Theorem inveq 17696

Description: If there are two inverses of a morphism, these inverses are equal. Corollary 3.11 of [Adamek] p. 28. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2020.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
inveq.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
inveq.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)
inveq.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
inveq.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
inveq.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inveq	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾) → 𝐺 = 𝐾))

Proof of Theorem inveq

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inveq.b	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
2		eqid 2734	. . 3 ⊢ (Sect‘𝐶) = (Sect‘𝐶)
3		inveq.c	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
4	3	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾)) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
5		inveq.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
6	5	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾)) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
7		inveq.x	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
8	7	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾)) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
9		inveq.n	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)
10	1, 9, 3, 7, 5, 2	isinv 17682	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ↔ (𝐹(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐺(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐹)))
11		simpr 484	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐹(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐺(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐹) → 𝐺(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐹)
12	10, 11	biimtrdi 253	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 → 𝐺(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐹))
13	12	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 → (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐹))
14	13	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾) → (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐹))
15	14	impcom 407	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾)) → 𝐺(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐹)
16	1, 9, 3, 7, 5, 2	isinv 17682	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾 ↔ (𝐹(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐾 ∧ 𝐾(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐹)))
17		simpl 482	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐾 ∧ 𝐾(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐹) → 𝐹(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐾)
18	16, 17	biimtrdi 253	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾 → 𝐹(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐾))
19	18	adantld 490	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾) → 𝐹(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐾))
20	19	imp 406	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾)) → 𝐹(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐾)
21	1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 15, 20	sectcan 17677	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾)) → 𝐺 = 𝐾)
22	21	ex 412	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐾) → 𝐺 = 𝐾))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113   class class class wbr 5096  ‘cfv 6490  (class class class)co 7356  Basecbs 17134  Catccat 17585  Sectcsect 17666  Invcinv 17667

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2182  ax-ext 2706  ax-rep 5222  ax-sep 5239  ax-nul 5249  ax-pow 5308  ax-pr 5375  ax-un 7678

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2883  df-ne 2931  df-ral 3050  df-rex 3059  df-rmo 3348  df-reu 3349  df-rab 3398  df-v 3440  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4284  df-if 4478  df-pw 4554  df-sn 4579  df-pr 4581  df-op 4585  df-uni 4862  df-iun 4946  df-br 5097  df-opab 5159  df-mpt 5178  df-id 5517  df-xp 5628  df-rel 5629  df-cnv 5630  df-co 5631  df-dm 5632  df-rn 5633  df-res 5634  df-ima 5635  df-iota 6446  df-fun 6492  df-fn 6493  df-f 6494  df-f1 6495  df-fo 6496  df-f1o 6497  df-fv 6498  df-riota 7313  df-ov 7359  df-oprab 7360  df-mpo 7361  df-1st 7931  df-2nd 7932  df-cat 17589  df-cid 17590  df-sect 17669  df-inv 17670

This theorem is referenced by: (None)