Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > unxpdom | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Cartesian product dominates union for sets with cardinality greater than 1. Proposition 10.36 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 93. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
unxpdom | ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | relsdom 8740 | . . . 4 ⊢ Rel ≺ | |
2 | 1 | brrelex2i 5644 | . . 3 ⊢ (1o ≺ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
3 | 1 | brrelex2i 5644 | . . 3 ⊢ (1o ≺ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V) |
4 | 2, 3 | anim12i 613 | . 2 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
5 | breq2 5078 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (1o ≺ 𝑥 ↔ 1o ≺ 𝐴)) | |
6 | 5 | anbi1d 630 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) ↔ (1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦))) |
7 | uneq1 4090 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦)) | |
8 | xpeq1 5603 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 × 𝑦) = (𝐴 × 𝑦)) | |
9 | 7, 8 | breq12d 5087 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦))) |
10 | 6, 9 | imbi12d 345 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦)) ↔ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦)))) |
11 | breq2 5078 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (1o ≺ 𝑦 ↔ 1o ≺ 𝐵)) | |
12 | 11 | anbi2d 629 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) ↔ (1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵))) |
13 | uneq2 4091 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | |
14 | xpeq2 5610 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝑦) = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | |
15 | 13, 14 | breq12d 5087 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) |
16 | 12, 15 | imbi12d 345 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦)) ↔ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)))) |
17 | eqid 2738 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉)) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉)) | |
18 | eqid 2738 | . . . 4 ⊢ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉) = if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉) | |
19 | 17, 18 | unxpdomlem3 9029 | . . 3 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦)) |
20 | 10, 16, 19 | vtocl2g 3510 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) |
21 | 4, 20 | mpcom 38 | 1 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 396 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2106 Vcvv 3432 ∪ cun 3885 ifcif 4459 〈cop 4567 class class class wbr 5074 ↦ cmpt 5157 × cxp 5587 1oc1o 8290 ≼ cdom 8731 ≺ csdm 8732 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2137 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2171 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5223 ax-nul 5230 ax-pow 5288 ax-pr 5352 ax-un 7588 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 845 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2889 df-ne 2944 df-ral 3069 df-rex 3070 df-reu 3072 df-rab 3073 df-v 3434 df-sbc 3717 df-csb 3833 df-dif 3890 df-un 3892 df-in 3894 df-ss 3904 df-pss 3906 df-nul 4257 df-if 4460 df-pw 4535 df-sn 4562 df-pr 4564 df-op 4568 df-uni 4840 df-br 5075 df-opab 5137 df-mpt 5158 df-tr 5192 df-id 5489 df-eprel 5495 df-po 5503 df-so 5504 df-fr 5544 df-we 5546 df-xp 5595 df-rel 5596 df-cnv 5597 df-co 5598 df-dm 5599 df-rn 5600 df-res 5601 df-ima 5602 df-ord 6269 df-on 6270 df-lim 6271 df-suc 6272 df-iota 6391 df-fun 6435 df-fn 6436 df-f 6437 df-f1 6438 df-fo 6439 df-f1o 6440 df-fv 6441 df-om 7713 df-1o 8297 df-2o 8298 df-en 8734 df-dom 8735 df-sdom 8736 df-fin 8737 |
This theorem is referenced by: unxpdom2 9031 sucxpdom 9032 djuxpdom 9941 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |