Theorem asclcom 48843

Description: Scalars are commutative after being lifted.

However, the scalars themselves are not necessarily commutative if the algebra is not a faithful module. For example, Let 𝐹 be the 2 by 2 upper triangular matrix algebra over a commutative ring 𝑊. It is provable that 𝐹 is in general non-commutative. Define scalar multiplication 𝐶 · 𝑋 as multipying the top-left entry, which is a "vector" element of 𝑊, of the "scalar" 𝐶, which is now an upper triangular matrix, with the "vector" 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝑊).

Equivalently, the algebra scalar lifting function is not necessarily injective unless the algebra is faithful. Therefore, all "scalar injection" was renamed.

Alternate proof involves assa2ass 21910, assa2ass2 21911, and asclval 21927, by setting 𝑋 and 𝑌 the multiplicative identity of the algebra.

(Contributed by Zhi Wang, 11-Sep-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
asclelbas.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑊)
asclelbas.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
asclelbas.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)
asclelbas.w	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg)
asclelbas.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
asclcom.m	⊢ ∗ = (.r‘𝐹)
asclcom.d	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
asclcom	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘(𝐶 ∗ 𝐷)) = (𝐴‘(𝐷 ∗ 𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem asclcom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		asclelbas.w	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg)
2		asclelbas.c	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
3		asclelbas.a	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑊)
4		asclelbas.f	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
5		asclelbas.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)
6		asclcom.d	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)
7	3, 4, 5, 1, 6	asclelbas 48840	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘𝐷) ∈ (Base‘𝑊))
8		eqid 2737	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Base‘𝑊) = (Base‘𝑊)
9		eqid 2737	. . . . 5 ⊢ (.r‘𝑊) = (.r‘𝑊)
10		eqid 2737	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
11	3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10	asclmul1 21933	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴‘𝐷) ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) → ((𝐴‘𝐶)(.r‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐷)) = (𝐶( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐷)))
12	3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10	asclmul2 21934	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴‘𝐷) ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) → ((𝐴‘𝐷)(.r‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐶)) = (𝐶( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐷)))
13	11, 12	eqtr4d 2780	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴‘𝐷) ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) → ((𝐴‘𝐶)(.r‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐷)) = ((𝐴‘𝐷)(.r‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐶)))
14	1, 2, 7, 13	syl3anc 1372	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴‘𝐶)(.r‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐷)) = ((𝐴‘𝐷)(.r‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐶)))
15		asclcom.m	. . . 4 ⊢ ∗ = (.r‘𝐹)
16	3, 4, 5, 9, 15	ascldimul 21935	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴‘(𝐶 ∗ 𝐷)) = ((𝐴‘𝐶)(.r‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐷)))
17	1, 2, 6, 16	syl3anc 1372	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘(𝐶 ∗ 𝐷)) = ((𝐴‘𝐶)(.r‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐷)))
18	3, 4, 5, 9, 15	ascldimul 21935	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴‘(𝐷 ∗ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴‘𝐷)(.r‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐶)))
19	1, 6, 2, 18	syl3anc 1372	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘(𝐷 ∗ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴‘𝐷)(.r‘𝑊)(𝐴‘𝐶)))
20	14, 17, 19	3eqtr4d 2787	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘(𝐶 ∗ 𝐷)) = (𝐴‘(𝐷 ∗ 𝐶)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ‘cfv 6569  (class class class)co 7438  Basecbs 17254  ._rcmulr 17308  Scalarcsca 17310   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17311  AssAlgcasa 21897  algSccascl 21899

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2708  ax-rep 5288  ax-sep 5305  ax-nul 5315  ax-pow 5374  ax-pr 5441  ax-un 7761  ax-cnex 11218  ax-resscn 11219  ax-1cn 11220  ax-icn 11221  ax-addcl 11222  ax-addrcl 11223  ax-mulcl 11224  ax-mulrcl 11225  ax-mulcom 11226  ax-addass 11227  ax-mulass 11228  ax-distr 11229  ax-i2m1 11230  ax-1ne0 11231  ax-1rid 11232  ax-rnegex 11233  ax-rrecex 11234  ax-cnre 11235  ax-pre-lttri 11236  ax-pre-lttrn 11237  ax-pre-ltadd 11238  ax-pre-mulgt0 11239

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-nf 1783  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2892  df-ne 2941  df-nel 3047  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rmo 3380  df-reu 3381  df-rab 3437  df-v 3483  df-sbc 3795  df-csb 3912  df-dif 3969  df-un 3971  df-in 3973  df-ss 3983  df-pss 3986  df-nul 4343  df-if 4535  df-pw 4610  df-sn 4635  df-pr 4637  df-op 4641  df-uni 4916  df-iun 5001  df-br 5152  df-opab 5214  df-mpt 5235  df-tr 5269  df-id 5587  df-eprel 5593  df-po 5601  df-so 5602  df-fr 5645  df-we 5647  df-xp 5699  df-rel 5700  df-cnv 5701  df-co 5702  df-dm 5703  df-rn 5704  df-res 5705  df-ima 5706  df-pred 6329  df-ord 6395  df-on 6396  df-lim 6397  df-suc 6398  df-iota 6522  df-fun 6571  df-fn 6572  df-f 6573  df-f1 6574  df-fo 6575  df-f1o 6576  df-fv 6577  df-riota 7395  df-ov 7441  df-oprab 7442  df-mpo 7443  df-om 7895  df-2nd 8023  df-frecs 8314  df-wrecs 8345  df-recs 8419  df-rdg 8458  df-er 8753  df-en 8994  df-dom 8995  df-sdom 8996  df-pnf 11304  df-mnf 11305  df-xr 11306  df-ltxr 11307  df-le 11308  df-sub 11501  df-neg 11502  df-nn 12274  df-2 12336  df-sets 17207  df-slot 17225  df-ndx 17237  df-base 17255  df-plusg 17320  df-0g 17497  df-mgm 18675  df-sgrp 18754  df-mnd 18770  df-mgp 20162  df-ur 20209  df-ring 20262  df-lmod 20886  df-assa 21900  df-ascl 21902

This theorem is referenced by: (None)