| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > lssats2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: A way to express atomisticity (a subspace is the union of its atoms). (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| lssats2.s | ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) |
| lssats2.n | ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) |
| lssats2.w | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| lssats2.u | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| lssats2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | simpr 490 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) | |
| 2 | lssats2.w | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) | |
| 3 | 2 | adantr 486 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| 4 | lssats2.u | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) | |
| 5 | eqid 2765 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Base‘𝑊) = (Base‘𝑊) | |
| 6 | lssats2.s | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | lssel 21088 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) |
| 8 | 4, 7 | sylan 592 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) |
| 9 | lssats2.n | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) | |
| 10 | 5, 9 | lspsnid 21144 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) → 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 11 | 3, 8, 10 | syl2anc 596 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 12 | sneq 4601 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → {𝑥} = {𝑦}) | |
| 13 | 12 | fveq2d 6889 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑁‘{𝑥}) = (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 14 | 13 | eleq2d 2851 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦}))) |
| 15 | 14 | rspcev 3583 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| 16 | 1, 11, 15 | syl2anc 596 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| 17 | 16 | ex 418 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 18 | 2 | adantr 486 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| 19 | 4 | adantr 486 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) |
| 20 | simpr 490 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) | |
| 21 | 6, 9, 18, 19, 20 | ellspsn5 21147 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑈) |
| 22 | 21 | sseld 3937 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) |
| 23 | 22 | rexlimdva 3168 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) |
| 24 | 17, 23 | impbid 215 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 25 | eliun 4962 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) | |
| 26 | 24, 25 | bitr4di 292 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 27 | 26 | eqrdv 2763 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2146 ∃wrex 3091 {csn 4591 ∪ ciun 4958 ‘cfv 6540 Basecbs 17287 LModclmod 21011 LSubSpclss 21082 LSpanclspn 21122 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-10 2179 ax-11 2195 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2737 ax-rep 5240 ax-sep 5259 ax-nul 5271 ax-pow 5338 ax-pr 5406 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2569 df-eu 2599 df-clab 2744 df-cleq 2757 df-clel 2840 df-nfc 2914 df-ne 2961 df-ral 3082 df-rex 3092 df-rmo 3371 df-reu 3372 df-rab 3419 df-v 3459 df-sbc 3747 df-csb 3855 df-dif 3909 df-un 3911 df-in 3913 df-ss 3923 df-nul 4287 df-if 4490 df-pw 4566 df-sn 4592 df-pr 4594 df-op 4598 df-uni 4875 df-int 4915 df-iun 4960 df-br 5112 df-opab 5176 df-mpt 5195 df-id 5558 df-xp 5669 df-rel 5670 df-cnv 5671 df-co 5672 df-dm 5673 df-rn 5674 df-res 5675 df-ima 5676 df-iota 6496 df-fun 6542 df-fn 6543 df-f 6544 df-f1 6545 df-fo 6546 df-f1o 6547 df-fv 6548 df-riota 7373 df-ov 7419 df-0g 17512 df-mgm 18716 df-sgrp 18799 df-mnd 18815 df-grp 19027 df-lmod 21013 df-lss 21083 df-lsp 21123 |
| This theorem is used by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |