Theorem wwlksnon 27749

Description: The set of walks of a fixed length between two vertices as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wwlksnon.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wwlksnon	⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐺,𝑎,𝑏,𝑤   𝑁,𝑎,𝑏,𝑤   𝑉,𝑎,𝑏

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑈(𝑤,𝑎,𝑏)   𝑉(𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wwlksnon

Dummy variables 𝑔 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wwlksnon 27730	. . 3 ⊢ WWalksNOn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}))
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → WWalksNOn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)})))
3		fveq2 6663	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘𝑔) = (Vtx‘𝐺))
4		wwlksnon.v	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2811	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉)
6	5	adantl 485	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉)
7		oveq12 7165	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) = (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺))
8		fveqeq2 6672	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏 ↔ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏))
9	8	anbi2d 631	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏) ↔ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)))
10	9	adantr 484	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏) ↔ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)))
11	7, 10	rabeqbidv 3398	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)} = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)})
12	6, 6, 11	mpoeq123dv 7229	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))
13	12	adantl 485	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) → (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))
14		simpl 486	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
15		elex 3428	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
16	15	adantl 485	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝐺 ∈ V)
17	4	fvexi 6677	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 ∈ V
18	17, 17	mpoex 7788	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}) ∈ V
19	18	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}) ∈ V)
20	2, 13, 14, 16, 19	ovmpod 7303	1 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111  {crab 3074  Vcvv 3409  ‘cfv 6340  (class class class)co 7156   ∈ cmpo 7158  0cc0 10588  ℕ₀cn0 11947  Vtxcvtx 26901   WWalksN cwwlksn 27724   WWalksNOn cwwlksnon 27725

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2729  ax-rep 5160  ax-sep 5173  ax-nul 5180  ax-pow 5238  ax-pr 5302  ax-un 7465

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-fal 1551  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2557  df-eu 2588  df-clab 2736  df-cleq 2750  df-clel 2830  df-nfc 2901  df-ne 2952  df-ral 3075  df-rex 3076  df-reu 3077  df-rab 3079  df-v 3411  df-sbc 3699  df-csb 3808  df-dif 3863  df-un 3865  df-in 3867  df-ss 3877  df-nul 4228  df-if 4424  df-pw 4499  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-uni 4802  df-iun 4888  df-br 5037  df-opab 5099  df-mpt 5117  df-id 5434  df-xp 5534  df-rel 5535  df-cnv 5536  df-co 5537  df-dm 5538  df-rn 5539  df-res 5540  df-ima 5541  df-iota 6299  df-fun 6342  df-fn 6343  df-f 6344  df-f1 6345  df-fo 6346  df-f1o 6347  df-fv 6348  df-ov 7159  df-oprab 7160  df-mpo 7161  df-1st 7699  df-2nd 7700  df-wwlksnon 27730

This theorem is referenced by:  iswwlksnon  27751  wwlksnon0  27752