![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > unxpdom | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Cartesian product dominates union for sets with cardinality greater than 1. Proposition 10.36 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 93. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
unxpdom | ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | relsdom 8499 | . . . 4 ⊢ Rel ≺ | |
2 | 1 | brrelex2i 5573 | . . 3 ⊢ (1o ≺ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
3 | 1 | brrelex2i 5573 | . . 3 ⊢ (1o ≺ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V) |
4 | 2, 3 | anim12i 615 | . 2 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
5 | breq2 5034 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (1o ≺ 𝑥 ↔ 1o ≺ 𝐴)) | |
6 | 5 | anbi1d 632 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) ↔ (1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦))) |
7 | uneq1 4083 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦)) | |
8 | xpeq1 5533 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 × 𝑦) = (𝐴 × 𝑦)) | |
9 | 7, 8 | breq12d 5043 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦))) |
10 | 6, 9 | imbi12d 348 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦)) ↔ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦)))) |
11 | breq2 5034 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (1o ≺ 𝑦 ↔ 1o ≺ 𝐵)) | |
12 | 11 | anbi2d 631 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) ↔ (1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵))) |
13 | uneq2 4084 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | |
14 | xpeq2 5540 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝑦) = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | |
15 | 13, 14 | breq12d 5043 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) |
16 | 12, 15 | imbi12d 348 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦)) ↔ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)))) |
17 | eqid 2798 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉)) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉)) | |
18 | eqid 2798 | . . . 4 ⊢ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉) = if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉) | |
19 | 17, 18 | unxpdomlem3 8708 | . . 3 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦)) |
20 | 10, 16, 19 | vtocl2g 3520 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) |
21 | 4, 20 | mpcom 38 | 1 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 = wceq 1538 ∈ wcel 2111 Vcvv 3441 ∪ cun 3879 ifcif 4425 〈cop 4531 class class class wbr 5030 ↦ cmpt 5110 × cxp 5517 1oc1o 8078 ≼ cdom 8490 ≺ csdm 8491 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2770 ax-sep 5167 ax-nul 5174 ax-pow 5231 ax-pr 5295 ax-un 7441 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 845 df-3or 1085 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1541 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2598 df-eu 2629 df-clab 2777 df-cleq 2791 df-clel 2870 df-nfc 2938 df-ne 2988 df-ral 3111 df-rex 3112 df-rab 3115 df-v 3443 df-sbc 3721 df-dif 3884 df-un 3886 df-in 3888 df-ss 3898 df-pss 3900 df-nul 4244 df-if 4426 df-pw 4499 df-sn 4526 df-pr 4528 df-tp 4530 df-op 4532 df-uni 4801 df-br 5031 df-opab 5093 df-mpt 5111 df-tr 5137 df-id 5425 df-eprel 5430 df-po 5438 df-so 5439 df-fr 5478 df-we 5480 df-xp 5525 df-rel 5526 df-cnv 5527 df-co 5528 df-dm 5529 df-rn 5530 df-res 5531 df-ima 5532 df-ord 6162 df-on 6163 df-lim 6164 df-suc 6165 df-iota 6283 df-fun 6326 df-fn 6327 df-f 6328 df-f1 6329 df-fo 6330 df-f1o 6331 df-fv 6332 df-om 7561 df-1o 8085 df-2o 8086 df-er 8272 df-en 8493 df-dom 8494 df-sdom 8495 |
This theorem is referenced by: unxpdom2 8710 sucxpdom 8711 djuxpdom 9596 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |