Theorem grpsubpropd 19142

Description: Weak property deduction for the group subtraction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd.b	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
grpsubpropd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Proof of Theorem grpsubpropd

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		grpsubpropd.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
2		grpsubpropd.p	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐻))
3		eqidd 2767	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 = 𝑎)
4		eqidd 2767	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺))
5	2	oveqdr 7451	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))
6	4, 1, 5	grpinvpropd 19112	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐻))
7	6	fveq1d 6890	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) = ((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))
8	2, 3, 7	oveq123d 7444	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
9	1, 1, 8	mpoeq123dv 7498	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
10		eqid 2766	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
11		eqid 2766	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
12		eqid 2766	. . 3 ⊢ (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐺)
13		eqid 2766	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐺)
14	10, 11, 12, 13	grpsubfval 19081	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
15		eqid 2766	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐻) = (Base‘𝐻)
16		eqid 2766	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐻) = (+g‘𝐻)
17		eqid 2766	. . 3 ⊢ (invg‘𝐻) = (invg‘𝐻)
18		eqid 2766	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (-g‘𝐻)
19	15, 16, 17, 18	grpsubfval 19081	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
20	9, 14, 19	3eqtr4g 2826	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7423   ∈ cmpo 7425  Basecbs 17294  +_gcplusg 17335  inv_gcminusg 19032  -_gcsg 19033

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409  ax-un 7745

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-reu 3373  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-csb 3857  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-iun 4963  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-fv 6551  df-riota 7380  df-ov 7426  df-oprab 7427  df-mpo 7428  df-1st 7995  df-2nd 7996  df-0g 17519  df-minusg 19035  df-sbg 19036

This theorem is used by:  rlmsub  21354  matsubg  22626  tngngp2  24846  tngngp  24848  tcphsub  25417  ply1divalg2  26333  ttgsub  29265  zhmnrg  34386