P. 100 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 9901-10000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	decbin3 9901	Decompose base 4 into base 2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ ((4 · 𝐴) + 3) = ((2 · ((2 · 𝐴) + 1)) + 1)
Theorem	halfthird 9902	Half minus a third. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jul-2015.)
⊢ ((1 / 2) − (1 / 3)) = (1 / 6)
Theorem	5recm6rec 9903	One fifth minus one sixth. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((1 / 5) − (1 / 6)) = (1 / ;30)
4.4.11  Upper sets of integers
Syntax	cuz 9904	Extend class notation with the upper integer function. Read "ℤ≥‘𝑀 " as "the set of integers greater than or equal to 𝑀".
class ℤ≥
Definition	df-uz 9905*	Define a function whose value at 𝑗 is the semi-infinite set of contiguous integers starting at 𝑗, which we will also call the upper integers starting at 𝑗. Read "ℤ≥‘𝑀 " as "the set of integers greater than or equal to 𝑀". See uzval 9906 for its value, uzssz 9925 for its relationship to ℤ, nnuz 9941 and nn0uz 9940 for its relationships to ℕ and ℕ0, and eluz1 9908 and eluz2 9910 for its membership relations. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ℤ≥ = (𝑗 ∈ ℤ ↦ {𝑘 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝑗 ≤ 𝑘})
Theorem	uzval 9906*	The value of the upper integers function. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (ℤ≥‘𝑁) = {𝑘 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝑁 ≤ 𝑘})
Theorem	uzf 9907	The domain and codomain of the upper integers function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ℤ≥:ℤ⟶𝒫 ℤ
Theorem	eluz1 9908	Membership in the upper set of integers starting at 𝑀. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)))
Theorem	eluzel2 9909	Implication of membership in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	eluz2 9910	Membership in an upper set of integers. We use the fact that a function's value (under our function value definition) is empty outside of its domain to show 𝑀 ∈ ℤ. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁))
Theorem	eluzmn 9911	Membership in an earlier upper set of integers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 − 𝑁)))
Theorem	eluz1i 9912	Membership in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.)
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁))
Theorem	eluzuzle 9913	An integer in an upper set of integers is an element of an upper set of integers with a smaller bound. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	eluzelz 9914	A member of an upper set of integers is an integer. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	eluzelre 9915	A member of an upper set of integers is a real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	eluzelcn 9916	A member of an upper set of integers is a complex number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝑁 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	eluzle 9917	Implication of membership in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)
Theorem	eluz 9918	Membership in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↔ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁))
Theorem	uzid 9919	Membership of the least member in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uzidd 9920	Membership of the least member in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uzn0 9921	The upper integers are all nonempty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ran ℤ≥ → 𝑀 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	uztrn 9922	Transitive law for sets of upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))
Theorem	uztrn2 9923	Transitive law for sets of upper integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2013.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑍)
Theorem	uzneg 9924	Contraposition law for upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → -𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘-𝑁))
Theorem	uzssz 9925	An upper set of integers is a subset of all integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⊆ ℤ
Theorem	uzss 9926	Subset relationship for two sets of upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uztric 9927	Trichotomy of the ordering relation on integers, stated in terms of upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∨ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)))
Theorem	uz11 9928	The upper integers function is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ↔ 𝑀 = 𝑁))
Theorem	eluzp1m1 9929	Membership in the next upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	eluzp1l 9930	Strict ordering implied by membership in the next upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → 𝑀 < 𝑁)
Theorem	eluzp1p1 9931	Membership in the next upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1)))
Theorem	eluzaddi 9932	Membership in a later upper set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Nov-2007.)
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾)))
Theorem	eluzsubi 9933	Membership in an earlier upper set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Nov-2007.)
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾)) → (𝑁 − 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	eluzadd 9934	Membership in a later upper set of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾)))
Theorem	eluzsub 9935	Membership in an earlier upper set of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾))) → (𝑁 − 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uzm1 9936	Choices for an element of an upper interval of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 = 𝑀 ∨ (𝑁 − 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)))
Theorem	uznn0sub 9937	The nonnegative difference of integers is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 − 𝑀) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	uzin 9938	Intersection of two upper intervals of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∩ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) = (ℤ≥‘if(𝑀 ≤ 𝑁, 𝑁, 𝑀)))
Theorem	uzp1 9939	Choices for an element of an upper interval of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))))
Theorem	nn0uz 9940	Nonnegative integers expressed as an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ℕ0 = (ℤ≥‘0)
Theorem	nnuz 9941	Positive integers expressed as an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ℕ = (ℤ≥‘1)
Theorem	elnnuz 9942	A positive integer expressed as a member of an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘1))
Theorem	elnn0uz 9943	A nonnegative integer expressed as a member an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0))
Theorem	5eluz3 9944	5 is an integer greater than or equal to 3. (Contributed by AV, 7-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 5 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)
Theorem	uzuzle23 9945	An integer in the upper set of integers starting at 3 is element of the upper set of integers starting at 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	uzuzle24 9946	An integer greater than or equal to 4 is an integer greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → 𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	uzuzle34 9947	An integer greater than or equal to 4 is an integer greater than or equal to 3. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → 𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))
Theorem	uzuzle35 9948	An integer greater than or equal to 5 is an integer greater than or equal to 3. (Contributed by AV, 15-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘5) → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))
Theorem	eluz2nn 9949	An integer is greater than or equal to 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 3-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eluz3nn 9950	An integer greater than or equal to 3 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eluz4eluz2 9951	An integer greater than or equal to 4 is an integer greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → 𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	eluz4nn 9952	An integer greater than or equal to 4 is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → 𝑋 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eluzge2nn0 9953	If an integer is greater than or equal to 2, then it is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eluz2n0 9954	An integer greater than or equal to 2 is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝑁 ≠ 0)
Theorem	eluzge3nn 9955	If an integer is greater than 3, then it is a positive integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	uz3m2nn 9956	An integer greater than or equal to 3 decreased by 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → (𝑁 − 2) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	1eluzge0 9957	1 is an integer greater than or equal to 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 1 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0)
Theorem	2eluzge0 9958	2 is an integer greater than or equal to 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 2 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0)
Theorem	2eluzge1 9959	2 is an integer greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 2 ∈ (ℤ≥‘1)
Theorem	uznnssnn 9960	The upper integers starting from a natural are a subset of the naturals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ⊆ ℕ)
Theorem	raluz 9961*	Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	raluz2 9962*	Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	rexuz 9963*	Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	rexuz2 9964*	Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	2rexuz 9965*	Double existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑚 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	peano2uz 9966	Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	peano2uzs 9967	Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2013.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ 𝑍)
Theorem	peano2uzr 9968	Reversed second Peano axiom for upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uzaddcl 9969	Addition closure law for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	nn0pzuz 9970	The sum of a nonnegative integer and an integer is an integer greater than or equal to that integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 + 𝑍) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑍))
Theorem	uzind4 9971*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzind4ALT 9972*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The last four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are the basis and the induction step. Either uzind4 9971 or uzind4ALT 9972 may be used; see comment for nnind 9303. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzind4s 9973*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑘]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑘]𝜑)
Theorem	uzind4s2 9974*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. Use this instead of uzind4s 9973 when 𝑗 and 𝑘 must be distinct in [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑗]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → ([𝑘 / 𝑗]𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑗]𝜑)
Theorem	uzind4i 9975*	Induction on the upper integers that start at 𝑀. The first four give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. This is a stronger version of uzind4 9971 assuming that 𝜓 holds unconditionally. Notice that 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) implies that the lower bound 𝑀 is an integer (𝑀 ∈ ℤ, see eluzel2 9909). (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	indstr 9976*	Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)
Theorem	infrenegsupex 9977*	The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴 is the negative of the supremum of the negatives of its elements. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -sup({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supinfneg 9978*	If a set of real numbers has a least upper bound, the set of the negation of those numbers has a greatest lower bound. For a theorem which is similar but only for the boundedness part, see ublbneg 9996. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ 𝐴} ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ 𝐴}𝑧 < 𝑦)))
Theorem	infsupneg 9979*	If a set of real numbers has a greatest lower bound, the set of the negation of those numbers has a least upper bound. To go in the other direction see supinfneg 9978. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ 𝐴} ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ 𝐴}𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	supminfex 9980*	A supremum is the negation of the infimum of that set's image under negation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -inf({𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	infregelbex 9981*	Any lower bound of a set of real numbers with an infimum is less than or equal to the infimum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ≤ inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧))
Theorem	eluznn0 9982	Membership in a nonnegative upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eluznn 9983	Membership in a positive upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ. (Contributed by JJ, 1-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eluz2b1 9984	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 1 < 𝑁))
Theorem	eluz2gt1 9985	An integer greater than or equal to 2 is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 1 < 𝑁)
Theorem	eluz2b2 9986	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 1 < 𝑁))
Theorem	eluz2b3 9987	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 1))
Theorem	uz2m1nn 9988	One less than an integer greater than or equal to 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	1nuz2 9989	1 is not in (ℤ≥‘2). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ¬ 1 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)
Theorem	elnn1uz2 9990	A positive integer is either 1 or greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ↔ (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)))
Theorem	uz2mulcl 9991	Closure of multiplication of integers greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑀 · 𝑁) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	indstr2 9992*	Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). The first two hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)
Theorem	eluzdc 9993	Membership of an integer in an upper set of integers is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → DECID 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	elnn0dc 9994	Membership of an integer in ℕ0 is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → DECID 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	elnndc 9995	Membership of an integer in ℕ is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → DECID 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	ublbneg 9996*	The image under negation of a bounded-above set of reals is bounded below. For a theorem which is similar but also adds that the bounds need to be the tightest possible, see supinfneg 9978. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	eqreznegel 9997*	Two ways to express the image under negation of a set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℤ → {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
Theorem	negm 9998*	The image under negation of an inhabited set of reals is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
Theorem	lbzbi 9999*	If a set of reals is bounded below, it is bounded below by an integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	nn01to3 10000	A (nonnegative) integer between 1 and 3 must be 1, 2 or 3. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 1 ≤ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 3) → (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 = 2 ∨ 𝑁 = 3))