Theorem grpsubpropd2 19108

Description: Strong property deduction for the group subtraction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))
grpsubpropd2.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻))
grpsubpropd2.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
grpsubpropd2.4	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd2	⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐺,𝑦   𝑥,𝐻,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem grpsubpropd2

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp1 1152	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝜑)
2		simp2 1153	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
3		grpsubpropd2.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))
4	3	3ad2ant1 1149	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))
5	2, 4	eleqtrrd 2872	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐵)
6		grpsubpropd2.3	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
7	6	3ad2ant1 1149	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
8		simp3 1154	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
9		eqid 2769	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
10		eqid 2769	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐺)
11	9, 10	grpinvcl 19050	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
12	7, 8, 11	syl2anc 595	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
13	12, 4	eleqtrrd 2872	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ 𝐵)
14		grpsubpropd2.4	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))
15	14	oveqrspc2v 7435	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
16	1, 5, 13, 15	syl12anc 849	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
17		grpsubpropd2.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻))
18	3, 17, 14	grpinvpropd 19077	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐻))
19	18	fveq1d 6881	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) = ((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))
20	19	oveq2d 7424	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
21	20	3ad2ant1 1149	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
22	16, 21	eqtrd 2804	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
23	22	mpoeq3dva 7485	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
24	3, 17	eqtr3d 2806	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
25		mpoeq12 7481	. . . 4 ⊢ (((Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻) ∧ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻)) → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
26	24, 24, 25	syl2anc 595	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
27	23, 26	eqtrd 2804	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
28		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
29		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐺)
30	9, 28, 10, 29	grpsubfval 19046	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
31		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐻) = (Base‘𝐻)
32		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐻) = (+g‘𝐻)
33		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (invg‘𝐻) = (invg‘𝐻)
34		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (-g‘𝐻)
35	31, 32, 33, 34	grpsubfval 19046	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
36	27, 30, 35	3eqtr4g 2829	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7408   ∈ cmpo 7410  Basecbs 17265  +_gcplusg 17306  Grpcgrp 18996  inv_gcminusg 18997  -_gcsg 18998

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7730

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rmo 3376  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-iun 4959  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-fv 6541  df-riota 7365  df-ov 7411  df-oprab 7412  df-mpo 7413  df-1st 7982  df-2nd 7983  df-0g 17490  df-mgm 18694  df-sgrp 18773  df-mnd 18789  df-grp 18999  df-minusg 19000  df-sbg 19001

This theorem is referenced by:  ngppropd  24759