![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > upgrres | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: A subgraph obtained by removing one vertex and all edges incident with this vertex from a pseudograph (see uhgrspan1 29335) is a pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 8-Nov-2020.) (Revised by AV, 19-Dec-2021.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
upgrres.v | ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) |
upgrres.e | ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) |
upgrres.f | ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)} |
upgrres.s | ⊢ 𝑆 = 〈(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)〉 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
upgrres | ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | upgruhgr 29134 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph) | |
2 | upgrres.e | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) | |
3 | 2 | uhgrfun 29098 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → Fun 𝐸) |
4 | funres 6610 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fun 𝐸 → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)) | |
5 | 1, 3, 4 | 3syl 18 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)) |
6 | 5 | funfnd 6599 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)) |
7 | 6 | adantr 480 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)) |
8 | upgrres.v | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) | |
9 | upgrres.f | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)} | |
10 | 8, 2, 9 | upgrreslem 29336 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}) |
11 | df-f 6567 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2} ↔ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ∧ ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})) | |
12 | 7, 10, 11 | sylanbrc 583 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}) |
13 | upgrres.s | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = 〈(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)〉 | |
14 | opex 5475 | . . . 4 ⊢ 〈(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)〉 ∈ V | |
15 | 13, 14 | eqeltri 2835 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V |
16 | 8, 2, 9, 13 | uhgrspan1lem2 29333 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) |
17 | 16 | eqcomi 2744 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) = (Vtx‘𝑆) |
18 | 8, 2, 9, 13 | uhgrspan1lem3 29334 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) |
19 | 18 | eqcomi 2744 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) = (iEdg‘𝑆) |
20 | 17, 19 | isupgr 29116 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})) |
21 | 15, 20 | mp1i 13 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})) |
22 | 12, 21 | mpbird 257 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2106 ∉ wnel 3044 {crab 3433 Vcvv 3478 ∖ cdif 3960 ⊆ wss 3963 ∅c0 4339 𝒫 cpw 4605 {csn 4631 〈cop 4637 class class class wbr 5148 dom cdm 5689 ran crn 5690 ↾ cres 5691 Fun wfun 6557 Fn wfn 6558 ⟶wf 6559 ‘cfv 6563 ≤ cle 11294 2c2 12319 ♯chash 14366 Vtxcvtx 29028 iEdgciedg 29029 UHGraphcuhgr 29088 UPGraphcupgr 29112 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1792 ax-4 1806 ax-5 1908 ax-6 1965 ax-7 2005 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2139 ax-11 2155 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2706 ax-sep 5302 ax-nul 5312 ax-pr 5438 ax-un 7754 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1540 df-fal 1550 df-ex 1777 df-nf 1781 df-sb 2063 df-mo 2538 df-eu 2567 df-clab 2713 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2814 df-nfc 2890 df-ne 2939 df-nel 3045 df-ral 3060 df-rex 3069 df-rab 3434 df-v 3480 df-sbc 3792 df-dif 3966 df-un 3968 df-in 3970 df-ss 3980 df-nul 4340 df-if 4532 df-pw 4607 df-sn 4632 df-pr 4634 df-op 4638 df-uni 4913 df-br 5149 df-opab 5211 df-mpt 5232 df-id 5583 df-xp 5695 df-rel 5696 df-cnv 5697 df-co 5698 df-dm 5699 df-rn 5700 df-res 5701 df-ima 5702 df-iota 6516 df-fun 6565 df-fn 6566 df-f 6567 df-fv 6571 df-1st 8013 df-2nd 8014 df-vtx 29030 df-iedg 29031 df-uhgr 29090 df-upgr 29114 |
This theorem is referenced by: finsumvtxdg2size 29583 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |