid 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺)) = (LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))
11	10	lsmmod 19901	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘(oppg‘𝐺))) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)) = ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆))
12	4, 6, 8, 9, 11	syl31anc 1400	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)) = ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆))
13	12	eqcomd 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆) = (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)))
14		incom 4108	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) ∩ 𝑆) = (𝑆 ∩ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇))
15		incom 4108	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑆) = (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)
16	15	oveq2i 7438	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑇 ∩ 𝑆)) = (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑆 ∩ 𝑇))
17	13, 14, 16	3eqtr3g 2821	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇)) = (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)))
18		lsmmod.p	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
19	2, 18	oppglsm 19868	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇) = (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)
20	19	ineq2i 4116	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∩ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))𝑇)) = (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈))
21	2, 18	oppglsm 19868	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈(LSSum‘(oppg‘𝐺))(𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)) = ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈)
22	17, 20, 21	3eqtr3g 2821	1 ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146   ⊆ wss 3899   ∩ cin 4091  ‘cfv 6546  (class class class)co 7427  SubGrpcsubg 19342  opp_gcoppg 19571  LSSumclsm 19860

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5234  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5262  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5394  ax-un 7758  ax-cnex 11266  ax-resscn 11267  ax-1cn 11268  ax-icn 11269  ax-addcl 11270  ax-addrcl 11271  ax-mulcl 11272  ax-mulrcl 11273  ax-mulcom 11274  ax-addass 11275  ax-mulass 11276  ax-distr 11277  ax-i2m1 11278  ax-1ne0 11279  ax-1rid 11280  ax-rnegex 11281  ax-rrecex 11282  ax-cnre 11283  ax-pre-lttri 11284  ax-pre-lttrn 11285  ax-pre-ltadd 11286  ax-pre-mulgt0 11287

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-nel 3065  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3368  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3416  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3742  df-csb 3851  df-ss 3900  df-pss 4016  df-dif 4049  df-in 4093  df-un 4153  df-nul 4281  df-if 4485  df-pw 4561  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4838  df-uni 4870  df-int 4910  df-iun 4955  df-iin 4956  df-br 5106  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-tr 5215  df-id 5549  df-eprel 5554  df-po 5562  df-so 5563  df-fr 5607  df-we 5609  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-rn 5665  df-res 5666  df-ima 5667  df-pred 6310  df-ord 6371  df-on 6372  df-lim 6373  df-suc 6374  df-iota 6500  df-fun 6548  df-fn 6549  df-f 6550  df-f1 6551  df-fo 6552  df-f1o 6553  df-fv 6554  df-riota 7384  df-ov 7430  df-oprab 7431  df-mpo 7432  df-om 7885  df-1st 8008  df-2nd 8009  df-tpos 8254  df-frecs 8310  df-wrecs 8341  df-recs 8390  df-rdg 8429  df-1o 8487  df-2o 8488  df-er 8728  df-en 8985  df-dom 8986  df-sdom 8987  df-fin 8988  df-pnf 11355  df-mnf 11356  df-xr 11357  df-ltxr 11358  df-le 11359  df-sub 11553  df-neg 11554  df-nn 12346  df-2 12415  df-sets 17354  df-slot 17372  df-ndx 17384  df-base 17400  df-ress 17421  df-plusg 17453  df-0g 17624  df-mre 17768  df-mrc 17769  df-acs 17771  df-mgm 18828  df-sgrp 18920  df-mnd 18936  df-submnd 18991  df-grp 19159  df-minusg 19160  df-subg 19345  df-oppg 19572  df-lsm 19862

This theorem is used by:  lcvexchlem3  40233  lcfrlem23  42762