Theorem grpsubpropdg 13486

Description: Weak property deduction for the group subtraction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd.b	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
grpsubpropd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))
grpsubpropdg.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
grpsubpropdg.h	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropdg	⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Proof of Theorem grpsubpropdg

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		grpsubpropd.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
2		grpsubpropd.p	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))
3		eqidd 2207	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 = 𝑎)
4		eqidd 2207	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺))
5		grpsubpropdg.g	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
6		grpsubpropdg.h	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑊)
7	2	oveqdr 5982	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))
8	4, 1, 5, 6, 7	grpinvpropdg 13457	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐻))
9	8	fveq1d 5588	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) = ((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))
10	2, 3, 9	oveq123d 5975	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
11	1, 1, 10	mpoeq123dv 6017	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
12		eqid 2206	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
13		eqid 2206	. . . 4 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
14		eqid 2206	. . . 4 ⊢ (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐺)
15		eqid 2206	. . . 4 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐺)
16	12, 13, 14, 15	grpsubfvalg 13427	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))))
17	5, 16	syl 14	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))))
18		eqid 2206	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐻) = (Base‘𝐻)
19		eqid 2206	. . . 4 ⊢ (+g‘𝐻) = (+g‘𝐻)
20		eqid 2206	. . . 4 ⊢ (invg‘𝐻) = (invg‘𝐻)
21		eqid 2206	. . . 4 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (-g‘𝐻)
22	18, 19, 20, 21	grpsubfvalg 13427	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ 𝑊 → (-g‘𝐻) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
23	6, 22	syl 14	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐻) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
24	11, 17, 23	3eqtr4d 2249	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1373   ∈ wcel 2177  ‘cfv 5277  (class class class)co 5954   ∈ cmpo 5956  Basecbs 12882  +_gcplusg 12959  inv_gcminusg 13383  -_gcsg 13384

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-13 2179  ax-14 2180  ax-ext 2188  ax-coll 4164  ax-sep 4167  ax-pow 4223  ax-pr 4258  ax-un 4485  ax-cnex 8029  ax-resscn 8030  ax-1re 8032  ax-addrcl 8035

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-eu 2058  df-mo 2059  df-clab 2193  df-cleq 2199  df-clel 2202  df-nfc 2338  df-ral 2490  df-rex 2491  df-reu 2492  df-rab 2494  df-v 2775  df-sbc 3001  df-csb 3096  df-un 3172  df-in 3174  df-ss 3181  df-pw 3620  df-sn 3641  df-pr 3642  df-op 3644  df-uni 3854  df-int 3889  df-iun 3932  df-br 4049  df-opab 4111  df-mpt 4112  df-id 4345  df-xp 4686  df-rel 4687  df-cnv 4688  df-co 4689  df-dm 4690  df-rn 4691  df-res 4692  df-ima 4693  df-iota 5238  df-fun 5279  df-fn 5280  df-f 5281  df-f1 5282  df-fo 5283  df-f1o 5284  df-fv 5285  df-riota 5909  df-ov 5957  df-oprab 5958  df-mpo 5959  df-1st 6236  df-2nd 6237  df-inn 9050  df-ndx 12885  df-slot 12886  df-base 12888  df-0g 13140  df-minusg 13386  df-sbg 13387

This theorem is referenced by:  rlmsubg  14270