Theorem wwlksnon 28216

Description: The set of walks of a fixed length between two vertices as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wwlksnon.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wwlksnon	⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐺,𝑎,𝑏,𝑤   𝑁,𝑎,𝑏,𝑤   𝑉,𝑎,𝑏

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑈(𝑤,𝑎,𝑏)   𝑉(𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wwlksnon

Dummy variables 𝑔 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wwlksnon 28197	. . 3 ⊢ WWalksNOn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}))
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → WWalksNOn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)})))
3		fveq2 6774	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘𝑔) = (Vtx‘𝐺))
4		wwlksnon.v	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2796	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉)
6	5	adantl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉)
7		oveq12 7284	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) = (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺))
8		fveqeq2 6783	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏 ↔ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏))
9	8	anbi2d 629	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏) ↔ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)))
10	9	adantr 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏) ↔ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)))
11	7, 10	rabeqbidv 3420	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)} = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)})
12	6, 6, 11	mpoeq123dv 7350	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))
13	12	adantl 482	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) → (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))
14		simpl 483	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
15		elex 3450	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
16	15	adantl 482	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝐺 ∈ V)
17	4	fvexi 6788	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 ∈ V
18	17, 17	mpoex 7920	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}) ∈ V
19	18	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}) ∈ V)
20	2, 13, 14, 16, 19	ovmpod 7425	1 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  {crab 3068  Vcvv 3432  ‘cfv 6433  (class class class)co 7275   ∈ cmpo 7277  0cc0 10871  ℕ₀cn0 12233  Vtxcvtx 27366   WWalksN cwwlksn 28191   WWalksNOn cwwlksnon 28192

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5209  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pow 5288  ax-pr 5352  ax-un 7588

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-reu 3072  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3717  df-csb 3833  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-iun 4926  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-mpt 5158  df-id 5489  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-ima 5602  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fn 6436  df-f 6437  df-f1 6438  df-fo 6439  df-f1o 6440  df-fv 6441  df-ov 7278  df-oprab 7279  df-mpo 7280  df-1st 7831  df-2nd 7832  df-wwlksnon 28197

This theorem is referenced by:  iswwlksnon  28218  wwlksnon0  28219