Theorem sectcan 17384

Description: If 𝐺 is a section of 𝐹 and 𝐹 is a section of 𝐻, then 𝐺 = 𝐻. Proposition 3.10 of [Adamek] p. 28. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sectcan.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
sectcan.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)
sectcan.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
sectcan.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
sectcan.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
sectcan.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹)
sectcan.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sectcan	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = 𝐻)

Proof of Theorem sectcan

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sectcan.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
2		eqid 2738	. . . 4 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
3		eqid 2738	. . . 4 ⊢ (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐶)
4		sectcan.c	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
5		sectcan.x	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
6		sectcan.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
7		sectcan.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹)
8		eqid 2738	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Id‘𝐶) = (Id‘𝐶)
9		sectcan.s	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)
10	1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 4, 5, 6	issect 17382	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹 ↔ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋))))
11	7, 10	mpbid 231	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
12	11	simp1d 1140	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
13		sectcan.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻)
14	1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 4, 6, 5	issect 17382	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌))))
15	13, 14	mpbid 231	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)))
16	15	simp1d 1140	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋))
17	15	simp2d 1141	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
18	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5, 12, 16, 6, 17	catass 17312	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)(𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺)))
19	15	simp3d 1142	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌))
20	19	oveq1d 7270	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺))
21	11	simp3d 1142	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋))
22	21	oveq2d 7271	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)(𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺)) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
23	18, 20, 22	3eqtr3d 2786	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
24	1, 2, 8, 4, 5, 3, 6, 12	catlid 17309	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = 𝐺)
25	1, 2, 8, 4, 5, 3, 6, 17	catrid 17310	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) = 𝐻)
26	23, 24, 25	3eqtr3d 2786	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = 𝐻)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ⟨cop 4564   class class class wbr 5070  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255  Basecbs 16840  Hom chom 16899  compcco 16900  Catccat 17290  Idccid 17291  Sectcsect 17373

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5205  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rmo 3071  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-iun 4923  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-riota 7212  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259  df-mpo 7260  df-1st 7804  df-2nd 7805  df-cat 17294  df-cid 17295  df-sect 17376

This theorem is referenced by:  invfun  17393  inveq  17403