| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 209 of 504) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31009) |
(31010-32532) |
(32533-50307) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | abvneg 20801 | The absolute value of a negative is the same as that of the positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑁‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | abvsubtri 20802 | An absolute value satisfies the triangle inequality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑋 − 𝑌)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | abvrec 20803 | The absolute value distributes under reciprocal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = (1 / (𝐹‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | abvdiv 20804 | The absolute value distributes under division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ / = (/r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹‘(𝑋 / 𝑌)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋) / (𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | abvdom 20805 | Any ring with an absolute value is a domain, which is to say that it contains no zero divisors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 0 )) → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ≠ 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | abvres 20806 | The restriction of an absolute value to a subring is an absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (AbsVal‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | abvtrivd 20807* | The trivial absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1)) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 0 ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 0 )) → (𝑦 · 𝑧) ≠ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abvtrivg 20808* | The trivial absolute value. This theorem is not true for rings with zero divisors, which violate the multiplication axiom; abvdom 20805 is the converse of this theorem. (Contributed by SN, 25-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Domn → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abvtriv 20809* | The trivial absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DivRing → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abvpropd 20810* | If two structures have the same ring components, they have the same collection of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (AbsVal‘𝐾) = (AbsVal‘𝐿)) | ||
| Theorem | abvn0b 20811 | Another characterization of domains, hinted at in abvtrivg 20808: a nonzero ring is a domain iff it has an absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Domn ↔ (𝑅 ∈ NzRing ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Syntax | cstf 20812 | Extend class notation with the functionalization of the *-ring involution. |
| class *rf | ||
| Syntax | csr 20813 | Extend class notation with class of all *-rings. |
| class *-Ring | ||
| Definition | df-staf 20814* | Define the functionalization of the involution in a star ring. This is not strictly necessary but by having *𝑟 as an actual function we can state the principal properties of an involution much more cleanly. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ *rf = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑓) ↦ ((*𝑟‘𝑓)‘𝑥))) | ||
| Definition | df-srng 20815* | Define class of all star rings. A star ring is a ring with an involution (conjugation) function. Involution (unlike say the ring zero) is not unique and therefore must be added as a new component to the ring. For example, two possible involutions for complex numbers are the identity function and complex conjugation. Definition of involution in [Holland95] p. 204. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ *-Ring = {𝑓 ∣ [(*rf‘𝑓) / 𝑖](𝑖 ∈ (𝑓 RingHom (oppr‘𝑓)) ∧ 𝑖 = ◡𝑖)} | ||
| Theorem | staffval 20816* | The functionalization of the involution component of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( ∗ ‘𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | stafval 20817 | The functionalization of the involution component of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ( ∙ ‘𝐴) = ( ∗ ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | staffn 20818 | The functionalization is equal to the original function, if it is a function on the right base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ( ∗ Fn 𝐵 → ∙ = ∗ ) | ||
| Theorem | issrng 20819 | The predicate "is a star ring". (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ↔ ( ∗ ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑂) ∧ ∗ = ◡ ∗ )) | ||
| Theorem | srngrhm 20820 | The involution function in a star ring is an antiautomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑂)) | ||
| Theorem | srngring 20821 | A star ring is a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | srngcnv 20822 | The involution function in a star ring is its own inverse function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ = ◡ ∗ ) | ||
| Theorem | srngf1o 20823 | The involution function in a star ring is a bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ :𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | srngcl 20824 | The involution function in a star ring is closed in the ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | srngnvl 20825 | The involution function in a star ring is an involution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘( ∗ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | srngadd 20826 | The involution function in a star ring distributes over addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑋 + 𝑌)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑋) + ( ∗ ‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | srngmul 20827 | The involution function in a star ring distributes over multiplication, with a change in the order of the factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑋 · 𝑌)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑌) · ( ∗ ‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | srng1 20828 | The conjugate of the ring identity is the identity. (This is sometimes taken as an axiom, and indeed the proof here follows because we defined *𝑟 to be a ring homomorphism, which preserves 1; nevertheless, it is redundant, as can be seen from the proof of issrngd 20830.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ( ∗ ‘ 1 ) = 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | srng0 20829 | The conjugate of the ring zero is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ( ∗ ‘ 0 ) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | issrngd 20830* | Properties that determine a star ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (.r‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑥) + ( ∗ ‘𝑦))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑦) · ( ∗ ‘𝑥))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘( ∗ ‘𝑥)) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring) | ||
| Theorem | idsrngd 20831* | A commutative ring is a star ring when the conjugate operation is the identity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘𝑥) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring) | ||
| Syntax | corng 20832 | Extend class notation with the class of all ordered rings. |
| class oRing | ||
| Syntax | cofld 20833 | Extend class notation with the class of all ordered fields. |
| class oField | ||
| Definition | df-orng 20834* | Define class of all ordered rings. An ordered ring is a ring with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ oRing = {𝑟 ∈ (Ring ∩ oGrp) ∣ [(Base‘𝑟) / 𝑣][(0g‘𝑟) / 𝑧][(.r‘𝑟) / 𝑡][(le‘𝑟) / 𝑙]∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑣 ((𝑧𝑙𝑎 ∧ 𝑧𝑙𝑏) → 𝑧𝑙(𝑎𝑡𝑏))} | ||
| Definition | df-ofld 20835 | Define class of all ordered fields. An ordered field is a field with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ oField = (Field ∩ oRing) | ||
| Theorem | isorng 20836* | An ordered ring is a ring with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑅 ∈ oGrp ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (( 0 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) → 0 ≤ (𝑎 · 𝑏)))) | ||
| Theorem | orngring 20837 | An ordered ring is a ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | orngogrp 20838 | An ordered ring is an ordered group. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing → 𝑅 ∈ oGrp) | ||
| Theorem | isofld 20839 | An ordered field is a field with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Field ∧ 𝐹 ∈ oRing)) | ||
| Theorem | orngmul 20840 | In an ordered ring, the ordering is compatible with the ring multiplication operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngsqr 20841 | In an ordered ring, all squares are positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | ornglmulle 20842 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 · 𝑋) ≤ (𝑍 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngrmulle 20843 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑍) ≤ (𝑌 · 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | ornglmullt 20844 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change strict comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 < 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 · 𝑋) < (𝑍 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngrmullt 20845 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change strict comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 < 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑍) < (𝑌 · 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | orngmullt 20846 | In an ordered ring, the strict ordering is compatible with the ring multiplication operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | ofldfld 20847 | An ordered field is a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 𝐹 ∈ Field) | ||
| Theorem | ofldtos 20848 | An ordered field is a totally ordered set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 𝐹 ∈ Toset) | ||
| Theorem | orng0le1 20849 | In an ordered ring, the ring unity is positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oRing → 0 ≤ 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | ofldlt1 20850 | In an ordered field, the ring unity is strictly positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 0 < 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | suborng 20851 | Every subring of an ordered ring is also an ordered ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Ring) → (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ oRing) | ||
| Theorem | subofld 20852 | Every subfield of an ordered field is also an ordered field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ oField ∧ (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Field) → (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ oField) | ||
| Syntax | clmod 20853 | Extend class notation with class of all left modules. |
| class LMod | ||
| Syntax | cscaf 20854 | The functionalization of the scalar multiplication operation. |
| class ·sf | ||
| Definition | df-lmod 20855* | Define the class of all left modules, which are generalizations of left vector spaces. A left module over a ring is an (Abelian) group (vectors) together with a ring (scalars) and a left scalar product connecting them. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ LMod = {𝑔 ∈ Grp ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(+g‘𝑔) / 𝑎][(Scalar‘𝑔) / 𝑓][( ·𝑠 ‘𝑔) / 𝑠][(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑘][(+g‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(.r‘𝑓) / 𝑡](𝑓 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑘 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑣 (((𝑟𝑠𝑤) ∈ 𝑣 ∧ (𝑟𝑠(𝑤𝑎𝑥)) = ((𝑟𝑠𝑤)𝑎(𝑟𝑠𝑥)) ∧ ((𝑞𝑝𝑟)𝑠𝑤) = ((𝑞𝑠𝑤)𝑎(𝑟𝑠𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑞𝑡𝑟)𝑠𝑤) = (𝑞𝑠(𝑟𝑠𝑤)) ∧ ((1r‘𝑓)𝑠𝑤) = 𝑤)))} | ||
| Definition | df-scaf 20856* | Define the functionalization of the ·𝑠 operator. This restricts the value of ·𝑠 to the stated domain, which is necessary when working with restricted structures, whose operations may be defined on a larger set than the true base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ·sf = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑔)), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝑔)𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | islmod 20857* | The predicate "is a left module". (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑉 (((𝑟 · 𝑤) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑟 · (𝑤 + 𝑥)) = ((𝑟 · 𝑤) + (𝑟 · 𝑥)) ∧ ((𝑞 ⨣ 𝑟) · 𝑤) = ((𝑞 · 𝑤) + (𝑟 · 𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑞 × 𝑟) · 𝑤) = (𝑞 · (𝑟 · 𝑤)) ∧ ( 1 · 𝑤) = 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodlema 20858 | Lemma for properties of a left module. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑅 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 · (𝑌 + 𝑋)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑌) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑌) = ((𝑄 · 𝑌) + (𝑅 · 𝑌))) ∧ (((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑌) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑌)) ∧ ( 1 · 𝑌) = 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | islmodd 20859* | Properties that determine a left module. See note in isgrpd2 18927 regarding the 𝜑 on hypotheses that name structure components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → × = (.r‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 = (1r‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑥 · (𝑦 + 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 · 𝑦) + (𝑥 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑥 ⨣ 𝑦) · 𝑧) = ((𝑥 · 𝑧) + (𝑦 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑥 × 𝑦) · 𝑧) = (𝑥 · (𝑦 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 1 · 𝑥) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) | ||
| Theorem | lmodgrp 20860 | A left module is a group. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodring 20861 | The scalar component of a left module is a ring. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐹 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfgrp 20862 | The scalar component of a left module is an additive group. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐹 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodgrpd 20863 | A left module is a group. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodbn0 20864 | The base set of a left module is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | lmodacl 20865 | Closure of ring addition for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodmcl 20866 | Closure of ring multiplication for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodsn0 20867 | The set of scalars in a left module is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvacl 20868 | Closure of vector addition for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodass 20869 | Left module vector sum is associative. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodlcan 20870 | Left cancellation law for vector sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑍 + 𝑋) = (𝑍 + 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvscl 20871 | Closure of scalar product for a left module. (hvmulcl 31104 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvscld 20872 | Closure of scalar product for a left module. (Contributed by SN, 15-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | scaffval 20873* | The scalar multiplication operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Mar-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | scafval 20874 | The scalar multiplication operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∙ 𝑌) = (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | scafeq 20875 | If the scalar multiplication operation is already a function, the functionalization of it is equal to the original operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ( · Fn (𝐾 × 𝐵) → ∙ = · ) | ||
| Theorem | scaffn 20876 | The scalar multiplication operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ Fn (𝐾 × 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lmodscaf 20877 | The scalar multiplication operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → ∙ :(𝐾 × 𝐵)⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsdi 20878 | Distributive law for scalar product (left-distributivity). (ax-hvdistr1 31099 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑅 · (𝑋 + 𝑌)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsdir 20879 | Distributive law for scalar product (right-distributivity). (ax-hvdistr1 31099 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsass 20880 | Associative law for scalar product. (ax-hvmulass 31098 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0cl 20881 | The ring zero in a left module belongs to the set of scalars. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 0 ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1cl 20882 | The ring unity in a left module belongs to the set of scalars. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 1 ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvs1 20883 | Scalar product with the ring unity. (ax-hvmulid 31097 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 1 · 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vcl 20884 | The zero vector is a vector. (ax-hv0cl 31094 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 0 ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vlid 20885 | Left identity law for the zero vector. (hvaddlid 31114 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 0 + 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vrid 20886 | Right identity law for the zero vector. (ax-hvaddid 31095 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 0 ) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vid 20887 | Identity equivalent to the value of the zero vector. Provides a convenient way to compute the value. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑋 + 𝑋) = 𝑋 ↔ 0 = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vs 20888 | Zero times a vector is the zero vector. Equation 1a of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (ax-hvmul0 31101 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvs0 20889 | Anything times the zero vector is the zero vector. Equation 1b of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (hvmul0 31115 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 · 0 ) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsmmulgdi 20890 | Distributive law for a group multiple of a scalar multiplication. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (.g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑁 ↑ (𝐶 · 𝑋)) = ((𝑁𝐸𝐶) · 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopnelem1 20891 | Lemma 1 for lmodfopne 20893. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ + = · ) → 𝑉 = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopnelem2 20892 | Lemma 2 for lmodfopne 20893. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ + = · ) → ( 0 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopne 20893 | The (functionalized) operations of a left module (over a nonzero ring) cannot be identical. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2008.) (Revised by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 1 ≠ 0 ) → + ≠ · ) | ||
| Theorem | lcomf 20894 | A linear-combination sum is a function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐼⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐼⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻):𝐼⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lcomfsupp 20895 | A linear-combination sum is finitely supported if the coefficients are. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐼⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐼⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻) finSupp 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvnegcl 20896 | Closure of vector negative. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑁‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvnegid 20897 | Addition of a vector with its negative. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + (𝑁‘𝑋)) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvneg1 20898 | Minus 1 times a vector is the negative of the vector. Equation 2 of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (invg‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑀‘ 1 ) · 𝑋) = (𝑁‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsneg 20899 | Multiplication of a vector by a negated scalar. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (invg‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘(𝑅 · 𝑋)) = ((𝑀‘𝑅) · 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsubcl 20900 | Closure of vector subtraction. (hvsubcl 31108 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 − 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |