P. 73 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7201-7300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	exmidomni 7201	Excluded middle is equivalent to every set being omniscient. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ Omni)
Theorem	exmidlpo 7202	Excluded middle implies the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (EXMID → ω ∈ Omni)
Theorem	fodjuomnilemdc 7203*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7208. Decidability of a condition we use in various lemmas. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑂–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑂) → DECID ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑋) = (inl‘𝑧))
Theorem	fodjuf 7204*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7208 and fodjumkv 7219. Domain and range of 𝑃. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑂–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑂 ↦ if(∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (inl‘𝑧), ∅, 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 𝑂))
Theorem	fodjum 7205*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7208 and fodjumkv 7219. A condition which shows that 𝐴 is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑂–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑂 ↦ if(∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (inl‘𝑧), ∅, 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑂 (𝑃‘𝑤) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	fodju0 7206*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7208 and fodjumkv 7219. A condition which shows that 𝐴 is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑂–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑂 ↦ if(∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (inl‘𝑧), ∅, 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑂 (𝑃‘𝑤) = 1o)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	fodjuomnilemres 7207*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7208. The final result with 𝑃 expressed as a local definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ Omni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑂–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑂 ↦ if(∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (inl‘𝑧), ∅, 1o))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = ∅))
Theorem	fodjuomni 7208*	A condition which ensures 𝐴 is either inhabited or empty. Lemma 3.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 4. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ Omni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑂–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = ∅))
Theorem	ctssexmid 7209*	The decidability condition in ctssdc 7172 is needed. More specifically, ctssdc 7172 minus that condition, plus the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO), implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑦 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o))    &   ⊢ ω ∈ Omni    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
2.6.39  Markov's principle
Syntax	cmarkov 7210	Extend class definition to include the class of Markov sets.
class Markov
Definition	df-markov 7211*	A Markov set is one where if a predicate (here represented by a function 𝑓) on that set does not hold (where hold means is equal to 1o) for all elements, then there exists an element where it fails (is equal to ∅). Generalization of definition 2.5 of [Pierik], p. 9. In particular, ω ∈ Markov is known as Markov's Principle (MP). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ Markov = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑓(𝑓:𝑦⟶2o → (¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑓‘𝑥) = ∅))}
Theorem	ismkv 7212*	The predicate of being Markov. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Markov ↔ ∀𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶2o → (¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = ∅))))
Theorem	ismkvmap 7213*	The predicate of being Markov stated in terms of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Markov ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴)(¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = ∅)))
Theorem	ismkvnex 7214*	The predicate of being Markov stated in terms of double negation and comparison with 1o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Markov ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴)(¬ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o)))
Theorem	omnimkv 7215	An omniscient set is Markov. In particular, the case where 𝐴 is ω means that the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO) implies Markov's Principle (MP). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Omni → 𝐴 ∈ Markov)
Theorem	exmidmp 7216	Excluded middle implies Markov's Principle (MP). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (EXMID → ω ∈ Markov)
Theorem	mkvprop 7217*	Markov's Principle expressed in terms of propositions (or more precisely, the 𝐴 = ω case is Markov's Principle). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Markov ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑) → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	fodjumkvlemres 7218*	Lemma for fodjumkv 7219. The final result with 𝑃 expressed as a local definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Markov)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑀–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ if(∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (inl‘𝑧), ∅, 1o))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	fodjumkv 7219*	A condition which ensures that a nonempty set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Markov)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑀–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	enmkvlem 7220	Lemma for enmkv 7221. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Markov → 𝐵 ∈ Markov))
Theorem	enmkv 7221	Being Markov is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Markov's Principle as either ω ∈ Markov or ℕ0 ∈ Markov. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6483 says that 2o = {∅, 1o} whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and {0, 1}. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Markov ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Markov))
2.6.40  Weakly omniscient sets
Syntax	cwomni 7222	Extend class definition to include the class of weakly omniscient sets.
