Theorem map0g 8943

Description: Set exponentiation is empty iff the base is empty and the exponent is not empty. Theorem 97 of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
map0g	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))

Proof of Theorem map0g

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		n0 4303	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴)
2		fconst6g 6796	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 × {𝑓}):𝐵⟶𝐴)
3		elmapg 8890	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ↔ (𝐵 × {𝑓}):𝐵⟶𝐴))
4	2, 3	imbitrrid 249	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)))
5		ne0i 4290	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
6	4, 5	syl6 36	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
7	6	exlimdv 1968	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
8	1, 7	biimtrid 245	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
9	8	necon4d 2983	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐴 = ∅))
10		f0 6788	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∅:∅⟶𝐴
11		feq2 6713	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = ∅ → (∅:𝐵⟶𝐴 ↔ ∅:∅⟶𝐴))
12	10, 11	mpbiri 261	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = ∅ → ∅:𝐵⟶𝐴)
13		elmapg 8890	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ↔ ∅:𝐵⟶𝐴))
14	12, 13	imbitrrid 249	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 = ∅ → ∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)))
15		ne0i 4290	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
16	14, 15	syl6 36	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
17	16	necon2d 2982	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 ≠ ∅))
18	9, 17	jcad 522	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))
19		oveq1 7453	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) = (∅ ↑m 𝐵))
20		map0b 8942	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (∅ ↑m 𝐵) = ∅)
21	19, 20	sylan9eq 2818	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) = ∅)
22	18, 21	impbid1 228	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ∅c0 4281  {csn 4588   × cxp 5654  ⟶wf 6557  (class class class)co 7446   ↑_m cmap 8878

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5264  ax-pow 5332  ax-pr 5396  ax-un 7778

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5551  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-co 5665  df-dm 5666  df-rn 5667  df-res 5668  df-ima 5669  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6563  df-fn 6564  df-f 6565  df-fv 6569  df-ov 7449  df-oprab 7450  df-mpo 7451  df-1st 8028  df-2nd 8029  df-map 8880

This theorem is used by:  map0  8946  mapdom2  9198  map0cor  50181