Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 298 of 464) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29181) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29182-30704) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30705-46395) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | pjoc2i 29701 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(iii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻) ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0ℎ) | ||
Theorem | pjoc2 29702 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(iii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻) ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0ℎ)) | ||
Theorem | sh0le 29703 | The zero subspace is the smallest subspace. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ch0le 29704 | The zero subspace is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | shle0 29705 | No subspace is smaller than the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | chle0 29706 | No Hilbert lattice element is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | chnlen0 29707 | A Hilbert lattice element that is not a subset of another is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | ch0pss 29708 | The zero subspace is a proper subset of nonzero Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (0ℋ ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | orthin 29709 | The intersection of orthogonal subspaces is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | ssjo 29710 | The lattice join of a subset with its orthocomplement is the whole space. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ) | ||
Theorem | shne0i 29711* | A nonzero subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
Theorem | shs0i 29712 | Hilbert subspace sum with the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | shs00i 29713 | Two subspaces are zero iff their join is zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 = 0ℋ) ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | ch0lei 29714 | The closed subspace zero is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chle0i 29715 | No Hilbert closed subspace is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chne0i 29716* | A nonzero closed subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
Theorem | chocini 29717 | Intersection of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. Part of Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ | ||
Theorem | chj0i 29718 | Join with lattice zero in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chm1i 29719 | Meet with lattice one in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chjcli 29720 | Closure of Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
Theorem | chsleji 29721 | Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chseli 29722* | Membership in subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | chincli 29723 | Closure of Hilbert lattice intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
Theorem | chsscon3i 29724 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chsscon1i 29725 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chsscon2i 29726 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chcon2i 29727 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 = (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chcon1i 29728 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chcon3i 29729 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chunssji 29730 | Union is smaller than Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chjcomi 29731 | Commutative law for join in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chub1i 29732 | Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chub2i 29733 | Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chlubi 29734 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | chlubii 29735 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements (one direction of chlubi 29734). (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | chlej1i 29736 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chlej2i 29737 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chlej12i 29738 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | chlejb1i 29739 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmm1i 29740 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm2i 29741 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm3i 29742 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmm4i 29743 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmj1i 29744 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmj2i 29745 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmj3i 29746 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmj4i 29747 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chnlei 29748 | Equivalent expressions for "not less than" in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chjassi 29749 | Associative law for Hilbert lattice join. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chj00i 29750 | Two Hilbert lattice elements are zero iff their join is zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 = 0ℋ) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chjoi 29751 | The join of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ | ||
Theorem | chj1i 29752 | Join with Hilbert lattice unit. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ ℋ) = ℋ | ||
Theorem | chm0i 29753 | Meet with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 0ℋ) = 0ℋ | ||
Theorem | chm0 29754 | Meet with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∩ 0ℋ) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | shjshsi 29755 | Hilbert lattice join equals the double orthocomplement of subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (⊥‘(⊥‘(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | shjshseli 29756 | A closed subspace sum equals Hilbert lattice join. Part of Lemma 31.1.5 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chne0 29757* | A nonzero closed subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ)) | ||
Theorem | chocin 29758 | Intersection of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. Part of Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chssoc 29759 | A closed subspace less than its orthocomplement is zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | chj0 29760 | Join with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chslej 29761 | Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chincl 29762 | Closure of Hilbert lattice intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ) | ||
Theorem | chsscon3 29763 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chsscon1 29764 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chsscon2 29765 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chpsscon3 29766 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊊ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chpsscon1 29767 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊊ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chpsscon2 29768 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊊ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chjcom 29769 | Commutative law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chub1 29770 | Hilbert lattice join is greater than or equal to its first argument. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chub2 29771 | Hilbert lattice join is greater than or equal to its second argument. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chlub 29772 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chlej1 29773 | Add join to both sides of Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chlej2 29774 | Add join to both sides of Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chlejb1 29775 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chlejb2 29776 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chnle 29777 | Equivalent expressions for "not less than" in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chjo 29778 | The join of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement is all of Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chabs1 29779 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chabs2 29780 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chabs1i 29781 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chabs2i 29782 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chjidm 29783 | Idempotent law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chjidmi 29784 | Idempotent law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chj12i 29785 | A rearrangement of Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chj4i 29786 | Rearrangement of the join of 4 Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | chjjdiri 29787 | Hilbert lattice join distributes over itself. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm1 29788 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chdmm2 29789 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chdmm3 29790 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm4 29791 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmj1 29792 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chdmj2 29793 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chdmj3 29794 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmj4 29795 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chjass 29796 | Associative law for Hilbert lattice join. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | chj12 29797 | A rearrangement of Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | chj4 29798 | Rearrangement of the join of 4 Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ )) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | ledii 29799 | An ortholattice is distributive in one ordering direction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) ⊆ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | lediri 29800 | An ortholattice is distributive in one ordering direction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |