Theorem eldprd 20181

Description: A class 𝐴 is an internal direct product iff it is the (group) sum of an infinite, but finitely supported cartesian product of subgroups (which mutually commute and have trivial intersections). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Apr-2016.) (Revised by AV, 11-Jul-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dprdval.0	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
dprdval.w	⊢ 𝑊 = {ℎ ∈ X𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑆‘𝑖) ∣ ℎ finSupp 0 }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eldprd	⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,ℎ,𝑖   𝐴,𝑓   𝑓,𝐼,ℎ,𝑖   𝑆,𝑓,ℎ,𝑖   𝑓,𝐺,ℎ,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(ℎ, 𝑖)   𝑊(𝑓, ℎ, 𝑖)   0 (𝑓, ℎ, 𝑖)

Proof of Theorem eldprd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elfvdm 6907	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( DProd ‘⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩) → ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
2		df-ov 7411	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) = ( DProd ‘⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩)
3	1, 2	eleq2s 2878	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) → ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
4		df-br 5103	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ↔ ⟨𝐺, 𝑆⟩ ∈ dom DProd )
5	3, 4	sylibr 237	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) → 𝐺dom DProd 𝑆)
6	5	pm4.71ri 570	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆)))
7		dprdval.0	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
8		dprdval.w	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑊 = {ℎ ∈ X𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑆‘𝑖) ∣ ℎ finSupp 0 }
9	7, 8	dprdval 20180	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) = ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
10	9	eleq2d 2846	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))
11		eqid 2760	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)) = (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))
12		ovex 7441	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓) ∈ V
13	11, 12	elrnmpti 5940	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran (𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))
14	10, 13	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ dom 𝑆 = 𝐼) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
15	14	ancoms 464	. . 3 ⊢ ((dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺dom DProd 𝑆) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓)))
16	15	pm5.32da 590	. 2 ⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → ((𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆)) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))
17	6, 16	bitrid 286	1 ⊢ (dom 𝑆 = 𝐼 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 DProd 𝑆) ↔ (𝐺dom DProd 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = (𝐺 Σg 𝑓))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3086  {crab 3412  ⟨cop 4589   class class class wbr 5102   ↦ cmpt 5185  dom cdm 5647  ran crn 5648  ‘cfv 6527  (class class class)co 7408  Xcixp 8903   finSupp cfsupp 9331  0_gc0g 17571   Σ_g cgsu 17572   DProd cdprd 20170

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-in 3905  df-ss 3915  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5542  df-xp 5653  df-rel 5654  df-cnv 5655  df-co 5656  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-res 5659  df-ima 5660  df-iota 6483  df-fun 6529  df-fn 6530  df-f 6531  df-f1 6532  df-fo 6533  df-f1o 6534  df-fv 6535  df-ov 7411  df-oprab 7412  df-mpo 7413  df-1st 7984  df-2nd 7985  df-ixp 8904  df-dprd 20172

This theorem is used by:  dprdssv  20193  eldprdi  20195  dprdsubg  20201  dprdss  20206  dmdprdsplitlem  20214  dprddisj2  20216  dpjidcl  20235