Theorem eldprd 20134

Description: A class 𝐴 is an internal direct product iff it is the (group) sum of an infinite, but finitely supported cartesian product of subgroups (which mutually commute and have trivial intersections). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Apr-2016.) (Revised by AV, 11-Jul-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dprdval.0	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
dprdval.w	⊢ 𝑊 = {ℎ ∈ X𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑆‘𝑖) ∣ ℎ finSupp 0 }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eldprd	⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,ℎ,𝑖   𝐴,𝑓   𝑓,𝐼,ℎ,𝑖   𝑆,𝑓,ℎ,𝑖   𝑓,𝐺,ℎ,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(ℎ, 𝑖)   𝑊(𝑓, ℎ, 𝑖)   0 (𝑓, ℎ, 𝑖)

Proof of Theorem eldprd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elfvdm 6916	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( DProd ‘⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩) → ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
2		df-ov 7419	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) = ( DProd ‘⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩)
3	1, 2	eleq2s 2880	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) → ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
4		df-br 5108	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ↔ ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
5	3, 4	sylibr 237	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) → 𝐺dom DProd 𝑆)
6	5	pm4.71ri 570	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆)))
7		dprdval.0	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
8		dprdval.w	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑊 = {ℎ ∈ X𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑆‘𝑖) ∣ ℎ finSupp 0 }
9	7, 8	dprdval 20133	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) = ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
10	9	eleq2d 2848	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))
11		eqid 2762	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)) = (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))
12		ovex 7449	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓) ∈ V
13	11, 12	elrnmpti 5950	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))
14	10, 13	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
15	14	ancoms 464	. . 3 ⊢ ((dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺dom DProd 𝑆) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
16	15	pm5.32da 590	. 2 ⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆)) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))
17	6, 16	bitrid 286	1 ⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3088  {crab 3414  ⟨cop 4593   class class class wbr 5107   ↦ cmpt 5190  dom cdm 5659  ran crn 5660  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7416  Xcixp 8907   finSupp cfsupp 9334  0_gc0g 17528   Σ_g cgsu 17529   DProd cdprd 20123

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-1st 7989  df-2nd 7990  df-ixp 8908  df-dprd 20125

This theorem is used by:  dprdssv  20146  eldprdi  20148  dprdsubg  20154  dprdss  20159  dmdprdsplitlem  20167  dprddisj2  20169  dpjidcl  20188