| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 73 of 171) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | prfidceq 7201* | A pair is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | tpfidisj 7202 | A triple is finite if it consists of three unequal sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | tpfidceq 7203* | A triple is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fiintim 7204* |
If a class is closed under pairwise intersections, then it is closed
under nonempty finite intersections. The converse would appear to
require an additional condition, such as 𝑥 and 𝑦 not
being
equal, or 𝐴 having decidable equality.
This theorem is applicable to a topology, which (among other axioms) is closed under finite intersections. Some texts use a pairwise intersection and some texts use a finite intersection, but most topology texts assume excluded middle (in which case the two intersection properties would be equivalent). (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2002.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ Fin) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | xpfi 7205 | The Cartesian product of two finite sets is finite. Lemma 8.1.16 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | imaf1fi 7206 | The image of a finite set under a one-to-one mapping is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Mar-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → (𝐹 “ 𝑋) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | 3xpfi 7207 | The Cartesian product of three finite sets is a finite set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ Fin → ((𝑉 × 𝑉) × 𝑉) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fisseneq 7208 | A finite set is equal to its subset if they are equinumerous. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | phpeqd 7209 | Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle using equality. Strengthening of phpm 7133 expressed without negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ssfirab 7210* | A subset of a finite set is finite if it is defined by a decidable property. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | ssfidc 7211* | A subset of a finite set is finite if membership in the subset is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | exmidssfi 7212* | Excluded middle is equivalent to any subset of a finite set being finite. Theorem 2.1 of [Bauer], p. 485. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Mar-2026.) |
| ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → 𝑦 ∈ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | opabfi 7213* | Finiteness of an ordered pair abstraction which is a decidable subset of finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | infidc 7214* | The intersection of two sets is finite if one of them is and the other is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | snon0 7215 | An ordinal which is a singleton is {∅}. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝐴} ∈ On) → 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | fnfi 7216 | A version of fnex 5911 for finite sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → 𝐹 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fundmfi 7217 | The domain of a finite function is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ Fun 𝐴) → dom 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fundmfibi 7218 | A function is finite if and only if its domain is finite. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹 ∈ Fin ↔ dom 𝐹 ∈ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | resfnfinfinss 7219 | The restriction of a function to a finite subset of its domain is finite. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | residfi 7220 | A restricted identity function is finite iff the restricting class is finite. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | relcnvfi 7221 | If a relation is finite, its converse is as well. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ◡𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | funrnfi 7222 | The range of a finite relation is finite if its converse is a function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ran 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | f1ofi 7223 | If a 1-1 and onto function has a finite domain, its range is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | f1dmvrnfibi 7224 | A one-to-one function whose domain is a set is finite if and only if its range is finite. See also f1vrnfibi 7225. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐹 ∈ Fin ↔ ran 𝐹 ∈ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | f1vrnfibi 7225 | A one-to-one function which is a set is finite if and only if its range is finite. See also f1dmvrnfibi 7224. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐹 ∈ Fin ↔ ran 𝐹 ∈ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | iunfidisj 7226* | The finite union of disjoint finite sets is finite. Note that 𝐵 depends on 𝑥, i.e. can be thought of as 𝐵(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | mapfi 7227 | Set exponentiation of finite sets is finite. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | elfpw 7228 | Membership in a class of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | fissfi 7229* | A finite subset of a finite set is a decidable subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-May-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | f1finf1o 7230 | Any injection from one finite set to another of equal size must be a bijection. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | en1eqsn 7231 | A set with one element is a singleton. (Contributed by FL, 18-Aug-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 1o) → 𝐵 = {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | en1eqsnbi 7232 | A set containing an element has exactly one element iff it is a singleton. (Contributed by FL, 13-Feb-2010.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐵 = {𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | snexxph 7233* | A case where the antecedent of snexg 4302 is not needed. The class {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} is from dcextest 4708. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ {{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | preimaf1ofi 7234 | The preimage of a finite set under a one-to-one, onto function is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fidcenumlemim 7235* | Lemma for fidcenum 7239. Forward direction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑛–onto→𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | fidcenumlemrks 7236* | Lemma for fidcenum 7239. Induction step for fidcenumlemrk 7237. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → suc 𝐽 ⊆ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐽) ∨ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐽))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 “ suc 𝐽) ∨ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 “ suc 𝐽))) | ||
| Theorem | fidcenumlemrk 7237* | Lemma for fidcenum 7239. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐾) ∨ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐾))) | ||
| Theorem | fidcenumlemr 7238* | Lemma for fidcenum 7239. Reverse direction (put into deduction form). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fidcenum 7239* | A set is finite if and only if it has decidable equality and is finitely enumerable. Proposition 8.1.11 of [AczelRathjen], p. 72. The definition of "finitely enumerable" as ∃𝑛 ∈ ω∃𝑓𝑓:𝑛–onto→𝐴 is Definition 8.1.4 of [AczelRathjen], p. 71. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑛–onto→𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | sbthlem1 7240* | Lemma for isbth 7250. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) | ||
| Theorem | sbthlem2 7241* | Lemma for isbth 7250. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} ⇒ ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | sbthlemi3 7242* | Lemma for isbth 7250. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} ⇒ ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | sbthlemi4 7243* | Lemma for isbth 7250. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} ⇒ ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → (◡𝑔 “ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)) = (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | sbthlemi5 7244* | Lemma for isbth 7250. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (dom 𝑓 = 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴)) → dom 𝐻 = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sbthlemi6 7245* | Lemma for isbth 7250. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ ((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔)) → ran 𝐻 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sbthlem7 7246* | Lemma for isbth 7250. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → Fun 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | sbthlemi8 7247* | Lemma for isbth 7250. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (((EXMID ∧ Fun ◡𝑓) ∧ (((Fun 𝑔 ∧ dom 𝑔 = 𝐵) ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔)) → Fun ◡𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | sbthlemi9 7248* | Lemma for isbth 7250. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝑔:𝐵–1-1→𝐴) → 𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sbthlemi10 7249* | Lemma for isbth 7250. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | isbth 7250 | Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem. Theorem 18 of [Suppes] p. 95. This theorem states that if set 𝐴 is smaller (has lower cardinality) than 𝐵 and vice-versa, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are equinumerous (have the same cardinality). The interesting thing is that this can be proved without invoking the Axiom of Choice, as we do here, but the proof as you can see is quite difficult. (The theorem can be proved more easily if we allow AC.) The main proof consists of lemmas sbthlem1 7240 through sbthlemi10 7249; this final piece mainly changes bound variables to eliminate the hypotheses of sbthlemi10 7249. We follow closely the proof in Suppes, which you should consult to understand our proof at a higher level. Note that Suppes' proof, which is credited to J. M. Whitaker, does not require the Axiom of Infinity. The proof does require the law of the excluded middle which cannot be avoided as shown at exmidsbthr 16942. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
| Syntax | cfsupp 7251 | Extend class definition to include the predicate to be a finitely supported function. |
| class finSupp | ||
| Definition | df-fsupp 7252* | Define the property of a function to be finitely supported (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ finSupp = {〈𝑟, 𝑧〉 ∣ (Fun 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 supp 𝑧) ∈ Fin)} | ||
| Theorem | relfsupp 7253 | The property of a function to be finitely supported is a relation. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ Rel finSupp | ||
| Theorem | relprcnfsupp 7254 | A proper class is never finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝐴 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | isfsupp 7255 | The property of a class to be a finitely supported function (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (Fun 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin))) | ||
| Theorem | isfsuppd 7256 | Deduction form of isfsupp 7255. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | funisfsupp 7257 | The property of a function to be finitely supported (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (𝑅 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppimp 7258 | Implications of a class being a finitely supported function (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 26-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 finSupp 𝑍 → (Fun 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppimpd 7259 | A finitely supported function is a function with a finite support. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppfund 7260 | A finitely supported function is a function. (Contributed by SN, 8-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | suppeqfsuppbi 7261 | If two functions have the same support, one function is finitely supported iff the other one is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ Fun 𝐹) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐺)) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) = (𝐺 supp 𝑍) → (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppxpfi 7262 | The cartesian product of two finitely supported functions is finite. (Contributed by AV, 17-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ∧ 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) × (𝐺 supp 𝑍)) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fczfsuppd 7263 | A constant function with value zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 × {𝑍}) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | 0fsupp 7264 | The empty set is a finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | snopfsuppdc 7265 | A singleton containing an ordered pair is a finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝑌 = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑋, 𝑌〉} finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | ffsuppbi 7266 | Two ways of saying that a function with known codomain is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin))) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppcorn 7267 | The composition of a 1-1 function with a finitely supported function is finitely supported. The purpose of the (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ ran 𝐺 condition is to ensure we don't subset the support of the function in such a way as to fun afoul of exmidssfi 7212. (Other alternative conditions might also be sufficient). (Contributed by AV, 28-May-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋–1-1→𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ ran 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Syntax | cfi 7268 | Extend class notation with the function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of a given set. |
| class fi | ||
| Definition | df-fi 7269* | Function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of the argument. Note that the empty intersection being the universal class, hence a proper class, it cannot be an element of that class. Therefore, the function value is the class of nonempty finite intersections of elements of the argument (see elfi2 7272). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) |
| ⊢ fi = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ Fin)𝑧 = ∩ 𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | fival 7270* | The set of all the finite intersections of the elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)𝑦 = ∩ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | elfi 7271* | Specific properties of an element of (fi‘𝐵). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | elfi2 7272* | The empty intersection need not be considered in the set of finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | elfir 7273 | Sufficient condition for an element of (fi‘𝐵). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ssfii 7274 | Any element of a set 𝐴 is the intersection of a finite subset of 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ⊆ (fi‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | fi0 7275 | The set of finite intersections of the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (fi‘∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | fieq0 7276 | A set is empty iff the class of all the finite intersections of that set is empty. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ (fi‘𝐴) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | fiss 7277 | Subset relationship for function fi. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ (fi‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | fiuni 7278 | The union of the finite intersections of a set is simply the union of the set itself. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 5-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ (fi‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | fipwssg 7279 | If a set is a family of subsets of some base set, then so is its finite intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) → (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | fifo 7280* | Describe a surjection from nonempty finite sets to finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↦ ∩ 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | dcfi 7281* | Decidability of a family of propositions indexed by a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝜑) → DECID ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | 2omap 7282* | Mapping between (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴) and decidable subsets of 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑠 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑠‘𝑧) = 1o}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:(2o ↑𝑚 𝐴)–1-1-onto→{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | 2omapen 7283* | Equinumerosity of (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴) and the set of decidable subsets of 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴) ≈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | 2omapfi 7284 | The number of finite subsets of a finite set. For a similar theorem with set size expressed using ♯ (df-ihash 11167), see hashpwfi 11221. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-May-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴) ≈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | fipwfi 7285 | The set of finite subsets of a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Syntax | csup 7286 | Extend class notation to include supremum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers. |
| class sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) | ||
| Syntax | cinf 7287 | Extend class notation to include infimum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers. |
| class inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) | ||
| Definition | df-sup 7288* | Define the supremum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the supremum exists. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} | ||
| Definition | df-inf 7289 | Define the infimum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the infimum exists. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than', 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers, and 𝐴 could be the set of all positive reals; in this case the infimum is 0. The infimum is defined as the supremum using the converse ordering relation. In the given example, 0 is the supremum of all reals (greatest real number) for which all positive reals are greater. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, ◡𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | supeq1 7290 | Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | supeq1d 7291 | Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | supeq1i 7292 | Equality inference for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | supeq2 7293 | Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | supeq3 7294 | Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | supeq123d 7295 | Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶) = sup(𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | nfsup 7296 | Hypothesis builder for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | supmoti 7297* | Any class 𝐵 has at most one supremum in 𝐴 (where 𝑅 is interpreted as 'less than'). The hypothesis is satisfied by real numbers (see lttri3 8369) or other orders which correspond to tight apartnesses. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑢 = 𝑣 ↔ (¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣 ∧ ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | supeuti 7298* | A supremum is unique. Similar to Theorem I.26 of [Apostol] p. 24 (but for suprema in general). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑢 = 𝑣 ↔ (¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣 ∧ ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | supval2ti 7299* | Alternate expression for the supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑢 = 𝑣 ↔ (¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣 ∧ ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))) | ||
| Theorem | eqsupti 7300* | Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑢 = 𝑣 ↔ (¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣 ∧ ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝐶 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |