MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  0subcat Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem 0subcat 17927
Description: For any category 𝐶, the empty set is a (full) subcategory of 𝐶, see example 4.3(1.a) in [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2020.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
0subcat (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶))

Proof of Theorem 0subcat
Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 0ssc 17926 . 2 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ ⊆cat (Homf𝐶))
2 ral0 4454 . . 3 𝑥 ∈ ∅ (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑧 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝑧))
32a1i 11 . 2 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑧 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝑧)))
4 eqid 2760 . . 3 (Homf𝐶) = (Homf𝐶)
5 eqid 2760 . . 3 (Id‘𝐶) = (Id‘𝐶)
6 eqid 2760 . . 3 (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐶)
7 id 23 . . 3 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
8 f0 6756 . . . . . 6 ∅:∅⟶∅
9 ffn 6702 . . . . . 6 (∅:∅⟶∅ → ∅ Fn ∅)
108, 9ax-mp 5 . . . . 5 ∅ Fn ∅
11 0xp 5754 . . . . . 6 (∅ × ∅) = ∅
1211fneq2i 6630 . . . . 5 (∅ Fn (∅ × ∅) ↔ ∅ Fn ∅)
1310, 12mpbir 234 . . . 4 ∅ Fn (∅ × ∅)
1413a1i 11 . . 3 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ Fn (∅ × ∅))
154, 5, 6, 7, 14issubc2 17925 . 2 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (∅ ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶) ↔ (∅ ⊆cat (Homf𝐶) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑧 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝑧)))))
161, 3, 15mpbir2and 726 1 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wa 401  wcel 2145  wral 3076  c0 4279  cop 4590   class class class wbr 5103   × cxp 5653   Fn wfn 6528  wf 6529  cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7413  compcco 17354  Catccat 17752  Idccid 17753  Homf chomf 17754  cat cssc 17896  Subcatcsubc 17898
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7736
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-ov 7416  df-oprab 7417  df-mpo 7418  df-1st 7986  df-2nd 7987  df-pm 8829  df-ixp 8905  df-homf 17758  df-ssc 17899  df-subc 17901
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator