| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 179 of 514) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31553) |
(31554-33076) |
(33077-51302) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | mreincl 17801 | Two closed sets have a closed intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | mreuni 17802 | Since the entire base set of a Moore collection is the greatest element of it, the base set can be recovered from a Moore collection by set union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → ∪ 𝐶 = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | mreunirn 17803 | Two ways to express the notion of being a Moore collection on an unspecified base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ∪ ran Moore ↔ 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘∪ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ismred 17804* | Properties that determine a Moore collection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑠 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | ismred2 17805* | Properties that determine a Moore collection, using restricted intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑠) ∈ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | mremre 17806 | The Moore collections of subsets of a space, viewed as a kind of subset of the power set, form a Moore collection in their own right on the power set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (Moore‘𝑋) ∈ (Moore‘𝒫 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | submre 17807 | The subcollection of a closed set system below a given closed set is itself a closed set system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝒫 𝐴) ∈ (Moore‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | xrsle 17808 | The ordering of the extended real number structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘ℝ*𝑠) | ||
| Theorem | xrge0le 17809 | The "less than or equal to" relation in the extended real numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘(ℝ*𝑠 ↾s (0[,]+∞))) | ||
| Theorem | xrsbas 17810 | The base set of the extended real number structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ℝ* = (Base‘ℝ*𝑠) | ||
| Theorem | xrge0base 17811 | The base of the extended nonnegative real numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (0[,]+∞) = (Base‘(ℝ*𝑠 ↾s (0[,]+∞))) | ||
| Theorem | mrcflem 17812* | The domain and codomain of the function expression for Moore closures. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ ∩ {𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑠}):𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fnmrc 17813 | Moore-closure is a well-behaved function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ mrCls Fn ∪ ran Moore | ||
| Theorem | mrcfval 17814* | Value of the function expression for the Moore closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ ∩ {𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑠})) | ||
| Theorem | mrcf 17815 | The Moore closure is a function mapping arbitrary subsets to closed sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | mrcval 17816* | Evaluation of the Moore closure of a set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 6-Jun-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑈) = ∩ {𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑠}) | ||
| Theorem | mrccl 17817 | The Moore closure of a set is a closed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑈) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | mrcsncl 17818 | The Moore closure of a singleton is a closed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘{𝑈}) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | mrcid 17819 | The closure of a closed set is itself. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑈) = 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | mrcssv 17820 | The closure of a set is a subset of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑈) ⊆ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | mrcidb 17821 | A set is closed iff it is equal to its closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑈) = 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | mrcss 17822 | Closure preserves subset ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑈) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mrcssid 17823 | The closure of a set is a superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | mrcidb2 17824 | A set is closed iff it contains its closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑈) ⊆ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | mrcidm 17825 | The closure operation is idempotent. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑈)) = (𝐹‘𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | mrcsscl 17826 | The closure is the minimal closed set; any closed set which contains the generators is a superset of the closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | mrcuni 17827 | Idempotence of closure under a general union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑈) = (𝐹‘∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑈))) | ||
| Theorem | mrcun 17828 | Idempotence of closure under a pair union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘(𝑈 ∪ 𝑉)) = (𝐹‘((𝐹‘𝑈) ∪ (𝐹‘𝑉)))) | ||
| Theorem | mrcssvd 17829 | The Moore closure of a set is a subset of the base. Deduction form of mrcssv 17820. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | mrcssd 17830 | Moore closure preserves subset ordering. Deduction form of mrcss 17822. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑈) ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mrcssidd 17831 | A set is contained in its Moore closure. Deduction form of mrcssid 17823. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | mrcidmd 17832 | Moore closure is idempotent. Deduction form of mrcidm 17825. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘(𝑁‘𝑈)) = (𝑁‘𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | mressmrcd 17833 | In a Moore system, if a set is between another set and its closure, the two sets have the same closure. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | submrc 17834 | In a closure system which is cut off above some level, closures below that level act as normal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (mrCls‘(𝐶 ∩ 𝒫 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐷) → (𝐺‘𝑈) = (𝐹‘𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | mrieqvlemd 17835 | In a Moore system, if 𝑌 is a member of 𝑆, (𝑆 ∖ {𝑌}) and 𝑆 have the same closure if and only if 𝑌 is in the closure of (𝑆 ∖ {𝑌}). Used in the proof of mrieqvd 17844 and mrieqv2d 17845. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑌})) ↔ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑌})) = (𝑁‘𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | mrisval 17836* | Value of the set of independent sets of a Moore system. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐼 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∖ {𝑥}))}) | ||
| Theorem | ismri 17837* | Criterion for a set to be an independent set of a Moore system. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥}))))) | ||
| Theorem | ismri2 17838* | Criterion for a subset of the base set in a Moore system to be independent. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})))) | ||
| Theorem | ismri2d 17839* | Criterion for a subset of the base set in a Moore system to be independent. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})))) | ||
| Theorem | ismri2dd 17840* | Definition of independence of a subset of the base set in a Moore system. One-way deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥}))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | mriss 17841 | An independent set of a Moore system is a subset of the base set. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | mrissd 17842 | An independent set of a Moore system is a subset of the base set. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | ismri2dad 17843 | Consequence of a set in a Moore system being independent. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑌}))) | ||
| Theorem | mrieqvd 17844* | In a Moore system, a set is independent if and only if, for all elements of the set, the closure of the set with the element removed is unequal to the closure of the original set. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})) ≠ (𝑁‘𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | mrieqv2d 17845* | In a Moore system, a set is independent if and only if all its proper subsets have closure properly contained in the closure of the set. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑠(𝑠 ⊊ 𝑆 → (𝑁‘𝑠) ⊊ (𝑁‘𝑆)))) | ||
| Theorem | mrissmrcd 17846 | In a Moore system, if an independent set is between a set and its closure, the two sets are equal (since the two sets must have equal closures by mressmrcd 17833, and so are equal by mrieqv2d 17845.) (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | mrissmrid 17847 | In a Moore system, subsets of independent sets are independent. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | mreexd 17848* | In a Moore system, the closure operator is said to have the exchange property if, for all elements 𝑦 and 𝑧 of the base set and subsets 𝑆 of the base set such that 𝑧 is in the closure of (𝑆 ∪ {𝑦}) but not in the closure of 𝑆, 𝑦 is in the closure of (𝑆 ∪ {𝑧}) (Definition 3.1.9 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 57 to 58.) This theorem allows to construct substitution instances of this definition. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∪ {𝑌}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∪ {𝑍}))) | ||
| Theorem | mreexmrid 17849* | In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if a set is independent and an element is not in its closure, then adding the element to the set gives another independent set. Lemma 4.1.5 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 84. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∪ {𝑌}) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | mreexexlemd 17850* | This lemma is used to generate substitution instances of the induction hypothesis in mreexexd 17854. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≈ 𝐾 ∨ 𝐺 ≈ 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑡∀𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ 𝑡)∀𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ 𝑡)(((𝑢 ≈ 𝐾 ∨ 𝑣 ≈ 𝐾) ∧ 𝑢 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝑣 ∪ 𝑡)) ∧ (𝑢 ∪ 𝑡) ∈ 𝐼) → ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣(𝑢 ≈ 𝑖 ∧ (𝑖 ∪ 𝑡) ∈ 𝐼))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | mreexexlem2d 17851* | Used in mreexexlem4d 17853 to prove the induction step in mreexexd 17854. See the proof of Proposition 4.2.1 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 86 to 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 (¬ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐹 ∖ {𝑌}) ∧ ((𝐹 ∖ {𝑌}) ∪ (𝐻 ∪ {𝑔})) ∈ 𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | mreexexlem3d 17852* | Base case of the induction in mreexexd 17854. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = ∅ ∨ 𝐺 = ∅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑖 ∧ (𝑖 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | mreexexlem4d 17853* | Induction step of the induction in mreexexd 17854. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀ℎ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ ℎ)∀𝑔 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ ℎ)(((𝑓 ≈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑔 ≈ 𝐿) ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝑔 ∪ ℎ)) ∧ (𝑓 ∪ ℎ) ∈ 𝐼) → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝑔(𝑓 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ ℎ) ∈ 𝐼))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≈ suc 𝐿 ∨ 𝐺 ≈ suc 𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | mreexexd 17854* | Exchange-type theorem. In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if 𝐹 and 𝐺 are disjoint from 𝐻, (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) is independent, 𝐹 is contained in the closure of (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻), and either 𝐹 or 𝐺 is finite, then there is a subset 𝑞 of 𝐺 equinumerous to 𝐹 such that (𝑞 ∪ 𝐻) is independent. This implies the case of Proposition 4.2.1 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 86 where either (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) or (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) is finite. The theorem is proven by induction using mreexexlem3d 17852 for the base case and mreexexlem4d 17853 for the induction step. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) Remove dependencies on ax-rep 5236 and ax-ac2 10571. (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ Fin ∨ 𝐺 ∈ Fin)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑞 ∧ (𝑞 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | mreexdomd 17855* | In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if 𝑆 is independent and contained in the closure of 𝑇, and either 𝑆 or 𝑇 is finite, then 𝑇 dominates 𝑆. This is an immediate consequence of mreexexd 17854. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ Fin ∨ 𝑇 ∈ Fin)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≼ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | mreexfidimd 17856* | In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if two independent sets have equal closure and one is finite, then they are equinumerous. Proven by using mreexdomd 17855 twice. This implies a special case of Theorem 4.2.2 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | isacs 17857* | A set is an algebraic closure system iff it is specified by some function of the finite subsets, such that a set is closed iff it does not expand under the operation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝒫 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∪ (𝑓 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝑠)))) | ||
| Theorem | acsmre 17858 | Algebraic closure systems are closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | isacs2 17859* | In the definition of an algebraic closure system, we may always take the operation being closed over as the Moore closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑠))) | ||
| Theorem | acsfiel 17860* | A set is closed in an algebraic closure system iff it contains all closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | acsfiel2 17861* | A set is closed in an algebraic closure system iff it contains all closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | acsmred 17862 | An algebraic closure system is also a Moore system. Deduction form of acsmre 17858. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | isacs1i 17863* | A closure system determined by a function is a closure system and algebraic. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝒫 𝑋) → {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝑠} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | mreacs 17864 | Algebraicity is a composable property; combining several algebraic closure properties gives another. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (ACS‘𝑋) ∈ (Moore‘𝒫 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | acsfn 17865* | Algebraicity of a conditional point closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Fin)) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑎)} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | acsfn0 17866* | Algebraicity of a point closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | acsfn1 17867* | Algebraicity of a one-argument closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | acsfn1c 17868* | Algebraicity of a one-argument closure condition with additional constant. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | acsfn2 17869* | Algebraicity of a two-argument closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
| Syntax | ccat 17870 | Extend class notation with the class of categories. |
| class Cat | ||
| Syntax | ccid 17871 | Extend class notation with the identity arrow of a category. |
| class Id | ||
| Syntax | chomf 17872 | Extend class notation to include functionalized Hom-set extractor. |
| class Homf | ||
| Syntax | ccomf 17873 | Extend class notation to include functionalized composition operation. |
| class compf | ||
| Definition | df-cat 17874* | A category is an abstraction of a structure (a group, a topology, an order...) Category theory consists in finding new formulation of the concepts associated with those structures (product, substructure...) using morphisms instead of the belonging relation. That trick has the interesting property that heterogeneous structures like topologies or groups for instance become comparable. Definition in [Lang] p. 53, without the axiom CAT 1, i.e., pairwise disjointness of hom-sets (cat1 18304). See setc2obas 18301 and setc2ohom 18302 for a counterexample. In contrast to definition 3.1 of [Adamek] p. 21, where "A category is a quadruple A = (O, hom, id, o)", a category is defined as an extensible structure consisting of three slots: the objects "O" ((Base‘𝑐)), the morphisms "hom" ((Hom ‘𝑐)) and the composition law "o" ((comp‘𝑐)). The identities "id" are defined by their properties related to morphisms and their composition, see condition 3.1(b) in [Adamek] p. 21 and df-cid 17875. (Note: in category theory morphisms are also called arrows.) (Contributed by FL, 24-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ Cat = {𝑐 ∣ [(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏][(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ][(comp‘𝑐) / 𝑜]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑥)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑥〉𝑜𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉𝑜𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑧)((𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉𝑜𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑘 ∈ (𝑧ℎ𝑤)((𝑘(〈𝑦, 𝑧〉𝑜𝑤)𝑔)(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉𝑜𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(〈𝑥, 𝑧〉𝑜𝑤)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉𝑜𝑧)𝑓))))} | ||
| Definition | df-cid 17875* | Define the category identity arrow. Since it is uniquely defined when it exists, we do not need to add it to the data of the category, and instead extract it by uniqueness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ Id = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ⦌⦋(comp‘𝑐) / 𝑜⦌(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (℩𝑔 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑥)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑥〉𝑜𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉𝑜𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓)))) | ||
