Theorem grpsubpropd 19235

Description: Weak property deduction for the group subtraction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd.b	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
grpsubpropd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Proof of Theorem grpsubpropd

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		grpsubpropd.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
2		grpsubpropd.p	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))
3		eqidd 2762	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 = 𝑎)
4		eqidd 2762	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺))
5	2	oveqdr 7440	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))
6	4, 1, 5	grpinvpropd 19205	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐻))
7	6	fveq1d 6879	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) = ((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))
8	2, 3, 7	oveq123d 7433	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
9	1, 1, 8	mpoeq123dv 7487	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
10		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
11		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
12		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐺)
13		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐺)
14	10, 11, 12, 13	grpsubfval 19174	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
15		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐻) = (Base‘𝐻)
16		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐻) = (+g‘𝐻)
17		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (invg‘𝐻) = (invg‘𝐻)
18		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (-g‘𝐻)
19	15, 16, 17, 18	grpsubfval 19174	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
20	9, 14, 19	3eqtr4g 2821	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ‘cfv 6531  (class class class)co 7412   ∈ cmpo 7414  Basecbs 17367  +_gcplusg 17408  inv_gcminusg 19125  -_gcsg 19126

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-fv 6539  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7990  df-2nd 7991  df-0g 17592  df-minusg 19128  df-sbg 19129

This theorem is used by:  rlmsub  21451  matsubg  22727  tngngp2  24951  tngngp  24953  tcphsub  25522  ply1divalg2  26437  ttgsub  29438  zhmnrg  34579