Theorem lautco 41420

Description: The composition of two lattice automorphisms is a lattice automorphism. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
lautco.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (LAut‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lautco	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∈ 𝐼)

Proof of Theorem lautco

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2763	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
2		lautco.i	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐼 = (LAut‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	laut1o 41408	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐹:(Base‘𝐾)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝐾))
4	3	3adant3 1150	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐹:(Base‘𝐾)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝐾))
5	1, 2	laut1o 41408	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐺:(Base‘𝐾)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝐾))
6	5	3adant2 1149	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐺:(Base‘𝐾)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝐾))
7		f1oco 6878	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:(Base‘𝐾)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝐺:(Base‘𝐾)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝐾)) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):(Base‘𝐾)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝐾))
8	4, 6, 7	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):(Base‘𝐾)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝐾))
9		simpl1 1210	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
10		simpl2 1211	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼)
11		simpl3 1212	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼)
12		simprl 783	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → 𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
13	1, 2	lautcl 41410	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
14	9, 11, 12, 13	syl21anc 851	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
15		simprr 785	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
16	1, 2	lautcl 41410	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
17	9, 11, 15, 16	syl21anc 851	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
18		eqid 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (le‘𝐾) = (le‘𝐾)
19	1, 18, 2	lautle 41407	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → ((𝐺‘𝑥)(le‘𝐾)(𝐺‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑥))(le‘𝐾)(𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑦))))
20	9, 10, 14, 17, 19	syl22anc 852	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → ((𝐺‘𝑥)(le‘𝐾)(𝐺‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑥))(le‘𝐾)(𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑦))))
21	1, 18, 2	lautle 41407	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥(le‘𝐾)𝑦 ↔ (𝐺‘𝑥)(le‘𝐾)(𝐺‘𝑦)))
22	21	3adantl2 1186	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥(le‘𝐾)𝑦 ↔ (𝐺‘𝑥)(le‘𝐾)(𝐺‘𝑦)))
23		f1of 6854	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐺:(Base‘𝐾)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝐾) → 𝐺:(Base‘𝐾)⟶(Base‘𝐾))
24	6, 23	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐺:(Base‘𝐾)⟶(Base‘𝐾))
25		simpl 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → 𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
26		fvco3 7016	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺:(Base‘𝐾)⟶(Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑥)))
27	24, 25, 26	syl2an 608	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑥)))
28		simpr 490	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
29		fvco3 7016	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺:(Base‘𝐾)⟶(Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑦)))
30	24, 28, 29	syl2an 608	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑦)))
31	27, 30	breq12d 5121	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑥)(le‘𝐾)((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑥))(le‘𝐾)(𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑦))))
32	20, 22, 31	3bitr4d 314	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥(le‘𝐾)𝑦 ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑥)(le‘𝐾)((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑦)))
33	32	ralrimivva 3209	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) → ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(le‘𝐾)𝑦 ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑥)(le‘𝐾)((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑦)))
34	1, 18, 2	islaut 41406	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):(Base‘𝐾)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(le‘𝐾)𝑦 ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑥)(le‘𝐾)((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑦)))))
35	34	3ad2ant1 1151	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):(Base‘𝐾)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(le‘𝐾)𝑦 ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑥)(le‘𝐾)((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑦)))))
36	8, 33, 35	mpbir2and 726	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∈ 𝐼)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080   class class class wbr 5108   ∘ ccom 5662  ⟶wf 6562  ⟶1-1ontowf1o 6565  ‘cfv 6566  Basecbs 17431  lecple 17479  LAutclaut 41308

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-f1 6571  df-fo 6572  df-f1o 6573  df-fv 6574  df-ov 7454  df-oprab 7455  df-mpo 7456  df-map 8887  df-laut 41312

This theorem is used by:  ldilco  41439