class WOmni
Definition	df-womni 7223*	A weakly omniscient set is one where we can decide whether a predicate (here represented by a function 𝑓) holds (is equal to 1o) for all elements or not. Generalization of definition 2.4 of [Pierik], p. 9. In particular, ω ∈ WOmni is known as the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). The term WLPO is common in the literature; there appears to be no widespread term for what we are calling a weakly omniscient set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
⊢ WOmni = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑓(𝑓:𝑦⟶2o → DECID ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o)}
Theorem	iswomni 7224*	The predicate of being weakly omniscient. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶2o → DECID ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o)))
Theorem	iswomnimap 7225*	The predicate of being weakly omniscient stated in terms of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴)DECID ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o))
Theorem	omniwomnimkv 7226	A set is omniscient if and only if it is weakly omniscient and Markov. The case 𝐴 = ω says that LPO ↔ WLPO ∧ MP which is a remark following Definition 2.5 of [Pierik], p. 9. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Omni ↔ (𝐴 ∈ WOmni ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Markov))
Theorem	lpowlpo 7227	LPO implies WLPO. Easy corollary of the more general omniwomnimkv 7226. There is an analogue in terms of analytic omniscience principles at tridceq 15546. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (ω ∈ Omni → ω ∈ WOmni)
Theorem	enwomnilem 7228	Lemma for enwomni 7229. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ WOmni → 𝐵 ∈ WOmni))
Theorem	enwomni 7229	Weak omniscience is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience as either ω ∈ WOmni or ℕ0 ∈ WOmni. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6483 says that 2o = {∅, 1o} whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and {0, 1}. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ WOmni ↔ 𝐵 ∈ WOmni))
Theorem	nninfdcinf 7230*	The Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) implies that it is decidable whether an element of ℕ∞ equals the point at infinity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ WOmni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝑁 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ 1o))
Theorem	nninfwlporlemd 7231*	Given two countably infinite sequences of zeroes and ones, they are equal if and only if a sequence formed by pointwise comparing them is all ones. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:ω⟶2o)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:ω⟶2o)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝑋‘𝑖) = (𝑌‘𝑖), 1o, ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 = 𝑌 ↔ 𝐷 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ 1o)))
Theorem	nninfwlporlem 7232*	Lemma for nninfwlpor 7233. The result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:ω⟶2o)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:ω⟶2o)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝑋‘𝑖) = (𝑌‘𝑖), 1o, ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ WOmni)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	nninfwlpor 7233*	The Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) implies that equality for ℕ∞ is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (ω ∈ WOmni → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	nninfwlpoimlemg 7234*	Lemma for nninfwlpoim 7237. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶2o)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅, ∅, 1o))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℕ∞)
Theorem	nninfwlpoimlemginf 7235*	Lemma for nninfwlpoim 7237. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶2o)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅, ∅, 1o))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ 1o) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐹‘𝑛) = 1o))
Theorem	nninfwlpoimlemdc 7236*	Lemma for nninfwlpoim 7237. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶2o)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅, ∅, 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐹‘𝑛) = 1o)
Theorem	nninfwlpoim 7237*	Decidable equality for ℕ∞ implies the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ω ∈ WOmni)
Theorem	nninfwlpo 7238*	Decidability of equality for ℕ∞ is equivalent to the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ω ∈ WOmni)
2.6.41  Cardinal numbers
Syntax	ccrd 7239	Extend class definition to include the cardinal size function.
class card
Definition	df-card 7240*	Define the cardinal number function. The cardinal number of a set is the least ordinal number equinumerous to it. In other words, it is the "size" of the set. Definition of [Enderton] p. 197. Our notation is from Enderton. Other textbooks often use a double bar over the set to express this function. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.)
⊢ card = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝑦 ≈ 𝑥})
Theorem	cardcl 7241*	The cardinality of a well-orderable set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑦 ≈ 𝐴 → (card‘𝐴) ∈ On)
Theorem	isnumi 7242	A set equinumerous to an ordinal is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	finnum 7243	Every finite set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	onenon 7244	Every ordinal number is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	cardval3ex 7245*	The value of (card‘𝐴). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑥 ≈ 𝐴 → (card‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝑦 ≈ 𝐴})
Theorem	oncardval 7246*	The value of the cardinal number function with an ordinal number as its argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (card‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐴})
Theorem	cardonle 7247	The cardinal of an ordinal number is less than or equal to the ordinal number. Proposition 10.6(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 85. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	card0 7248	The cardinality of the empty set is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (card‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	carden2bex 7249*	If two numerable sets are equinumerous, then they have equal cardinalities. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑥 ≈ 𝐴) → (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵))
Theorem	pm54.43 7250	Theorem *54.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 360. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 1o ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 1o) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≈ 2o))
Theorem	pr2nelem 7251	Lemma for pr2ne 7252. (Contributed by FL, 17-Aug-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o)
Theorem	pr2ne 7252	If an unordered pair has two elements they are different. (Contributed by FL, 14-Feb-2010.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	exmidonfinlem 7253*	Lemma for exmidonfin 7254. (Contributed by Andrew W Swan and Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {{𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}, {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ ¬ 𝜑}}    ⇒   ⊢ (ω = (On ∩ Fin) → DECID 𝜑)
Theorem	exmidonfin 7254	If a finite ordinal is a natural number, excluded middle follows. That excluded middle implies that a finite ordinal is a natural number is proved in the Metamath Proof Explorer. That a natural number is a finite ordinal is shown at nnfi 6928 and nnon 4642. (Contributed by Andrew W Swan and Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
⊢ (ω = (On ∩ Fin) → EXMID)
Theorem	en2eleq 7255	Express a set of pair cardinality as the unordered pair of a given element and the other element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑃 ≈ 2o) → 𝑃 = {𝑋, ∪ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑋})})
Theorem	en2other2 7256	Taking the other element twice in a pair gets back to the original element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑃 ≈ 2o) → ∪ (𝑃 ∖ {∪ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑋})}) = 𝑋)
Theorem	dju1p1e2 7257	Disjoint union version of one plus one equals two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (1o ⊔ 1o) ≈ 2o
Theorem	infpwfidom 7258	The collection of finite subsets of a set dominates the set. (We use the weaker sethood assumption (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∈ V because this theorem also implies that 𝐴 is a set if 𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∈ V → 𝐴 ≼ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin))
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemeldju 7259	Lemma for exmidfodomr 7264. A variant of djur 7128. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 1o)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ⊔ 1o))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = (inl‘∅) ∨ 𝐵 = (inr‘∅)))
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemreseldju 7260	Lemma for exmidfodomrlemrALT 7263. A variant of eldju 7127. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 1o)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ⊔ 1o))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = ((inl ↾ 𝐴)‘∅)) ∨ 𝐵 = ((inr ↾ 1o)‘∅)))
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemim 7261*	Excluded middle implies the existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates. Proposition 1.1 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (EXMID → ∀𝑥∀𝑦((∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≼ 𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–onto→𝑦))
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemr 7262*	The existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates implies excluded middle. Proposition 1.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≼ 𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–onto→𝑦) → EXMID)
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemrALT 7263*	The existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates implies excluded middle. Proposition 1.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. An alternative proof of exmidfodomrlemr 7262. In particular, this proof uses eldju 7127 instead of djur 7128 and avoids djulclb 7114. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≼ 𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–onto→𝑦) → EXMID)
Theorem	exmidfodomr 7264*	Excluded middle is equivalent to the existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≼ 𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–onto→𝑦))
2.6.42  Axiom of Choice equivalents
Syntax	wac 7265	Formula for an abbreviation of the axiom of choice.
wff CHOICE
Definition	df-ac 7266*	The expression CHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of the axiom of choice; all concrete forms are long, cryptic, have dummy variables, or all three, making it useful to have a short name. Similar to the Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49. There are some decisions about how to write this definition especially around whether ax-setind 4569 is needed to show equivalence to other ways of stating choice, and about whether choice functions are available for nonempty sets or inhabited sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑓(𝑓 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑓 Fn dom 𝑥))
Theorem	acfun 7267*	A convenient form of choice. The goal here is to state choice as the existence of a choice function on a set of inhabited sets, while making full use of our notation around functions and function values. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	exmidaclem 7268*	Lemma for exmidac 7269. The result, with a few hypotheses to break out commonly used expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑦 = {∅})}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝑦 = {∅})}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ (CHOICE → EXMID)
Theorem	exmidac 7269	The axiom of choice implies excluded middle. See acexmid 5917 for more discussion of this theorem and a way of stating it without using CHOICE or EXMID. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (CHOICE → EXMID)
2.6.43  Cardinal number arithmetic
Theorem	endjudisj 7270	Equinumerosity of a disjoint union and a union of two disjoint sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	djuen 7271	Disjoint unions of equinumerous sets are equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐷))
Theorem	djuenun 7272	Disjoint union is equinumerous to union for disjoint sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐷))
Theorem	dju1en 7273	Cardinal addition with cardinal one (which is the same as ordinal one). Used in proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ⊔ 1o) ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	dju0en 7274	Cardinal addition with cardinal zero (the empty set). Part (a1) of proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ⊔ ∅) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	xp2dju 7275	Two times a cardinal number. Exercise 4.56(g) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (2o × 𝐴) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐴)
Theorem	djucomen 7276	Commutative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≈ (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐴))
Theorem	djuassen 7277	Associative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ⊔ 𝐶) ≈ (𝐴 ⊔ (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐶)))
Theorem	xpdjuen 7278	Cardinal multiplication distributes over cardinal addition. Theorem 6I(3) of [Enderton] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴 × (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐶)) ≈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊔ (𝐴 × 𝐶)))
Theorem	djudoml 7279	A set is dominated by its disjoint union with another. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐴 ≼ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
Theorem	djudomr 7280	A set is dominated by its disjoint union with another. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐵 ≼ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
2.6.44  Ordinal trichotomy
Theorem	exmidontriimlem1 7281	Lemma for exmidontriim 7285. A variation of r19.30dc 2641. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ EXMID) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	exmidontriimlem2 7282*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7285. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → EXMID)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	exmidontriimlem3 7283*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7285. What we get to do based on induction on both 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → EXMID)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	exmidontriimlem4 7284*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7285. The induction step for the induction on 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → EXMID)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	exmidontriim 7285*	Excluded middle implies ordinal trichotomy. Lemma 10.4.1 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The proof follows the proof from the HoTT book fairly closely. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (EXMID → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
2.6.45  Excluded middle and the power set of a singleton
Theorem	pw1on 7286	The power set of 1o is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝒫 1o ∈ On
Theorem	pw1dom2 7287	The power set of 1o dominates 2o. Also see pwpw0ss 3830 which is similar. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2022.)
⊢ 2o ≼ 𝒫 1o
Theorem	pw1ne0 7288	The power set of 1o is not zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝒫 1o ≠ ∅
Theorem	pw1ne1 7289	The power set of 1o is not one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝒫 1o ≠ 1o
Theorem	pw1ne3 7290	The power set of 1o is not three. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝒫 1o ≠ 3o
Theorem	pw1nel3 7291	Negated excluded middle implies that the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (¬ EXMID → ¬ 𝒫 1o ∈ 3o)
Theorem	sucpw1ne3 7292	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not three . (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (¬ EXMID → suc 𝒫 1o ≠ 3o)
Theorem	sucpw1nel3 7293	The successor of the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ¬ suc 𝒫 1o ∈ 3o
Theorem	3nelsucpw1 7294	Three is not an element of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ¬ 3o ∈ suc 𝒫 1o
Theorem	sucpw1nss3 7295	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not a subset of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (¬ EXMID → ¬ suc 𝒫 1o ⊆ 3o)
Theorem	3nsssucpw1 7296	Negated excluded middle implies that 3o is not a subset of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (¬ EXMID → ¬ 3o ⊆ suc 𝒫 1o)
Theorem	onntri35 7297*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. There are five equivalent statements: (1) ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥), (2) ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On(𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥), (3) ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥), (4) ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥), and (5) ¬ ¬ EXMID. That these are all equivalent is expressed by (1) implies (3) (onntri13 7298), (3) implies (5) (onntri35 7297), (5) implies (1) (onntri51 7300), (2) implies (4) (onntri24 7302), (4) implies (5) (onntri45 7301), and (5) implies (2) (onntri52 7304). Another way of stating this is that EXMID is equivalent to trichotomy, either the 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 or the 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 form, as shown in exmidontri 7299 and exmidontri2or 7303, respectively. Thus ¬ ¬ EXMID is equivalent to (1) or (2). In addition, ¬ ¬ EXMID is equivalent to (3) by onntri3or 7305 and (4) by onntri2or 7306. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ¬ ¬ EXMID)
Theorem	onntri13 7298	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	exmidontri 7299*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	onntri51 7300*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ EXMID → ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))