Theorem eldprd 20247

Description: A class 𝐴 is an internal direct product iff it is the (group) sum of an infinite, but finitely supported cartesian product of subgroups (which mutually commute and have trivial intersections). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Apr-2016.) (Revised by AV, 11-Jul-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dprdval.0	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
dprdval.w	⊢ 𝑊 = {ℎ ∈ X𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑆‘𝑖) ∣ ℎ finSupp 0 }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eldprd	⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,ℎ,𝑖   𝐴,𝑓   𝑓,𝐼,ℎ,𝑖   𝑆,𝑓,ℎ,𝑖   𝑓,𝐺,ℎ,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(ℎ, 𝑖)   𝑊(𝑓, ℎ, 𝑖)   0 (𝑓, ℎ, 𝑖)

Proof of Theorem eldprd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elfvdm 6939	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( DProd ‘⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩) → ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
2		df-ov 7443	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) = ( DProd ‘⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩)
3	1, 2	eleq2s 2882	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) → ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
4		df-br 5107	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ↔ ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
5	3, 4	sylibr 237	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) → 𝐺dom DProd 𝑆)
6	5	pm4.71ri 570	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆)))
7		dprdval.0	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
8		dprdval.w	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑊 = {ℎ ∈ X𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑆‘𝑖) ∣ ℎ finSupp 0 }
9	7, 8	dprdval 20246	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) = ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
10	9	eleq2d 2850	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))
11		eqid 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)) = (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))
12		ovex 7473	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓) ∈ V
13	11, 12	elrnmpti 5950	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))
14	10, 13	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
15	14	ancoms 464	. . 3 ⊢ ((dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺dom DProd 𝑆) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
16	15	pm5.32da 590	. 2 ⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆)) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))
17	6, 16	bitrid 286	1 ⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∃wrex 3090  {crab 3416  ⟨cop 4838   class class class wbr 5106   ↦ cmpt 5189  dom cdm 5655  ran crn 5656  ‘cfv 6555  (class class class)co 7440  Xcixp 8950   finSupp cfsupp 9378  0_gc0g 17636   Σ_g cgsu 17637   DProd cdprd 20236

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7772

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-f 6559  df-f1 6560  df-fo 6561  df-f1o 6562  df-fv 6563  df-ov 7443  df-oprab 7444  df-mpo 7445  df-1st 8022  df-2nd 8023  df-ixp 8951  df-dprd 20238

This theorem is used by:  dprdssv  20259  eldprdi  20261  dprdsubg  20267  dprdss  20272  dmdprdsplitlem  20280  dprddisj2  20282  dpjidcl  20301