Theorem grpsubpropd2 18966

Description: Strong property deduction for the group subtraction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))
grpsubpropd2.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻))
grpsubpropd2.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
grpsubpropd2.4	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpsubpropd2	⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐺,𝑦   𝑥,𝐻,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem grpsubpropd2

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp1 1135	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝜑)
2		simp2 1136	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
3		grpsubpropd2.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))
4	3	3ad2ant1 1132	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))
5	2, 4	eleqtrrd 2835	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐵)
6		grpsubpropd2.3	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
7	6	3ad2ant1 1132	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
8		simp3 1137	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
9		eqid 2731	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
10		eqid 2731	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐺)
11	9, 10	grpinvcl 18909	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
12	7, 8, 11	syl2anc 583	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
13	12, 4	eleqtrrd 2835	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ 𝐵)
14		grpsubpropd2.4	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))
15	14	oveqrspc2v 7439	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
16	1, 5, 13, 15	syl12anc 834	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
17		grpsubpropd2.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻))
18	3, 17, 14	grpinvpropd 18935	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐻))
19	18	fveq1d 6894	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) = ((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))
20	19	oveq2d 7428	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
21	20	3ad2ant1 1132	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
22	16, 21	eqtrd 2771	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
23	22	mpoeq3dva 7489	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
24	3, 17	eqtr3d 2773	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
25		mpoeq12 7485	. . . 4 ⊢ (((Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻) ∧ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻)) → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
26	24, 24, 25	syl2anc 583	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
27	23, 26	eqtrd 2771	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
28		eqid 2731	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
29		eqid 2731	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐺)
30	9, 28, 10, 29	grpsubfval 18905	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
31		eqid 2731	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐻) = (Base‘𝐻)
32		eqid 2731	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝐻) = (+g‘𝐻)
33		eqid 2731	. . 3 ⊢ (invg‘𝐻) = (invg‘𝐻)
34		eqid 2731	. . 3 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (-g‘𝐻)
35	31, 32, 33, 34	grpsubfval 18905	. 2 ⊢ (-g‘𝐻) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
36	27, 30, 35	3eqtr4g 2796	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105  ‘cfv 6544  (class class class)co 7412   ∈ cmpo 7414  Basecbs 17149  +_gcplusg 17202  Grpcgrp 18856  inv_gcminusg 18857  -_gcsg 18858

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pow 5364  ax-pr 5428  ax-un 7728

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rmo 3375  df-reu 3376  df-rab 3432  df-v 3475  df-sbc 3779  df-csb 3895  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-pw 4605  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-iun 5000  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-mpt 5233  df-id 5575  df-xp 5683  df-rel 5684  df-cnv 5685  df-co 5686  df-dm 5687  df-rn 5688  df-res 5689  df-ima 5690  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6546  df-fn 6547  df-f 6548  df-fv 6552  df-riota 7368  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7978  df-2nd 7979  df-0g 17392  df-mgm 18566  df-sgrp 18645  df-mnd 18661  df-grp 18859  df-minusg 18860  df-sbg 18861

This theorem is referenced by:  ngppropd  24367