Theorem upgrres 29769

Description: A subgraph obtained by removing one vertex and all edges incident with this vertex from a pseudograph (see uhgrspan1 29766) is a pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 8-Nov-2020.) (Revised by AV, 19-Dec-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
upgrres.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
upgrres.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
upgrres.f	⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)}
upgrres.s	⊢ 𝑆 = ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩

Assertion

Ref	Expression
upgrres	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑖,𝐸   𝑖,𝑁

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑆(𝑖)   𝐹(𝑖)   𝐺(𝑖)   𝑉(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem upgrres

Dummy variable 𝑝 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		upgruhgr 29562	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph)
2		upgrres.e	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
3	2	uhgrfun 29526	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → Fun 𝐸)
4		funres 6576	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fun 𝐸 → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
5	1, 3, 4	3syl 19	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
6	5	funfnd 6565	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
7	6	adantr 486	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
8		upgrres.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
9		upgrres.f	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)}
10	8, 2, 9	upgrreslem 29767	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})
11		df-f 6537	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2} ↔ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ∧ ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
12	7, 10, 11	sylanbrc 595	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})
13		upgrres.s	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩
14		opex 5439	. . . 4 ⊢ ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ V
15	13, 14	eqeltri 2856	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
16	8, 2, 9, 13	uhgrspan1lem2 29764	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁})
17	16	eqcomi 2769	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) = (Vtx‘𝑆)
18	8, 2, 9, 13	uhgrspan1lem3 29765	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)
19	18	eqcomi 2769	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) = (iEdg‘𝑆)
20	17, 19	isupgr 29544	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
21	15, 20	mp1i 14	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
22	12, 21	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ∉ wnel 3061  {crab 3412  Vcvv 3450   ∖ cdif 3896   ⊆ wss 3899  ∅c0 4279  𝒫 cpw 4557  {csn 4584  ⟨cop 4590   class class class wbr 5103  dom cdm 5655  ran crn 5656   ↾ cres 5657  Fun wfun 6527   Fn wfn 6528  ⟶wf 6529  ‘cfv 6533   ≤ cle 11271  2c2 12322  ♯chash 14397  Vtxcvtx 29456  iEdgciedg 29457  UHGraphcuhgr 29516  UPGraphcupgr 29540

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7737

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-nel 3062  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-fv 6541  df-1st 7987  df-2nd 7988  df-vtx 29458  df-iedg 29459  df-uhgr 29518  df-upgr 29542

This theorem is used by:  finsumvtxdg2size  30013