P. 337 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 33601-33700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	fedgmullem1 33601*	Lemma for fedgmul 33603. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐹)‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑗 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑖(.r‘𝐸)𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑗 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ((𝐺‘𝑗)‘𝑖))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (LBasis‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (LBasis‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:𝑌⟶(Base‘(Scalar‘𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 = (𝐵 Σg (𝑗 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ ((𝐿‘𝑗)( ·𝑠 ‘𝐵)𝑗))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑌⟶((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐶)) ↑m 𝑋))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐺‘𝑗) finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐶)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐿‘𝑗) = (𝐶 Σg (𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (((𝐺‘𝑗)‘𝑖)( ·𝑠 ‘𝐶)𝑖))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐴)) ∧ 𝑍 = (𝐴 Σg (𝐻 ∘f ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐴)𝐷))))
Theorem	fedgmullem2 33602*	Lemma for fedgmul 33603. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐹)‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑗 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑖(.r‘𝐸)𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑗 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ((𝐺‘𝑗)‘𝑖))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (LBasis‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (LBasis‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (Base‘((Scalar‘𝐴) freeLMod (𝑌 × 𝑋))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Σg (𝑊 ∘f ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐴)𝐷)) = (0g‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 = ((𝑌 × 𝑋) × {(0g‘(Scalar‘𝐴))}))
Theorem	fedgmul 33603	The multiplicativity formula for degrees of field extensions. Given 𝐸 a field extension of 𝐹, itself a field extension of 𝐾, we have [𝐸:𝐾] = [𝐸:𝐹][𝐹:𝐾]. Proposition 1.2 of [Lang], p. 224. Here (dim‘𝐴) is the degree of the extension 𝐸 of 𝐾, (dim‘𝐵) is the degree of the extension 𝐸 of 𝐹, and (dim‘𝐶) is the degree of the extension 𝐹 of 𝐾. This proof is valid for infinite dimensions, and is actually valid for division ring extensions, not just field extensions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐹)‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐴) = ((dim‘𝐵) ·e (dim‘𝐶)))
Theorem	dimlssid 33604	If the dimension of a linear subspace 𝐿 is the dimension of the whole vector space 𝐸, then 𝐿 is the whole space. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐸) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐿)) = (dim‘𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 = 𝐵)
Theorem	lvecendof1f1o 33605	If an endomorphism 𝑈 of a vector space 𝐸 of finite dimension is injective, then it is bijective. Item (b) of Corollary of Proposition 9 in [BourbakiAlg1] p. 298 . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐸) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝐸 LMHom 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈:𝐵–1-1→𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	lactlmhm 33606*	In an associative algebra 𝐴, left-multiplication by a fixed element of the algebra is a module homomorphism, analogous to ringlghm 20215. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶 · 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ AssAlg)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 LMHom 𝐴))
Theorem	assalactf1o 33607*	In an associative algebra 𝐴, left-multiplication by a fixed element of the algebra is bijective. See also lactlmhm 33606. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶 · 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ AssAlg)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (RLReg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	assarrginv 33608	If an element 𝑋 of an associative algebra 𝐴 over a division ring 𝐾 is regular, then it is a unit. Proposition 2. in Chapter 5. of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 113. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (RLReg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ AssAlg)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	assafld 33609	If an algebra 𝐴 of finite degree over a division ring 𝐾 is an integral domain, then it is a field. Corollary of Proposition 2. in Chapter 5. of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 113. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ AssAlg)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ IDomn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Field)
21.3.11  Field Extensions
Syntax	cfldext 33610	Syntax for the field extension relation.
class /FldExt
Syntax	cfinext 33611	Syntax for the finite field extension relation.
class /FinExt
Syntax	cextdg 33612	Syntax for the field extension degree operation.
class [:]
Definition	df-fldext 33613*	Definition of the field extension relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ /FldExt = {⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩ ∣ ((𝑒 ∈ Field ∧ 𝑓 ∈ Field) ∧ (𝑓 = (𝑒 ↾s (Base‘𝑓)) ∧ (Base‘𝑓) ∈ (SubRing‘𝑒)))}
Definition	df-extdg 33614*	Definition of the field extension degree operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ [:] = (𝑒 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ (/FldExt “ {𝑒}) ↦ (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝑒)‘(Base‘𝑓))))
Definition	df-finext 33615*	Definition of the finite field extension relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ /FinExt = {⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩ ∣ (𝑒/FldExt𝑓 ∧ (𝑒[:]𝑓) ∈ ℕ0)}
Theorem	relfldext 33616	The field extension is a relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ Rel /FldExt
Theorem	brfldext 33617	The field extension relation explicited. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ Field ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Field) → (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ↔ (𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s (Base‘𝐹)) ∧ (Base‘𝐹) ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸))))
Theorem	ccfldextrr 33618	The field of the complex numbers is an extension of the field of the real numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ℂfld/FldExtℝfld
Theorem	fldextfld1 33619	A field extension is only defined if the extension is a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)
Theorem	fldextfld2 33620	A field extension is only defined if the subfield is a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝐹 ∈ Field)
Theorem	fldextsubrg 33621	Field extension implies a subring relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸))
Theorem	sdrgfldext 33622	A field 𝐸 and any sub-division-ring 𝐹 of 𝐸 form a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/FldExt(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))
Theorem	fldextress 33623	Field extension implies a structure restriction relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s (Base‘𝐹)))
Theorem	brfinext 33624	The finite field extension relation explicited. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (𝐸/FinExt𝐹 ↔ (𝐸[:]𝐹) ∈ ℕ0))
Theorem	extdgval 33625	Value of the field extension degree operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (𝐸[:]𝐹) = (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘(Base‘𝐹))))
Theorem	fldextsdrg 33626	Deduce sub-division-ring from field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/FldExt𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))
Theorem	fldextsralvec 33627	The subring algebra associated with a field extension is a vector space. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘(Base‘𝐹)) ∈ LVec)
Theorem	extdgcl 33628	Closure of the field extension degree operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (𝐸[:]𝐹) ∈ ℕ0*)
Theorem	extdggt0 33629	Degrees of field extension are greater than zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 0 < (𝐸[:]𝐹))
Theorem	fldexttr 33630	Field extension is a transitive relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FldExt𝐾) → 𝐸/FldExt𝐾)
Theorem	fldextid 33631	The field extension relation is reflexive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ Field → 𝐹/FldExt𝐹)
Theorem	extdgid 33632	A trivial field extension has degree one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸 ∈ Field → (𝐸[:]𝐸) = 1)
Theorem	fldsdrgfldext 33633	A sub-division-ring of a field forms a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹/FldExt𝐺)
Theorem	fldsdrgfldext2 33634	A sub-sub-division-ring of a field forms a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 ↾s 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺/FldExt𝐻)
Theorem	extdgmul 33635	The multiplicativity formula for degrees of field extensions. Given 𝐸 a field extension of 𝐹, itself a field extension of 𝐾, the degree of the extension 𝐸/FldExt𝐾 is the product of the degrees of the extensions 𝐸/FldExt𝐹 and 𝐹/FldExt𝐾. Proposition 1.2 of [Lang], p. 224. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FldExt𝐾) → (𝐸[:]𝐾) = ((𝐸[:]𝐹) ·e (𝐹[:]𝐾)))
Theorem	finexttrb 33636	The extension 𝐸 of 𝐾 is finite if and only if 𝐸 is finite over 𝐹 and 𝐹 is finite over 𝐾. Corollary 1.3 of [Lang] , p. 225. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FldExt𝐾) → (𝐸/FinExt𝐾 ↔ (𝐸/FinExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FinExt𝐾)))
Theorem	extdg1id 33637	If the degree of the extension 𝐸/FldExt𝐹 is 1, then 𝐸 and 𝐹 are identical. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 1) → 𝐸 = 𝐹)
Theorem	extdg1b 33638	The degree of the extension 𝐸/FldExt𝐹 is 1 iff 𝐸 and 𝐹 are the same structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → ((𝐸[:]𝐹) = 1 ↔ 𝐸 = 𝐹))
Theorem	fldgenfldext 33639	A subfield 𝐹 extended with a set 𝐴 forms a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿/FldExt𝐾)
Theorem	fldextchr 33640	The characteristic of a subfield is the same as the characteristic of the larger field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (chr‘𝐹) = (chr‘𝐸))
Theorem	evls1fldgencl 33641	Closure of the subring polynomial evaluation in the field extention. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐺)‘𝐴) ∈ (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))
Theorem	ccfldsrarelvec 33642	The subring algebra of the complex numbers over the real numbers is a left vector space. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((subringAlg ‘ℂfld)‘ℝ) ∈ LVec
Theorem	ccfldextdgrr 33643	The degree of the field extension of the complex numbers over the real numbers is 2. (Suggested by GL, 4-Aug-2023.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (ℂfld[:]ℝfld) = 2
Theorem	fldextrspunlsplem 33644*	Lemma for fldextrspunlsp 33645: First direction. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (LBasis‘((subringAlg ‘𝐽)‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:𝐻⟶𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 finSupp (0g‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐿 Σg (𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ ((𝑃‘𝑓)(.r‘𝐿)𝑓))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝐺 ↑m 𝐵)(𝑎 finSupp (0g‘𝐿) ∧ 𝑋 = (𝐿 Σg (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑏)(.r‘𝐿)𝑏)))))
Theorem	fldextrspunlsp 33645	Lemma for fldextrspunfld 33647. The subring generated by the union of two field extensions 𝐺 and 𝐻 is the vector sub- 𝐺 space generated by a basis 𝐵 of 𝐻. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (LBasis‘((subringAlg ‘𝐽)‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = ((LSpan‘((subringAlg ‘𝐿)‘𝐺))‘𝐵))
Theorem	fldextrspunlem1 33646	Lemma for fldextrspunfld 33647. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐺)) ≤ (𝐽[:]𝐾))
Theorem	fldextrspunfld 33647	The ring generated by the union of two field extensions is a field. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)
Theorem	fldextrspunlem2 33648	Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))
Theorem	fldextrspundgle 33649	Inequality involving the degree of two different field extensions 𝐼 and 𝐽 of a same field 𝐹. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸[:]𝐼) ≤ (𝐽[:]𝐾))
Theorem	fldextrspundglemul 33650	Given two field extensions 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾 of the same field 𝐾, 𝐽 / 𝐾 being finite, and the composiste field 𝐸 = 𝐼𝐽, the degree of the extension of the composite field 𝐸 / 𝐾 is at most the product of the field extension degrees of 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸[:]𝐾) ≤ ((𝐼[:]𝐾) ·e (𝐽[:]𝐾)))
Theorem	fldextrspundgdvdslem 33651	Lemma for fldextrspundgdvds 33652. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸[:]𝐼) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	fldextrspundgdvds 33652	Given two finite extensions 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾 of the same field 𝐾, the degree of the extension 𝐼 / 𝐾 divides the degree of the extension 𝐸 / 𝐾, 𝐸 being the composite field 𝐼𝐽. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) ∥ (𝐸[:]𝐾))
Theorem	fldext2rspun 33653*	Given two field extensions 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾, 𝐼 / 𝐾 being a quadratic extension, and the degree of 𝐽 / 𝐾 being a power of 2, the degree of the extension 𝐸 / 𝐾 is a power of 2 , 𝐸 being the composite field 𝐼𝐽. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) = 2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) = (2↑𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐸[:]𝐾) = (2↑𝑛))
21.3.11.1  Algebraic numbers
Syntax	cirng 33654	Integral subring of a ring.
class IntgRing
Definition	df-irng 33655*	Define the subring of elements of a ring 𝑟 integral over a subset 𝑠. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.)
⊢ IntgRing = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑓 ∈ (Monic1p‘(𝑟 ↾s 𝑠))(◡((𝑟 evalSub1 𝑠)‘𝑓) “ {(0g‘𝑟)}))
Theorem	irngval 33656*	The elements of a field 𝑅 integral over a subset 𝑆. In the case of a subfield, those are the algebraic numbers over the field 𝑆 within the field 𝑅. That is, the numbers 𝑋 which are roots of monic polynomials 𝑃(𝑋) with coefficients in 𝑆. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) = ∪ 𝑓 ∈ (Monic1p‘𝑈)(◡(𝑂‘𝑓) “ { 0 }))
Theorem	elirng 33657*	Property for an element 𝑋 of a field 𝑅 to be integral over a subring 𝑆. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ (Monic1p‘𝑈)((𝑂‘𝑓)‘𝑋) = 0 )))
Theorem	irngss 33658	All elements of a subring 𝑆 are integral over 𝑆. This is only true in the case of a nonzero ring, since there are no integral elements in a zero ring (see 0ringirng 33660). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ NzRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆))
Theorem	irngssv 33659	An integral element is an element of the base set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	0ringirng 33660	A zero ring 𝑅 has no integral elements. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑅 ∈ NzRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) = ∅)
Theorem	irngnzply1lem 33661	In the case of a field 𝐸, a root 𝑋 of some nonzero polynomial 𝑃 with coefficients in a subfield 𝐹 is integral over 𝐹. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ dom 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝑃)‘𝑋) = 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))
Theorem	irngnzply1 33662*	In the case of a field 𝐸, the roots of nonzero polynomials 𝑝 with coefficients in a subfield 𝐹 are exactly the integral elements over 𝐹. Roots of nonzero polynomials are called algebraic numbers, so this shows that in the case of a field, elements integral over 𝐹 are exactly the algebraic numbers. In this formula, dom 𝑂 represents the polynomials, and 𝑍 the zero polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹) = ∪ 𝑝 ∈ (dom 𝑂 ∖ {𝑍})(◡(𝑂‘𝑝) “ { 0 }))
21.3.11.2  Algebraic extensions
Syntax	calgext 33663	Syntax for the algebraic field extension relation.
class /AlgExt
Definition	df-algext 33664*	Definition of the algebraic extension relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ /AlgExt = {⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩ ∣ (𝑒/FldExt𝑓 ∧ (𝑒 IntgRing 𝑓) = (Base‘𝑒))}
21.3.11.3  Minimal polynomials
Syntax	cminply 33665	Extend class notation with the minimal polynomial builder function.
class minPoly
Definition	df-minply 33666*	Define the minimal polynomial builder function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jan-2025.)
⊢ minPoly = (𝑒 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑒) ↦ ((idlGen1p‘(𝑒 ↾s 𝑓))‘{𝑝 ∈ dom (𝑒 evalSub1 𝑓) ∣ (((𝑒 evalSub1 𝑓)‘𝑝)‘𝑥) = (0g‘𝑒)})))
Theorem	ply1annidllem 33667*	Write the set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 as the kernel of the ring homomorphism 𝐹 mapping polynomials 𝑝 to their subring evaluation at a given point 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑃) ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 = (◡𝐹 “ { 0 }))
Theorem	ply1annidl 33668*	The set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 forms an ideal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑃))
Theorem	ply1annnr 33669*	The set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 is not the whole polynomial ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ NzRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑈)
Theorem	ply1annig1p 33670*	The ideal 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 is generated by the ideal's canonical generator. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (RSpan‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (idlGen1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 = (𝐾‘{(𝐺‘𝑄)}))
Theorem	minplyval 33671*	Expand the value of the minimal polynomial (𝑀‘𝐴) for a given element 𝐴. It is defined as the unique monic polynomial of minimal degree which annihilates 𝐴. By ply1annig1p 33670, that polynomial generates the ideal of the annihilators of 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (RSpan‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (idlGen1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝑄))
Theorem	minplycl 33672*	The minimal polynomial is a polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (RSpan‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (idlGen1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ (Base‘𝑃))
Theorem	ply1annprmidl 33673*	The set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 is a prime ideal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑃))
Theorem	minplymindeg 33674	The minimal polynomial of 𝐴 is minimal among the nonzero annihilators of 𝐴 with regard to degree. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ≠ 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) ≤ (𝐷‘𝐻))
