Theorem wwlksnon 30051

Description: The set of walks of a fixed length between two vertices as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wwlksnon.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wwlksnon	⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐺,𝑎,𝑏,𝑤   𝑁,𝑎,𝑏,𝑤   𝑉,𝑎,𝑏

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑈(𝑤,𝑎,𝑏)   𝑉(𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wwlksnon

Dummy variables 𝑔 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wwlksnon 30032	. . 3 ⊢ WWalksNOn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}))
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → WWalksNOn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)})))
3		fveq2 6867	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘𝑔) = (Vtx‘𝐺))
4		wwlksnon.v	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2815	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉)
6	5	adantl 485	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉)
7		oveq12 7405	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) = (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺))
8		fveqeq2 6876	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏 ↔ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏))
9	8	anbi2d 639	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏) ↔ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)))
10	9	adantr 484	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏) ↔ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)))
11	7, 10	rabeqbidv 3432	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)} = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)})
12	6, 6, 11	mpoeq123dv 7471	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))
13	12	adantl 485	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) → (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))
14		simpl 486	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
15		elex 3475	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
16	15	adantl 485	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝐺 ∈ V)
17	4	fvexi 6881	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 ∈ V
18	17, 17	mpoex 8060	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}) ∈ V
19	18	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}) ∈ V)
20	2, 13, 14, 16, 19	ovmpod 7548	1 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1560   ∈ wcel 2142  {crab 3414  Vcvv 3454  ‘cfv 6521  (class class class)co 7396   ∈ cmpo 7398  0cc0 11073  ℕ₀cn0 12481  Vtxcvtx 29197   WWalksN cwwlksn 30026   WWalksNOn cwwlksnon 30027

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5227  ax-sep 5246  ax-nul 5256  ax-pow 5322  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7718

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1100  df-tru 1563  df-fal 1573  df-ex 1800  df-nf 1804  df-sb 2091  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4481  df-pw 4557  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-iun 4951  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-id 5542  df-xp 5653  df-rel 5654  df-cnv 5655  df-co 5656  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-res 5659  df-ima 5660  df-iota 6477  df-fun 6523  df-fn 6524  df-f 6525  df-f1 6526  df-fo 6527  df-f1o 6528  df-fv 6529  df-ov 7399  df-oprab 7400  df-mpo 7401  df-1st 7970  df-2nd 7971  df-wwlksnon 30032

This theorem is referenced by:  iswwlksnon  30053  wwlksnon0  30054