| Definition | df-homf 17876* | Define the functionalized Hom-set operator, which is exactly like Hom but is guaranteed to be a function on the base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ Homf = (𝑐 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑦))) | ||
| Definition | df-comf 17877* | Define the functionalized composition operator, which is exactly like comp but is guaranteed to be a function of the proper type. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ compf = (𝑐 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑐) × (Base‘𝑐)), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ ((Hom ‘𝑐)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑔(𝑥(comp‘𝑐)𝑦)𝑓)))) | ||
| Theorem | iscat 17878* | The predicate "is a category". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉 · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧)((𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤)((𝑘(〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)𝑔)(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓)))))) | ||
| Theorem | iscatd 17879* | Properties that determine a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 1 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥))) → ( 1 (〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦))) → (𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉 · 𝑦) 1 ) = 𝑓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧))) → (𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑧)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤))) → ((𝑘(〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)𝑔)(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
| Theorem | catidex 17880* | Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓)) | ||
| Theorem | catideu 17881* | Each object in a category has a unique identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓)) | ||
| Theorem | cidfval 17882* | Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑔 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉 · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓)))) | ||
| Theorem | cidval 17883* | Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = (℩𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓))) | ||
| Theorem | cidffn 17884 | The identity arrow construction is a function on categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ Id Fn Cat | ||
| Theorem | cidfn 17885 | The identity arrow operator is a function from objects to arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → 1 Fn 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | catidd 17886* | Deduce the identity arrow in a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 1 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥))) → ( 1 (〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦))) → (𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉 · 𝑦) 1 ) = 𝑓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 1 )) | ||
| Theorem | iscatd2 17887* | Version of iscatd 17879 with a uniform assumption list, for increased proof sharing capabilities. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤)))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 1 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑦)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ( 1 (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑦)𝑓) = 𝑓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧) 1 ) = 𝑔) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑧)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((𝑘(〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)𝑔)(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 1 ))) | ||
| Theorem | catidcl 17888 | Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | catlid 17889 | Left identity property of an identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( 1 ‘𝑌)(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑌)𝐹) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | catrid 17890 | Right identity property of an identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑌)( 1 ‘𝑋)) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | catcocl 17891 | Closure of a composition arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | catass 17892 | Associativity of composition in a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾(〈𝑌, 𝑍〉 · 𝑊)𝐺)(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)𝐹) = (𝐾(〈𝑋, 𝑍〉 · 𝑊)(𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | catcone0 17893 | Composition of non-empty hom-sets is non-empty. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌𝐻𝑍) ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑍) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | 0catg 17894 | Any structure with an empty set of objects is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∅ = (Base‘𝐶)) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
| Theorem | 0cat 17895 | The empty set is a category, the empty category, see example 3.3(4.c) in [Adamek] p. 24. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ ∅ ∈ Cat | ||
| Theorem | homffval 17896* | Value of the functionalized Hom-set operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-Mar-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | fnhomeqhomf 17897 | If the Hom-set operation is a function it is equal to the corresponding functionalized Hom-set operation. (Contributed by AV, 1-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) → 𝐹 = 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | homfval 17898 | Value of the functionalized Hom-set operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) = (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | homffn 17899 | The functionalized Hom-set operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | homfeq 17900* | Condition for two categories with the same base to have the same hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐻𝑦) = (𝑥𝐽𝑦))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |