Theorem carsgval 31556

Description: Value of the Caratheodory sigma-Algebra construction function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
carsgval.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑉)
carsgval.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝒫 𝑂⟶(0[,]+∞))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
carsgval	⊢ (𝜑 → (toCaraSiga‘𝑀) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑀,𝑎,𝑒   𝑂,𝑎,𝑒   𝜑,𝑎,𝑒

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑒,𝑎)

Proof of Theorem carsgval

Dummy variable 𝑚 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-carsg 31555	. 2 ⊢ toCaraSiga = (𝑚 ∈ V ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒)})
2		simpr 487	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝑚 = 𝑀)
3	2	dmeqd 5768	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑚 = dom 𝑀)
4		carsgval.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝒫 𝑂⟶(0[,]+∞))
5	4	fdmd 6517	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑀 = 𝒫 𝑂)
6	5	adantr 483	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑀 = 𝒫 𝑂)
7	3, 6	eqtrd 2856	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑚 = 𝒫 𝑂)
8	7	unieqd 4841	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ∪ dom 𝑚 = ∪ 𝒫 𝑂)
9		unipw 5334	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∪ 𝒫 𝑂 = 𝑂
10	8, 9	syl6eq 2872	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ∪ dom 𝑚 = 𝑂)
11	10	pweqd 4543	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚 = 𝒫 𝑂)
12		fveq1 6663	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) = (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)))
13		fveq1 6663	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎)) = (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎)))
14	12, 13	oveq12d 7168	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = ((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))))
15		fveq1 6663	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚‘𝑒) = (𝑀‘𝑒))
16	14, 15	eqeq12d 2837	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒) ↔ ((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)))
17	16	adantl 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒) ↔ ((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)))
18	11, 17	raleqbidv 3401	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒) ↔ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)))
19	11, 18	rabeqbidv 3485	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒)} = {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)})
20		carsgval.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑉)
21	20	pwexd 5272	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V)
22		fex 6983	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀:𝒫 𝑂⟶(0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V) → 𝑀 ∈ V)
23	4, 21, 22	syl2anc 586	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ V)
24		pwexg 5271	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V)
25		rabexg 5226	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)} ∈ V)
26	20, 24, 25	3syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)} ∈ V)
27	1, 19, 23, 26	fvmptd2 6770	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (toCaraSiga‘𝑀) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2110  ∀wral 3138  {crab 3142  Vcvv 3494   ∖ cdif 3932   ∩ cin 3934  𝒫 cpw 4538  ∪ cuni 4831  dom cdm 5549  ⟶wf 6345  ‘cfv 6349  (class class class)co 7150  0cc0 10531  +∞cpnf 10666   +_𝑒 cxad 12499  [,]cicc 12735  toCaraSigaccarsg 31554

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5182  ax-sep 5195  ax-nul 5202  ax-pow 5258  ax-pr 5321

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3772  df-csb 3883  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-pw 4540  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-op 4567  df-uni 4832  df-iun 4913  df-br 5059  df-opab 5121  df-mpt 5139  df-id 5454  df-xp 5555  df-rel 5556  df-cnv 5557  df-co 5558  df-dm 5559  df-rn 5560  df-res 5561  df-ima 5562  df-iota 6308  df-fun 6351  df-fn 6352  df-f 6353  df-f1 6354  df-fo 6355  df-f1o 6356  df-fv 6357  df-ov 7153  df-carsg 31555

This theorem is referenced by:  carsgcl  31557  elcarsg  31558