![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > upgrres | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: A subgraph obtained by removing one vertex and all edges incident with this vertex from a pseudograph (see uhgrspan1 27093) is a pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 8-Nov-2020.) (Revised by AV, 19-Dec-2021.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
upgrres.v | ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) |
upgrres.e | ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) |
upgrres.f | ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)} |
upgrres.s | ⊢ 𝑆 = 〈(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)〉 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
upgrres | ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | upgruhgr 26895 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph) | |
2 | upgrres.e | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) | |
3 | 2 | uhgrfun 26859 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → Fun 𝐸) |
4 | funres 6366 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fun 𝐸 → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)) | |
5 | 1, 3, 4 | 3syl 18 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)) |
6 | 5 | funfnd 6355 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)) |
7 | 6 | adantr 484 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)) |
8 | upgrres.v | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) | |
9 | upgrres.f | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)} | |
10 | 8, 2, 9 | upgrreslem 27094 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}) |
11 | df-f 6328 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2} ↔ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ∧ ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})) | |
12 | 7, 10, 11 | sylanbrc 586 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}) |
13 | upgrres.s | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = 〈(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)〉 | |
14 | opex 5321 | . . . 4 ⊢ 〈(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)〉 ∈ V | |
15 | 13, 14 | eqeltri 2886 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V |
16 | 8, 2, 9, 13 | uhgrspan1lem2 27091 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) |
17 | 16 | eqcomi 2807 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) = (Vtx‘𝑆) |
18 | 8, 2, 9, 13 | uhgrspan1lem3 27092 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) |
19 | 18 | eqcomi 2807 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) = (iEdg‘𝑆) |
20 | 17, 19 | isupgr 26877 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})) |
21 | 15, 20 | mp1i 13 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})) |
22 | 12, 21 | mpbird 260 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 = wceq 1538 ∈ wcel 2111 ∉ wnel 3091 {crab 3110 Vcvv 3441 ∖ cdif 3878 ⊆ wss 3881 ∅c0 4243 𝒫 cpw 4497 {csn 4525 〈cop 4531 class class class wbr 5030 dom cdm 5519 ran crn 5520 ↾ cres 5521 Fun wfun 6318 Fn wfn 6319 ⟶wf 6320 ‘cfv 6324 ≤ cle 10665 2c2 11680 ♯chash 13686 Vtxcvtx 26789 iEdgciedg 26790 UHGraphcuhgr 26849 UPGraphcupgr 26873 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2770 ax-sep 5167 ax-nul 5174 ax-pow 5231 ax-pr 5295 ax-un 7441 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 845 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1541 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2598 df-eu 2629 df-clab 2777 df-cleq 2791 df-clel 2870 df-nfc 2938 df-ne 2988 df-nel 3092 df-ral 3111 df-rex 3112 df-rab 3115 df-v 3443 df-sbc 3721 df-dif 3884 df-un 3886 df-in 3888 df-ss 3898 df-nul 4244 df-if 4426 df-pw 4499 df-sn 4526 df-pr 4528 df-op 4532 df-uni 4801 df-br 5031 df-opab 5093 df-mpt 5111 df-id 5425 df-xp 5525 df-rel 5526 df-cnv 5527 df-co 5528 df-dm 5529 df-rn 5530 df-res 5531 df-ima 5532 df-iota 6283 df-fun 6326 df-fn 6327 df-f 6328 df-fv 6332 df-1st 7671 df-2nd 7672 df-vtx 26791 df-iedg 26792 df-uhgr 26851 df-upgr 26875 |
This theorem is referenced by: finsumvtxdg2size 27340 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |