Theorem upgrres 29718

Description: A subgraph obtained by removing one vertex and all edges incident with this vertex from a pseudograph (see uhgrspan1 29715) is a pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 8-Nov-2020.) (Revised by AV, 19-Dec-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
upgrres.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
upgrres.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
upgrres.f	⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)}
upgrres.s	⊢ 𝑆 = ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩

Assertion

Ref	Expression
upgrres	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑖,𝐸   𝑖,𝑁

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑆(𝑖)   𝐹(𝑖)   𝐺(𝑖)   𝑉(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem upgrres

Dummy variable 𝑝 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		upgruhgr 29511	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph)
2		upgrres.e	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
3	2	uhgrfun 29475	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → Fun 𝐸)
4		funres 6582	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fun 𝐸 → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
5	1, 3, 4	3syl 19	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
6	5	funfnd 6571	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
7	6	adantr 486	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
8		upgrres.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
9		upgrres.f	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)}
10	8, 2, 9	upgrreslem 29716	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})
11		df-f 6544	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2} ↔ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ∧ ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
12	7, 10, 11	sylanbrc 595	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})
13		upgrres.s	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩
14		opex 5447	. . . 4 ⊢ ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ V
15	13, 14	eqeltri 2861	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
16	8, 2, 9, 13	uhgrspan1lem2 29713	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁})
17	16	eqcomi 2774	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) = (Vtx‘𝑆)
18	8, 2, 9, 13	uhgrspan1lem3 29714	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)
19	18	eqcomi 2774	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) = (iEdg‘𝑆)
20	17, 19	isupgr 29493	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
21	15, 20	mp1i 14	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
22	12, 21	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ∉ wnel 3066  {crab 3418  Vcvv 3457   ∖ cdif 3903   ⊆ wss 3906  ∅c0 4286  𝒫 cpw 4564  {csn 4591  ⟨cop 4597   class class class wbr 5111  dom cdm 5663  ran crn 5664   ↾ cres 5665  Fun wfun 6534   Fn wfn 6535  ⟶wf 6536  ‘cfv 6540   ≤ cle 11263  2c2 12314  ♯chash 14388  Vtxcvtx 29405  iEdgciedg 29406  UHGraphcuhgr 29465  UPGraphcupgr 29489

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-nel 3067  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-fv 6548  df-1st 7992  df-2nd 7993  df-vtx 29407  df-iedg 29408  df-uhgr 29467  df-upgr 29491

This theorem is used by:  finsumvtxdg2size  29962