Theorem eldprdi 20090

Description: The domain of definition of the internal direct product, which states that 𝑆 is a family of subgroups that mutually commute and have trivial intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Apr-2016.) (Revised by AV, 14-Jul-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eldprdi.0	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
eldprdi.w	⊢ 𝑊 = {ℎ ∈ X𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑆‘𝑖) ∣ ℎ finSupp 0 }
eldprdi.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺dom DProd 𝑆)
eldprdi.2	⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑆 = 𝐼)
eldprdi.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eldprdi	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆))

Distinct variable groups:   ℎ,𝐹   ℎ,𝑖,𝐺   ℎ,𝐼,𝑖   0 ,ℎ   𝑆,ℎ,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(ℎ,𝑖)   𝐹(𝑖)   𝑊(ℎ,𝑖)   0 (𝑖)

Proof of Theorem eldprdi

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eldprdi.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺dom DProd 𝑆)
2		eldprdi.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊)
3		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = (𝐺 Σg 𝐹)
4		oveq2 7419	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝐺 Σg 𝑓) = (𝐺 Σg 𝐹))
5	4	rspceeqv 3611	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = (𝐺 Σg 𝐹)) → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))
6	2, 3, 5	sylancl 597	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))
7		eldprdi.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑆 = 𝐼)
8		eldprdi.0	. . . 4 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
9		eldprdi.w	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑊 = {ℎ ∈ X𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑆‘𝑖) ∣ ℎ finSupp 0 }
10	8, 9	eldprd 20076	. . 3 ⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → ((𝐺 Σg 𝐹) ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))
11	7, 10	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺 Σg 𝐹) ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))
12	1, 6, 11	mpbir2and 725	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  ∃wrex 3095  {crab 3422   class class class wbr 5111  dom cdm 5662  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7411  Xcixp 8895   finSupp cfsupp 9321  0_gc0g 17492   Σ_g cgsu 17493   DProd cdprd 20065

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5337  ax-pr 5405  ax-un 7733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-reu 3376  df-rab 3423  df-v 3463  df-sbc 3752  df-csb 3860  df-dif 3914  df-un 3916  df-in 3918  df-ss 3928  df-nul 4293  df-if 4491  df-pw 4567  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5557  df-xp 5668  df-rel 5669  df-cnv 5670  df-co 5671  df-dm 5672  df-rn 5673  df-res 5674  df-ima 5675  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7414  df-oprab 7415  df-mpo 7416  df-1st 7986  df-2nd 7987  df-ixp 8896  df-dprd 20067

This theorem is referenced by:  dprdfsub  20093  dprdf11  20095  dprdsubg  20096  dprdub  20097  dpjidcl  20130