| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 130 of 168) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | pcabs 12901 | The prime count of an absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) → (𝑃 pCnt (abs‘𝐴)) = (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pcdvdstr 12902 | The prime count increases under the divisibility relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵)) → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑃 pCnt 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | pcgcd1 12903 | The prime count of a GCD is the minimum of the prime counts of the arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑃 pCnt 𝐵)) → (𝑃 pCnt (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) = (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pcgcd 12904 | The prime count of a GCD is the minimum of the prime counts of the arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑃 pCnt (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) = if((𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑃 pCnt 𝐵), (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴), (𝑃 pCnt 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pc2dvds 12905* | A characterization of divisibility in terms of prime count. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∥ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑝 pCnt 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pc11 12906* | The prime count function, viewed as a function from ℕ to (ℕ ↑𝑚 ℙ), is one-to-one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 pCnt 𝐴) = (𝑝 pCnt 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pcz 12907* | The prime count function can be used as an indicator that a given rational number is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → (𝐴 ∈ ℤ ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ 0 ≤ (𝑝 pCnt 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pcprmpw2 12908* | Self-referential expression for a prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → (∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 ∥ (𝑃↑𝑛) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | pcprmpw 12909* | Self-referential expression for a prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → (∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 = (𝑃↑𝑛) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | dvdsprmpweq 12910* | If a positive integer divides a prime power, it is a prime power. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝑃↑𝑁) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 = (𝑃↑𝑛))) | ||
| Theorem | dvdsprmpweqnn 12911* | If an integer greater than 1 divides a prime power, it is a (proper) prime power. (Contributed by AV, 13-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝑃↑𝑁) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑃↑𝑛))) | ||
| Theorem | dvdsprmpweqle 12912* | If a positive integer divides a prime power, it is a prime power with a smaller exponent. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝑃↑𝑁) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑛 ≤ 𝑁 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑃↑𝑛)))) | ||
| Theorem | difsqpwdvds 12913 | If the difference of two squares is a power of a prime, the prime divides twice the second squared number. (Contributed by AV, 13-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝐵 + 1) < 𝐴) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)) → ((𝐶↑𝐷) = ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐵↑2)) → 𝐶 ∥ (2 · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pcaddlem 12914 | Lemma for pcadd 12915. The original numbers 𝐴 and 𝐵 have been decomposed using the prime count function as (𝑃↑𝑀) · (𝑅 / 𝑆) where 𝑅, 𝑆 are both not divisible by 𝑃 and 𝑀 = (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴), and similarly for 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((𝑃↑𝑀) · (𝑅 / 𝑆))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((𝑃↑𝑁) · (𝑇 / 𝑈))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ∈ ℤ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∈ ℤ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ (𝑃 pCnt (𝐴 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pcadd 12915 | An inequality for the prime count of a sum. This is the source of the ultrametric inequality for the p-adic metric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑃 pCnt 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑃 pCnt (𝐴 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pcadd2 12916 | The inequality of pcadd 12915 becomes an equality when one of the factors has prime count strictly less than the other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) < (𝑃 pCnt 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) = (𝑃 pCnt (𝐴 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pcmptcl 12917 | Closure for the prime power map. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:ℕ⟶ℕ ∧ seq1( · , 𝐹):ℕ⟶ℕ)) | ||
| Theorem | pcmpt 12918* | Construct a function with given prime count characteristics. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑃 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁)) = if(𝑃 ≤ 𝑁, 𝐵, 0)) | ||
| Theorem | pcmpt2 12919* | Dividing two prime count maps yields a number with all dividing primes confined to an interval. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑃 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt ((seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑀) / (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) = if((𝑃 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑁), 𝐵, 0)) | ||
| Theorem | pcmptdvds 12920 | The partial products of the prime power map form a divisibility chain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) ∥ (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | pcprod 12921* | The product of the primes taken to their respective powers reconstructs the original number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑(𝑛 pCnt 𝑁)), 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) = 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | sumhashdc 12922* | The sum of 1 over a set is the size of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0) = (♯‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | fldivp1 12923 | The difference between the floors of adjacent fractions is either 1 or 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((⌊‘((𝑀 + 1) / 𝑁)) − (⌊‘(𝑀 / 𝑁))) = if(𝑁 ∥ (𝑀 + 1), 1, 0)) | ||
| Theorem | pcfaclem 12924 | Lemma for pcfac 12925. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑀))) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | pcfac 12925* | Calculate the prime count of a factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (𝑃 pCnt (!‘𝑁)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑀)(⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑘)))) | ||
| Theorem | pcbc 12926* | Calculate the prime count of a binomial coefficient. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (𝑃 pCnt (𝑁C𝐾)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)((⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑘))) − ((⌊‘((𝑁 − 𝐾) / (𝑃↑𝑘))) + (⌊‘(𝐾 / (𝑃↑𝑘)))))) | ||
| Theorem | qexpz 12927 | If a power of a rational number is an integer, then the number is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴↑𝑁) ∈ ℤ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | expnprm 12928 | A second or higher power of a rational number is not a prime number. Or by contraposition, the n-th root of a prime number is not rational. Suggested by Norm Megill. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → ¬ (𝐴↑𝑁) ∈ ℙ) | ||
| Theorem | oddprmdvds 12929* | Every positive integer which is not a power of two is divisible by an odd prime number. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐾 = (2↑𝑛)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2})𝑝 ∥ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | prmpwdvds 12930 | A relation involving divisibility by a prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐷 ∥ (𝐾 · (𝑃↑𝑁)) ∧ ¬ 𝐷 ∥ (𝐾 · (𝑃↑(𝑁 − 1))))) → (𝑃↑𝑁) ∥ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | pockthlem 12931 | Lemma for pockthg 12932. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄 pCnt 𝐴) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑄)) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑄 pCnt (𝑃 − 1))) | ||
| Theorem | pockthg 12932* | The generalized Pocklington's theorem. If 𝑁 − 1 = 𝐴 · 𝐵 where 𝐵 < 𝐴, then 𝑁 is prime if and only if for every prime factor 𝑝 of 𝐴, there is an 𝑥 such that 𝑥↑(𝑁 − 1) = 1( mod 𝑁) and gcd (𝑥↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑝) − 1, 𝑁) = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ∥ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ (((𝑥↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = 1 ∧ (((𝑥↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑝)) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℙ) | ||
| Theorem | pockthi 12933 | Pocklington's theorem, which gives a sufficient criterion for a number 𝑁 to be prime. This is the preferred method for verifying large primes, being much more efficient to compute than trial division. This form has been optimized for application to specific large primes; see pockthg 12932 for a more general closed-form version. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐺 · 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐷 · (𝑃↑𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐷 < (𝑃↑𝐸) & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝑀) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (((𝐴↑𝐺) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1 ⇒ ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ | ||
| Theorem | infpnlem1 12934* | Lemma for infpn 12936. The smallest divisor (greater than 1) 𝑀 of 𝑁! + 1 is a prime greater than 𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = ((!‘𝑁) + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → (((1 < 𝑀 ∧ (𝐾 / 𝑀) ∈ ℕ) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℕ ((1 < 𝑗 ∧ (𝐾 / 𝑗) ∈ ℕ) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑗)) → (𝑁 < 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℕ ((𝑀 / 𝑗) ∈ ℕ → (𝑗 = 1 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑀))))) | ||
| Theorem | infpnlem2 12935* | Lemma for infpn 12936. For any positive integer 𝑁, there exists a prime number 𝑗 greater than 𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = ((!‘𝑁) + 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ (𝑁 < 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝑗 / 𝑘) ∈ ℕ → (𝑘 = 1 ∨ 𝑘 = 𝑗)))) | ||
| Theorem | infpn 12936* | There exist infinitely many prime numbers: for any positive integer 𝑁, there exists a prime number 𝑗 greater than 𝑁. (See infpn2 13079 for the equinumerosity version.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ (𝑁 < 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝑗 / 𝑘) ∈ ℕ → (𝑘 = 1 ∨ 𝑘 = 𝑗)))) | ||
| Theorem | prmunb 12937* | The primes are unbounded. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ 𝑁 < 𝑝) | ||
| Theorem | 1arithlem1 12938* | Lemma for 1arith 12942. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑀‘𝑁) = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | 1arithlem2 12939* | Lemma for 1arith 12942. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑀‘𝑁)‘𝑃) = (𝑃 pCnt 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 1arithlem3 12940* | Lemma for 1arith 12942. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑀‘𝑁):ℙ⟶ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | 1arithlem4 12941* | Lemma for 1arith 12942. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑦 ∈ ℙ, (𝑦↑(𝐹‘𝑦)), 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℙ⟶ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 𝑞)) → (𝐹‘𝑞) = 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ 𝐹 = (𝑀‘𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | 1arith 12942* | Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a sequence of prime exponents, for which only finitely many primes have nonzero exponent. The function 𝑀 maps the set of positive integers one-to-one onto the set of prime factorizations 𝑅. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑒 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 ℙ) ∣ (◡𝑒 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin} ⇒ ⊢ 𝑀:ℕ–1-1-onto→𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | 1arith2 12943* | Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a finite monotonic 1-based sequence of primes. Every positive integer has a unique prime factorization. Theorem 1.10 in [ApostolNT] p. 17. This is Metamath 100 proof #80. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑒 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 ℙ) ∣ (◡𝑒 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin} ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑔 ∈ 𝑅 (𝑀‘𝑧) = 𝑔 | ||
| Syntax | cgz 12944 | Extend class notation with the set of gaussian integers. |
| class ℤ[i] | ||
| Definition | df-gz 12945 | Define the set of gaussian integers, which are complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are integers. (Note that the [i] is actually part of the symbol token and has no independent meaning.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ℤ[i] = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((ℜ‘𝑥) ∈ ℤ ∧ (ℑ‘𝑥) ∈ ℤ)} | ||
| Theorem | elgz 12946 | Elementhood in the gaussian integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (ℜ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ ∧ (ℑ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ)) | ||
| Theorem | gzcn 12947 | A gaussian integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | zgz 12948 | An integer is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | igz 12949 | i is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ i ∈ ℤ[i] | ||
| Theorem | gznegcl 12950 | The gaussian integers are closed under negation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → -𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzcjcl 12951 | The gaussian integers are closed under conjugation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → (∗‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzaddcl 12952 | The gaussian integers are closed under addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzmulcl 12953 | The gaussian integers are closed under multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzreim 12954 | Construct a gaussian integer from real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzsubcl 12955 | The gaussian integers are closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzabssqcl 12956 | The squared norm of a gaussian integer is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem5 12957 | Lemma for 4sq 12985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ)) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem6 12958 | Lemma for 4sq 12985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (-(𝑀 / 2) ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < (𝑀 / 2))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem7 12959 | Lemma for 4sq 12985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵↑2) ≤ (((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2)) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem8 12960 | Lemma for 4sq 12985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐵↑2))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem9 12961 | Lemma for 4sq 12985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐵↑2) = 0) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝐴↑2)) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem10 12962 | Lemma for 4sq 12985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐵↑2)) = 0) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ ((𝐴↑2) − (((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem1 12963* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. The set 𝑆 is the set of all numbers that are expressible as a sum of four squares. Our goal is to show that 𝑆 = ℕ0; here we show one subset direction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ0 | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem2 12964* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. Change bound variables in 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) + ((𝑐↑2) + (𝑑↑2)))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem3 12965* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. Sufficient condition to be in 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem4a 12966* | Lemma for 4sqlem4 12967. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (((abs‘𝐴)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐵)↑2)) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem4 12967* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. We can express the four-square property more compactly in terms of gaussian integers, because the norms of gaussian integers are exactly sums of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ ℤ[i] ∃𝑣 ∈ ℤ[i] 𝐴 = (((abs‘𝑢)↑2) + ((abs‘𝑣)↑2))) | ||
| Theorem | mul4sqlem 12968* | Lemma for mul4sq 12969: algebraic manipulations. The extra assumptions involving 𝑀 would let us know not just that the product is a sum of squares, but also that it preserves divisibility by 𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (((abs‘𝐴)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐵)↑2)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (((abs‘𝐶)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐷)↑2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐶) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵 − 𝐷) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 / 𝑀) ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 / 𝑀) · (𝑌 / 𝑀)) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | mul4sq 12969* | Euler's four-square identity: The product of two sums of four squares is also a sum of four squares. This is usually quoted as an explicit formula involving eight real variables; we save some time by working with complex numbers (gaussian integers) instead, so that we only have to work with four variables, and also hiding the actual formula for the product in the proof of mul4sqlem 12968. (For the curious, the explicit formula that is used is ( ∣ 𝑎 ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑏 ∣ ↑2)( ∣ 𝑐 ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑑 ∣ ↑2) = ∣ 𝑎∗ · 𝑐 + 𝑏 · 𝑑∗ ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑎∗ · 𝑑 − 𝑏 · 𝑐∗ ∣ ↑2.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlemafi 12970* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlemffi 12971* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. ran 𝐹 is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqleminfi 12972* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹 is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqexercise1 12973* | Exercise which may help in understanding the proof of 4sqlemsdc 12975. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (𝑥↑2)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → DECID 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqexercise2 12974* | Exercise which may help in understanding the proof of 4sqlemsdc 12975. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → DECID 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlemsdc 12975* |
Lemma for 4sq 12985. The property of being the sum of four
squares is
decidable.
