Theorem carsgval 31671

Description: Value of the Caratheodory sigma-Algebra construction function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
carsgval.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑉)
carsgval.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝒫 𝑂⟶(0[,]+∞))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
carsgval	⊢ (𝜑 → (toCaraSiga‘𝑀) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑀,𝑎,𝑒   𝑂,𝑎,𝑒   𝜑,𝑎,𝑒

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑒,𝑎)

Proof of Theorem carsgval

Dummy variable 𝑚 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-carsg 31670	. 2 ⊢ toCaraSiga = (𝑚 ∈ V ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒)})
2		simpr 488	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝑚 = 𝑀)
3	2	dmeqd 5738	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑚 = dom 𝑀)
4		carsgval.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝒫 𝑂⟶(0[,]+∞))
5	4	fdmd 6497	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑀 = 𝒫 𝑂)
6	5	adantr 484	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑀 = 𝒫 𝑂)
7	3, 6	eqtrd 2833	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑚 = 𝒫 𝑂)
8	7	unieqd 4814	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ∪ dom 𝑚 = ∪ 𝒫 𝑂)
9		unipw 5308	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∪ 𝒫 𝑂 = 𝑂
10	8, 9	eqtrdi 2849	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ∪ dom 𝑚 = 𝑂)
11	10	pweqd 4516	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚 = 𝒫 𝑂)
12		fveq1 6644	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) = (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)))
13		fveq1 6644	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎)) = (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎)))
14	12, 13	oveq12d 7153	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = ((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))))
15		fveq1 6644	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚‘𝑒) = (𝑀‘𝑒))
16	14, 15	eqeq12d 2814	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒) ↔ ((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)))
17	16	adantl 485	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒) ↔ ((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)))
18	11, 17	raleqbidv 3354	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒) ↔ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)))
19	11, 18	rabeqbidv 3433	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒)} = {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)})
20		carsgval.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑉)
21	20	pwexd 5245	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V)
22		fex 6966	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀:𝒫 𝑂⟶(0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V) → 𝑀 ∈ V)
23	4, 21, 22	syl2anc 587	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ V)
24		pwexg 5244	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V)
25		rabexg 5198	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)} ∈ V)
26	20, 24, 25	3syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)} ∈ V)
27	1, 19, 23, 26	fvmptd2 6753	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (toCaraSiga‘𝑀) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111  ∀wral 3106  {crab 3110  Vcvv 3441   ∖ cdif 3878   ∩ cin 3880  𝒫 cpw 4497  ∪ cuni 4800  dom cdm 5519  ⟶wf 6320  ‘cfv 6324  (class class class)co 7135  0cc0 10526  +∞cpnf 10661   +_𝑒 cxad 12493  [,]cicc 12729  toCaraSigaccarsg 31669

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-rep 5154  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pow 5231  ax-pr 5295

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ne 2988  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-reu 3113  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-pw 4499  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-uni 4801  df-iun 4883  df-br 5031  df-opab 5093  df-mpt 5111  df-id 5425  df-xp 5525  df-rel 5526  df-cnv 5527  df-co 5528  df-dm 5529  df-rn 5530  df-res 5531  df-ima 5532  df-iota 6283  df-fun 6326  df-fn 6327  df-f 6328  df-f1 6329  df-fo 6330  df-f1o 6331  df-fv 6332  df-ov 7138  df-carsg 31670

This theorem is referenced by:  carsgcl  31672  elcarsg  31673