Theorem	minplyann 33675	The minimal polynomial for 𝐴 annihilates 𝐴 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘(𝑀‘𝐴))‘𝐴) = 0 )
Theorem	minplyirredlem 33676	Lemma for minplyirred 33677. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Base‘𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (Base‘𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(.r‘𝑃)𝐻) = (𝑀‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐺)‘𝐴) = (0g‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ≠ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ≠ 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (Unit‘𝑃))
Theorem	minplyirred 33677	A nonzero minimal polynomial is irreducible. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ (Irred‘𝑃))
Theorem	irngnminplynz 33678	Integral elements have nonzero minimal polynomials. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍)
Theorem	minplym1p 33679	A minimal polynomial is monic. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	minplynzm1p 33680	If a minimal polynomial is nonzero, then it is monic. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	minplyelirng 33681	If the minimial polynomial 𝐹 of an element 𝑋 of a field 𝑅 has nonnegative degree, then 𝑋 is integral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑅 minPoly 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆))
Theorem	irredminply 33682	An irreducible, monic, annihilating polynomial is the minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐺)‘𝐴) = 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Irred‘𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑀‘𝐴))
Theorem	algextdeglem1 33683	Lemma for algextdeg 33691. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) = 𝐾)
Theorem	algextdeglem2 33684*	Lemma for algextdeg 33691. Both the ring of polynomials 𝑃 and the field 𝐿 generated by 𝐾 and the algebraic element 𝐴 can be considered as modules over the elements of 𝐹. Then, the evaluation map 𝐺, mapping polynomials to their evaluation at 𝐴, is a module homomorphism between those modules. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑃 LMHom ((subringAlg ‘𝐿)‘𝐹)))
Theorem	algextdeglem3 33685*	Lemma for algextdeg 33691. The quotient 𝑃 / 𝑍 of the vector space 𝑃 of polynomials by the subspace 𝑍 of polynomials annihilating 𝐴 is itself a vector space. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ LVec)
Theorem	algextdeglem4 33686*	Lemma for algextdeg 33691. By lmhmqusker 33364, the surjective module homomorphism 𝐺 described in algextdeglem2 33684 induces an isomorphism with the quotient space. Therefore, the dimension of that quotient space 𝑃 / 𝑍 is the degree of the algebraic field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝑄) = (𝐿[:]𝐾))
Theorem	algextdeglem5 33687*	Lemma for algextdeg 33691. The subspace 𝑍 of annihilators of 𝐴 is a principal ideal generated by the minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 = ((RSpan‘𝑃)‘{(𝑀‘𝐴)}))
Theorem	algextdeglem6 33688*	Lemma for algextdeg 33691. By r1pquslmic 33552, the univariate polynomial remainder ring (𝐻 “s 𝑃) is isomorphic with the quotient ring 𝑄. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (rem1p‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑝𝑅(𝑀‘𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝑄) = (dim‘(𝐻 “s 𝑃)))
Theorem	algextdeglem7 33689*	Lemma for algextdeg 33691. The polynomials 𝑋 of lower degree than the minimal polynomial are left unchanged when taking the remainder of the division by that minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (rem1p‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑝𝑅(𝑀‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡(deg1‘𝐾) “ (-∞[,)(𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝐻‘𝑋) = 𝑋))
Theorem	algextdeglem8 33690*	Lemma for algextdeg 33691. The dimension of the univariate polynomial remainder ring (𝐻 “s 𝑃) is the degree of the minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (rem1p‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑝𝑅(𝑀‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡(deg1‘𝐾) “ (-∞[,)(𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘(𝐻 “s 𝑃)) = (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)))
Theorem	algextdeg 33691	The degree of an algebraic field extension (noted [𝐿:𝐾]) is the degree of the minimal polynomial 𝑀(𝐴), whereas 𝐿 is the field generated by 𝐾 and the algebraic element 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿[:]𝐾) = (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)))
21.3.11.4  Quadratic Field Extensions
Theorem	rtelextdg2lem 33692	Lemma for rtelextdg2 33693: If an element 𝑋 is a solution of a quadratic equation, then the degree of its field extension is at most 2. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝑋})))    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2 ↑ 𝑋) + ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵)) = 0 )    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (var1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (+g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ⊗ = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (algSc‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((2 ∧ 𝑌) ⊕ (((𝑈‘𝐴) ⊗ 𝑌) ⊕ (𝑈‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿[:]𝐾) ≤ 2)
Theorem	rtelextdg2 33693	If an element 𝑋 is a solution of a quadratic equation, then it is either in the base field, or the degree of its field extension is exactly 2. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝑋})))    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2 ↑ 𝑋) + ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵)) = 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∨ (𝐿[:]𝐾) = 2))
21.3.11.5  Towers of quadratic extentions
Theorem	fldext2chn 33694*	In a non-empty chain 𝑇 of quadratic field extensions, the degree of the final extension is always a power of two. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑒)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑓)    &   ⊢ < = {⟨𝑓, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 2)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ( < Chain(SubDRing‘𝑊)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ↾s (𝑇‘0)) = 𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ↾s (lastS‘𝑇)) = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (♯‘𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿/FldExt𝑄 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐿[:]𝑄) = (2↑𝑛)))
21.3.12  Constructible Numbers This section defines the set of constructible points as complex numbers which can be drawn starting from two points (we take 0 and 1), and taking intersections of circles and lines. This construction is useful for proving the impossibility of doubling the cube (2sqr3nconstr 33747), and of angle trisection (cos9thpinconstr 33757)
Syntax	cconstr 33695	Extend class notation with the set of constructible points.
class Constr
Definition	df-constr 33696*	Define the set of geometrically constructible points, by recursively adding the line-line, line-circle and circle-circle intersections constructions using points in a previous iteration. Definition 7.4. in [Stewart] p. 92 (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 19-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Constr = ∪ (rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) “ ω)
Theorem	constrrtll 33697	In the construction of constructible numbers, line-line intersections are solutions of linear equations, and can therefore be completely constructed. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐶 + (𝑅 · (𝐷 − 𝐶))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐶))) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐴 + (((((𝐴 − 𝐶) · ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐶))) − (((∗‘𝐴) − (∗‘𝐶)) · (𝐷 − 𝐶))) / ((((∗‘𝐵) − (∗‘𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐶)) − ((𝐵 − 𝐴) · ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐶))))) · (𝐵 − 𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑁)
Theorem	constrrtlc1 33698	In the construction of constructible numbers, line-circle intersections are roots of a quadratic equation, non-degenerate case. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐶)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (((∗‘𝐵) − (∗‘𝐴)) / (𝐵 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (((((∗‘𝐴) − (𝐴 · 𝑄)) − (∗‘𝐶)) − (𝐶 · 𝑄)) / 𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (-((𝐶 · (((∗‘𝐴) − (𝐴 · 𝑄)) − (∗‘𝐶))) + ((𝐸 − 𝐹) · ((∗‘𝐸) − (∗‘𝐹)))) / 𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑋↑2) + ((𝑀 · 𝑋) + 𝑁)) = 0 ∧ 𝑄 ≠ 0))
Theorem	constrrtlc2 33699	In the construction of constructible numbers, line-circle intersections are one of the original points, in a degenerate case. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐶)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝐴)
Theorem	constrrtcclem 33700	In the construction of constructible numbers, circle-circle intersections are roots of a quadratic equation. Case of non-degenerate circles. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐴)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐷)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ((𝐵 − 𝐶) · (∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐸 − 𝐹) · (∗‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (((𝑄 − ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐷 + 𝐴))) − (𝑃 − ((∗‘𝐴) · (𝐷 + 𝐴)))) / ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = -(((((∗‘𝐴) · (𝐷 · 𝐴)) − (𝑃 · 𝐷)) − (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐷 · 𝐴)) − (𝑄 · 𝐴))) / ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋↑2) + ((𝑀 · 𝑋) + 𝑁)) = 0)