Theorem fundcmpsurinj 47410

Description: Every function 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 can be decomposed into a surjective and an injective function. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fundcmpsurinj	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∃𝑔∃ℎ∃𝑝(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔,ℎ,𝑝   𝐵,𝑔,ℎ,𝑝   𝑔,𝐹,ℎ,𝑝   𝑔,𝑉

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(ℎ,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem fundcmpsurinj

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		abrexexg 7939	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} ∈ V)
2	1	adantl 481	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} ∈ V)
3		fveq2 6858	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
4	3	sneqd 4601	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → {(𝐹‘𝑥)} = {(𝐹‘𝑦)})
5	4	imaeq2d 6031	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)}) = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑦)}))
6	5	eqeq2d 2740	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)}) ↔ 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑦)})))
7	6	cbvrexvw 3216	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)}) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑦)}))
8	7	abbii 2796	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑦)})}
9	8	fundcmpsurinjpreimafv 47409	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∃𝑔∃ℎ(𝑔:𝐴–onto→{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} ∧ ℎ:{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})}–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)))
10		foeq3 6770	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} → (𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ↔ 𝑔:𝐴–onto→{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})}))
11		f1eq2 6752	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} → (ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ↔ ℎ:{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})}–1-1→𝐵))
12	10, 11	3anbi12d 1439	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} → ((𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)) ↔ (𝑔:𝐴–onto→{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} ∧ ℎ:{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})}–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔))))
13	12	2exbidv 1924	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} → (∃𝑔∃ℎ(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)) ↔ ∃𝑔∃ℎ(𝑔:𝐴–onto→{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} ∧ ℎ:{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})}–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔))))
14	2, 9, 13	spcedv 3564	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∃𝑝∃𝑔∃ℎ(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)))
15		exrot3 2166	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑝∃𝑔∃ℎ(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)) ↔ ∃𝑔∃ℎ∃𝑝(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)))
16	14, 15	sylib 218	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∃𝑔∃ℎ∃𝑝(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109  {cab 2707  ∃wrex 3053  Vcvv 3447  {csn 4589  ^◡ccnv 5637   “ cima 5641   ∘ ccom 5642  ⟶wf 6507  –1-1→wf1 6508  –onto→wfo 6509  ‘cfv 6511

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5234  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pow 5320  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-nel 3030  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-reu 3355  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-f1 6516  df-fo 6517  df-f1o 6518  df-fv 6519

This theorem is referenced by: (None)