Theorem grpsubpropd 19260

Description: Weak property deduction for the group subtraction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd.b	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
grpsubpropd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Proof of Theorem grpsubpropd

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		grpsubpropd.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
2		grpsubpropd.p	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))
3		eqidd 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 = 𝑎)
4		eqidd 2761	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺))
5	2	oveqdr 7448	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))
6	4, 1, 5	grpinvpropd 19230	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐻))
7	6	fveq1d 6887	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) = ((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))
8	2, 3, 7	oveq123d 7441	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
9	1, 1, 8	mpoeq123dv 7495	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
10		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
11		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
12		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐺)
13		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐺)
14	10, 11, 12, 13	grpsubfval 19199	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
15		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐻) = (Base‘𝐻)
16		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐻) = (+g‘𝐻)
17		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (invg‘𝐻) = (invg‘𝐻)
18		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (-g‘𝐻)
19	15, 16, 17, 18	grpsubfval 19199	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
20	9, 14, 19	3eqtr4g 2820	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7420   ∈ cmpo 7422  Basecbs 17392  +_gcplusg 17433  inv_gcminusg 19150  -_gcsg 19151

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7751

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-fv 6546  df-riota 7377  df-ov 7423  df-oprab 7424  df-mpo 7425  df-1st 8001  df-2nd 8002  df-0g 17617  df-minusg 19153  df-sbg 19154

This theorem is used by:  rlmsub  21476  matsubg  22752  tngngp2  24976  tngngp  24978  tcphsub  25547  ply1divalg2  26462  ttgsub  29461  zhmnrg  34643