P. 93 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9201-9300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	f1domfi2 9201	If the domain of a one-to-one function is finite, then the function's domain is dominated by its codomain when the latter is a set. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1dom2g 9000). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	enreffi 9202	Equinumerosity is reflexive for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike enrefg 9015). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ensymfib 9203	Symmetry of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike ensymb 9033). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴))
Theorem	entrfil 9204	Transitivity of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike entr 9037). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 10-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	enfii 9205	A set equinumerous to a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	enfi 9206	Equinumerous sets have the same finiteness. For a shorter proof using ax-pow 5326, see enfiALT 9207. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
Theorem	enfiALT 9207	Shorter proof of enfi 9206 using ax-pow 5326. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
Theorem	domfi 9208	A set dominated by a finite set is finite. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	entrfi 9209	Transitivity of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike entr 9037). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	entrfir 9210	Transitivity of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike entr 9037). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	domtrfil 9211	Transitivity of dominance relation when 𝐴 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domtr 9038). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	domtrfi 9212	Transitivity of dominance relation when 𝐵 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domtr 9038). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	domtrfir 9213	Transitivity of dominance relation for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domtr 9038). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	f1imaenfi 9214	If a function is one-to-one, then the image of a finite subset of its domain under it is equinumerous to the subset. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Replacement or the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1imaeng 9045). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 29-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Fin) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	ssdomfi 9215	A finite set dominates its subsets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike ssdomg 9031). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	ssdomfi2 9216	A set dominates its finite subsets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike ssdomg 9031). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthfilem 9217*	Lemma for sbthfi 9218. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthfi 9218	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike sbth 9120). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	domnsymfi 9219	If a set dominates a finite set, it cannot also be strictly dominated by the finite set. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domnsym 9126). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	sdomdomtrfi 9220	Transitivity of strict dominance and dominance when 𝐴 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike sdomdomtr 9133). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	domsdomtrfi 9221	Transitivity of dominance and strict dominance when 𝐴 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domsdomtr 9135). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	sucdom2 9222	Strict dominance of a set over another set implies dominance over its successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 4-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
2.4.33  Pigeonhole Principle
Theorem	phplem1 9223	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem2 9224	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. Equinumerosity of successors implies equinumerosity of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	nneneq 9225	Two equinumerous natural numbers are equal. Proposition 10.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. Also compare Corollary 6E of [Enderton] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	php 9226	Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. Theorem (Pigeonhole Principle) of [Enderton] p. 134. The theorem is so-called because you can't put n + 1 pigeons into n holes (if each hole holds only one pigeon). The proof consists of phplem1 9223, phplem2 9224, nneneq 9225, and this final piece of the proof. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	php2 9227	Corollary of Pigeonhole Principle. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 20-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	php3 9228	Corollary of Pigeonhole Principle. If 𝐴 is finite and 𝐵 is a proper subset of 𝐴, the 𝐵 is strictly less numerous than 𝐴. Stronger version of Corollary 6C of [Enderton] p. 135. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	php4 9229	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle php 9226: a natural number is strictly dominated by its successor. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ≺ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	php5 9230	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle php 9226: a natural number is not equinumerous to its successor. Corollary 10.21(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	phpeqd 9231	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle using equality. Strengthening of php 9226 expressed without negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 28-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	nndomog 9232	Cardinal ordering agrees with ordinal number ordering when the smaller number is a natural number. Compare with nndomo 9237 when both are natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.) Generalize from nndomo 9237. (Revised by RP, 5-Nov-2023.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
2.4.34  Finite sets (cont.)
Theorem	onomeneq 9233	An ordinal number equinumerous to a natural number is equal to it. Proposition 10.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 2-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	onfin 9234	An ordinal number is finite iff it is a natural number. Proposition 10.32 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ω))
Theorem	ordfin 9235	A generalization of onfin 9234 to include the class of all ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ω))
Theorem	onfin2 9236	A set is a natural number iff it is a finite ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ω = (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	nndomo 9237	Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. Example 3 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	nnsdomo 9238	Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
Theorem	sucdom 9239	Strict dominance of a set over a natural number is the same as dominance over its successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 4-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	snnen2o 9240	A singleton {𝐴} is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. This holds for proper singletons (𝐴 ∈ V) as well as for singletons being the empty set (𝐴 ∉ V). (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2019.) Avoid ax-pow 5326, ax-un 7752. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 1-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ {𝐴} ≈ 2o
Theorem	0sdom1dom 9241	Strict dominance over 0 is the same as dominance over 1. For a shorter proof requiring ax-un 7752, see 0sdom1domALT . (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) Avoid ax-un 7752. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 1o ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	0sdom1domALT 9242	Alternate proof of 0sdom1dom 9241, shorter but requiring ax-un 7752. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 1o ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	1sdom2 9243	Ordinal 1 is strictly dominated by ordinal 2. For a shorter proof requiring ax-un 7752, see 1sdom2ALT 9244. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.) Avoid ax-un 7752. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 8-Dec-2024.)
⊢ 1o ≺ 2o
Theorem	1sdom2ALT 9244	Alternate proof of 1sdom2 9243, shorter but requiring ax-un 7752. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1o ≺ 2o
Theorem	sdom1 9245	A set has less than one member iff it is empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) Avoid ax-pow 5326, ax-un 7752. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 12-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 1o ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	modom 9246	Two ways to express "at most one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≼ 1o)
Theorem	modom2 9247*	Two ways to express "at most one". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 1o)
Theorem	rex2dom 9248*	A set that has at least 2 different members dominates ordinal 2. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) → 2o ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	1sdom2dom 9249	Strict dominance over 1 is the same as dominance over 2. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (1o ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 2o ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	1sdom 9250*	A set that strictly dominates ordinal 1 has at least 2 different members. (Closely related to 2dom 9062.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) Avoid ax-un 7752. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (1o ≺ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	unxpdomlem1 9251*	Lemma for unxpdom 9254. (Trivial substitution proof.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∪ 𝑏) ↦ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎, ⟨𝑥, if(𝑥 = 𝑚, 𝑡, 𝑠)⟩, ⟨if(𝑥 = 𝑡, 𝑛, 𝑚), 𝑥⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∪ 𝑏) → (𝐹‘𝑧) = if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑎, ⟨𝑧, if(𝑧 = 𝑚, 𝑡, 𝑠)⟩, ⟨if(𝑧 = 𝑡, 𝑛, 𝑚), 𝑧⟩))
Theorem	unxpdomlem2 9252*	Lemma for unxpdom 9254. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∪ 𝑏) ↦ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎, ⟨𝑥, if(𝑥 = 𝑚, 𝑡, 𝑠)⟩, ⟨if(𝑥 = 𝑡, 𝑛, 𝑚), 𝑥⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑤 ∈ (𝑎 ∪ 𝑏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑚 = 𝑛)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑠 = 𝑡)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑎)) → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤))
Theorem	unxpdomlem3 9253*	Lemma for unxpdom 9254. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∪ 𝑏) ↦ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎, ⟨𝑥, if(𝑥 = 𝑚, 𝑡, 𝑠)⟩, ⟨if(𝑥 = 𝑡, 𝑛, 𝑚), 𝑥⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝑎 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝑏) → (𝑎 ∪ 𝑏) ≼ (𝑎 × 𝑏))
Theorem	unxpdom 9254	Cartesian product dominates union for sets with cardinality greater than 1. Proposition 10.36 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 93. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	unxpdom2 9255	Corollary of unxpdom 9254. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	sucxpdom 9256	Cartesian product dominates successor for set with cardinality greater than 1. Proposition 10.38 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 93 (but generalized to arbitrary sets, not just ordinals). (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (1o ≺ 𝐴 → suc 𝐴 ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	pssinf 9257	A set equinumerous to a proper subset of itself is infinite. Corollary 6D(a) of [Enderton] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fisseneq 9258	A finite set is equal to its subset if they are equinumerous. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ominf 9259	The set of natural numbers is infinite. Corollary 6D(b) of [Enderton] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 2-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ ω ∈ Fin
Theorem	isinf 9260*	Any set that is not finite is literally infinite, in the sense that it contains subsets of arbitrarily large finite cardinality. (It cannot be proven that the set has countably infinite subsets unless AC is invoked.) The proof does not require the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 2-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝑛))
Theorem	fineqvlem 9261	Lemma for fineqv 9262. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ω ≼ 𝒫 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	fineqv 9262	If the Axiom of Infinity is denied, then all sets are finite (which implies the Axiom of Choice). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (¬ ω ∈ V ↔ Fin = V)
Theorem	xpfir 9263	The components of a nonempty finite Cartesian product are finite. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 11-Apr-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ Fin ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
Theorem	ssfid 9264	A subset of a finite set is finite, deduction version of ssfi 9192. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 21-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	infi 9265	The intersection of two sets is finite if one of them is. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	rabfi 9266*	A restricted class built from a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	finresfin 9267	The restriction of a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝐸 ∈ Fin → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	f1finf1o 9268	Any injection from one finite set to another of equal size must be a bijection. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2014.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 4-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵))
Theorem	nfielex 9269*	If a class is not finite, then it contains at least one element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	en1eqsn 9270	A set with one element is a singleton. (Contributed by FL, 18-Aug-2008.) Avoid ax-pow 5326, ax-un 7752. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 4-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 1o) → 𝐵 = {𝐴})
Theorem	en1eqsnbi 9271	A set containing an element has exactly one element iff it is a singleton. Formerly part of proof for rngen1zr 20411. (Contributed by FL, 13-Feb-2010.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐵 = {𝐴}))
Theorem	dif1ennnALT 9272	Alternate proof of dif1ennn 9182 using ax-pow 5326. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	enp1ilem 9273	Lemma for uses of enp1i 9274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
⊢ 𝑇 = ({𝑥} ∪ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) = 𝑆 → 𝐴 = 𝑇))
Theorem	enp1i 9274*	Proof induction for en2 9275 and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.) Generalize to all ordinals and avoid ax-pow 5326, ax-un 7752. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Ord 𝑀    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = suc 𝑀    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝑁 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	en2 9275*	A set equinumerous to ordinal 2 is an unordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 2o → ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐴 = {𝑥, 𝑦})
Theorem	en3 9276*	A set equinumerous to ordinal 3 is a triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 3o → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝐴 = {𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧})
Theorem	en4 9277*	A set equinumerous to ordinal 4 is a quadruple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 4o → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤 𝐴 = ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∪ {𝑧, 𝑤}))
Theorem	findcard3 9278*	Schema for strong induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive hypothesis is that the result is true on any proper subset. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Dec-2013.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦 → 𝜑) → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	ac6sfi 9279*	A version of ac6s 10566 for finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 26-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	frfi 9280	A partial order is well-founded on a finite set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 18-Jun-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴)
Theorem	fimax2g 9281*	A finite set has a maximum under a total order. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 18-Jun-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	fimaxg 9282*	A finite set has a maximum under a total order. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	fisupg 9283*	Lemma showing existence and closure of supremum of a finite set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	wofi 9284	A total order on a finite set is a well-order. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 18-Jun-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → 𝑅 We 𝐴)
Theorem	ordunifi 9285	The maximum of a finite collection of ordinals is in the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	fissorduni 9286	The union (supremum) of a finite set of ordinals less than a nonzero ordinal class is an element of that ordinal class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	nnunifi 9287	The union (supremum) of a finite set of finite ordinals is a finite ordinal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ω ∧ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) → ∪ 𝑆 ∈ ω)
Theorem	unblem1 9288*	Lemma for unbnn 9292. After removing the successor of an element from an unbounded set of natural numbers, the intersection of the result belongs to the original unbounded set. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2003.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ ω ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ∩ (𝐵 ∖ suc 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	unblem2 9289*	Lemma for unbnn 9292. The value of the function 𝐹 belongs to the unbounded set of natural numbers 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ (𝐴 ∖ suc 𝑥)), ∩ 𝐴) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ ω ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 𝑤 ∈ 𝑣) → (𝑧 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	unblem3 9290*	Lemma for unbnn 9292. The value of the function 𝐹 is less than its value at a successor. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ (𝐴 ∖ suc 𝑥)), ∩ 𝐴) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ ω ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 𝑤 ∈ 𝑣) → (𝑧 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ (𝐹‘suc 𝑧)))
Theorem	unblem4 9291*	Lemma for unbnn 9292. The function 𝐹 maps the set of natural numbers one-to-one to the set of unbounded natural numbers 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ (𝐴 ∖ suc 𝑥)), ∩ 𝐴) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ ω ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 𝑤 ∈ 𝑣) → 𝐹:ω–1-1→𝐴)
Theorem	unbnn 9292*	Any unbounded subset of natural numbers is equinumerous to the set of all natural numbers. Part of the proof of Theorem 42 of [Suppes] p. 151. See unbnn3 9664 for a stronger version without the first assumption. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2003.)
⊢ ((ω ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐴 ≈ ω)
Theorem	unbnn2 9293*	Version of unbnn 9292 that does not require a strict upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((ω ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) → 𝐴 ≈ ω)
Theorem	isfinite2 9294	Any set strictly dominated by the class of natural numbers is finite. Sufficiency part of Theorem 42 of [Suppes] p. 151. This theorem does not require the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ ω → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	nnsdomg 9295	Omega strictly dominates a natural number. Example 3 of [Enderton] p. 146. In order to avoid the Axiom of Infinity, we include it as part of the antecedent. See nnsdom 9659 for the version without this sethood requirement. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((ω ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω) → 𝐴 ≺ ω)
Theorem	isfiniteg 9296	A set is finite iff it is strictly dominated by the class of natural number. Theorem 42 of [Suppes] p. 151. In order to avoid the Axiom of infinity, we include it as a hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (ω ∈ V → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐴 ≺ ω))
Theorem	infsdomnn 9297	An infinite set strictly dominates a natural number. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5326. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((ω ≼ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	infn0 9298	An infinite set is not empty. For a shorter proof using ax-un 7752, see infn0ALT 9299. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.) Avoid ax-un 7752. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 8-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	infn0ALT 9299	Shorter proof of infn0 9298 using ax-un 7752. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	fin2inf 9300	This (useless) theorem, which was proved without the Axiom of Infinity, demonstrates an artifact of our definition of binary relation, which is meaningful only when its arguments exist. In particular, the antecedent cannot be satisfied unless ω exists. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ ω → ω ∈ V)