Theorem grpsubpropdg 13176

Description: Weak property deduction for the group subtraction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd.b	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
grpsubpropd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))
grpsubpropdg.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
grpsubpropdg.h	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropdg	⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Proof of Theorem grpsubpropdg

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		grpsubpropd.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
2		grpsubpropd.p	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))
3		eqidd 2194	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 = 𝑎)
4		eqidd 2194	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺))
5		grpsubpropdg.g	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
6		grpsubpropdg.h	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑊)
7	2	oveqdr 5946	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))
8	4, 1, 5, 6, 7	grpinvpropdg 13147	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐻))
9	8	fveq1d 5556	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) = ((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))
10	2, 3, 9	oveq123d 5939	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
11	1, 1, 10	mpoeq123dv 5980	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
12		eqid 2193	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
13		eqid 2193	. . . 4 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
14		eqid 2193	. . . 4 ⊢ (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐺)
15		eqid 2193	. . . 4 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐺)
16	12, 13, 14, 15	grpsubfvalg 13117	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))))
17	5, 16	syl 14	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))))
18		eqid 2193	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐻) = (Base‘𝐻)
19		eqid 2193	. . . 4 ⊢ (+g‘𝐻) = (+g‘𝐻)
20		eqid 2193	. . . 4 ⊢ (invg‘𝐻) = (invg‘𝐻)
21		eqid 2193	. . . 4 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (-g‘𝐻)
22	18, 19, 20, 21	grpsubfvalg 13117	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ 𝑊 → (-g‘𝐻) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
23	6, 22	syl 14	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐻) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
24	11, 17, 23	3eqtr4d 2236	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2164  ‘cfv 5254  (class class class)co 5918   ∈ cmpo 5920  Basecbs 12618  +_gcplusg 12695  inv_gcminusg 13073  -_gcsg 13074

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-coll 4144  ax-sep 4147  ax-pow 4203  ax-pr 4238  ax-un 4464  ax-cnex 7963  ax-resscn 7964  ax-1re 7966  ax-addrcl 7969

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-reu 2479  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2986  df-csb 3081  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-pw 3603  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-int 3871  df-iun 3914  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-mpt 4092  df-id 4324  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666  df-cnv 4667  df-co 4668  df-dm 4669  df-rn 4670  df-res 4671  df-ima 4672  df-iota 5215  df-fun 5256  df-fn 5257  df-f 5258  df-f1 5259  df-fo 5260  df-f1o 5261  df-fv 5262  df-riota 5873  df-ov 5921  df-oprab 5922  df-mpo 5923  df-1st 6193  df-2nd 6194  df-inn 8983  df-ndx 12621  df-slot 12622  df-base 12624  df-0g 12869  df-minusg 13076  df-sbg 13077

This theorem is referenced by:  rlmsubg  13954