P. 298 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 29701-29800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	hstrbi 29701*	Strong CH-state theorem (bidirectional version). Theorem in [Mayet3] p. 10 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ CHStates ((normℎ‘(𝑓‘𝐴)) = 1 → (normℎ‘(𝑓‘𝐵)) = 1) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	largei 29702*	A Hilbert lattice admits a largei set of states. Remark in [Mayet] p. 370. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 = 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ States (𝑓‘𝐴) = 1)
Theorem	jplem1 29703	Lemma for Jauch-Piron theorem. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐴)‘𝑢))↑2) = 1))
Theorem	jplem2 29704*	Lemma for Jauch-Piron theorem. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))
Theorem	jpi 29705*	The function 𝑆, that maps a closed subspace to the square of the norm of its projection onto a unit vector, is a Jauch-Piron state. Remark in [Mayet] p. 370. (See strlem3a 29687 for the proof that 𝑆 is a state.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → (((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 ∧ (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1) ↔ (𝑆‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 1))
19.7.2  Godowski's equation
Theorem	golem1 29706	Lemma for Godowski's equation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ States → (((𝑓‘𝐹) + (𝑓‘𝐺)) + (𝑓‘𝐻)) = (((𝑓‘𝐷) + (𝑓‘𝑅)) + (𝑓‘𝑆)))
Theorem	golem2 29707	Lemma for Godowski's equation. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ States → ((𝑓‘((𝐹 ∩ 𝐺) ∩ 𝐻)) = 1 → (𝑓‘𝐷) = 1))
Theorem	goeqi 29708	Godowski's equation, shown here as a variant equivalent to Equation SF of [Godowski] p. 730. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∩ 𝐺) ∩ 𝐻) ⊆ 𝐷
Theorem	stcltr1i 29709*	Property of a strong classical state. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	stcltr2i 29710*	Property of a strong classical state. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → 𝐴 = ℋ))
Theorem	stcltrlem1 29711*	Lemma for strong classical state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐵) = 1 → (𝑆‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) = 1))
Theorem	stcltrlem2 29712*	Lemma for strong classical state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	stcltrthi 29713*	Theorem for classically strong set of states. If there exists a "classically strong set of states" on lattice Cℋ (or actually any ortholattice, which would have an identical proof), then any two elements of the lattice commute, i.e., the lattice is distributive. (Proof due to Mladen Pavicic.) Theorem 3.3 of [MegPav2000] p. 2344. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ ∃𝑠 ∈ States ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑠‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑠‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
19.8  Cover relation, atoms, exchange axiom, and modular symmetry
19.8.1  Covers relation; modular pairs
Definition	df-cv 29714*	Define the covers relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68, whose notation we use. Ptak/Pulmannova's notation 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 is read "𝐵 covers 𝐴 " or "𝐴 is covered by 𝐵 " , and it means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. See cvbr 29717 and cvbr2 29718 for membership relations. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ⋖ℋ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ⊊ 𝑦)))}
Definition	df-md 29715*	Define the modular pair relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1, who use the notation (x,y)M for "the ordered pair <x,y> is a modular pair." See mdbr 29729 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑀ℋ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∨ℋ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦))))}
Definition	df-dmd 29716*	Define the dual modular pair relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1, who use the notation (x,y)M* for "the ordered pair <x,y> is a dual modular pair." See dmdbr 29734 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑀ℋ* = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑧 ∩ 𝑥) ∨ℋ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∩ (𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦))))}
Theorem	cvbr 29717*	Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴, which means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvbr2 29718*	Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴. Definition of covers in [Kalmbach] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvcon3 29719	Contraposition law for the covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⋖ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cvpss 29720	The covers relation implies proper subset. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvnbtwn 29721	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ¬ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvnbtwn2 29722	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvnbtwn3 29723	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐴)))
Theorem	cvnbtwn4 29724	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. Part of proof of Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvnsym 29725	The covers relation is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ⋖ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	cvnref 29726	The covers relation is not reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → ¬ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	cvntr 29727	The covers relation is not transitive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⋖ℋ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	spansncv2 29728	Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Proposition 1(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (¬ (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵}))))
Theorem	mdbr 29729*	Binary relation expressing ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ is a modular pair. Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	mdi 29730	Consequence of the modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐶 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdbr2 29731*	Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version has a weaker constraint than mdbr 29729. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	mdbr3 29732*	Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version quantifies an equality instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdbr4 29733*	Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version quantifies an ordering instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdbr 29734*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥 → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	dmdmd 29735	The dual modular pair property expressed in terms of the modular pair property, that hold in Hilbert lattices. Remark 29.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	mddmd 29736	The modular pair property expressed in terms of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ* (⊥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdi 29737	Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdbr2 29738*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version has a weaker constraint than dmdbr 29734. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdi2 29739	Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)) → (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	dmdbr3 29740*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version quantifies an equality instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdbr4 29741*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version quantifies an ordering instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdi4 29742	Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdbr5 29743*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mddmd2 29744*	Relationship between modular pairs and dual-modular pairs. Lemma 1.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝑥))
Theorem	mdsl0 29745	A sublattice condition that transfers the modular pair property. Exercise 12 of [Kalmbach] p. 103. Also Lemma 1.5.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ )) → ((((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) ∧ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷))
Theorem	ssmd1 29746	Ordering implies the modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	ssmd2 29747	Ordering implies the modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	ssdmd1 29748	Ordering implies the dual modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	ssdmd2 29749	Ordering implies the dual modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (⊥‘𝐵) 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐴))
Theorem	dmdsl3 29750	Sublattice mapping for a dual-modular pair. Part of Theorem 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐶)
Theorem	mdsl3 29751	Sublattice mapping for a modular pair. Part of Theorem 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶)
Theorem	mdslle1i 29752	Order preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslle2i 29753	Order preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐴)))
Theorem	mdslj1i 29754	Join preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ∩ 𝐵) = ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslj2i 29755	Meet preservation of the reverse mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∨ℋ 𝐴) = ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐴)))
Theorem	mdsl1i 29756*	If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))) ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	mdsl2i 29757*	If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdsl2bi 29758*	If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvmdi 29759	The covering property implies the modular pair property. Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	mdslmd1lem1 29760	Lemma for mdslmd1i 29764. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))) → (((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐷 → (((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ ((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷))) → ((((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) → ((𝑅 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵))))))
Theorem	mdslmd1lem2 29761	Lemma for mdslmd1i 29764. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))) → (((𝑅 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵) → (((𝑅 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝑅 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))) → (((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝐷) → ((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝑅 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷)))))
Theorem	mdslmd1lem3 29762*	Lemma for mdslmd1i 29764. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))))) → (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐷 → (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷))) → ((((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵))))))
Theorem	mdslmd1lem4 29763*	Lemma for mdslmd1i 29764. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))))) → (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵) → (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))) → (((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐷) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷)))))
Theorem	mdslmd1i 29764	Preservation of the modular pair property in the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2 (meet version). (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → (𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) 𝑀ℋ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslmd2i 29765	Preservation of the modular pair property in the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2 (join version). (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵)) → (𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) 𝑀ℋ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐴)))
Theorem	mdsldmd1i 29766	Preservation of the dual modular pair property in the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → (𝐶 𝑀ℋ* 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) 𝑀ℋ* (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslmd3i 29767	Modular pair conditions that imply the modular pair property in a sublattice. Lemma 1.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) 𝑀ℋ 𝐶) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)) → 𝐷 𝑀ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	mdslmd4i 29768	Modular pair condition that implies the modular pair property in a sublattice. Lemma 1.5.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷)
Theorem	csmdsymi 29769*	Cross-symmetry implies M-symmetry. Theorem 1.9.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 3. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑐 ∈ Cℋ (𝑐 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝑐) ∧ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	mdexchi 29770	An exchange lemma for modular pairs. Lemma 1.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 𝑀ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvmd 29771	The covering property implies the modular pair property. Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cvdmd 29772	The covering property implies the dual modular pair property. Lemma 7.5.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
19.8.2  Atoms
Definition	df-at 29773	Define the set of atoms in a Hilbert lattice. An atom is a nonzero element of a lattice such that anything less than it is zero, i.e. it is the smallest nonzero element of the lattice. Definition of atom in [Kalmbach] p. 15. See ela 29774 and elat2 29775 for membership relations. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ HAtoms = {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝑥}
Theorem	ela 29774	Atoms in a Hilbert lattice are the elements that cover the zero subspace. Definition of atom in [Kalmbach] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	elat2 29775*	Expanded membership relation for the set of atoms, i.e. the predicate "is an atom (of the Hilbert lattice)." An atom is a nonzero element of a lattice such that anything less than it is zero, i.e. it is the smallest nonzero element of the lattice. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 0ℋ)))))
Theorem	elatcv0 29776	A Hilbert lattice element is an atom iff it covers the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	atcv0 29777	An atom covers the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	atssch 29778	Atoms are a subset of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ HAtoms ⊆ Cℋ
Theorem	atelch 29779	An atom is a Hilbert lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )
Theorem	atne0 29780	An atom is not the Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ)
Theorem	atss 29781	A lattice element smaller than an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)))
Theorem	atsseq 29782	Two atoms in a subset relationship are equal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	atcveq0 29783	A Hilbert lattice element covered by an atom must be the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ))
Theorem	h1da 29784	A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐴})) ∈ HAtoms)
Theorem	spansna 29785	The span of the singleton of a vector is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (span‘{𝐴}) ∈ HAtoms)
Theorem	sh1dle 29786	A 1-dimensional subspace is less than or equal to any subspace containing its generating vector. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	ch1dle 29787	A 1-dimensional subspace is less than or equal to any member of Cℋ containing its generating vector. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	atom1d 29788*	The 1-dimensional subspaces of Hilbert space are its atoms. Part of Remark 10.3.5 of [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ ∧ 𝐴 = (span‘{𝑥})))
19.8.3  Superposition principle
Theorem	superpos 29789*	Superposition Principle. If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are distinct atoms, there exists a third atom, distinct from 𝐴 and 𝐵, that is the superposition of 𝐴 and 𝐵. Definition 3.4-3(a) in [MegPav2000] p. 2345 (PDF p. 8). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ≠ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
19.8.4  Atoms, exchange and covering properties, atomicity
Theorem	chcv1 29790	The Hilbert lattice has the covering property. Proposition 1(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chcv2 29791	The Hilbert lattice has the covering property. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chjatom 29792	The join of a closed subspace and an atom equals their subspace sum. Special case of remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65, stating that if 𝐴 or 𝐵 is finite-dimensional, then this equality holds. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	shatomici 29793*	The lattice of Hilbert subspaces is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	hatomici 29794*	The Hilbert lattice is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	hatomic 29795*	A Hilbert lattice is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. Also Definition 3.4-2 in [MegPav2000] p. 2345 (PDF p. 8). (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	shatomistici 29796*	The lattice of Hilbert subspaces is atomistic, i.e. any element is the supremum of its atoms. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (span‘∪ {𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴})
Theorem	hatomistici 29797*	Cℋ is atomistic, i.e. any element is the supremum of its atoms. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ( ∨ℋ ‘{𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴})
Theorem	chpssati 29798*	Two Hilbert lattice elements in a proper subset relationship imply the existence of an atom less than or equal to one but not the other. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	chrelati 29799*	The Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	chrelat2i 29800*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))