P. 490 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 48901-49000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	nn0sumshdiglemA 48901*	Lemma for nn0sumshdig 48905 (induction step, even multiplier). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑎 / 2) ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ((#b‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^𝑦)((𝑘(digit‘2)𝑥) · (2↑𝑘))) → ((#b‘𝑎) = (𝑦 + 1) → 𝑎 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^(𝑦 + 1))((𝑘(digit‘2)𝑎) · (2↑𝑘)))))
Theorem	nn0sumshdiglemB 48902*	Lemma for nn0sumshdig 48905 (induction step, odd multiplier). (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝑎 − 1) / 2) ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ((#b‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^𝑦)((𝑘(digit‘2)𝑥) · (2↑𝑘))) → ((#b‘𝑎) = (𝑦 + 1) → 𝑎 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^(𝑦 + 1))((𝑘(digit‘2)𝑎) · (2↑𝑘)))))
Theorem	nn0sumshdiglem1 48903*	Lemma 1 for nn0sumshdig 48905 (induction step). (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ((#b‘𝑎) = 𝑦 → 𝑎 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^𝑦)((𝑘(digit‘2)𝑎) · (2↑𝑘))) → ∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ((#b‘𝑎) = (𝑦 + 1) → 𝑎 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^(𝑦 + 1))((𝑘(digit‘2)𝑎) · (2↑𝑘)))))
Theorem	nn0sumshdiglem2 48904*	Lemma 2 for nn0sumshdig 48905. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐿 ∈ ℕ → ∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ((#b‘𝑎) = 𝐿 → 𝑎 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^𝐿)((𝑘(digit‘2)𝑎) · (2↑𝑘))))
Theorem	nn0sumshdig 48905*	A nonnegative integer can be represented as sum of its shifted bits. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → 𝐴 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#b‘𝐴))((𝑘(digit‘2)𝐴) · (2↑𝑘)))
21.48.21.11  Algorithms for the multiplication of nonnegative integers
Theorem	nn0mulfsum 48906*	Trivial algorithm to calculate the product of two nonnegative integers 𝑎 and 𝑏 by adding 𝑏 to itself 𝑎 times. (Contributed by AV, 17-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝐴)𝐵)
Theorem	nn0mullong 48907*	Standard algorithm (also known as "long multiplication" or "grade-school multiplication") to calculate the product of two nonnegative integers 𝑎 and 𝑏 by multiplying the multiplicand 𝑏 by each digit of the multiplier 𝑎 and then add up all the properly shifted results. Here, the binary representation of the multiplier 𝑎 is used, i.e., the above mentioned "digits" are 0 or 1. This is a similar result as provided by smumul 16424. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#b‘𝐴))(((𝑘(digit‘2)𝐴) · (2↑𝑘)) · 𝐵))
21.48.21.12  N-ary functions According to Wikipedia ("Arity", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arity, 19-May-2024): "In logic, mathematics, and computer science, arity is the number of arguments or operands taken by a function, operation or relation." N-ary functions are often also called multivariate functions, without indicating the actual number of arguments. See also Wikipedia ("Multivariate functions", 19-May-2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_(mathematics)#Multivariate_functions ): "A multivariate function, multivariable function, or function of several variables is a function that depends on several arguments. ... Formally, a function of n variables is a function whose domain is a set of n-tuples. For example, multiplication of integers is a function of two variables, or bivariate function, whose domain is the set of all ordered pairs (2-tuples) of integers, and whose codomain is the set of integers. The same is true for every binary operation. Commonly, an n-tuple is denoted enclosed between parentheses, such as in ( 1 , 2 , ... , n ). When using functional notation, one usually omits the parentheses surrounding tuples, writing f ( x1 , ... , xn ) instead of f ( ( x1 , ... , xn ) ). Given n sets X1 , ... , Xn , the set of all n-tuples ( x1 , ... , xn ) such that x1 is an element of X1 , ... , xn is an element of Xn is called the Cartesian product of X1 , ... , Xn , and denoted X1 X ... X Xn . Therefore, a multivariate function is a function that has a Cartesian product or a proper subset of a Cartesian product as a domain: 𝑓:𝑈⟶𝑌 where where the domain 𝑈 has the form 𝑈 ⊆ ((...((𝑋‘1) × (𝑋‘2)) × ...) × (𝑋‘𝑛))." In the following, n-ary functions are defined as mappings (see df-map 8769) from a finite sequence of arguments, which themselves are defined as mappings from the half-open range of nonnegative integers to the domain of each argument. Furthermore, the definition is restricted to endofunctions, meaning that the domain(s) of the argument(s) is identical with its codomain. This means that the domains of all arguments are identical (in contrast to the definition in Wikipedia, see above: here, we have X1 = X2 = ... = Xn = X). For small n, n-ary functions correspond to "usual" functions with a different number of arguments: - n = 0 (nullary functions): These correspond actually to constants, see 0aryfvalelfv 48917 and mapsn 8830: (𝑋 ↑m {∅}) - n = 1 (unary functions): These correspond actually to usual endofunctions, see 1aryenef 48927 and efmndbas 18800: (𝑋 ↑m 𝑋) - n = 2 (binary functions): These correspond to usual operations on two elements of the same set, also called "binary operation" (according to Wikipedia ("Binary operation", 19-May-2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_operation 18800): "In mathematics, a binary operation or dyadic operation is a rule for combining two elements (called operands) to produce another element. More formally, a binary operation is an operation of arity two. More specifically, a binary operation on a set is a binary operation whose two domains and the codomain are the same set." Sometimes also called "closed internal binary operation"), see 2aryenef 48938 and compare with df-clintop 48482: (𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)). Instead of using indexed arguments (represented by a mapping as described above), elements of Cartesian exponentiations (𝑈↑↑𝑁) (see df-finxp 37560) could have been used to represent multiple arguments. However, this concept is not fully developed yet (it is within a mathbox), and it is currently based on ordinal numbers, e.g., (𝑈↑↑2o), instead of integers, e.g., (𝑈↑↑2), which is not very practical. The definition df-ixp of infinite Cartesian product could also have been used to represent multiple arguments, but this would have been more cumbersome without any additional advantage. naryfvalixp 48911 shows that both definitions are equivalent.
Syntax	cnaryf 48908	Extend the definition of a class to include the n-ary functions.
class -aryF
Definition	df-naryf 48909*	Define the n-ary (endo)functions. (Contributed by AV, 11-May-2024.) (Revised by TA and SN, 7-Jun-2024.)
⊢ -aryF = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ↑m (𝑥 ↑m (0..^𝑛))))
Theorem	naryfval 48910	The set of the n-ary (endo)functions on a class 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 13-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁-aryF 𝑋) = (𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 ↑m 𝐼)))
Theorem	naryfvalixp 48911*	The set of the n-ary (endo)functions on a class 𝑋 expressed with the notation of infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁-aryF 𝑋) = (𝑋 ↑m X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝑋))
Theorem	naryfvalel 48912	An n-ary (endo)function on a set 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 14-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑁-aryF 𝑋) ↔ 𝐹:(𝑋 ↑m 𝐼)⟶𝑋))
Theorem	naryrcl 48913	Reverse closure for n-ary (endo)functions. (Contributed by AV, 14-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑁-aryF 𝑋) → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ V))
Theorem	naryfvalelfv 48914	The value of an n-ary (endo)function on a set 𝑋 is an element of 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 14-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑁-aryF 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴:𝐼⟶𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑋)
Theorem	naryfvalelwrdf 48915*	An n-ary (endo)function on a set 𝑋 expressed as a function over the set of words on 𝑋 of length 𝑛. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑁-aryF 𝑋) ↔ 𝐹:{𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑋 ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = 𝑁}⟶𝑋))
Theorem	0aryfvalel 48916*	A nullary (endo)function on a set 𝑋 is a singleton of an ordered pair with the empty set as first component. A nullary function represents a constant: (𝐹‘∅) = 𝐶 with 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋, see also 0aryfvalelfv 48917. Instead of (𝐹‘∅), nullary functions are usually written as 𝐹() in literature. (Contributed by AV, 15-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ∈ (0-aryF 𝑋) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝐹 = {⟨∅, 𝑥⟩}))
Theorem	0aryfvalelfv 48917*	The value of a nullary (endo)function on a set 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (0-aryF 𝑋) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘∅) = 𝑥)
Theorem	1aryfvalel 48918	A unary (endo)function on a set 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 15-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) ↔ 𝐹:(𝑋 ↑m {0})⟶𝑋))
Theorem	fv1arycl 48919	Closure of a unary (endo)function. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐺‘{⟨0, 𝐴⟩}) ∈ 𝑋)
Theorem	1arympt1 48920*	A unary (endo)function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ↑m {0}) ↦ (𝐴‘(𝑥‘0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴:𝑋⟶𝑋) → 𝐹 ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋))
Theorem	1arympt1fv 48921*	The value of a unary (endo)function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ↑m {0}) ↦ (𝐴‘(𝑥‘0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘{⟨0, 𝐵⟩}) = (𝐴‘𝐵))
Theorem	1arymaptfv 48922*	The value of the mapping of unary (endo)functions. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) → (𝐻‘𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝐹‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩})))
Theorem	1arymaptf 48923*	The mapping of unary (endo)functions is a function into the set of endofunctions. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(1-aryF 𝑋)⟶(𝑋 ↑m 𝑋))
Theorem	1arymaptf1 48924*	The mapping of unary (endo)functions is a one-to-one function into the set of endofunctions. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(1-aryF 𝑋)–1-1→(𝑋 ↑m 𝑋))
Theorem	1arymaptfo 48925*	The mapping of unary (endo)functions is a function onto the set of endofunctions. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(1-aryF 𝑋)–onto→(𝑋 ↑m 𝑋))
Theorem	1arymaptf1o 48926*	The mapping of unary (endo)functions is a one-to-one function onto the set of endofunctions. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(1-aryF 𝑋)–1-1-onto→(𝑋 ↑m 𝑋))
Theorem	1aryenef 48927	The set of unary (endo)functions and the set of endofunctions are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ (1-aryF 𝑋) ≈ (𝑋 ↑m 𝑋)
Theorem	1aryenefmnd 48928	The set of unary (endo)functions and the base set of the monoid of endofunctions are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ (1-aryF 𝑋) ≈ (Base‘(EndoFMnd‘𝑋))
Theorem	2aryfvalel 48929	A binary (endo)function on a set 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↔ 𝐹:(𝑋 ↑m {0, 1})⟶𝑋))
Theorem	fv2arycl 48930	Closure of a binary (endo)function. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐺‘{⟨0, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1, 𝐵⟩}) ∈ 𝑋)
Theorem	2arympt 48931*	A binary (endo)function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ↑m {0, 1}) ↦ ((𝑥‘0)𝑂(𝑥‘1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑂:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶𝑋) → 𝐹 ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋))
Theorem	2arymptfv 48932*	The value of a binary (endo)function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ↑m {0, 1}) ↦ ((𝑥‘0)𝑂(𝑥‘1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘{⟨0, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1, 𝐵⟩}) = (𝐴𝑂𝐵))
Theorem	2arymaptfv 48933*	The value of the mapping of binary (endo)functions. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) → (𝐻‘𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝐹‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))
Theorem	2arymaptf 48934*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a function into the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)⟶(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2arymaptf1 48935*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a one-to-one function into the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)–1-1→(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2arymaptfo 48936*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a function onto the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)–onto→(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2arymaptf1o 48937*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a one-to-one function onto the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)–1-1-onto→(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2aryenef 48938	The set of binary (endo)functions and the set of binary operations are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ (2-aryF 𝑋) ≈ (𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋))
21.48.21.13  The Ackermann function According to Wikipedia ("Ackermann function", 8-May-2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ackermann_function): "In computability theory, the Ackermann function, named after Wilhelm Ackermann, is one of the simplest and earliest-discovered examples of a total computable function that is not primitive recursive. ... One common version is the two-argument Ackermann-Péter function developed by Rózsa Péter and Raphael Robinson. Its value grows very rapidly; for example, A(4,2) results in 2^65536-3 [see ackval42 48978)], an integer of 19,729 decimal digits." In the following, the Ackermann function is defined as iterated 1-ary function (also mentioned in Wikipedia), see df-ack 48942, based on a definition IterComp of "the n-th iterate of (a class/function) f", see df-itco 48941. As an illustration, we have ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘3) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))) (see itcoval3 48947). The following recursive definition of the Ackermann function follows immediately from Definition df-ack 48942: ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁) = (((IterComp‘(Ack‘𝑀))‘(𝑁 + 1))‘1)). That Definition df-ack 48942 is equivalent to Péter's definition is proven by the following three theorems: ackval0val 48968: ((Ack‘0)‘𝑀) = (𝑀 + 1); ackvalsuc0val 48969: ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘0) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘1); ackvalsucsucval 48970: ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁)). The initial values of the Ackermann function are calculated in the following four theorems: ackval0012 48971: 𝐴(0, 0) = 1, 𝐴(0, 1) = 2, 𝐴(0, 2) = 3; ackval1012 48972: 𝐴(1, 0) = 2, 𝐴(1, 1) = 3, 𝐴(1, 3) = 4; ackval2012 48973: 𝐴(2, 0) = 3, 𝐴(2, 1) = 5, 𝐴(2, 3) = 7; ackval3012 48974: 𝐴(3, 0) = 5, 𝐴(3, 1) = ;13, 𝐴(3, 3) = ;29.
Syntax	citco 48939	Extend the definition of a class to include iterated functions.
class IterComp
Syntax	cack 48940	Extend the definition of a class to include the Ackermann function operator.
class Ack
Definition	df-itco 48941*	Define a function (recursively) that returns the n-th iterate of a class (usually a function) with regard to composition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ IterComp = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ seq0((𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∘ 𝑔)), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑖 = 0, ( I ↾ dom 𝑓), 𝑓))))
Definition	df-ack 48942*	Define the Ackermann function (recursively). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ Ack = seq0((𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((IterComp‘𝑓)‘(𝑛 + 1))‘1))), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑖 = 0, (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 1)), 𝑖)))
Theorem	itcoval 48943*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of a class (usually a function) with regard to composition. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (IterComp‘𝐹) = seq0((𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑔)), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑖 = 0, ( I ↾ dom 𝐹), 𝐹))))
Theorem	itcoval0 48944	A function iterated zero times (defined as identity function). (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = ( I ↾ dom 𝐹))
Theorem	itcoval1 48945	A function iterated once. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘1) = 𝐹)
Theorem	itcoval2 48946	A function iterated twice. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘2) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))
Theorem	itcoval3 48947	A function iterated three times. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘3) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)))
Theorem	itcoval0mpt 48948*	A mapping iterated zero times (defined as identity function). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑛))
Theorem	itcovalsuc 48949*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of a function with regard to composition at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑌) = 𝐺) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑌 + 1)) = (𝐺(𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑔))𝐹))
Theorem	itcovalsucov 48950	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of a function with regard to composition at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑌) = 𝐺) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑌 + 1)) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺))
Theorem	itcovalendof 48951	The n-th iterate of an endofunction is an endofunction. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑁):𝐴⟶𝐴)
Theorem	itcovalpclem1 48952*	Lemma 1 for itcovalpc 48954: induction basis. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 0))))
Theorem	itcovalpclem2 48953*	Lemma 2 for itcovalpc 48954: induction step. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 𝑦))) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑦 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · (𝑦 + 1))))))
Theorem	itcovalpc 48954*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of the "plus a constant" function with regard to composition. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝐼) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 𝐼))))
Theorem	itcovalt2lem2lem1 48955	Lemma 1 for itcovalt2lem2 48958. (Contributed by AV, 6-May-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑌 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · 𝑌) − 𝐶) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	itcovalt2lem2lem2 48956	Lemma 2 for itcovalt2lem2 48958. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((2 · (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝑌)) − 𝐶)) + 𝐶) = (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · (2↑(𝑌 + 1))) − 𝐶))
Theorem	itcovalt2lem1 48957*	Lemma 1 for itcovalt2 48959: induction basis. (Contributed by AV, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑0)) − 𝐶)))
Theorem	itcovalt2lem2 48958*	Lemma 2 for itcovalt2 48959: induction step. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝑦)) − 𝐶)) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑦 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑(𝑦 + 1))) − 𝐶))))
Theorem	itcovalt2 48959*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of the "times 2 plus a constant" function with regard to composition. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝐼) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝐼)) − 𝐶)))
Theorem	ackvalsuc1mpt 48960*	The Ackermann function at a successor of the first argument as a mapping of the second argument. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘(𝑀 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((IterComp‘(Ack‘𝑀))‘(𝑛 + 1))‘1)))
Theorem	ackvalsuc1 48961	The Ackermann function at a successor of the first argument and an arbitrary second argument. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁) = (((IterComp‘(Ack‘𝑀))‘(𝑁 + 1))‘1))
Theorem	ackval0 48962	The Ackermann function at 0. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 1))
Theorem	ackval1 48963	The Ackermann function at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘1) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 2))
Theorem	ackval2 48964	The Ackermann function at 2. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘2) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 3))
Theorem	ackval3 48965	The Ackermann function at 3. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘3) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2↑(𝑛 + 3)) − 3))
Theorem	ackendofnn0 48966	The Ackermann function at any nonnegative integer is an endofunction on the nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘𝑀):ℕ0⟶ℕ0)
Theorem	ackfnnn0 48967	The Ackermann function at any nonnegative integer is a function on the nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 8-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘𝑀) Fn ℕ0)
Theorem	ackval0val 48968	The Ackermann function at 0 (for the first argument). This is the first equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → ((Ack‘0)‘𝑀) = (𝑀 + 1))
Theorem	ackvalsuc0val 48969	The Ackermann function at a successor (of the first argument). This is the second equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘0) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘1))
Theorem	ackvalsucsucval 48970	The Ackermann function at the successors. This is the third equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ackval0012 48971	The Ackermann function at (0,0), (0,1), (0,2). (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘0)‘0), ((Ack‘0)‘1), ((Ack‘0)‘2)⟩ = ⟨1, 2, 3⟩
Theorem	ackval1012 48972	The Ackermann function at (1,0), (1,1), (1,2). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘1)‘0), ((Ack‘1)‘1), ((Ack‘1)‘2)⟩ = ⟨2, 3, 4⟩
Theorem	ackval2012 48973	The Ackermann function at (2,0), (2,1), (2,2). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘2)‘0), ((Ack‘2)‘1), ((Ack‘2)‘2)⟩ = ⟨3, 5, 7⟩
Theorem	ackval3012 48974	The Ackermann function at (3,0), (3,1), (3,2). (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘3)‘0), ((Ack‘3)‘1), ((Ack‘3)‘2)⟩ = ⟨5, ;13, ;29⟩
Theorem	ackval40 48975	The Ackermann function at (4,0). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘0) = ;13
Theorem	ackval41a 48976	The Ackermann function at (4,1). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘1) = ((2↑;16) − 3)
Theorem	ackval41 48977	The Ackermann function at (4,1). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘1) = ;;;;65533
Theorem	ackval42 48978	The Ackermann function at (4,2). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘2) = ((2↑;;;;65536) − 3)
Theorem	ackval42a 48979	The Ackermann function at (4,2), expressed with powers of 2. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘2) = ((2↑(2↑(2↑(2↑2)))) − 3)
Theorem	ackval50 48980	The Ackermann function at (5,0). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘5)‘0) = ;;;;65533
21.48.22  Elementary geometry (extension)
21.48.22.1  Auxiliary theorems
Theorem	fv1prop 48981	The function value of unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩}‘1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	fv2prop 48982	The function value of unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩}‘2) = 𝐵)
Theorem	submuladdmuld 48983	Transformation of a sum of a product of a difference and a product with the subtrahend of the difference. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · (𝐷 − 𝐶))))
Theorem	affinecomb1 48984*	Combination of two real affine combinations, one class variable resolved. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐺 − 𝐹) / (𝐶 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐵) + (𝑡 · 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐸 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐹) + (𝑡 · 𝐺))) ↔ 𝐸 = ((𝑆 · (𝐴 − 𝐵)) + 𝐹)))
Theorem	affinecomb2 48985*	Combination of two real affine combinations, presented without fraction. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐵) + (𝑡 · 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐸 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐹) + (𝑡 · 𝐺))) ↔ ((𝐶 − 𝐵) · 𝐸) = (((𝐺 − 𝐹) · 𝐴) + ((𝐹 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐺)))))
Theorem	affineid 48986	Identity of an affine combination. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((1 − 𝑇) · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	1subrec1sub 48987	Subtract the reciprocal of 1 minus a number from 1 results in the number divided by the number minus 1. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → (1 − (1 / (1 − 𝐴))) = (𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1)))
Theorem	resum2sqcl 48988	The sum of two squares of real numbers is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑄 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	resum2sqgt0 48989	The sum of the square of a nonzero real number and the square of another real number is greater than zero. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 0 < 𝑄)
Theorem	resum2sqrp 48990	The sum of the square of a nonzero real number and the square of another real number is a positive real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑄 ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	resum2sqorgt0 48991	The sum of the square of two real numbers is greater than zero if at least one of the real numbers is nonzero. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0)) → 0 < 𝑄)
Theorem	reorelicc 48992	Membership in and outside of a closed real interval. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐶))
21.48.22.2  Real euclidean space of dimension 2
Theorem	rrx2pxel 48993	The x-coordinate of a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑋‘1) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rrx2pyel 48994	The y-coordinate of a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑋‘2) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	prelrrx2 48995	An unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 and real numbers as second components is a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → {⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩} ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	prelrrx2b 48996	An unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 and real numbers as second components is a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2, determined by its coordinates. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (((𝑍‘1) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑍‘2) = 𝐵) ∨ ((𝑍‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑍‘2) = 𝑌))) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ {{⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩}, {⟨1, 𝑋⟩, ⟨2, 𝑌⟩}}))
Theorem	rrx2pnecoorneor 48997	If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then they are different at least at one coordinate. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ((𝑋‘1) ≠ (𝑌‘1) ∨ (𝑋‘2) ≠ (𝑌‘2)))
Theorem	rrx2pnedifcoorneor 48998	If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then at least one difference of two corresponding coordinates is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑌‘2) − (𝑋‘2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0))
Theorem	rrx2pnedifcoorneorr 48999	If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then at least one difference of two corresponding coordinates is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑋‘2) − (𝑌‘2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0))
Theorem	rrx2xpref1o 49000*	There is a bijection between the set of ordered pairs of real numbers (the cartesian product of the real numbers) and the set of points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane (represented as mappings from {1, 2} to the real numbers). (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ {⟨1, 𝑥⟩, ⟨2, 𝑦⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(ℝ × ℝ)–1-1-onto→𝑅