P. 490 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 48901-49000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ovmpox2 48901*	The value of an operation class abstraction. Variant of ovmpoga 7535 which does not require 𝐷 and 𝑥 to be distinct. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆)
Theorem	fdmdifeqresdif 48902*	The restriction of a conditional mapping to function values of a function having a domain which is a difference with a singleton equals this function. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑌, 𝑋, (𝐺‘𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺:(𝐷 ∖ {𝑌})⟶𝑅 → 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾ (𝐷 ∖ {𝑌})))
Theorem	ofaddmndmap 48903	The function operation applied to the addition for functions (with the same domain) into a monoid is a function (with the same domain) into the monoid. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ Mnd ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉))) → (𝐴 ∘f + 𝐵) ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉))
Theorem	mapsnop 48904	A singleton of an ordered pair as an element of the mapping operation. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m {𝑋}))
Theorem	fprmappr 48905	A function with a domain of two elements as element of the mapping operator applied to a pair. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)) → {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩} ∈ (𝑋 ↑m {𝐴, 𝐵}))
Theorem	mapprop 48906	An unordered pair containing two ordered pairs as an element of the mapping operation. (Contributed by AV, 16-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Jun-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑋, 𝐴⟩, ⟨𝑌, 𝐵⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊)) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m {𝑋, 𝑌}))
Theorem	ztprmneprm 48907	A prime is not an integer multiple of another prime. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑍 · 𝐴) = 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	2t6m3t4e0 48908	2 times 6 minus 3 times 4 equals 0. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ ((2 · 6) − (3 · 4)) = 0
Theorem	ssnn0ssfz 48909*	For any finite subset of ℕ0, find a superset in the form of a set of sequential integers, analogous to ssnnssfz 32928. (Contributed by AV, 30-Sep-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 ⊆ (0...𝑛))
Theorem	nn0sumltlt 48910	If the sum of two nonnegative integers is less than a third integer, then one of the summands is already less than this third integer. (Contributed by AV, 19-Oct-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝑎 + 𝑏) < 𝑐 → 𝑏 < 𝑐))
21.48.19.2  The binomial coefficient operation (extension)
Theorem	bcpascm1 48911	Pascal's rule for the binomial coefficient, generalized to all integers 𝐾, shifted down by 1. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) → (((𝑁 − 1)C𝐾) + ((𝑁 − 1)C(𝐾 − 1))) = (𝑁C𝐾))
Theorem	altgsumbc 48912*	The sum of binomial coefficients for a fixed positive 𝑁 with alternating signs is zero. Notice that this is not valid for 𝑁 = 0 (since ((-1↑0) · (0C0)) = (1 · 1) = 1). For a proof using Pascal's rule (bcpascm1 48911) instead of the binomial theorem (binom 15832), see altgsumbcALT 48913. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2019.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)((-1↑𝑘) · (𝑁C𝑘)) = 0)
Theorem	altgsumbcALT 48913*	Alternate proof of altgsumbc 48912, using Pascal's rule (bcpascm1 48911) instead of the binomial theorem (binom 15832). (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)((-1↑𝑘) · (𝑁C𝑘)) = 0)
21.48.19.3  The ` ZZ `-module ` ZZ X. ZZ `
Theorem	zlmodzxzlmod 48914	The ℤ-module ℤ × ℤ is a (left) module with the ring of integers as base set. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ LMod ∧ ℤring = (Scalar‘𝑍))
Theorem	zlmodzxzel 48915	An element of the (base set of the) ℤ-module ℤ × ℤ. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → {⟨0, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1, 𝐵⟩} ∈ (Base‘𝑍))
Theorem	zlmodzxz0 48916	The 0 of the ℤ-module ℤ × ℤ. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1})    &   ⊢ 0 = {⟨0, 0⟩, ⟨1, 0⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑍)
Theorem	zlmodzxzscm 48917	The scalar multiplication of the ℤ-module ℤ × ℤ. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1})    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∙ {⟨0, 𝐵⟩, ⟨1, 𝐶⟩}) = {⟨0, (𝐴 · 𝐵)⟩, ⟨1, (𝐴 · 𝐶)⟩})
