Theorem grpsubpropd 19284

Description: Weak property deduction for the group subtraction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd.b	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
grpsubpropd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Proof of Theorem grpsubpropd

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		grpsubpropd.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
2		grpsubpropd.p	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))
3		eqidd 2764	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 = 𝑎)
4		eqidd 2764	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺))
5	2	oveqdr 7471	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))
6	4, 1, 5	grpinvpropd 19254	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐻))
7	6	fveq1d 6910	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) = ((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))
8	2, 3, 7	oveq123d 7464	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
9	1, 1, 8	mpoeq123dv 7518	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
10		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
11		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
12		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐺)
13		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐺)
14	10, 11, 12, 13	grpsubfval 19223	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
15		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐻) = (Base‘𝐻)
16		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐻) = (+g‘𝐻)
17		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (invg‘𝐻) = (invg‘𝐻)
18		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (-g‘𝐻)
19	15, 16, 17, 18	grpsubfval 19223	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
20	9, 14, 19	3eqtr4g 2823	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ‘cfv 6558  (class class class)co 7443   ∈ cmpo 7445  Basecbs 17416  +_gcplusg 17457  inv_gcminusg 19174  -_gcsg 19175

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-fv 6566  df-riota 7400  df-ov 7446  df-oprab 7447  df-mpo 7448  df-1st 8025  df-2nd 8026  df-0g 17641  df-minusg 19177  df-sbg 19178

This theorem is used by:  rlmsub  21501  matsubg  22777  tngngp2  25001  tngngp  25003  tcphsub  25572  ply1divalg2  26487  ttgsub  29486  zhmnrg  34667