Theorem upgrres 27576

Description: A subgraph obtained by removing one vertex and all edges incident with this vertex from a pseudograph (see uhgrspan1 27573) is a pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 8-Nov-2020.) (Revised by AV, 19-Dec-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
upgrres.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
upgrres.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
upgrres.f	⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)}
upgrres.s	⊢ 𝑆 = ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩

Assertion

Ref	Expression
upgrres	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑖,𝐸   𝑖,𝑁

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑆(𝑖)   𝐹(𝑖)   𝐺(𝑖)   𝑉(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem upgrres

Dummy variable 𝑝 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		upgruhgr 27375	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph)
2		upgrres.e	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
3	2	uhgrfun 27339	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → Fun 𝐸)
4		funres 6460	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fun 𝐸 → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
5	1, 3, 4	3syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
6	5	funfnd 6449	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
7	6	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
8		upgrres.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
9		upgrres.f	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)}
10	8, 2, 9	upgrreslem 27574	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})
11		df-f 6422	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2} ↔ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ∧ ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
12	7, 10, 11	sylanbrc 582	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})
13		upgrres.s	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩
14		opex 5373	. . . 4 ⊢ ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ V
15	13, 14	eqeltri 2835	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
16	8, 2, 9, 13	uhgrspan1lem2 27571	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁})
17	16	eqcomi 2747	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) = (Vtx‘𝑆)
18	8, 2, 9, 13	uhgrspan1lem3 27572	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)
19	18	eqcomi 2747	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) = (iEdg‘𝑆)
20	17, 19	isupgr 27357	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
21	15, 20	mp1i 13	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
22	12, 21	mpbird 256	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108   ∉ wnel 3048  {crab 3067  Vcvv 3422   ∖ cdif 3880   ⊆ wss 3883  ∅c0 4253  𝒫 cpw 4530  {csn 4558  ⟨cop 4564   class class class wbr 5070  dom cdm 5580  ran crn 5581   ↾ cres 5582  Fun wfun 6412   Fn wfn 6413  ⟶wf 6414  ‘cfv 6418   ≤ cle 10941  2c2 11958  ♯chash 13972  Vtxcvtx 27269  iEdgciedg 27270  UHGraphcuhgr 27329  UPGraphcupgr 27353

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-nel 3049  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-fv 6426  df-1st 7804  df-2nd 7805  df-vtx 27271  df-iedg 27272  df-uhgr 27331  df-upgr 27355

This theorem is referenced by:  finsumvtxdg2size  27820