Theorem upgrres 29656

Description: A subgraph obtained by removing one vertex and all edges incident with this vertex from a pseudograph (see uhgrspan1 29653) is a pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 8-Nov-2020.) (Revised by AV, 19-Dec-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
upgrres.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
upgrres.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
upgrres.f	⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)}
upgrres.s	⊢ 𝑆 = ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩

Assertion

Ref	Expression
upgrres	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑖,𝐸   𝑖,𝑁

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑆(𝑖)   𝐹(𝑖)   𝐺(𝑖)   𝑉(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem upgrres

Dummy variable 𝑝 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		upgruhgr 29452	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph)
2		upgrres.e	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
3	2	uhgrfun 29416	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → Fun 𝐸)
4		funres 6578	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fun 𝐸 → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
5	1, 3, 4	3syl 19	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → Fun (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
6	5	funfnd 6567	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
7	6	adantr 485	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹))
8		upgrres.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
9		upgrres.f	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ (𝐸‘𝑖)}
10	8, 2, 9	upgrreslem 29654	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})
11		df-f 6540	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2} ↔ ((𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) Fn dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ∧ ran (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
12	7, 10, 11	sylanbrc 594	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})
13		upgrres.s	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩
14		opex 5445	. . . 4 ⊢ ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ V
15	13, 14	eqeltri 2859	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
16	8, 2, 9, 13	uhgrspan1lem2 29651	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁})
17	16	eqcomi 2772	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) = (Vtx‘𝑆)
18	8, 2, 9, 13	uhgrspan1lem3 29652	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)
19	18	eqcomi 2772	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹) = (iEdg‘𝑆)
20	17, 19	isupgr 29434	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
21	15, 20	mp1i 14	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆 ∈ UPGraph ↔ (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹):dom (𝐸 ↾ 𝐹)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
22	12, 21	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ UPGraph)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143   ∉ wnel 3064  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3455   ∖ cdif 3902   ⊆ wss 3905  ∅c0 4286  𝒫 cpw 4562  {csn 4589  ⟨cop 4595   class class class wbr 5109  dom cdm 5661  ran crn 5662   ↾ cres 5663  Fun wfun 6530   Fn wfn 6531  ⟶wf 6532  ‘cfv 6536   ≤ cle 11239  2c2 12290  ♯chash 14362  Vtxcvtx 29346  iEdgciedg 29347  UHGraphcuhgr 29406  UPGraphcupgr 29430

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-nel 3065  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-fv 6544  df-1st 7982  df-2nd 7983  df-vtx 29348  df-iedg 29349  df-uhgr 29408  df-upgr 29432

This theorem is referenced by:  finsumvtxdg2size  29900