Theorem sectcan 17813

Description: If 𝐺 is a section of 𝐹 and 𝐹 is a section of 𝐻, then 𝐺 = 𝐻. Proposition 3.10 of [Adamek] p. 28. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sectcan.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
sectcan.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)
sectcan.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
sectcan.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
sectcan.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
sectcan.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹)
sectcan.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sectcan	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = 𝐻)

Proof of Theorem sectcan

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sectcan.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
2		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
3		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐶)
4		sectcan.c	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
5		sectcan.x	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
6		sectcan.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
7		sectcan.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹)
8		eqid 2763	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Id‘𝐶) = (Id‘𝐶)
9		sectcan.s	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)
10	1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 4, 5, 6	issect 17811	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐹 ↔ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋))))
11	7, 10	mpbid 235	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
12	11	simp1d 1160	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
13		sectcan.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻)
14	1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 4, 6, 5	issect 17811	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐻 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌))))
15	13, 14	mpbid 235	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) ∧ (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)))
16	15	simp1d 1160	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋))
17	15	simp2d 1161	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
18	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5, 12, 16, 6, 17	catass 17743	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)(𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺)))
19	15	simp3d 1162	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌))
20	19	oveq1d 7427	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐻(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐹)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺))
21	11	simp3d 1162	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺) = ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋))
22	21	oveq2d 7428	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)(𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝐺)) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
23	18, 20, 22	3eqtr3d 2806	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)))
24	1, 2, 8, 4, 5, 3, 6, 12	catlid 17740	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)𝐺) = 𝐺)
25	1, 2, 8, 4, 5, 3, 6, 17	catrid 17741	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑌)((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) = 𝐻)
26	23, 24, 25	3eqtr3d 2806	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = 𝐻)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  ⟨cop 4596   class class class wbr 5110  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7412  Basecbs 17270  Hom chom 17322  compcco 17323  Catccat 17721  Idccid 17722  Sectcsect 17802

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5239  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5270  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-iun 4959  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7987  df-2nd 7988  df-cat 17725  df-cid 17726  df-sect 17805

This theorem is referenced by:  invfun  17822  inveq  17832