MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  0subcat Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem 0subcat 17912
Description: For any category 𝐶, the empty set is a (full) subcategory of 𝐶, see example 4.3(1.a) in [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2020.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
0subcat (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶))

Proof of Theorem 0subcat
Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 0ssc 17911 . 2 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ ⊆cat (Homf𝐶))
2 ral0 4461 . . 3 𝑥 ∈ ∅ (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑧 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝑧))
32a1i 11 . 2 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑧 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝑧)))
4 eqid 2765 . . 3 (Homf𝐶) = (Homf𝐶)
5 eqid 2765 . . 3 (Id‘𝐶) = (Id‘𝐶)
6 eqid 2765 . . 3 (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐶)
7 id 23 . . 3 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
8 f0 6763 . . . . . 6 ∅:∅⟶∅
9 ffn 6709 . . . . . 6 (∅:∅⟶∅ → ∅ Fn ∅)
108, 9ax-mp 5 . . . . 5 ∅ Fn ∅
11 0xp 5762 . . . . . 6 (∅ × ∅) = ∅
1211fneq2i 6637 . . . . 5 (∅ Fn (∅ × ∅) ↔ ∅ Fn ∅)
1310, 12mpbir 234 . . . 4 ∅ Fn (∅ × ∅)
1413a1i 11 . . 3 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ Fn (∅ × ∅))
154, 5, 6, 7, 14issubc2 17910 . 2 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (∅ ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶) ↔ (∅ ⊆cat (Homf𝐶) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑧 ∈ ∅ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝑧)))))
161, 3, 15mpbir2and 726 1 (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wa 401  wcel 2146  wral 3081  c0 4286  cop 4597   class class class wbr 5111   × cxp 5661   Fn wfn 6535  wf 6536  cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7416  compcco 17339  Catccat 17737  Idccid 17738  Homf chomf 17739  cat cssc 17881  Subcatcsubc 17883
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7738
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-1st 7988  df-2nd 7989  df-pm 8829  df-ixp 8898  df-homf 17743  df-ssc 17884  df-subc 17886
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator