Theorem fundcmpsurinj 46562

Description: Every function 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 can be decomposed into a surjective and an injective function. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fundcmpsurinj	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∃𝑔∃ℎ∃𝑝(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔,ℎ,𝑝   𝐵,𝑔,ℎ,𝑝   𝑔,𝐹,ℎ,𝑝   𝑔,𝑉

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(ℎ,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem fundcmpsurinj

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		abrexexg 7940	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} ∈ V)
2	1	adantl 481	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} ∈ V)
3		fveq2 6881	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
4	3	sneqd 4632	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → {(𝐹‘𝑥)} = {(𝐹‘𝑦)})
5	4	imaeq2d 6049	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)}) = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑦)}))
6	5	eqeq2d 2735	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)}) ↔ 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑦)})))
7	6	cbvrexvw 3227	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)}) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑦)}))
8	7	abbii 2794	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑦)})}
9	8	fundcmpsurinjpreimafv 46561	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∃𝑔∃ℎ(𝑔:𝐴–onto→{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} ∧ ℎ:{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})}–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)))
10		foeq3 6793	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} → (𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ↔ 𝑔:𝐴–onto→{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})}))
11		f1eq2 6773	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} → (ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ↔ ℎ:{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})}–1-1→𝐵))
12	10, 11	3anbi12d 1433	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} → ((𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)) ↔ (𝑔:𝐴–onto→{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} ∧ ℎ:{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})}–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔))))
13	12	2exbidv 1919	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} → (∃𝑔∃ℎ(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)) ↔ ∃𝑔∃ℎ(𝑔:𝐴–onto→{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})} ∧ ℎ:{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘𝑥)})}–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔))))
14	2, 9, 13	spcedv 3580	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∃𝑝∃𝑔∃ℎ(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)))
15		exrot3 2157	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑝∃𝑔∃ℎ(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)) ↔ ∃𝑔∃ℎ∃𝑝(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)))
16	14, 15	sylib 217	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∃𝑔∃ℎ∃𝑝(𝑔:𝐴–onto→𝑝 ∧ ℎ:𝑝–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = (ℎ ∘ 𝑔)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1773   ∈ wcel 2098  {cab 2701  ∃wrex 3062  Vcvv 3466  {csn 4620  ^◡ccnv 5665   “ cima 5669   ∘ ccom 5670  ⟶wf 6529  –1-1→wf1 6530  –onto→wfo 6531  ‘cfv 6533

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2695  ax-rep 5275  ax-sep 5289  ax-nul 5296  ax-pow 5353  ax-pr 5417  ax-un 7718

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2526  df-eu 2555  df-clab 2702  df-cleq 2716  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-ne 2933  df-nel 3039  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3063  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3425  df-v 3468  df-sbc 3770  df-csb 3886  df-dif 3943  df-un 3945  df-in 3947  df-ss 3957  df-nul 4315  df-if 4521  df-pw 4596  df-sn 4621  df-pr 4623  df-op 4627  df-uni 4900  df-iun 4989  df-br 5139  df-opab 5201  df-mpt 5222  df-id 5564  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-iota 6485  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541

This theorem is referenced by: (None)