Theorem	zlmodzxzadd 48918	The addition of the ℤ-module ℤ × ℤ. (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1})    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)) → ({⟨0, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1, 𝐶⟩} + {⟨0, 𝐵⟩, ⟨1, 𝐷⟩}) = {⟨0, (𝐴 + 𝐵)⟩, ⟨1, (𝐶 + 𝐷)⟩})
Theorem	zlmodzxzsubm 48919	The subtraction of the ℤ-module ℤ × ℤ expressed as addition. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1})    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)) → ({⟨0, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1, 𝐶⟩} − {⟨0, 𝐵⟩, ⟨1, 𝐷⟩}) = ({⟨0, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1, 𝐶⟩} (+g‘𝑍)(-1( ·𝑠 ‘𝑍){⟨0, 𝐵⟩, ⟨1, 𝐷⟩})))
Theorem	zlmodzxzsub 48920	The subtraction of the ℤ-module ℤ × ℤ. (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1})    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)) → ({⟨0, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1, 𝐶⟩} − {⟨0, 𝐵⟩, ⟨1, 𝐷⟩}) = {⟨0, (𝐴 − 𝐵)⟩, ⟨1, (𝐶 − 𝐷)⟩})
21.48.19.4  Group sum operation (extension 2)
Theorem	mgpsumunsn 48921*	Extract a summand/factor from the group sum for the multiplicative group of a unital ring. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑁) → 𝐴 ∈ (Base‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐼 → 𝐴 = 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 Σg (𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 ↦ 𝐴)) = ((𝑀 Σg (𝑘 ∈ (𝑁 ∖ {𝐼}) ↦ 𝐴)) · 𝑋))
Theorem	mgpsumz 48922*	If the group sum for the multiplicative group of a unital ring contains a summand/factor that is the zero of the ring, the group sum itself is zero. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑁) → 𝐴 ∈ (Base‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐼 → 𝐴 = 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 Σg (𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 ↦ 𝐴)) = 0 )
Theorem	mgpsumn 48923*	If the group sum for the multiplicative group of a unital ring contains a summand/factor that is the one of the ring, this summand/ factor can be removed from the group sum. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑁) → 𝐴 ∈ (Base‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐼 → 𝐴 = 1 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 Σg (𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 ↦ 𝐴)) = (𝑀 Σg (𝑘 ∈ (𝑁 ∖ {𝐼}) ↦ 𝐴)))
21.48.19.5  Symmetric groups (extension)
Theorem	exple2lt6 48924	A nonnegative integer to the power of itself is less than 6 if it is less than or equal to 2. (Contributed by AV, 16-Mar-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 2) → (𝑁↑𝑁) < 6)
Theorem	pgrple2abl 48925	Every symmetric group on a set with at most 2 elements is abelian. (Contributed by AV, 16-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (SymGrp‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝐴) ≤ 2) → 𝐺 ∈ Abel)
Theorem	pgrpgt2nabl 48926	Every symmetric group on a set with more than 2 elements is not abelian, see also the remark in [Rotman] p. 28. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (SymGrp‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 2 < (♯‘𝐴)) → 𝐺 ∉ Abel)
21.48.19.6  Divisibility (extension)
Theorem	invginvrid 48927	Identity for a multiplication with additive and multiplicative inverses in a ring. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) → ((𝑁‘𝑌) · ((𝐼‘(𝑁‘𝑌)) · 𝑋)) = 𝑋)
21.48.19.7  The support of functions (extension)
Theorem	rmsupp0 48928*	The support of a mapping of a multiplication of zero with a function into a ring is empty. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 = (0g‘𝑀)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)) → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐶(.r‘𝑀)(𝐴‘𝑣))) supp (0g‘𝑀)) = ∅)
Theorem	domnmsuppn0 48929*	The support of a mapping of a multiplication of a nonzero constant with a function into a (ring theoretic) domain equals the support of the function. (Contributed by AV, 11-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ Domn ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ (0g‘𝑀)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)) → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐶(.r‘𝑀)(𝐴‘𝑣))) supp (0g‘𝑀)) = (𝐴 supp (0g‘𝑀)))
Theorem	rmsuppss 48930*	The support of a mapping of a multiplication of a constant with a function into a ring is a subset of the support of the function. (Contributed by AV, 11-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)) → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐶(.r‘𝑀)(𝐴‘𝑣))) supp (0g‘𝑀)) ⊆ (𝐴 supp (0g‘𝑀)))
Theorem	scmsuppss 48931*	The support of a mapping of a scalar multiplication with a function of scalars is a subset of the support of the function of scalars. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)) → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑣)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑣)) supp (0g‘𝑀)) ⊆ (𝐴 supp (0g‘𝑆)))
21.48.19.8  Finitely supported functions (extension)
Theorem	rmsuppfi 48932*	The support of a mapping of a multiplication of a constant with a function into a ring is finite if the support of the function is finite. (Contributed by AV, 11-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴 supp (0g‘𝑀)) ∈ Fin) → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐶(.r‘𝑀)(𝐴‘𝑣))) supp (0g‘𝑀)) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	rmfsupp 48933*	A mapping of a multiplication of a constant with a function into a ring is finitely supported if the function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 finSupp (0g‘𝑀)) → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐶(.r‘𝑀)(𝐴‘𝑣))) finSupp (0g‘𝑀))
Theorem	scmsuppfi 48934*	The support of a mapping of a scalar multiplication with a function of scalars is finite if the support of the function of scalars is finite. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴 supp (0g‘𝑆)) ∈ Fin) → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑣)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑣)) supp (0g‘𝑀)) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	scmfsupp 48935*	A mapping of a scalar multiplication with a function of scalars is finitely supported if the function of scalars is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 finSupp (0g‘𝑆)) → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑣)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑣)) finSupp (0g‘𝑀))
Theorem	suppmptcfin 48936*	The support of a mapping with value 0 except of one is finite. (Contributed by AV, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑋, 1 , 0 ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 supp 0 ) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	mptcfsupp 48937*	A mapping with value 0 except of one is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑋, 1 , 0 ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐹 finSupp 0 )
Theorem	fsuppmptdmf 48938*	A mapping with a finite domain is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)
21.48.19.9  Left modules (extension)
Theorem	lmodvsmdi 48939	Multiple distributive law for scalar product (left-distributivity). (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (.g‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑅 · (𝑁 ↑ 𝑋)) = ((𝑁𝐸𝑅) · 𝑋))
Theorem	gsumlsscl 48940*	Closure of a group sum in a linear subspace: A (finitely supported) sum of scalar multiplications of vectors of a subset of a linear subspace is also contained in the linear subspace. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑍) → ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp (0g‘𝑅)) → (𝑀 Σg (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑣)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑣))) ∈ 𝑍))
21.48.19.10  Associative algebras (extension)
Theorem	assaascl0 48941	The scalar 0 embedded into an associative algebra corresponds to the 0 of the associative algebra. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘(0g‘𝐹)) = (0g‘𝑊))
Theorem	assaascl1 48942	The scalar 1 embedded into an associative algebra corresponds to the 1 of the an associative algebra. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘(1r‘𝐹)) = (1r‘𝑊))
21.48.19.11  Univariate polynomials (extension)
Theorem	ply1vr1smo 48943	The variable in a polynomial expressed as scaled monomial. (Contributed by AV, 12-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (mulGrp‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → ( 1 · (1 ↑ 𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	ply1sclrmsm 48944	The ring multiplication of a polynomial with a scalar polynomial is equal to the scalar multiplication of the polynomial with the corresponding scalar. (Contributed by AV, 14-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ × = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mulGrp‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐸) → ((𝐴‘𝐹) × 𝑍) = (𝐹 · 𝑍))
Theorem	coe1sclmulval 48945	The value of the coefficient vector of a polynomial multiplied on the left by a scalar. (Contributed by AV, 14-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((coe1‘(𝑌𝑆𝑍))‘𝑁) = (𝑌 · ((coe1‘𝑍)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ply1mulgsumlem1 48946*	Lemma 1 for ply1mulgsum 48950. (Contributed by AV, 19-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (coe1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (coe1‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ × = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑠 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑠 < 𝑛 → ((𝐴‘𝑛) = (0g‘𝑅) ∧ (𝐶‘𝑛) = (0g‘𝑅))))
Theorem	ply1mulgsumlem2 48947*	Lemma 2 for ply1mulgsum 48950. (Contributed by AV, 19-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (coe1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (coe1‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ × = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑠 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑠 < 𝑛 → (𝑅 Σg (𝑙 ∈ (0...𝑛) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑙) ∗ (𝐶‘(𝑛 − 𝑙))))) = (0g‘𝑅)))
Theorem	ply1mulgsumlem3 48948*	Lemma 3 for ply1mulgsum 48950. (Contributed by AV, 20-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (coe1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (coe1‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ × = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑅 Σg (𝑙 ∈ (0...𝑘) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑙) ∗ (𝐶‘(𝑘 − 𝑙)))))) finSupp (0g‘𝑅))
Theorem	ply1mulgsumlem4 48949*	Lemma 4 for ply1mulgsum 48950. (Contributed by AV, 19-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (coe1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (coe1‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ × = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝑅 Σg (𝑙 ∈ (0...𝑘) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑙) ∗ (𝐶‘(𝑘 − 𝑙))))) · (𝑘 ↑ 𝑋))) finSupp (0g‘𝑃))
Theorem	ply1mulgsum 48950*	The product of two polynomials expressed as group sum of scaled monomials. (Contributed by AV, 20-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (coe1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (coe1‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ × = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐾 × 𝐿) = (𝑃 Σg (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝑅 Σg (𝑙 ∈ (0...𝑘) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑙) ∗ (𝐶‘(𝑘 − 𝑙))))) · (𝑘 ↑ 𝑋)))))
Theorem	evl1at0 48951	Polynomial evaluation for the 0 scalar. (Contributed by AV, 10-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (eval1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ CRing → ((𝑂‘𝑍)‘ 0 ) = 0 )
Theorem	evl1at1 48952	Polynomial evaluation for the 1 scalar. (Contributed by AV, 10-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (eval1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (1r‘𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ CRing → ((𝑂‘𝐼)‘ 1 ) = 1 )
21.48.19.12  Univariate polynomials (examples)
Theorem	linply1 48953	A term of the form 𝑥 − 𝐶 is a (univariate) polynomial, also called "linear polynomial". (Part of ply1remlem 26194). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑋 − (𝐴‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	lineval 48954	A term of the form 𝑥 − 𝐶 evaluated for 𝑥 = 𝑉 results in 𝑉 − 𝐶 (part of ply1remlem 26194). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑋 − (𝐴‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (eval1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐺)‘𝑉) = (𝑉(-g‘𝑅)𝐶))
Theorem	linevalexample 48955	The polynomial 𝑥 − 3 over ℤ evaluated for 𝑥 = 5 results in 2. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘ℤring)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘ℤring)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑋 − (𝐴‘3))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (eval1‘ℤring)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑂‘(𝑋 − (𝐴‘3)))‘5) = 2
21.48.20  Linear algebra (extension)
21.48.20.1  The subalgebras of diagonal and scalar matrices (extension) In the following, alternative definitions for diagonal and scalar matrices are provided. These definitions define diagonal and scalar matrices as extensible structures, whereas Definitions df-dmat 22519 and df-scmat 22520 define diagonal and scalar matrices as sets.
Syntax	cdmatalt 48956	Alternative notation for the algebra of diagonal matrices.
class DMatALT
Syntax	cscmatalt 48957	Alternative notation for the algebra of scalar matrices.
class ScMatALT
Definition	df-dmatalt 48958*	Define the set of n x n diagonal (square) matrices over a set (usually a ring) r, see definition in [Roman] p. 4 or Definition 3.12 in [Hefferon] p. 240. (Contributed by AV, 8-Dec-2019.)
⊢ DMatALT = (𝑛 ∈ Fin, 𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(𝑛 Mat 𝑟) / 𝑎⦌(𝑎 ↾s {𝑚 ∈ (Base‘𝑎) ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑖𝑚𝑗) = (0g‘𝑟))}))
Definition	df-scmatalt 48959*	Define the algebra of n x n scalar matrices over a set (usually a ring) r, see definition in [Connell] p. 57: "A scalar matrix is a diagonal matrix for which all the diagonal terms are equal, i.e., a matrix of the form cIn";. (Contributed by AV, 8-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ScMatALT = (𝑛 ∈ Fin, 𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(𝑛 Mat 𝑟) / 𝑎⦌(𝑎 ↾s {𝑚 ∈ (Base‘𝑎) ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (Base‘𝑟)∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑖𝑚𝑗) = if(𝑖 = 𝑗, 𝑐, (0g‘𝑟))}))
Theorem	dmatALTval 48960*	The algebra of 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrices over a ring 𝑅. (Contributed by AV, 8-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑁 Mat 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑁 DMatALT 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑅 ∈ V) → 𝐷 = (𝐴 ↾s {𝑚 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑖𝑚𝑗) = 0 )}))
Theorem	dmatALTbas 48961*	The base set of the algebra of 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrices over a ring 𝑅, i.e. the set of all 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrices over the ring 𝑅. (Contributed by AV, 8-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑁 Mat 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑁 DMatALT 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑅 ∈ V) → (Base‘𝐷) = {𝑚 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑖𝑚𝑗) = 0 )})
Theorem	dmatALTbasel 48962*	An element of the base set of the algebra of 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrices over a ring 𝑅, i.e. an 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrix over the ring 𝑅. (Contributed by AV, 8-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑁 Mat 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑁 DMatALT 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑅 ∈ V) → (𝑀 ∈ (Base‘𝐷) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑖𝑀𝑗) = 0 ))))
Theorem	dmatbas 48963	The set of all 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrices over (the ring) 𝑅 is the base set of the algebra of 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrices over (the ring) 𝑅. (Contributed by AV, 8-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑁 Mat 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑁 DMat 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐷 = (Base‘(𝑁 DMatALT 𝑅)))
21.48.20.2  Linear combinations According to Wikipedia ("Linear combination", 29-Mar-2019, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_combination) "In mathematics, a linear combination is an expression constructed from a set of terms by multiplying each term by a constant and adding the results (e.g., a linear combination of x and y would be any expression of the form ax + by, where a and b are constants). The concept of linear combinations is central to linear algebra and related fields of mathematics." In linear algebra, these "terms" are "vectors" (elements from vector spaces or left modules), and the constants are elements of the underlying field resp. ring. This corresponds to the definition in [Lang] p. 129: "Let M be a module over a ring A and let S be a subset of M. By a linear combination of elements of S (with coefficients in A) one means a sum ∑x ∈S axx where {ax} is a set of elements of A, ...". In the definition in [Lang] p. 129, it is additionally claimed that "..., almost all of which [elements of A] are equal to 0.". This is not necessarily required in the following definition df-linc 48966, but it is essential if additions and scalar multiplications of linear combinations are considered. Therefore, we define the set of all linear combinations with finite support in df-lco 48967, so that we can show that such sets are submodules of the corresponding modules, see lincolss 48994. Remark:According to Wikipedia ("Linear span", 28-Apr-2019, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_span 48994) "In linear algebra, the linear span (also called the linear hull or just span) of a set of vectors in a vector space [or module] is the intersection of all linear subspaces which each contain every vector in that set.", and "Alternately, the span of [a set] S may be defined as the set of all finite linear combinations of elements (vectors) of S". Whereas spans are defined according to the first approach in df-lsp 21008, the set of all linear combinations as defined by df-lco 48967 follows the alternative approach. That both definitions are equivalent is shown by lspeqlco 48999.
Syntax	clinc 48964	Extend class notation with the operation constructing a linear combination (of vectors from a left module).
class linC
Syntax	clinco 48965	Extend class notation with the operation constructing a set of linear combinations (of vectors from a left module) with finite support.
class LinCo
Definition	df-linc 48966*	Define the operation constructing a linear combination. Although this definition is taylored for linear combinations of vectors from left modules, it can be used for any structure having a Base, Scalar s and a scalar multiplication ·𝑠. (Contributed by AV, 29-Mar-2019.)
⊢ linC = (𝑚 ∈ V ↦ (𝑠 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑚)) ↑m 𝑣), 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑚) ↦ (𝑚 Σg (𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ ((𝑠‘𝑥)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑚)𝑥)))))
Definition	df-lco 48967*	Define the operation constructing the set of all linear combinations for a set of vectors. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ LinCo = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑚) ↦ {𝑐 ∈ (Base‘𝑚) ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑚)) ↑m 𝑣)(𝑠 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑚)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝑠( linC ‘𝑚)𝑣))})
Theorem	lincop 48968*	A linear combination as operation. (Contributed by AV, 30-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑋 → ( linC ‘𝑀) = (𝑠 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m 𝑣), 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ↦ (𝑀 Σg (𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ ((𝑠‘𝑥)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑥)))))
Theorem	lincval 48969*	The value of a linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 30-Mar-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) → (𝑆( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = (𝑀 Σg (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ ((𝑆‘𝑥)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑥))))
Theorem	dflinc2 48970*	Alternative definition of linear combinations using the function operation. (Contributed by AV, 1-Apr-2019.)
⊢ linC = (𝑚 ∈ V ↦ (𝑠 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑚)) ↑m 𝑣), 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑚) ↦ (𝑚 Σg (𝑠 ∘f ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑚)( I ↾ 𝑣)))))
Theorem	lcoop 48971*	A linear combination as operation. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) = {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)(𝑠 finSupp (0g‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝑠( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉))})
Theorem	lcoval 48972*	The value of a linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑠 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)(𝑠 finSupp (0g‘𝑆) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑠( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉)))))
Theorem	lincfsuppcl 48973	A linear combination of vectors (with finite support) is a vector. (Contributed by AV, 25-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 )) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	linccl 48974	A linear combination of vectors is a vector. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉))) → (𝑆( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	lincval0 48975	The value of an empty linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑋 → (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀))
Theorem	lincvalsng 48976	The linear combination over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅) → ({⟨𝑉, 𝑌⟩} ( linC ‘𝑀){𝑉}) = (𝑌 · 𝑉))
Theorem	lincvalsn 48977	The linear combination over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑉, 𝑌⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀){𝑉}) = (𝑌 · 𝑉))
Theorem	lincvalpr 48978	The linear combination over an unordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 16-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑉, 𝑋⟩, ⟨𝑊, 𝑌⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ≠ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑉 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅)) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀){𝑉, 𝑊}) = ((𝑋 · 𝑉) + (𝑌 · 𝑊)))
Theorem	lincval1 48979	The linear combination over a singleton mapping to 0. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑉, (0g‘𝑆)⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀){𝑉}) = (0g‘𝑀))
Theorem	lcosn0 48980	Properties of a linear combination over a singleton mapping to 0. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑉, (0g‘𝑆)⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m {𝑉}) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp (0g‘𝑆) ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀){𝑉}) = (0g‘𝑀)))
Theorem	lincvalsc0 48981*	The linear combination where all scalars are 0. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = 𝑍)
Theorem	lcoc0 48982*	Properties of a linear combination where all scalars are 0. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ 0 )    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = 𝑍))
Theorem	linc0scn0 48983*	If a set contains the zero element of a module, there is a linear combination being 0 where not all scalars are 0. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑍, 1 , 0 ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = 𝑍)
Theorem	lincdifsn 48984	A vector is a linear combination of a set containing this vector. (Contributed by AV, 21-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ) ∧ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑋}))) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = ((𝐺( linC ‘𝑀)(𝑉 ∖ {𝑋})) + ((𝐹‘𝑋) · 𝑋)))
Theorem	linc1 48985*	A vector is a linear combination of a set containing this vector. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑋, 1 , 0 ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = 𝑋)
Theorem	lincellss 48986	A linear combination of a subset of a linear subspace is also contained in the linear subspace. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝐹 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) ∈ 𝑆))
Theorem	lco0 48987	The set of empty linear combinations over a monoid is the singleton with the identity element of the monoid. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ Mnd → (𝑀 LinCo ∅) = {(0g‘𝑀)})
Theorem	lcoel0 48988	The zero vector is always a linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) → (0g‘𝑀) ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉))
Theorem	lincsum 48989	The sum of two linear combinations is a linear combination, see also the proof in [Lang] p. 129. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐴( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐵( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ✚ = (+g‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)) ∧ (𝐴 finSupp (0g‘𝑆) ∧ 𝐵 finSupp (0g‘𝑆))) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = ((𝐴 ∘f ✚ 𝐵)( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉))
Theorem	lincscm 48990*	A linear combinations multiplied with a scalar is a linear combination, see also the proof in [Lang] p. 129. (Contributed by AV, 9-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘(Scalar‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐴( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝑆 · (𝐴‘𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝐴 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))) → (𝑆 ∙ 𝑋) = (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉))
Theorem	lincsumcl 48991	The sum of two linear combinations is a linear combination, see also the proof in [Lang] p. 129. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉))) → (𝐶 + 𝐷) ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉))
Theorem	lincscmcl 48992	The multiplication of a linear combination with a scalar is a linear combination, see also the proof in [Lang] p. 129. (Contributed by AV, 11-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Jul-2019.)
⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉)) → (𝐶 · 𝐷) ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉))
Theorem	lincsumscmcl 48993	The sum of a linear combination and a multiplication of a linear combination with a scalar is a linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 11-Apr-2019.)
⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉))) → ((𝐶 · 𝐷) + 𝐵) ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉))
Theorem	lincolss 48994	According to the statement in [Lang] p. 129, the set (LSubSp‘𝑀) of all linear combinations of a set of vectors V is a submodule (generated by V) of the module M. The elements of V are called generators of (LSubSp‘𝑀). (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) → (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑀))
Theorem	ellcoellss 48995*	Every linear combination of a subset of a linear subspace is also contained in the linear subspace. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑆) → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉)𝑥 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	lcoss 48996	A set of vectors of a module is a subset of the set of all linear combinations of the set. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) → 𝑉 ⊆ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉))
Theorem	lspsslco 48997	Lemma for lspeqlco 48999. (Contributed by AV, 17-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → ((LSpan‘𝑀)‘𝑉) ⊆ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉))
Theorem	lcosslsp 48998	Lemma for lspeqlco 48999. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) ⊆ ((LSpan‘𝑀)‘𝑉))
Theorem	lspeqlco 48999	Equivalence of a span of a set of vectors of a left module defined as the intersection of all linear subspaces which each contain every vector in that set (see df-lsp 21008) and as the set of all linear combinations of the vectors of the set with finite support. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) = ((LSpan‘𝑀)‘𝑉))
21.48.20.3  Linear independence According to the definition in [Lang] p. 129: "A subset S of a module M is said to be linearly independent (over [the ring] A) if whenever we have a linear combination ∑x ∈S axx which is equal to 0, then ax=0 for all x∈S." This definition does not care for the finiteness of the set S (because the definition of a linear combination in [Lang] p.129 does already assure that only a finite number of coefficients can be 0 in the sum). Our definition df-lininds 49002 does also neither claim that the subset must be finite, nor that almost all coefficients within the linear combination are 0. If this is required, it must be explicitly stated as precondition in the corresponding theorems. Usually, the linear independence is defined for vector spaces, see Wikipedia ("Linear independence", 15-Apr-2019, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_independence 49002): "In the theory of vector spaces, a set of vectors is said to be linearly dependent if at least one of the vectors in the set can be defined as a linear combination of the others; if no vector in the set can be written in this way, then the vectors are said to be linearly independent." Furthermore, "In order to allow the number of linearly independent vectors in a vector space to be countably infinite, it is useful to define linear dependence as follows. More generally, let V be a vector space over a field K, and let {vi | i∈I} be a family of elements of V. The family is linearly dependent over K if there exists a finite family {aj | j∈J} of elements of K, all nonzero, such that ∑j∈J ajvj=0. A set X of elements of V is linearly independent if the corresponding family{x}x∈X is linearly independent". Remark 1: There are already definitions of (linearly) independent families (df-lindf 21827) and (linearly) independent sets (df-linds 21828). These definitions are based on the principle "of vectors, no nonzero multiple of which can be expressed as a linear combination of other elements" or (see lbsind2 21117) "every element is not in the span of the remainder of the [set]". The equivalence of Definitions df-linds 21828 and df-lininds 49002 for (linear) independence for (left) modules is shown in lindslininds 49024. Remark 2: Subsets of the base set of a (left) module are linearly dependent if they are not linearly independent (see df-lindeps 49004) or, according to Wikipedia, "if at least one of the vectors in the set can be defined as a linear combination of the others", see islindeps2 49043. The reversed implication is not valid for arbitrary modules (but for arbitrary vector spaces), because it requires a division by a coefficient. Therefore, the definition of Wikipedia is equivalent to our definition for (left) vector spaces (see isldepslvec2 49045) and not for (left) modules in general.
Syntax	clininds 49000	Extend class notation with the relation between a module and its linearly independent subsets.
class linIndS