MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  grpsubpropd2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem grpsubpropd2 19263
Description: Strong property deduction for the group subtraction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
grpsubpropd2.1 (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))
grpsubpropd2.2 (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻))
grpsubpropd2.3 (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
grpsubpropd2.4 ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))
Assertion
Ref Expression
grpsubpropd2 (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐺,𝑦   𝑥,𝐻,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem grpsubpropd2
Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 simp1 1154 . . . . . 6 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝜑)
2 simp2 1155 . . . . . . 7 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
3 grpsubpropd2.1 . . . . . . . 8 (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))
433ad2ant1 1151 . . . . . . 7 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))
52, 4eleqtrrd 2863 . . . . . 6 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐵)
6 grpsubpropd2.3 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
763ad2ant1 1151 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
8 simp3 1156 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
9 eqid 2760 . . . . . . . . 9 (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
10 eqid 2760 . . . . . . . . 9 (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐺)
119, 10grpinvcl 19205 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
127, 8, 11syl2anc 596 . . . . . . 7 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ (Base‘𝐺))
1312, 4eleqtrrd 2863 . . . . . 6 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ 𝐵)
14 grpsubpropd2.4 . . . . . . 7 ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐻)𝑦))
1514oveqrspc2v 7449 . . . . . 6 ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
161, 5, 13, 15syl12anc 850 . . . . 5 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
17 grpsubpropd2.2 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻))
183, 17, 14grpinvpropd 19232 . . . . . . . 8 (𝜑 → (invg‘𝐺) = (invg‘𝐻))
1918fveq1d 6890 . . . . . . 7 (𝜑 → ((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏) = ((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))
2019oveq2d 7438 . . . . . 6 (𝜑 → (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
21203ad2ant1 1151 . . . . 5 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
2216, 21eqtrd 2795 . . . 4 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
2322mpoeq3dva 7499 . . 3 (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
243, 17eqtr3d 2797 . . . 4 (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻))
25 mpoeq12 7495 . . . 4 (((Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻) ∧ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐻)) → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
2624, 24, 25syl2anc 596 . . 3 (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
2723, 26eqtrd 2795 . 2 (𝜑 → (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏))))
28 eqid 2760 . . 3 (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
29 eqid 2760 . . 3 (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐺)
309, 28, 10, 29grpsubfval 19201 . 2 (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐺), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)((invg‘𝐺)‘𝑏)))
31 eqid 2760 . . 3 (Base‘𝐻) = (Base‘𝐻)
32 eqid 2760 . . 3 (+g‘𝐻) = (+g‘𝐻)
33 eqid 2760 . . 3 (invg‘𝐻) = (invg‘𝐻)
34 eqid 2760 . . 3 (-g‘𝐻) = (-g‘𝐻)
3531, 32, 33, 34grpsubfval 19201 . 2 (-g‘𝐻) = (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝐻), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝐻) ↦ (𝑎(+g‘𝐻)((invg‘𝐻)‘𝑏)))
3627, 30, 353eqtr4g 2820 1 (𝜑 → (-g‘𝐺) = (-g‘𝐻))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ‘cfv 6541  (class class class)co 7422   ∈ cmpo 7424  Basecbs 17394  +gcplusg 17435  Grpcgrp 19151  invgcminusg 19152  -gcsg 19153
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7753
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3848  df-ss 3897  df-dif 4046  df-in 4090  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6543  df-fn 6544  df-f 6545  df-fv 6549  df-riota 7379  df-ov 7425  df-oprab 7426  df-mpo 7427  df-1st 8003  df-2nd 8004  df-0g 17619  df-mgm 18823  df-sgrp 18915  df-mnd 18931  df-grp 19154  df-minusg 19155  df-sbg 19156
This theorem is used by:  ngppropd  24963
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator