Theorem sectcan 17910

Description: If 𝐺 is a section of 𝐹 and 𝐹 is a section of 𝐻, then 𝐺 = 𝐻. Proposition 3.10 of [Adamek] p. 28. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sectcan.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
sectcan.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)
sectcan.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
sectcan.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
sectcan.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
sectcan.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹)
sectcan.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sectcan	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = 𝐻)

Proof of Theorem sectcan

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sectcan.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
2		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
3		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐶)
4		sectcan.c	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
5		sectcan.x	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
6		sectcan.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
7		sectcan.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹)
8		eqid 2761	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Id‘𝐶) = (Id‘𝐶)
9		sectcan.s	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)
10	1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 4, 5, 6	issect 17908	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹 ↔ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋))))
11	7, 10	mpbid 235	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
12	11	simp1d 1160	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
13		sectcan.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻)
14	1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 4, 6, 5	issect 17908	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌))))
15	13, 14	mpbid 235	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)))
16	15	simp1d 1160	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋))
17	15	simp2d 1161	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
18	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5, 12, 16, 6, 17	catass 17840	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)(𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺)))
19	15	simp3d 1162	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌))
20	19	oveq1d 7427	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺))
21	11	simp3d 1162	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋))
22	21	oveq2d 7428	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)(𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺)) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
23	18, 20, 22	3eqtr3d 2804	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
24	1, 2, 8, 4, 5, 3, 6, 12	catlid 17837	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = 𝐺)
25	1, 2, 8, 4, 5, 3, 6, 17	catrid 17838	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) = 𝐻)
26	23, 24, 25	3eqtr3d 2804	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = 𝐻)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ⟨cop 4590   class class class wbr 5103  ‘cfv 6531  (class class class)co 7412  Basecbs 17367  Hom chom 17419  compcco 17420  Catccat 17818  Idccid 17819  Sectcsect 17899

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3366  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7990  df-2nd 7991  df-cat 17822  df-cid 17823  df-sect 17902

This theorem is used by:  invfun  17919  inveq  17929