Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > unxpdom | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Cartesian product dominates union for sets with cardinality greater than 1. Proposition 10.36 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 93. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
unxpdom | ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | relsdom 8698 | . . . 4 ⊢ Rel ≺ | |
2 | 1 | brrelex2i 5635 | . . 3 ⊢ (1o ≺ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
3 | 1 | brrelex2i 5635 | . . 3 ⊢ (1o ≺ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V) |
4 | 2, 3 | anim12i 612 | . 2 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
5 | breq2 5074 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (1o ≺ 𝑥 ↔ 1o ≺ 𝐴)) | |
6 | 5 | anbi1d 629 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) ↔ (1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦))) |
7 | uneq1 4086 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦)) | |
8 | xpeq1 5594 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 × 𝑦) = (𝐴 × 𝑦)) | |
9 | 7, 8 | breq12d 5083 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦))) |
10 | 6, 9 | imbi12d 344 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦)) ↔ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦)))) |
11 | breq2 5074 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (1o ≺ 𝑦 ↔ 1o ≺ 𝐵)) | |
12 | 11 | anbi2d 628 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) ↔ (1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵))) |
13 | uneq2 4087 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | |
14 | xpeq2 5601 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝑦) = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | |
15 | 13, 14 | breq12d 5083 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) |
16 | 12, 15 | imbi12d 344 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦)) ↔ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)))) |
17 | eqid 2738 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉)) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉)) | |
18 | eqid 2738 | . . . 4 ⊢ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉) = if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉) | |
19 | 17, 18 | unxpdomlem3 8958 | . . 3 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦)) |
20 | 10, 16, 19 | vtocl2g 3500 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) |
21 | 4, 20 | mpcom 38 | 1 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2108 Vcvv 3422 ∪ cun 3881 ifcif 4456 〈cop 4564 class class class wbr 5070 ↦ cmpt 5153 × cxp 5578 1oc1o 8260 ≼ cdom 8689 ≺ csdm 8690 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1799 ax-4 1813 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2139 ax-11 2156 ax-12 2173 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5218 ax-nul 5225 ax-pow 5283 ax-pr 5347 ax-un 7566 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-3or 1086 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1784 df-nf 1788 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2817 df-nfc 2888 df-ne 2943 df-ral 3068 df-rex 3069 df-rab 3072 df-v 3424 df-dif 3886 df-un 3888 df-in 3890 df-ss 3900 df-pss 3902 df-nul 4254 df-if 4457 df-pw 4532 df-sn 4559 df-pr 4561 df-tp 4563 df-op 4565 df-uni 4837 df-br 5071 df-opab 5133 df-mpt 5154 df-tr 5188 df-id 5480 df-eprel 5486 df-po 5494 df-so 5495 df-fr 5535 df-we 5537 df-xp 5586 df-rel 5587 df-cnv 5588 df-co 5589 df-dm 5590 df-rn 5591 df-res 5592 df-ima 5593 df-ord 6254 df-on 6255 df-lim 6256 df-suc 6257 df-iota 6376 df-fun 6420 df-fn 6421 df-f 6422 df-f1 6423 df-fo 6424 df-f1o 6425 df-fv 6426 df-om 7688 df-1o 8267 df-2o 8268 df-er 8456 df-en 8692 df-dom 8693 df-sdom 8694 |
This theorem is referenced by: unxpdom2 8960 sucxpdom 8961 djuxpdom 9872 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |