Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > unxpdom | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Cartesian product dominates union for sets with cardinality greater than 1. Proposition 10.36 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 93. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
unxpdom | ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | relsdom 8518 | . . . 4 ⊢ Rel ≺ | |
2 | 1 | brrelex2i 5611 | . . 3 ⊢ (1o ≺ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
3 | 1 | brrelex2i 5611 | . . 3 ⊢ (1o ≺ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V) |
4 | 2, 3 | anim12i 614 | . 2 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
5 | breq2 5072 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (1o ≺ 𝑥 ↔ 1o ≺ 𝐴)) | |
6 | 5 | anbi1d 631 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) ↔ (1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦))) |
7 | uneq1 4134 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦)) | |
8 | xpeq1 5571 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 × 𝑦) = (𝐴 × 𝑦)) | |
9 | 7, 8 | breq12d 5081 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦))) |
10 | 6, 9 | imbi12d 347 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦)) ↔ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦)))) |
11 | breq2 5072 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (1o ≺ 𝑦 ↔ 1o ≺ 𝐵)) | |
12 | 11 | anbi2d 630 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) ↔ (1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵))) |
13 | uneq2 4135 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | |
14 | xpeq2 5578 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝑦) = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | |
15 | 13, 14 | breq12d 5081 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) |
16 | 12, 15 | imbi12d 347 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝑦)) ↔ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)))) |
17 | eqid 2823 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉)) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉)) | |
18 | eqid 2823 | . . . 4 ⊢ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉) = if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 〈𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑣, 𝑤, 𝑡)〉, 〈if(𝑧 = 𝑤, 𝑢, 𝑣), 𝑧〉) | |
19 | 17, 18 | unxpdomlem3 8726 | . . 3 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝑥 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑦) → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ≼ (𝑥 × 𝑦)) |
20 | 10, 16, 19 | vtocl2g 3574 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) |
21 | 4, 20 | mpcom 38 | 1 ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 398 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2114 Vcvv 3496 ∪ cun 3936 ifcif 4469 〈cop 4575 class class class wbr 5068 ↦ cmpt 5148 × cxp 5555 1oc1o 8097 ≼ cdom 8509 ≺ csdm 8510 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2145 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2795 ax-sep 5205 ax-nul 5212 ax-pow 5268 ax-pr 5332 ax-un 7463 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-3or 1084 df-3an 1085 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2622 df-eu 2654 df-clab 2802 df-cleq 2816 df-clel 2895 df-nfc 2965 df-ne 3019 df-ral 3145 df-rex 3146 df-rab 3149 df-v 3498 df-sbc 3775 df-dif 3941 df-un 3943 df-in 3945 df-ss 3954 df-pss 3956 df-nul 4294 df-if 4470 df-pw 4543 df-sn 4570 df-pr 4572 df-tp 4574 df-op 4576 df-uni 4841 df-br 5069 df-opab 5131 df-mpt 5149 df-tr 5175 df-id 5462 df-eprel 5467 df-po 5476 df-so 5477 df-fr 5516 df-we 5518 df-xp 5563 df-rel 5564 df-cnv 5565 df-co 5566 df-dm 5567 df-rn 5568 df-res 5569 df-ima 5570 df-ord 6196 df-on 6197 df-lim 6198 df-suc 6199 df-iota 6316 df-fun 6359 df-fn 6360 df-f 6361 df-f1 6362 df-fo 6363 df-f1o 6364 df-fv 6365 df-om 7583 df-1o 8104 df-2o 8105 df-er 8291 df-en 8512 df-dom 8513 df-sdom 8514 |
This theorem is referenced by: unxpdom2 8728 sucxpdom 8729 djuxpdom 9613 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |