| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > lssats2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: A way to express atomisticity (a subspace is the union of its atoms). (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| lssats2.s | ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) |
| lssats2.n | ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) |
| lssats2.w | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| lssats2.u | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| lssats2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | simpr 488 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) | |
| 2 | lssats2.w | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) | |
| 3 | 2 | adantr 484 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| 4 | lssats2.u | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) | |
| 5 | eqid 2761 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Base‘𝑊) = (Base‘𝑊) | |
| 6 | lssats2.s | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | lssel 20992 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) |
| 8 | 4, 7 | sylan 589 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) |
| 9 | lssats2.n | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) | |
| 10 | 5, 9 | lspsnid 21048 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) → 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 11 | 3, 8, 10 | syl2anc 593 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 12 | sneq 4589 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → {𝑥} = {𝑦}) | |
| 13 | 12 | fveq2d 6866 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑁‘{𝑥}) = (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 14 | 13 | eleq2d 2847 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦}))) |
| 15 | 14 | rspcev 3580 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| 16 | 1, 11, 15 | syl2anc 593 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| 17 | 16 | ex 416 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 18 | 2 | adantr 484 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| 19 | 4 | adantr 484 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) |
| 20 | simpr 488 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) | |
| 21 | 6, 9, 18, 19, 20 | ellspsn5 21051 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑈) |
| 22 | 21 | sseld 3933 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) |
| 23 | 22 | rexlimdva 3162 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) |
| 24 | 17, 23 | impbid 214 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 25 | eliun 4950 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) | |
| 26 | 24, 25 | bitr4di 291 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 27 | 26 | eqrdv 2759 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 = wceq 1559 ∈ wcel 2141 ∃wrex 3085 {csn 4579 ∪ ciun 4946 ‘cfv 6516 Basecbs 17236 LModclmod 20915 LSubSpclss 20986 LSpanclspn 21026 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1814 ax-4 1828 ax-5 1929 ax-6 1986 ax-7 2027 ax-8 2143 ax-9 2151 ax-10 2174 ax-11 2190 ax-12 2211 ax-ext 2733 ax-rep 5224 ax-sep 5243 ax-nul 5253 ax-pow 5319 ax-pr 5387 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3an 1099 df-tru 1562 df-fal 1572 df-ex 1799 df-nf 1803 df-sb 2090 df-mo 2565 df-eu 2595 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-nfc 2910 df-ne 2957 df-ral 3076 df-rex 3086 df-rmo 3366 df-reu 3367 df-rab 3414 df-v 3455 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3851 df-dif 3905 df-un 3907 df-in 3909 df-ss 3919 df-nul 4284 df-if 4478 df-pw 4554 df-sn 4580 df-pr 4582 df-op 4586 df-uni 4863 df-int 4903 df-iun 4948 df-br 5098 df-opab 5160 df-mpt 5179 df-id 5538 df-xp 5649 df-rel 5650 df-cnv 5651 df-co 5652 df-dm 5653 df-rn 5654 df-res 5655 df-ima 5656 df-iota 6472 df-fun 6518 df-fn 6519 df-f 6520 df-f1 6521 df-fo 6522 df-f1o 6523 df-fv 6524 df-riota 7348 df-ov 7394 df-0g 17461 df-mgm 18665 df-sgrp 18744 df-mnd 18760 df-grp 18969 df-lmod 20917 df-lss 20987 df-lsp 21027 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |