| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 391 of 505) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31179) |
(31180-32702) |
(32703-50434) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | sucmapleftuniq 39001 | Left uniqueness of the successor mapping. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐿 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐿 SucMap 𝑁 ∧ 𝑀 SucMap 𝑁) → 𝐿 = 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | exeupre 39002* | Whenever a predecessor exists, it exists alone. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑚 𝑚 SucMap 𝑁 ↔ ∃!𝑚 𝑚 SucMap 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | preex 39003 | The successor-predecessor exists. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ pre 𝑁 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | eupre2 39004* | Unique predecessor exists on the range of the successor map. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑁 ∈ ran SucMap ↔ ∃!𝑚 𝑚 SucMap 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | eupre 39005* | Unique predecessor exists on the successor class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑁 ∈ Suc ↔ ∃!𝑚 𝑚 SucMap 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | presucmap 39006 | pre is really a predecessor (when it should be). This correctness theorem for pre makes it usable in proofs without unfolding ℩. This theorem gives one witness; preuniqval 39007 gives it is the only one. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ran SucMap → pre 𝑁 SucMap 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | preuniqval 39007* | Uniqueness/canonicity of pre. presucmap 39006 gives one witness; this theorem gives it is the only one. It turns any predecessor proof into an equality with pre 𝑁. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ran SucMap → ∀𝑚(𝑚 SucMap 𝑁 → 𝑚 = pre 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | sucpre 39008 | suc is a right-inverse of pre on Suc. This theorem states the partial inverse relation in the direction we most often need. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ Suc → suc pre 𝑁 = 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | presuc 39009 | pre is a left-inverse of suc. This theorem gives a clean rewrite rule that eliminates pre on explicit successors. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → pre suc 𝑀 = 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | press 39010 | Predecessor is a subset of its successor. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ Suc → pre 𝑁 ⊆ 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | preel 39011 | Predecessor is a subset of its successor. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ Suc → pre 𝑁 ∈ 𝑁) | ||
| Definition | df-coss 39012* |
Define the class of cosets by 𝑅: 𝑥 and 𝑦 are cosets by
𝑅 iff there exists a set 𝑢 such
that both 𝑢𝑅𝑥 and
𝑢𝑅𝑦 hold, i.e., both 𝑥 and
𝑦
are are elements of the 𝑅
-coset of 𝑢 (see dfcoss2 39014 and the comment of dfec2 8685). 𝑅 is
usually a relation.
This concept simplifies theorems relating partition and equivalence: the left side of these theorems relate to 𝑅, the right side relate to ≀ 𝑅 (see e.g. pet 39476). Without the definition of ≀ 𝑅 we should have to relate the right side of these theorems to a composition of a converse (cf. dfcoss3 39015) or to the range of a range Cartesian product of classes (cf. dfcoss4 39016), which would make the theorems complicated and confusing. Alternate definition is dfcoss2 39014. Technically, we can define it via composition (dfcoss3 39015) or as the range of a range Cartesian product (dfcoss4 39016), but neither of these definitions reveal directly how the cosets by 𝑅 relate to each other. We define functions (df-funsALTV 39277, df-funALTV 39278) and disjoints (dfdisjs 39304, dfdisjs2 39305, df-disjALTV 39301, dfdisjALTV2 39310) with the help of it as well. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)} | ||
| Definition | df-coels 39013 | Define the class of coelements on the class 𝐴, see also the alternate definition dfcoels 39031. Possible definitions are the special cases of dfcoss3 39015 and dfcoss4 39016. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Nov-2019.) |
| ⊢ ∼ 𝐴 = ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dfcoss2 39014* | Alternate definition of the class of cosets by 𝑅: 𝑥 and 𝑦 are cosets by 𝑅 iff there exists a set 𝑢 such that both 𝑥 and 𝑦 are are elements of the 𝑅-coset of 𝑢 (see also the comment of dfec2 8685). 𝑅 is usually a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)} | ||
| Theorem | dfcoss3 39015 | Alternate definition of the class of cosets by 𝑅 (see the comment of df-coss 39012). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = (𝑅 ∘ ◡𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dfcoss4 39016 | Alternate definition of the class of cosets by 𝑅 (see the comment of df-coss 39012). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = ran (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | cosscnv 39017* | Class of cosets by the converse of 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jun-2020.) |
| ⊢ ≀ ◡𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥𝑅𝑢 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑢)} | ||
| Theorem | coss1cnvres 39018* | Class of cosets by the converse of a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jun-2020.) |
| ⊢ ≀ ◡(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑢, 𝑣〉 ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑅𝑥))} | ||
| Theorem | coss2cnvepres 39019* | Special case of coss1cnvres 39018. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jun-2020.) |
| ⊢ ≀ ◡(◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑢, 𝑣〉 ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑣))} | ||
| Theorem | cossex 39020 | If 𝐴 is a set then the class of cosets by 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | cosscnvex 39021 | If 𝐴 is a set then the class of cosets by the converse of 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Oct-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ ◡𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | 1cosscnvepresex 39022 | Sufficient condition for a restricted converse epsilon coset to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | 1cossxrncnvepresex 39023 | Sufficient condition for a restricted converse epsilon range Cartesian product to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | relcoss 39024 | Cosets by 𝑅 is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ Rel ≀ 𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | relcoels 39025 | Coelements on 𝐴 is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Rel ∼ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | cossss 39026 | Subclass theorem for the classes of cosets by 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Nov-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ≀ 𝐴 ⊆ ≀ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cosseq 39027 | Equality theorem for the classes of cosets by 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ≀ 𝐴 = ≀ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cosseqi 39028 | Equality theorem for the classes of cosets by 𝐴 and 𝐵, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ≀ 𝐴 = ≀ 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | cosseqd 39029 | Equality theorem for the classes of cosets by 𝐴 and 𝐵, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Nov-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ≀ 𝐴 = ≀ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | 1cossres 39030* | The class of cosets by a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)} | ||
| Theorem | dfcoels 39031* | Alternate definition of the class of coelements on the class 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ∼ 𝐴 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢)} | ||
| Theorem | brcoss 39032* | 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by 𝑅: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | brcoss2 39033* | Alternate form of the 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by 𝑅 binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑢(𝐴 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | brcoss3 39034 | Alternate form of the 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by 𝑅 binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ([𝐴]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | brcosscnvcoss 39035 | For sets, the 𝐴 and 𝐵 cosets by 𝑅 binary relation and the 𝐵 and 𝐴 cosets by 𝑅 binary relation are the same. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≀ 𝑅𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | brcoels 39036* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are coelements : a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jan-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ∼ 𝐴𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑢))) | ||
| Theorem | cocossss 39037* | Two ways of saying that cosets by cosets by 𝑅 is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ( ≀ ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑆𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvcosseq 39038 | The converse of cosets by 𝑅 are cosets by 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ◡ ≀ 𝑅 = ≀ 𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | br2coss 39039 | Cosets by ≀ 𝑅 binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ([𝐴] ≀ 𝑅 ∩ [𝐵] ≀ 𝑅) ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | br1cossres 39040* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are cosets by a restriction: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | br1cossres2 39041* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are cosets by a restriction: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | brressn 39042 | Binary relation on a restriction to a singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ressn2 39043* | A class ' R ' restricted to the singleton of the class ' A ' is the ordered pair class abstraction of the class ' A ' and the sets in relation ' R ' to ' A ' (and not in relation to the singleton ' { A } ' ). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}) = {〈𝑎, 𝑢〉 ∣ (𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑢)} | ||
| Theorem | refressn 39044* | Any class ' R ' restricted to the singleton of the set ' A ' (see ressn2 39043) is reflexive, see also refrelressn 39115. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (dom (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}) ∩ ran (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}))𝑥(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | antisymressn 39045 | Every class ' R ' restricted to the singleton of the class ' A ' (see ressn2 39043) is antisymmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑦 ∧ 𝑦(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | trressn 39046 | Any class ' R ' restricted to the singleton of the class ' A ' (see ressn2 39043) is transitive, see also trrelressn 39178. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑦 ∧ 𝑦(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑧) → 𝑥(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑧) | ||
| Theorem | relbrcoss 39047* | 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by relation 𝑅: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))) | ||
| Theorem | br1cossinres 39048* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are cosets by an intersection with a restriction: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ≀ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴))𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢𝑆𝐵 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝑢𝑆𝐶 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | br1cossxrnres 39049* | 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 and 〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 are cosets by an range Cartesian product with a restriction: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌)) → (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴))〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢𝑆𝐶 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝑢𝑆𝐸 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐷)))) | ||
| Theorem | br1cossinidres 39050* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are cosets by an intersection with the restricted identity class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | br1cossincnvepres 39051* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are cosets by an intersection with the restricted converse epsilon class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ≀ (𝑅 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | br1cossxrnidres 39052* | 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 and 〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 are cosets by a range Cartesian product with the restricted identity class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌)) → (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐷)))) | ||
| Theorem | br1cossxrncnvepres 39053* | 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 and 〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 are cosets by a range Cartesian product with the restricted converse epsilon class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌)) → (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝐸 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐷)))) | ||
| Theorem | dmcoss3 39054 | The domain of cosets is the domain of converse. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ dom ≀ 𝑅 = dom ◡𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | dmcoss2 39055 | The domain of cosets is the range. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ dom ≀ 𝑅 = ran 𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | rncossdmcoss 39056 | The range of cosets is the domain of them (this should be rncoss 5958 but there exists a theorem with this name already). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ ran ≀ 𝑅 = dom ≀ 𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | dm1cosscnvepres 39057 | The domain of cosets of the restricted converse epsilon relation is the union of the restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-May-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ dom ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmcoels 39058 | The domain of coelements in 𝐴 is the union of 𝐴. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 14-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 5-Apr-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ dom ∼ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | eldmcoss 39059* | Elementhood in the domain of cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | eldmcoss2 39060 | Elementhood in the domain of cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | eldm1cossres 39061* | Elementhood in the domain of restricted cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | eldm1cossres2 39062* | Elementhood in the domain of restricted cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | refrelcosslem 39063 | Lemma for the left side of the refrelcoss3 39064 reflexivity theorem. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | refrelcoss3 39064* | The class of cosets by 𝑅 is reflexive, see dfrefrel3 39107. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran ≀ 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | refrelcoss2 39065 | The class of cosets by 𝑅 is reflexive, see dfrefrel2 39106. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (( I ∩ (dom ≀ 𝑅 × ran ≀ 𝑅)) ⊆ ≀ 𝑅 ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | symrelcoss3 39066 | The class of cosets by 𝑅 is symmetric, see dfsymrel3 39145. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Mar-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑥) ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | symrelcoss2 39067 | The class of cosets by 𝑅 is symmetric, see dfsymrel2 39144. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (◡ ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ ≀ 𝑅 ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | cossssid 39068 | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom ≀ 𝑅 × ran ≀ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | cossssid2 39069* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | cossssid3 39070* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑢∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | cossssid4 39071* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | cossssid5 39072* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝑅) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | brcosscnv 39073* | 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by converse 𝑅: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | brcosscnv2 39074 | 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by converse 𝑅: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | br1cosscnvxrn 39075 | 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by the converse range Cartesian product: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ ◡(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑆𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | 1cosscnvxrn 39076 | Cosets by the converse range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ≀ ◡(𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) = ( ≀ ◡𝐴 ∩ ≀ ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cosscnvssid3 39077* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by the converse of 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑢∀𝑣∀𝑥((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑅𝑥) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) | ||
| Theorem | cosscnvssid4 39078* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by the converse of 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | cosscnvssid5 39079* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by the converse of the relation 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | coss0 39080 | Cosets by the empty set are the empty set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Oct-2019.) |
| ⊢ ≀ ∅ = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | cossid 39081 | Cosets by the identity relation are the identity relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ ≀ I = I | ||
| Theorem | cosscnvid 39082 | Cosets by the converse identity relation are the identity relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ≀ ◡ I = I | ||
| Theorem | trcoss 39083* | Sufficient condition for the transitivity of cosets by 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑦∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑦 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | eleccossin 39084 | Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐶 have the common element 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ∈ ([𝐴] ≀ 𝑅 ∩ [𝐶] ≀ 𝑅) ↔ (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≀ 𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | trcoss2 39085* | Equivalent expressions for the transitivity of cosets by 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(([𝑥] ≀ 𝑅 ∩ [𝑧] ≀ 𝑅) ≠ ∅ → ([𝑥]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | cosselrels 39086 | Cosets of sets are elements of the relations class. Implies ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → ≀ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ 𝐴 ∈ Rels ) | ||
| Theorem | cnvelrels 39087 | The converse of a set is an element of the class of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡𝐴 ∈ Rels ) | ||
| Theorem | cosscnvelrels 39088 | Cosets of converse sets are elements of the relations class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ ◡𝐴 ∈ Rels ) | ||
| Definition | df-ssr 39089* |
Define the subsets class or the class of subset relations. Similar to
definitions of epsilon relation (df-eprel 5552) and identity relation
(df-id 5547) classes. Subset relation class and Scott
Fenton's subset
class df-sset 36217 are the same: S = SSet (compare dfssr2 39090 with
df-sset 36217), the only reason we do not use dfssr2 39090 as the base
definition of the subsets class is the way we defined the epsilon
relation and the identity relation classes.
The binary relation on the class of subsets and the subclass relationship (df-ss 3924) are the same, that is, (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) when 𝐵 is a set, see brssr 39092. Yet in general we use the subclass relation 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 both for classes and for sets, see the comment of df-ss 3924. The only exception (aside from directly investigating the class S e.g. in relssr 39091 or in extssr 39100) is when we have a specific purpose with its usage, like in case of df-refs 39101 versus df-cnvrefs 39116, where we need S to define the class of reflexive sets in order to be able to define the class of converse reflexive sets with the help of the converse of S. The subsets class S has another place in set.mm as well: if we define extensional relation based on the common property in extid 38827, extep 38800 and extssr 39100, then "extrelssr" " |- ExtRel S " is a theorem along with "extrelep" " |- ExtRel E " and "extrelid" " |- ExtRel I " . (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ S = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | dfssr2 39090 | Alternate definition of the subset relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ S = ((V × V) ∖ ran ( E ⋉ (V ∖ E ))) | ||
| Theorem | relssr 39091 | The subset relation is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ Rel S | ||
| Theorem | brssr 39092 | The subset relation and subclass relationship (df-ss 3924) are the same, that is, (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | brssrid 39093 | Any set is a subset of itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 S 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | issetssr 39094 | Two ways of expressing set existence. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 S 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | brssrres 39095 | Restricted subset binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Nov-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵( S ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | br1cnvssrres 39096 | Restricted converse subset binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Nov-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵◡( S ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | brcnvssr 39097 | The converse of a subset relation swaps arguments. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴◡ S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | brcnvssrid 39098 | Any set is a converse subset of itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴◡ S 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | br1cossxrncnvssrres 39099* | 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 and 〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 are cosets by range Cartesian product with restricted converse subsets class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌)) → (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ S ↾ 𝐴))〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝐸 ⊆ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐷)))) | ||
| Theorem | extssr 39100 | Property of subset relation, see also extid 38827, extep 38800 and the comment of df-ssr 39089. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴]◡ S = [𝐵]◡ S ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |