Theorem homf0 49936

Description: The base is empty iff the functionalized Hom-set operation is empty. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
homf0	⊢ ((Base‘𝐶) = ∅ ↔ (Homf ‘𝐶) = ∅)

Proof of Theorem homf0

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐶)
2		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐶)
3		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
4	1, 2, 3	homffval 17779	. . 3 ⊢ (Homf ‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ↦ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦))
5		0mpo0 7497	. . . 4 ⊢ (((Base‘𝐶) = ∅ ∨ (Base‘𝐶) = ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ↦ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)) = ∅)
6	5	orcs 889	. . 3 ⊢ ((Base‘𝐶) = ∅ → (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ↦ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)) = ∅)
7	4, 6	eqtrid 2807	. 2 ⊢ ((Base‘𝐶) = ∅ → (Homf ‘𝐶) = ∅)
8	1, 2	homffn 17782	. . . 4 ⊢ (Homf ‘𝐶) Fn ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶))
9		f0bi 6759	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Homf ‘𝐶):∅⟶∅ ↔ (Homf ‘𝐶) = ∅)
10		ffn 6703	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Homf ‘𝐶):∅⟶∅ → (Homf ‘𝐶) Fn ∅)
11	9, 10	sylbir 238	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Homf ‘𝐶) = ∅ → (Homf ‘𝐶) Fn ∅)
12		fndmu 6640	. . . 4 ⊢ (((Homf ‘𝐶) Fn ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∧ (Homf ‘𝐶) Fn ∅) → ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) = ∅)
13	8, 11, 12	sylancr 599	. . 3 ⊢ ((Homf ‘𝐶) = ∅ → ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) = ∅)
14		xpeq0 6152	. . . 4 ⊢ (((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) = ∅ ↔ ((Base‘𝐶) = ∅ ∨ (Base‘𝐶) = ∅))
15		pm4.25 919	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Base‘𝐶) = ∅ ↔ ((Base‘𝐶) = ∅ ∨ (Base‘𝐶) = ∅))
16	14, 15	bitr4i 281	. . 3 ⊢ (((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) = ∅ ↔ (Base‘𝐶) = ∅)
17	13, 16	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ ((Homf ‘𝐶) = ∅ → (Base‘𝐶) = ∅)
18	7, 17	impbii 212	1 ⊢ ((Base‘𝐶) = ∅ ↔ (Homf ‘𝐶) = ∅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570  ∅c0 4279   × cxp 5653   Fn wfn 6528  ⟶wf 6529  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7414   ∈ cmpo 7416  Basecbs 17302  Hom chom 17354  Hom_f chomf 17755

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7737

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-ov 7417  df-oprab 7418  df-mpo 7419  df-1st 7987  df-2nd 7988  df-homf 17759

This theorem is used by:  initopropdlem  50167  termopropdlem  50168