Theorem sectcan 17701

Description: If 𝐺 is a section of 𝐹 and 𝐹 is a section of 𝐻, then 𝐺 = 𝐻. Proposition 3.10 of [Adamek] p. 28. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sectcan.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
sectcan.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)
sectcan.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
sectcan.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
sectcan.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
sectcan.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹)
sectcan.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sectcan	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = 𝐻)

Proof of Theorem sectcan

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sectcan.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
2		eqid 2724	. . . 4 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
3		eqid 2724	. . . 4 ⊢ (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐶)
4		sectcan.c	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
5		sectcan.x	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
6		sectcan.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
7		sectcan.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹)
8		eqid 2724	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Id‘𝐶) = (Id‘𝐶)
9		sectcan.s	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)
10	1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 4, 5, 6	issect 17699	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹 ↔ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋))))
11	7, 10	mpbid 231	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
12	11	simp1d 1139	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
13		sectcan.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻)
14	1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 4, 6, 5	issect 17699	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌))))
15	13, 14	mpbid 231	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)))
16	15	simp1d 1139	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋))
17	15	simp2d 1140	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
18	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5, 12, 16, 6, 17	catass 17629	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)(𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺)))
19	15	simp3d 1141	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌))
20	19	oveq1d 7416	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺))
21	11	simp3d 1141	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋))
22	21	oveq2d 7417	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)(𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺)) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
23	18, 20, 22	3eqtr3d 2772	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
24	1, 2, 8, 4, 5, 3, 6, 12	catlid 17626	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = 𝐺)
25	1, 2, 8, 4, 5, 3, 6, 17	catrid 17627	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) = 𝐻)
26	23, 24, 25	3eqtr3d 2772	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = 𝐻)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  ⟨cop 4626   class class class wbr 5138  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7401  Basecbs 17143  Hom chom 17207  compcco 17208  Catccat 17607  Idccid 17608  Sectcsect 17690

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2695  ax-rep 5275  ax-sep 5289  ax-nul 5296  ax-pow 5353  ax-pr 5417  ax-un 7718

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2526  df-eu 2555  df-clab 2702  df-cleq 2716  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3368  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3425  df-v 3468  df-sbc 3770  df-csb 3886  df-dif 3943  df-un 3945  df-in 3947  df-ss 3957  df-nul 4315  df-if 4521  df-pw 4596  df-sn 4621  df-pr 4623  df-op 4627  df-uni 4900  df-iun 4989  df-br 5139  df-opab 5201  df-mpt 5222  df-id 5564  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-iota 6485  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-riota 7357  df-ov 7404  df-oprab 7405  df-mpo 7406  df-1st 7968  df-2nd 7969  df-cat 17611  df-cid 17612  df-sect 17693

This theorem is referenced by:  invfun  17710  inveq  17720