Theorem eldprd 20082

Description: A class 𝐴 is an internal direct product iff it is the (group) sum of an infinite, but finitely supported cartesian product of subgroups (which mutually commute and have trivial intersections). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Apr-2016.) (Revised by AV, 11-Jul-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dprdval.0	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
dprdval.w	⊢ 𝑊 = {ℎ ∈ X𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑆‘𝑖) ∣ ℎ finSupp 0 }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eldprd	⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,ℎ,𝑖   𝐴,𝑓   𝑓,𝐼,ℎ,𝑖   𝑆,𝑓,ℎ,𝑖   𝑓,𝐺,ℎ,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(ℎ, 𝑖)   𝑊(𝑓, ℎ, 𝑖)   0 (𝑓, ℎ, 𝑖)

Proof of Theorem eldprd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elfvdm 6915	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( DProd ‘⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩) → ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
2		df-ov 7415	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) = ( DProd ‘⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩)
3	1, 2	eleq2s 2880	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) → ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
4		df-br 5109	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ↔ ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
5	3, 4	sylibr 237	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) → 𝐺dom DProd 𝑆)
6	5	pm4.71ri 569	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆)))
7		dprdval.0	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
8		dprdval.w	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑊 = {ℎ ∈ X𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑆‘𝑖) ∣ ℎ finSupp 0 }
9	7, 8	dprdval 20081	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) = ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
10	9	eleq2d 2848	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))
11		eqid 2762	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)) = (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))
12		ovex 7445	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓) ∈ V
13	11, 12	elrnmpti 5951	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))
14	10, 13	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
15	14	ancoms 463	. . 3 ⊢ ((dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺dom DProd 𝑆) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
16	15	pm5.32da 589	. 2 ⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆)) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))
17	6, 16	bitrid 286	1 ⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  ∃wrex 3088  {crab 3415  ⟨cop 4594   class class class wbr 5108   ↦ cmpt 5191  dom cdm 5660  ran crn 5661  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7412  Xcixp 8893   finSupp cfsupp 9319  0_gc0g 17498   Σ_g cgsu 17499   DProd cdprd 20071

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5237  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5555  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7984  df-2nd 7985  df-ixp 8894  df-dprd 20073

This theorem is used by:  dprdssv  20094  eldprdi  20096  dprdsubg  20102  dprdss  20107  dmdprdsplitlem  20115  dprddisj2  20117  dpjidcl  20136