| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > lssats2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: A way to express atomisticity (a subspace is the union of its atoms). (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| lssats2.s | ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) |
| lssats2.n | ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) |
| lssats2.w | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| lssats2.u | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| lssats2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | simpr 489 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) | |
| 2 | lssats2.w | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) | |
| 3 | 2 | adantr 485 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| 4 | lssats2.u | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) | |
| 5 | eqid 2763 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Base‘𝑊) = (Base‘𝑊) | |
| 6 | lssats2.s | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | lssel 21039 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) |
| 8 | 4, 7 | sylan 591 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) |
| 9 | lssats2.n | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) | |
| 10 | 5, 9 | lspsnid 21095 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) → 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 11 | 3, 8, 10 | syl2anc 595 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 12 | sneq 4600 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → {𝑥} = {𝑦}) | |
| 13 | 12 | fveq2d 6887 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑁‘{𝑥}) = (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 14 | 13 | eleq2d 2849 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦}))) |
| 15 | 14 | rspcev 3582 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| 16 | 1, 11, 15 | syl2anc 595 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| 17 | 16 | ex 417 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 18 | 2 | adantr 485 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| 19 | 4 | adantr 485 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) |
| 20 | simpr 489 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) | |
| 21 | 6, 9, 18, 19, 20 | ellspsn5 21098 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑈) |
| 22 | 21 | sseld 3937 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) |
| 23 | 22 | rexlimdva 3166 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) |
| 24 | 17, 23 | impbid 215 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 25 | eliun 4961 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) | |
| 26 | 24, 25 | bitr4di 292 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 27 | 26 | eqrdv 2761 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 400 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2143 ∃wrex 3089 {csn 4590 ∪ ciun 4957 ‘cfv 6538 Basecbs 17270 LModclmod 20962 LSubSpclss 21033 LSpanclspn 21073 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1825 ax-4 1839 ax-5 1940 ax-6 1997 ax-7 2038 ax-8 2145 ax-9 2153 ax-10 2176 ax-11 2192 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2735 ax-rep 5239 ax-sep 5258 ax-nul 5270 ax-pow 5338 ax-pr 5406 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1810 df-nf 1814 df-sb 2097 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2838 df-nfc 2912 df-ne 2959 df-ral 3080 df-rex 3090 df-rmo 3369 df-reu 3370 df-rab 3417 df-v 3457 df-sbc 3746 df-csb 3855 df-dif 3909 df-un 3911 df-in 3913 df-ss 3923 df-nul 4288 df-if 4489 df-pw 4565 df-sn 4591 df-pr 4593 df-op 4597 df-uni 4874 df-int 4914 df-iun 4959 df-br 5111 df-opab 5175 df-mpt 5194 df-id 5558 df-xp 5669 df-rel 5670 df-cnv 5671 df-co 5672 df-dm 5673 df-rn 5674 df-res 5675 df-ima 5676 df-iota 6494 df-fun 6540 df-fn 6541 df-f 6542 df-f1 6543 df-fo 6544 df-f1o 6545 df-fv 6546 df-riota 7369 df-ov 7415 df-0g 17495 df-mgm 18699 df-sgrp 18778 df-mnd 18794 df-grp 19004 df-lmod 20964 df-lss 21034 df-lsp 21074 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |