P. 490 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 48901-49000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	seppsepf 48901	If two sets are precisely separated by a continuous function, then they are separated by the continuous function. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐽 Cn II)(𝑆 = (◡𝑓 “ {0}) ∧ 𝑇 = (◡𝑓 “ {1})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐽 Cn II)(𝑆 ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {0}) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {1})))
Theorem	seppcld 48902*	If two sets are precisely separated by a continuous function, then they are closed. An alternate proof involves II ∈ Fre. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐽 Cn II)(𝑆 = (◡𝑓 “ {0}) ∧ 𝑇 = (◡𝑓 “ {1})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽)))
21.49.10.7  Separated spaces: T0, T1, T2 (Hausdorff) ...
Theorem	isnrm4 48903*	A topological space is normal iff any two disjoint closed sets are separated by neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Nrm ↔ (𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽)∀𝑑 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽)((𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑐)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑑)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
Theorem	dfnrm2 48904*	A topological space is normal if any disjoint closed sets can be separated by open neighborhoods. An alternate definition of df-nrm 23220. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Aug-2024.)
⊢ Nrm = {𝑗 ∈ Top ∣ ∀𝑐 ∈ (Clsd‘𝑗)∀𝑑 ∈ (Clsd‘𝑗)((𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑗 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑐 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))}
Theorem	dfnrm3 48905*	A topological space is normal if any disjoint closed sets can be separated by neighborhoods. An alternate definition of df-nrm 23220. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ Nrm = {𝑗 ∈ Top ∣ ∀𝑐 ∈ (Clsd‘𝑗)∀𝑑 ∈ (Clsd‘𝑗)((𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝑗)‘𝑐)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝑗)‘𝑑)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)}
Theorem	iscnrm3lem1 48906*	Lemma for iscnrm3 48924. Subspace topology is a topology. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐽 ↾t 𝑥) ∈ Top ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	iscnrm3lem2 48907*	Lemma for iscnrm3 48924 proving a biconditional on restricted universal quantifications. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓 → ((𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐸) → 𝜒)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐸 𝜒 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐸 𝜒))
Theorem	iscnrm3lem4 48908	Lemma for iscnrm3lem5 48909 and iscnrm3r 48920. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜂 → (𝜓 → 𝜁))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜁 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))))
Theorem	iscnrm3lem5 48909*	Lemma for iscnrm3l 48923. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑇) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑇) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝑊))    &   ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → 𝜎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜏 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 (𝜑 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → (𝜁 → 𝜎))))
Theorem	iscnrm3lem6 48910*	Lemma for iscnrm3lem7 48911. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	iscnrm3lem7 48911*	Lemma for iscnrm3rlem8 48919 and iscnrm3llem2 48922 involving restricted existential quantifications. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑍 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒))
Theorem	iscnrm3rlem1 48912	Lemma for iscnrm3rlem2 48913. The hypothesis could be generalized to (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∖ 𝑇) ⊆ 𝑋). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∖ 𝑇) = (𝑆 ∩ (𝑋 ∖ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇))))
Theorem	iscnrm3rlem2 48913	Lemma for iscnrm3rlem3 48914. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇) ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇)))))
Theorem	iscnrm3rlem3 48914	Lemma for iscnrm3r 48920. The designed subspace is a subset of the original set; the two sets are closed sets in the subspace. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽)) → ((∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))) ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))))) ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇) ∖ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)))))))
Theorem	iscnrm3rlem4 48915	Lemma for iscnrm3rlem8 48919. Given two disjoint subsets 𝑆 and 𝑇 of the underlying set of a topology 𝐽, if 𝑁 is a superset of (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇), then it is a superset of 𝑆. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇) ⊆ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑁)
Theorem	iscnrm3rlem5 48916	Lemma for iscnrm3rlem6 48917. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))) ∈ 𝐽)
Theorem	iscnrm3rlem6 48917	Lemma for iscnrm3rlem7 48918. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ⊆ (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)))) ↔ 𝑂 ∈ 𝐽))
Theorem	iscnrm3rlem7 48918	Lemma for iscnrm3rlem8 48919. Open neighborhoods in the subspace topology are open neighborhoods in the original topology given that the subspace is an open set in the original topology. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐽)
Theorem	iscnrm3rlem8 48919*	Lemma for iscnrm3r 48920. Disjoint open neighborhoods in the subspace topology are disjoint open neighborhoods in the original topology given that the subspace is an open set in the original topology. Therefore, given any two sets separated in the original topology and separated by open neighborhoods in the subspace topology, they must be separated by open neighborhoods in the original topology. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽) ∧ ((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)) → (∃𝑙 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))))∃𝑘 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))))((((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) ⊆ 𝑙 ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇) ∖ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ (𝑙 ∩ 𝑘) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅)))
Theorem	iscnrm3r 48920*	Lemma for iscnrm3 48924. If all subspaces of a topology are normal, i.e., two disjoint closed sets can be separated by open neighborhoods, then in the original topology two separated sets can be separated by open neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽∀𝑐 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑧))∀𝑑 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑧))((𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ → ∃𝑙 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑧)∃𝑘 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑧)(𝑐 ⊆ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ (𝑙 ∩ 𝑘) = ∅)) → ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽) → (((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅)))))
Theorem	iscnrm3llem1 48921	Lemma for iscnrm3l 48923. Closed sets in the subspace are subsets of the underlying set of the original topology. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍))) ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) → (𝐶 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽))
Theorem	iscnrm3llem2 48922*	Lemma for iscnrm3l 48923. If there exist disjoint open neighborhoods in the original topology for two disjoint closed sets in a subspace, then they can be separated by open neighborhoods in the subspace topology. (Could shorten proof with ssin0 45033.) (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍))) ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) → (∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅) → ∃𝑙 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)∃𝑘 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)(𝐶 ⊆ 𝑙 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ (𝑙 ∩ 𝑘) = ∅)))
Theorem	iscnrm3l 48923*	Lemma for iscnrm3 48924. Given a topology 𝐽, if two separated sets can be separated by open neighborhoods, then all subspaces of the topology 𝐽 are normal, i.e., two disjoint closed sets can be separated by open neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽(((𝑠 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑡)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑠) ∩ 𝑡) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑠 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑡 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅)) → ((𝑍 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍))) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅ → ∃𝑙 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)∃𝑘 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)(𝐶 ⊆ 𝑙 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ (𝑙 ∩ 𝑘) = ∅)))))
Theorem	iscnrm3 48924*	A completely normal topology is a topology in which two separated sets can be separated by open neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐽 ∈ CNrm ↔ (𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽(((𝑠 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑡)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑠) ∩ 𝑡) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑠 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑡 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅))))
Theorem	iscnrm3v 48925*	A topology is completely normal iff two separated sets can be separated by open neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (𝐽 ∈ CNrm ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽(((𝑠 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑡)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑠) ∩ 𝑡) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑠 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑡 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅))))
Theorem	iscnrm4 48926*	A completely normal topology is a topology in which two separated sets can be separated by neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐽 ∈ CNrm ↔ (𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽(((𝑠 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑡)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑠) ∩ 𝑡) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑠)∃𝑚 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑡)(𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅)))
21.49.11  Preordered sets and directed sets using extensible structures
Theorem	isprsd 48927*	Property of being a preordered set (deduction form). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Proset ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
21.49.12  Posets and lattices using extensible structures
21.49.12.1  Posets
Theorem	lubeldm2 48928*	Member of the domain of the least upper bound function of a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)))
Theorem	glbeldm2 48929*	Member of the domain of the greatest lower bound function of a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)))
Theorem	lubeldm2d 48930*	Member of the domain of the least upper bound function of a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)))
Theorem	glbeldm2d 48931*	Member of the domain of the greatest lower bound function of a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)))
Theorem	lubsscl 48932	If a subset of 𝑆 contains the LUB of 𝑆, then the two sets have the same LUB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ∈ 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ (𝑈‘𝑇) = (𝑈‘𝑆)))
Theorem	glbsscl 48933	If a subset of 𝑆 contains the GLB of 𝑆, then the two sets have the same GLB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) ∈ 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑇) = (𝐺‘𝑆)))
Theorem	lubprlem 48934	Lemma for lubprdm 48935 and lubpr 48936. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑌))
Theorem	lubprdm 48935	The set of two comparable elements in a poset has LUB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈)
Theorem	lubpr 48936	The LUB of the set of two comparable elements in a poset is the greater one of the two. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑌)
Theorem	glbprlem 48937	Lemma for glbprdm 48938 and glbpr 48939. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝑋))
Theorem	glbprdm 48938	The set of two comparable elements in a poset has GLB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺)
Theorem	glbpr 48939	The GLB of the set of two comparable elements in a poset is the less one of the two. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝑋)
Theorem	joindm2 48940*	The join of any two elements always exists iff all unordered pairs have LUB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom ∨ = (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝑈))
Theorem	joindm3 48941*	The join of any two elements always exists iff all unordered pairs have LUB (expanded version). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom ∨ = (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑤) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑤))))
Theorem	meetdm2 48942*	The meet of any two elements always exists iff all unordered pairs have GLB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom ∧ = (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺))
Theorem	meetdm3 48943*	The meet of any two elements always exists iff all unordered pairs have GLB (expanded version). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom ∧ = (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑤 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑤 ≤ 𝑧))))
Theorem	posjidm 48944	Poset join is idempotent. latjidm 18386 could be shortened by this. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 27-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	posmidm 48945	Poset meet is idempotent. latmidm 18398 could be shortened by this. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 27-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	resiposbas 48946	Construct a poset (resipos 48947) for any base set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), ( I ↾ 𝐵)⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))
Theorem	resipos 48947	A set equipped with an order where no distinct elements are comparable is a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), ( I ↾ 𝐵)⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	exbaspos 48948*	There exists a poset for any base set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑘 ∈ Poset 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑘))
Theorem	exbasprs 48949*	There exists a preordered set for any base set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑘 ∈ Proset 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑘))
Theorem	basresposfo 48950	The base function restricted to the class of posets maps the class of posets onto the universal class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (Base ↾ Poset):Poset–onto→V
Theorem	basresprsfo 48951	The base function restricted to the class of preordered sets maps the class of preordered sets onto the universal class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (Base ↾ Proset ): Proset –onto→V
Theorem	posnex 48952	The class of posets is a proper class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.)
⊢ Poset ∉ V
Theorem	prsnex 48953	The class of preordered sets is a proper class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.)
⊢ Proset ∉ V
21.49.12.2  Lattices
Theorem	toslat 48954	A toset is a lattice. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	isclatd 48955*	The predicate "is a complete lattice" (deduction form). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑠 ∈ dom 𝑈)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑠 ∈ dom 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ CLat)
21.49.12.3  Subset order structures
Theorem	intubeu 48956*	Existential uniqueness of the least upper bound. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑦)) ↔ 𝐶 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥}))
Theorem	unilbeu 48957*	Existential uniqueness of the greatest lower bound. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝐶 = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴}))
Theorem	ipolublem 48958*	Lemma for ipolubdm 48959 and ipolub 48960. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹) → ((∪ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐹 (∪ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐹 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑧))))
Theorem	ipolubdm 48959*	The domain of the LUB of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ ∪ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈 ↔ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	ipolub 48960*	The LUB of the inclusion poset. (hypotheses "ipolub.s" and "ipolub.t" could be eliminated with 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈.) Could be significantly shortened if poslubdg 18336 is in quantified form. mrelatlub 18486 could potentially be shortened using this. See mrelatlubALT 48967. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ ∪ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑇)
Theorem	ipoglblem 48961*	Lemma for ipoglbdm 48962 and ipoglb 48963. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹) → ((𝑋 ⊆ ∩ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐹 (𝑧 ⊆ ∩ 𝑆 → 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑋)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐹 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑋))))
Theorem	ipoglbdm 48962*	The domain of the GLB of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ ∩ 𝑆})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	ipoglb 48963*	The GLB of the inclusion poset. (hypotheses "ipolub.s" and "ipoglb.t" could be eliminated with 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺.) Could be significantly shortened if posglbdg 18337 is in quantified form. mrelatglb 18484 could potentially be shortened using this. See mrelatglbALT 48968. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ ∩ 𝑆})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝑇)
Theorem	ipolub0 48964	The LUB of the empty set is the intersection of the base. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘∅) = ∩ 𝐹)
Theorem	ipolub00 48965	The LUB of the empty set is the empty set if it is contained. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘∅) = ∅)
Theorem	ipoglb0 48966	The GLB of the empty set is the union of the base. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘∅) = ∪ 𝐹)
Theorem	mrelatlubALT 48967	Least upper bounds in a Moore space are realized by the closure of the union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (lub‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐿‘𝑈) = (𝐹‘∪ 𝑈))
Theorem	mrelatglbALT 48968	Greatest lower bounds in a Moore space are realized by intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ ∅) → (𝐺‘𝑈) = ∩ 𝑈)
Theorem	mreclat 48969	A Moore space is a complete lattice under inclusion. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐼 ∈ CLat)
Theorem	topclat 48970	A topology is a complete lattice under inclusion. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝐼 ∈ CLat)
Theorem	toplatglb0 48971	The empty intersection in a topology is realized by the base set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘∅) = ∪ 𝐽)
Theorem	toplatlub 48972	Least upper bounds in a topology are realized by unions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = ∪ 𝑆)
Theorem	toplatglb 48973	Greatest lower bounds in a topology are realized by the interior of the intersection. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = ((int‘𝐽)‘∩ 𝑆))
Theorem	toplatjoin 48974	Joins in a topology are realized by unions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∨ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	toplatmeet 48975	Meets in a topology are realized by intersections. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∧ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Theorem	topdlat 48976	A topology is a distributive lattice under inclusion. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝐼 ∈ DLat)
21.49.13  Rings
21.49.13.1  Multiplicative Group
Theorem	elmgpcntrd 48977*	The center of a ring. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 11-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntr‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋(.r‘𝑅)𝑦) = (𝑦(.r‘𝑅)𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑍)
21.49.14  Associative algebras
21.49.14.1  Definition and basic properties
Theorem	asclelbas 48978	Lifted scalars are in the base set of the algebra. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 11-Sep-2025.) (Proof shortened by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘𝐶) ∈ (Base‘𝑊))
Theorem	asclelbasALT 48979	Alternate proof of asclelbas 48978. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 11-Sep-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘𝐶) ∈ (Base‘𝑊))
Theorem	asclcntr 48980	The algebra scalar lifting function maps into the center of the algebra. Equivalently, a lifted scalar is a center of the algebra. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 11-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘𝐶) ∈ (Cntr‘𝑀))
Theorem	asclcom 48981	Scalars are commutative after being lifted. However, the scalars themselves are not necessarily commutative if the algebra is not a faithful module. For example, Let 𝐹 be the 2 by 2 upper triangular matrix algebra over a commutative ring 𝑊. It is provable that 𝐹 is in general non-commutative. Define scalar multiplication 𝐶 · 𝑋 as multipying the top-left entry, which is a "vector" element of 𝑊, of the "scalar" 𝐶, which is now an upper triangular matrix, with the "vector" 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝑊). Equivalently, the algebra scalar lifting function is not necessarily injective unless the algebra is faithful. Therefore, all "scalar injection" was renamed. Alternate proof involves assa2ass 21788, assa2ass2 21789, and asclval 21805, by setting 𝑋 and 𝑌 the multiplicative identity of the algebra. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 11-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (.r‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘(𝐶 ∗ 𝐷)) = (𝐴‘(𝐷 ∗ 𝐶)))
21.49.15  Categories
21.49.15.1  Categories
Theorem	homf0 48982	The base is empty iff the functionalized Hom-set operation is empty. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((Base‘𝐶) = ∅ ↔ (Homf ‘𝐶) = ∅)
Theorem	catprslem 48983*	Lemma for catprs 48984. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ≠ ∅))
Theorem	catprs 48984*	A preorder can be extracted from a category. See catprs2 48985 for more details. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑍)))
Theorem	catprs2 48985*	A category equipped with the induced preorder, where an object 𝑥 is defined to be "less than or equal to" 𝑦 iff there is a morphism from 𝑥 to 𝑦, is a preordered set, or a proset. The category might not be thin. See catprsc 48986 and catprsc2 48987 for constructions satisfying the hypothesis "catprs.1". See catprs 48984 for a more primitive version. See prsthinc 49437 for constructing a thin category from a proset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Proset )
Theorem	catprsc 48986*	A construction of the preorder induced by a category. See catprs2 48985 for details. See also catprsc2 48987 for an alternate construction. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ≠ ∅)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ≤ 𝑤 ↔ (𝑧𝐻𝑤) ≠ ∅))
Theorem	catprsc2 48987*	An alternate construction of the preorder induced by a category. See catprs2 48985 for details. See also catprsc 48986 for a different construction. The two constructions are different because df-cat 17592 does not require the domain of 𝐻 to be 𝐵 × 𝐵. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ≠ ∅})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ≤ 𝑤 ↔ (𝑧𝐻𝑤) ≠ ∅))
Theorem	endmndlem 48988	A diagonal hom-set in a category equipped with the restriction of the composition has a structure of monoid. See also df-mndtc 49551 for converting a monoid to a category. Lemma for bj-endmnd 37291. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑋) = (Base‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑋) = (+g‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd)
21.49.15.2  Opposite category
Theorem	oppccatb 48989	An opposite category is a category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ↔ 𝑂 ∈ Cat))
Theorem	oppcmndclem 48990	Lemma for oppcmndc 48992. Everything is true for two distinct elements in a singleton or an empty set (since it is impossible). Note that if this theorem and oppcendc 48991 are in ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 form, then both proofs should be one step shorter. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = {𝐴})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 → 𝜓))
Theorem	oppcendc 48991*	The opposite category of a category whose morphisms are all endomorphisms has the same base and hom-sets as the original category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → (𝑥𝐻𝑦) = ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝑂))
Theorem	oppcmndc 48992	The opposite category of a category whose base set is a singleton or an empty set has the same base and hom-sets as the original category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = {𝑋})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝑂))
21.49.15.3  Monomorphisms and epimorphisms
Theorem	idmon 48993	An identity arrow, or an identity morphism, is a monomorphism. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝑀𝑋))
Theorem	idepi 48994	An identity arrow, or an identity morphism, is an epimorphism. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Epi‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐸𝑋))
21.49.15.4  Sections, inverses, isomorphisms
Theorem	sectrcl 48995	Reverse closure for section relations. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	sectrcl2 48996	Reverse closure for section relations. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	invrcl 48997	Reverse closure for inverse relations. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	invrcl2 48998	Reverse closure for inverse relations. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	isinv2 48999	The property "𝐹 is an inverse of 𝐺". (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ↔ (𝐹(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐺 ∧ 𝐺(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐹))
Theorem	isisod 49000	The predicate "is an isomorphism" (deduction form). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑋)𝐹) = ( 1 ‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⟨𝑌, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑌)𝐺) = ( 1 ‘𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))