The proof involves showing that (for a particular 𝐴) there are only a finite number of possible ways that it could be the sum of four squares, so checking each of those possibilities in turn decides whether the number is the sum of four squares. If this proof is hard to follow, especially because of its length, the simplified versions at 4sqexercise1 12973 and 4sqexercise2 12974 may help clarify, as they are using very much the same techniques on simplified versions of this lemma. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → DECID 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem11 12976* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. Use the pigeonhole principle to show that the sets {𝑚↑2 ∣ 𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)} and {-1 − 𝑛↑2 ∣ 𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)} have a common element, mod 𝑃. Note that although the conclusion is stated in terms of 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹 being nonempty, it is also inhabited by 4sqleminfi 12972 and fin0 7074. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem12 12977* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. For any odd prime 𝑃, there is a 𝑘 < 𝑃 such that 𝑘𝑃 − 1 is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ (1...(𝑃 − 1))∃𝑢 ∈ ℤ[i] (((abs‘𝑢)↑2) + 1) = (𝑘 · 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem13m 12978* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑀 < 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem14 12979* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem15 12980* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑅 = 𝑀) → ((((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐸↑2)) = 0 ∧ ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐹↑2)) = 0) ∧ (((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐺↑2)) = 0 ∧ ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐻↑2)) = 0))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem16 12981* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ ((𝑅 = 0 ∨ 𝑅 = 𝑀) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑃)))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem17 12982* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem18 12983* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. Inductive step, odd prime case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem19 12984* | Lemma for 4sq 12985. The proof is by strong induction - we show that if all the integers less than 𝑘 are in 𝑆, then 𝑘 is as well. In this part of the proof we do the induction argument and dispense with all the cases except the odd prime case, which is sent to 4sqlem18 12983. If 𝑘 is 0, 1, 2, we show 𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 directly; otherwise if 𝑘 is composite, 𝑘 is the product of two numbers less than it (and hence in 𝑆 by assumption), so by mul4sq 12969 𝑘 ∈ 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ ℕ0 = 𝑆 | ||
| Theorem | 4sq 12985* | Lagrange's four-square theorem, or Bachet's conjecture: every nonnegative integer is expressible as a sum of four squares. This is Metamath 100 proof #19. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) + ((𝑐↑2) + (𝑑↑2)))) | ||
| Theorem | dec2dvds 12986 | Divisibility by two is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐵 · 2) = 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ ;𝐴𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | dec5dvds 12987 | Divisibility by five is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 < 5 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 5 ∥ ;𝐴𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | dec5dvds2 12988 | Divisibility by five is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 < 5 & ⊢ (5 + 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 5 ∥ ;𝐴𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | dec5nprm 12989 | A decimal number greater than 10 and ending with five is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ ¬ ;𝐴5 ∈ ℙ | ||
| Theorem | dec2nprm 12990 | A decimal number greater than 10 and ending with an even digit is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐵 · 2) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ ;𝐴𝐶 ∈ ℙ | ||
| Theorem | modxai 12991 | Add exponents in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐶) mod 𝑁) = (𝐿 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐸 & ⊢ ((𝐷 · 𝑁) + 𝑀) = (𝐾 · 𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐸) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | mod2xi 12992 | Double exponents in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (2 · 𝐵) = 𝐸 & ⊢ ((𝐷 · 𝑁) + 𝑀) = (𝐾 · 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐸) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | modxp1i 12993 | Add one to an exponent in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝐵 + 1) = 𝐸 & ⊢ ((𝐷 · 𝑁) + 𝑀) = (𝐾 · 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐸) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | modsubi 12994 | Subtract from within a mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐴 mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝑀 + 𝐵) = 𝐾 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | gcdi 12995 | Calculate a GCD via Euclid's algorithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝑁 gcd 𝑅) = 𝐺 & ⊢ ((𝐾 · 𝑁) + 𝑅) = 𝑀 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 𝐺 | ||
| Theorem | gcdmodi 12996 | Calculate a GCD via Euclid's algorithm. Theorem 5.6 in [ApostolNT] p. 109. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ (𝐾 mod 𝑁) = (𝑅 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝑁 gcd 𝑅) = 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 gcd 𝑁) = 𝐺 | ||
| Theorem | numexp0 12997 | Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴↑0) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | numexp1 12998 | Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴↑1) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | numexpp1 12999 | Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝑀 + 1) = 𝑁 & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝑀) · 𝐴) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴↑𝑁) = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | numexp2x 13000 | Double an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (2 · 𝑀) = 𝑁 & ⊢ (𝐴↑𝑀) = 𝐷 & ⊢ (𝐷 · 𝐷) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴↑𝑁) = 𝐶 | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |