| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 209 of 503) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31004) |
(31005-32527) |
(32528-50292) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | abvtrivg 20801* | The trivial absolute value. This theorem is not true for rings with zero divisors, which violate the multiplication axiom; abvdom 20798 is the converse of this theorem. (Contributed by SN, 25-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Domn → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abvtriv 20802* | The trivial absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DivRing → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abvpropd 20803* | If two structures have the same ring components, they have the same collection of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (AbsVal‘𝐾) = (AbsVal‘𝐿)) | ||
| Theorem | abvn0b 20804 | Another characterization of domains, hinted at in abvtrivg 20801: a nonzero ring is a domain iff it has an absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Domn ↔ (𝑅 ∈ NzRing ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Syntax | cstf 20805 | Extend class notation with the functionalization of the *-ring involution. |
| class *rf | ||
| Syntax | csr 20806 | Extend class notation with class of all *-rings. |
| class *-Ring | ||
| Definition | df-staf 20807* | Define the functionalization of the involution in a star ring. This is not strictly necessary but by having *𝑟 as an actual function we can state the principal properties of an involution much more cleanly. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ *rf = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑓) ↦ ((*𝑟‘𝑓)‘𝑥))) | ||
| Definition | df-srng 20808* | Define class of all star rings. A star ring is a ring with an involution (conjugation) function. Involution (unlike say the ring zero) is not unique and therefore must be added as a new component to the ring. For example, two possible involutions for complex numbers are the identity function and complex conjugation. Definition of involution in [Holland95] p. 204. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ *-Ring = {𝑓 ∣ [(*rf‘𝑓) / 𝑖](𝑖 ∈ (𝑓 RingHom (oppr‘𝑓)) ∧ 𝑖 = ◡𝑖)} | ||
| Theorem | staffval 20809* | The functionalization of the involution component of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( ∗ ‘𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | stafval 20810 | The functionalization of the involution component of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ( ∙ ‘𝐴) = ( ∗ ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | staffn 20811 | The functionalization is equal to the original function, if it is a function on the right base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ( ∗ Fn 𝐵 → ∙ = ∗ ) | ||
| Theorem | issrng 20812 | The predicate "is a star ring". (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ↔ ( ∗ ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑂) ∧ ∗ = ◡ ∗ )) | ||
| Theorem | srngrhm 20813 | The involution function in a star ring is an antiautomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑂)) | ||
| Theorem | srngring 20814 | A star ring is a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | srngcnv 20815 | The involution function in a star ring is its own inverse function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ = ◡ ∗ ) | ||
| Theorem | srngf1o 20816 | The involution function in a star ring is a bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ :𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | srngcl 20817 | The involution function in a star ring is closed in the ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | srngnvl 20818 | The involution function in a star ring is an involution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘( ∗ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | srngadd 20819 | The involution function in a star ring distributes over addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑋 + 𝑌)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑋) + ( ∗ ‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | srngmul 20820 | The involution function in a star ring distributes over multiplication, with a change in the order of the factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑋 · 𝑌)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑌) · ( ∗ ‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | srng1 20821 | The conjugate of the ring identity is the identity. (This is sometimes taken as an axiom, and indeed the proof here follows because we defined *𝑟 to be a ring homomorphism, which preserves 1; nevertheless, it is redundant, as can be seen from the proof of issrngd 20823.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ( ∗ ‘ 1 ) = 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | srng0 20822 | The conjugate of the ring zero is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ( ∗ ‘ 0 ) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | issrngd 20823* | Properties that determine a star ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (.r‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑥) + ( ∗ ‘𝑦))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑦) · ( ∗ ‘𝑥))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘( ∗ ‘𝑥)) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring) | ||
| Theorem | idsrngd 20824* | A commutative ring is a star ring when the conjugate operation is the identity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘𝑥) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring) | ||
| Syntax | corng 20825 | Extend class notation with the class of all ordered rings. |
| class oRing | ||
| Syntax | cofld 20826 | Extend class notation with the class of all ordered fields. |
| class oField | ||
| Definition | df-orng 20827* | Define class of all ordered rings. An ordered ring is a ring with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ oRing = {𝑟 ∈ (Ring ∩ oGrp) ∣ [(Base‘𝑟) / 𝑣][(0g‘𝑟) / 𝑧][(.r‘𝑟) / 𝑡][(le‘𝑟) / 𝑙]∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑣 ((𝑧𝑙𝑎 ∧ 𝑧𝑙𝑏) → 𝑧𝑙(𝑎𝑡𝑏))} | ||
| Definition | df-ofld 20828 | Define class of all ordered fields. An ordered field is a field with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ oField = (Field ∩ oRing) | ||
| Theorem | isorng 20829* | An ordered ring is a ring with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑅 ∈ oGrp ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (( 0 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) → 0 ≤ (𝑎 · 𝑏)))) | ||
| Theorem | orngring 20830 | An ordered ring is a ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | orngogrp 20831 | An ordered ring is an ordered group. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing → 𝑅 ∈ oGrp) | ||
| Theorem | isofld 20832 | An ordered field is a field with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Field ∧ 𝐹 ∈ oRing)) | ||
| Theorem | orngmul 20833 | In an ordered ring, the ordering is compatible with the ring multiplication operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngsqr 20834 | In an ordered ring, all squares are positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | ornglmulle 20835 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 · 𝑋) ≤ (𝑍 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngrmulle 20836 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑍) ≤ (𝑌 · 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | ornglmullt 20837 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change strict comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 < 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 · 𝑋) < (𝑍 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngrmullt 20838 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change strict comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 < 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑍) < (𝑌 · 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | orngmullt 20839 | In an ordered ring, the strict ordering is compatible with the ring multiplication operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | ofldfld 20840 | An ordered field is a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 𝐹 ∈ Field) | ||
| Theorem | ofldtos 20841 | An ordered field is a totally ordered set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 𝐹 ∈ Toset) | ||
| Theorem | orng0le1 20842 | In an ordered ring, the ring unity is positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oRing → 0 ≤ 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | ofldlt1 20843 | In an ordered field, the ring unity is strictly positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 0 < 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | suborng 20844 | Every subring of an ordered ring is also an ordered ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Ring) → (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ oRing) | ||
| Theorem | subofld 20845 | Every subfield of an ordered field is also an ordered field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ oField ∧ (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Field) → (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ oField) | ||
| Syntax | clmod 20846 | Extend class notation with class of all left modules. |
| class LMod | ||
| Syntax | cscaf 20847 | The functionalization of the scalar multiplication operation. |
| class ·sf | ||
| Definition | df-lmod 20848* | Define the class of all left modules, which are generalizations of left vector spaces. A left module over a ring is an (Abelian) group (vectors) together with a ring (scalars) and a left scalar product connecting them. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ LMod = {𝑔 ∈ Grp ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(+g‘𝑔) / 𝑎][(Scalar‘𝑔) / 𝑓][( ·𝑠 ‘𝑔) / 𝑠][(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑘][(+g‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(.r‘𝑓) / 𝑡](𝑓 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑘 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑣 (((𝑟𝑠𝑤) ∈ 𝑣 ∧ (𝑟𝑠(𝑤𝑎𝑥)) = ((𝑟𝑠𝑤)𝑎(𝑟𝑠𝑥)) ∧ ((𝑞𝑝𝑟)𝑠𝑤) = ((𝑞𝑠𝑤)𝑎(𝑟𝑠𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑞𝑡𝑟)𝑠𝑤) = (𝑞𝑠(𝑟𝑠𝑤)) ∧ ((1r‘𝑓)𝑠𝑤) = 𝑤)))} | ||
| Definition | df-scaf 20849* | Define the functionalization of the ·𝑠 operator. This restricts the value of ·𝑠 to the stated domain, which is necessary when working with restricted structures, whose operations may be defined on a larger set than the true base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ·sf = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑔)), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝑔)𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | islmod 20850* | The predicate "is a left module". (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑉 (((𝑟 · 𝑤) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑟 · (𝑤 + 𝑥)) = ((𝑟 · 𝑤) + (𝑟 · 𝑥)) ∧ ((𝑞 ⨣ 𝑟) · 𝑤) = ((𝑞 · 𝑤) + (𝑟 · 𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑞 × 𝑟) · 𝑤) = (𝑞 · (𝑟 · 𝑤)) ∧ ( 1 · 𝑤) = 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodlema 20851 | Lemma for properties of a left module. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑅 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 · (𝑌 + 𝑋)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑌) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑌) = ((𝑄 · 𝑌) + (𝑅 · 𝑌))) ∧ (((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑌) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑌)) ∧ ( 1 · 𝑌) = 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | islmodd 20852* | Properties that determine a left module. See note in isgrpd2 18923 regarding the 𝜑 on hypotheses that name structure components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → × = (.r‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 = (1r‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑥 · (𝑦 + 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 · 𝑦) + (𝑥 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑥 ⨣ 𝑦) · 𝑧) = ((𝑥 · 𝑧) + (𝑦 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑥 × 𝑦) · 𝑧) = (𝑥 · (𝑦 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 1 · 𝑥) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) | ||
| Theorem | lmodgrp 20853 | A left module is a group. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodring 20854 | The scalar component of a left module is a ring. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐹 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfgrp 20855 | The scalar component of a left module is an additive group. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐹 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodgrpd 20856 | A left module is a group. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodbn0 20857 | The base set of a left module is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | lmodacl 20858 | Closure of ring addition for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodmcl 20859 | Closure of ring multiplication for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodsn0 20860 | The set of scalars in a left module is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvacl 20861 | Closure of vector addition for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodass 20862 | Left module vector sum is associative. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodlcan 20863 | Left cancellation law for vector sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑍 + 𝑋) = (𝑍 + 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvscl 20864 | Closure of scalar product for a left module. (hvmulcl 31099 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvscld 20865 | Closure of scalar product for a left module. (Contributed by SN, 15-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | scaffval 20866* | The scalar multiplication operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Mar-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | scafval 20867 | The scalar multiplication operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∙ 𝑌) = (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | scafeq 20868 | If the scalar multiplication operation is already a function, the functionalization of it is equal to the original operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ( · Fn (𝐾 × 𝐵) → ∙ = · ) | ||
| Theorem | scaffn 20869 | The scalar multiplication operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ Fn (𝐾 × 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lmodscaf 20870 | The scalar multiplication operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → ∙ :(𝐾 × 𝐵)⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsdi 20871 | Distributive law for scalar product (left-distributivity). (ax-hvdistr1 31094 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑅 · (𝑋 + 𝑌)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsdir 20872 | Distributive law for scalar product (right-distributivity). (ax-hvdistr1 31094 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsass 20873 | Associative law for scalar product. (ax-hvmulass 31093 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0cl 20874 | The ring zero in a left module belongs to the set of scalars. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 0 ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1cl 20875 | The ring unity in a left module belongs to the set of scalars. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 1 ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvs1 20876 | Scalar product with the ring unity. (ax-hvmulid 31092 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 1 · 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vcl 20877 | The zero vector is a vector. (ax-hv0cl 31089 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 0 ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vlid 20878 | Left identity law for the zero vector. (hvaddlid 31109 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 0 + 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vrid 20879 | Right identity law for the zero vector. (ax-hvaddid 31090 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 0 ) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vid 20880 | Identity equivalent to the value of the zero vector. Provides a convenient way to compute the value. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑋 + 𝑋) = 𝑋 ↔ 0 = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vs 20881 | Zero times a vector is the zero vector. Equation 1a of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (ax-hvmul0 31096 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvs0 20882 | Anything times the zero vector is the zero vector. Equation 1b of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (hvmul0 31110 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 · 0 ) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsmmulgdi 20883 | Distributive law for a group multiple of a scalar multiplication. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (.g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑁 ↑ (𝐶 · 𝑋)) = ((𝑁𝐸𝐶) · 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopnelem1 20884 | Lemma 1 for lmodfopne 20886. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ + = · ) → 𝑉 = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopnelem2 20885 | Lemma 2 for lmodfopne 20886. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ + = · ) → ( 0 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopne 20886 | The (functionalized) operations of a left module (over a nonzero ring) cannot be identical. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2008.) (Revised by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 1 ≠ 0 ) → + ≠ · ) | ||
| Theorem | lcomf 20887 | A linear-combination sum is a function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐼⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐼⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻):𝐼⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lcomfsupp 20888 | A linear-combination sum is finitely supported if the coefficients are. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐼⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐼⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻) finSupp 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvnegcl 20889 | Closure of vector negative. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑁‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvnegid 20890 | Addition of a vector with its negative. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + (𝑁‘𝑋)) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvneg1 20891 | Minus 1 times a vector is the negative of the vector. Equation 2 of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (invg‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑀‘ 1 ) · 𝑋) = (𝑁‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsneg 20892 | Multiplication of a vector by a negated scalar. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (invg‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘(𝑅 · 𝑋)) = ((𝑀‘𝑅) · 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsubcl 20893 | Closure of vector subtraction. (hvsubcl 31103 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 − 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodcom 20894 | Left module vector sum is commutative. (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 25-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = (𝑌 + 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodabl 20895 | A left module is an abelian group (of vectors, under addition). (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ Abel) | ||
| Theorem | lmodcmn 20896 | A left module is a commutative monoid under addition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ CMnd) | ||
| Theorem | lmodnegadd 20897 | Distribute negation through addition of scalar products. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘((𝐴 · 𝑋) + (𝐵 · 𝑌))) = (((𝐼‘𝐴) · 𝑋) + ((𝐼‘𝐵) · 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | lmod4 20898 | Commutative/associative law for left module vector sum. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + (𝑍 + 𝑈)) = ((𝑋 + 𝑍) + (𝑌 + 𝑈))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsubadd 20899 | Relationship between vector subtraction and addition. (hvsubadd 31163 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvaddsub4 20900 | Vector addition/subtraction law. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐵))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |