| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 209 of 504) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31014) |
(31015-32537) |
(32538-50302) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | abvtri 20801 | An absolute value satisfies the triangle inequality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑋 + 𝑌)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | abv0 20802 | The absolute value of zero is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐹‘ 0 ) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | abv1z 20803 | The absolute value of one is one in a non-trivial ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 ≠ 0 ) → (𝐹‘ 1 ) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | abv1 20804 | The absolute value of one is one in a division ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘ 1 ) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | abvneg 20805 | The absolute value of a negative is the same as that of the positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑁‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | abvsubtri 20806 | An absolute value satisfies the triangle inequality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑋 − 𝑌)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | abvrec 20807 | The absolute value distributes under reciprocal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = (1 / (𝐹‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | abvdiv 20808 | The absolute value distributes under division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ / = (/r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹‘(𝑋 / 𝑌)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋) / (𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | abvdom 20809 | Any ring with an absolute value is a domain, which is to say that it contains no zero divisors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 0 )) → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ≠ 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | abvres 20810 | The restriction of an absolute value to a subring is an absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (AbsVal‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | abvtrivd 20811* | The trivial absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1)) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 0 ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 0 )) → (𝑦 · 𝑧) ≠ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abvtrivg 20812* | The trivial absolute value. This theorem is not true for rings with zero divisors, which violate the multiplication axiom; abvdom 20809 is the converse of this theorem. (Contributed by SN, 25-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Domn → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abvtriv 20813* | The trivial absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DivRing → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abvpropd 20814* | If two structures have the same ring components, they have the same collection of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (AbsVal‘𝐾) = (AbsVal‘𝐿)) | ||
| Theorem | abvn0b 20815 | Another characterization of domains, hinted at in abvtrivg 20812: a nonzero ring is a domain iff it has an absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Domn ↔ (𝑅 ∈ NzRing ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Syntax | cstf 20816 | Extend class notation with the functionalization of the *-ring involution. |
| class *rf | ||
| Syntax | csr 20817 | Extend class notation with class of all *-rings. |
| class *-Ring | ||
| Definition | df-staf 20818* | Define the functionalization of the involution in a star ring. This is not strictly necessary but by having *𝑟 as an actual function we can state the principal properties of an involution much more cleanly. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ *rf = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑓) ↦ ((*𝑟‘𝑓)‘𝑥))) | ||
| Definition | df-srng 20819* | Define class of all star rings. A star ring is a ring with an involution (conjugation) function. Involution (unlike say the ring zero) is not unique and therefore must be added as a new component to the ring. For example, two possible involutions for complex numbers are the identity function and complex conjugation. Definition of involution in [Holland95] p. 204. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ *-Ring = {𝑓 ∣ [(*rf‘𝑓) / 𝑖](𝑖 ∈ (𝑓 RingHom (oppr‘𝑓)) ∧ 𝑖 = ◡𝑖)} | ||
| Theorem | staffval 20820* | The functionalization of the involution component of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( ∗ ‘𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | stafval 20821 | The functionalization of the involution component of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ( ∙ ‘𝐴) = ( ∗ ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | staffn 20822 | The functionalization is equal to the original function, if it is a function on the right base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ( ∗ Fn 𝐵 → ∙ = ∗ ) | ||
| Theorem | issrng 20823 | The predicate "is a star ring". (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ↔ ( ∗ ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑂) ∧ ∗ = ◡ ∗ )) | ||
| Theorem | srngrhm 20824 | The involution function in a star ring is an antiautomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑂)) | ||
| Theorem | srngring 20825 | A star ring is a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | srngcnv 20826 | The involution function in a star ring is its own inverse function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ = ◡ ∗ ) | ||
| Theorem | srngf1o 20827 | The involution function in a star ring is a bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ :𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | srngcl 20828 | The involution function in a star ring is closed in the ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | srngnvl 20829 | The involution function in a star ring is an involution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘( ∗ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | srngadd 20830 | The involution function in a star ring distributes over addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑋 + 𝑌)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑋) + ( ∗ ‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | srngmul 20831 | The involution function in a star ring distributes over multiplication, with a change in the order of the factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑋 · 𝑌)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑌) · ( ∗ ‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | srng1 20832 | The conjugate of the ring identity is the identity. (This is sometimes taken as an axiom, and indeed the proof here follows because we defined *𝑟 to be a ring homomorphism, which preserves 1; nevertheless, it is redundant, as can be seen from the proof of issrngd 20834.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ( ∗ ‘ 1 ) = 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | srng0 20833 | The conjugate of the ring zero is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ( ∗ ‘ 0 ) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | issrngd 20834* | Properties that determine a star ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (.r‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑥) + ( ∗ ‘𝑦))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑦) · ( ∗ ‘𝑥))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘( ∗ ‘𝑥)) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring) | ||
| Theorem | idsrngd 20835* | A commutative ring is a star ring when the conjugate operation is the identity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘𝑥) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring) | ||
| Syntax | corng 20836 | Extend class notation with the class of all ordered rings. |
| class oRing | ||
| Syntax | cofld 20837 | Extend class notation with the class of all ordered fields. |
| class oField | ||
| Definition | df-orng 20838* | Define class of all ordered rings. An ordered ring is a ring with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ oRing = {𝑟 ∈ (Ring ∩ oGrp) ∣ [(Base‘𝑟) / 𝑣][(0g‘𝑟) / 𝑧][(.r‘𝑟) / 𝑡][(le‘𝑟) / 𝑙]∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑣 ((𝑧𝑙𝑎 ∧ 𝑧𝑙𝑏) → 𝑧𝑙(𝑎𝑡𝑏))} | ||
| Definition | df-ofld 20839 | Define class of all ordered fields. An ordered field is a field with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ oField = (Field ∩ oRing) | ||
| Theorem | isorng 20840* | An ordered ring is a ring with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑅 ∈ oGrp ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (( 0 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) → 0 ≤ (𝑎 · 𝑏)))) | ||
| Theorem | orngring 20841 | An ordered ring is a ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | orngogrp 20842 | An ordered ring is an ordered group. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing → 𝑅 ∈ oGrp) | ||
| Theorem | isofld 20843 | An ordered field is a field with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Field ∧ 𝐹 ∈ oRing)) | ||
| Theorem | orngmul 20844 | In an ordered ring, the ordering is compatible with the ring multiplication operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngsqr 20845 | In an ordered ring, all squares are positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | ornglmulle 20846 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 · 𝑋) ≤ (𝑍 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngrmulle 20847 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑍) ≤ (𝑌 · 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | ornglmullt 20848 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change strict comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 < 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 · 𝑋) < (𝑍 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngrmullt 20849 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change strict comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 < 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑍) < (𝑌 · 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | orngmullt 20850 | In an ordered ring, the strict ordering is compatible with the ring multiplication operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | ofldfld 20851 | An ordered field is a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 𝐹 ∈ Field) | ||
| Theorem | ofldtos 20852 | An ordered field is a totally ordered set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 𝐹 ∈ Toset) | ||
| Theorem | orng0le1 20853 | In an ordered ring, the ring unity is positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oRing → 0 ≤ 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | ofldlt1 20854 | In an ordered field, the ring unity is strictly positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 0 < 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | suborng 20855 | Every subring of an ordered ring is also an ordered ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Ring) → (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ oRing) | ||
| Theorem | subofld 20856 | Every subfield of an ordered field is also an ordered field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ oField ∧ (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Field) → (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ oField) | ||
| Syntax | clmod 20857 | Extend class notation with class of all left modules. |
| class LMod | ||
| Syntax | cscaf 20858 | The functionalization of the scalar multiplication operation. |
| class ·sf | ||
| Definition | df-lmod 20859* | Define the class of all left modules, which are generalizations of left vector spaces. A left module over a ring is an (Abelian) group (vectors) together with a ring (scalars) and a left scalar product connecting them. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ LMod = {𝑔 ∈ Grp ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(+g‘𝑔) / 𝑎][(Scalar‘𝑔) / 𝑓][( ·𝑠 ‘𝑔) / 𝑠][(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑘][(+g‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(.r‘𝑓) / 𝑡](𝑓 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑘 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑣 (((𝑟𝑠𝑤) ∈ 𝑣 ∧ (𝑟𝑠(𝑤𝑎𝑥)) = ((𝑟𝑠𝑤)𝑎(𝑟𝑠𝑥)) ∧ ((𝑞𝑝𝑟)𝑠𝑤) = ((𝑞𝑠𝑤)𝑎(𝑟𝑠𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑞𝑡𝑟)𝑠𝑤) = (𝑞𝑠(𝑟𝑠𝑤)) ∧ ((1r‘𝑓)𝑠𝑤) = 𝑤)))} | ||
| Definition | df-scaf 20860* | Define the functionalization of the ·𝑠 operator. This restricts the value of ·𝑠 to the stated domain, which is necessary when working with restricted structures, whose operations may be defined on a larger set than the true base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ·sf = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑔)), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝑔)𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | islmod 20861* | The predicate "is a left module". (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑉 (((𝑟 · 𝑤) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑟 · (𝑤 + 𝑥)) = ((𝑟 · 𝑤) + (𝑟 · 𝑥)) ∧ ((𝑞 ⨣ 𝑟) · 𝑤) = ((𝑞 · 𝑤) + (𝑟 · 𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑞 × 𝑟) · 𝑤) = (𝑞 · (𝑟 · 𝑤)) ∧ ( 1 · 𝑤) = 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodlema 20862 | Lemma for properties of a left module. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑅 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 · (𝑌 + 𝑋)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑌) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑌) = ((𝑄 · 𝑌) + (𝑅 · 𝑌))) ∧ (((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑌) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑌)) ∧ ( 1 · 𝑌) = 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | islmodd 20863* | Properties that determine a left module. See note in isgrpd2 18930 regarding the 𝜑 on hypotheses that name structure components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → × = (.r‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 = (1r‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑥 · (𝑦 + 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 · 𝑦) + (𝑥 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑥 ⨣ 𝑦) · 𝑧) = ((𝑥 · 𝑧) + (𝑦 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑥 × 𝑦) · 𝑧) = (𝑥 · (𝑦 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 1 · 𝑥) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) | ||
| Theorem | lmodgrp 20864 | A left module is a group. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodring 20865 | The scalar component of a left module is a ring. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐹 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfgrp 20866 | The scalar component of a left module is an additive group. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐹 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodgrpd 20867 | A left module is a group. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodbn0 20868 | The base set of a left module is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | lmodacl 20869 | Closure of ring addition for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodmcl 20870 | Closure of ring multiplication for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodsn0 20871 | The set of scalars in a left module is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvacl 20872 | Closure of vector addition for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodass 20873 | Left module vector sum is associative. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodlcan 20874 | Left cancellation law for vector sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑍 + 𝑋) = (𝑍 + 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvscl 20875 | Closure of scalar product for a left module. (hvmulcl 31109 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvscld 20876 | Closure of scalar product for a left module. (Contributed by SN, 15-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | scaffval 20877* | The scalar multiplication operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Mar-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | scafval 20878 | The scalar multiplication operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∙ 𝑌) = (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | scafeq 20879 | If the scalar multiplication operation is already a function, the functionalization of it is equal to the original operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ( · Fn (𝐾 × 𝐵) → ∙ = · ) | ||
| Theorem | scaffn 20880 | The scalar multiplication operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ Fn (𝐾 × 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lmodscaf 20881 | The scalar multiplication operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → ∙ :(𝐾 × 𝐵)⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsdi 20882 | Distributive law for scalar product (left-distributivity). (ax-hvdistr1 31104 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑅 · (𝑋 + 𝑌)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsdir 20883 | Distributive law for scalar product (right-distributivity). (ax-hvdistr1 31104 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsass 20884 | Associative law for scalar product. (ax-hvmulass 31103 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0cl 20885 | The ring zero in a left module belongs to the set of scalars. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 0 ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1cl 20886 | The ring unity in a left module belongs to the set of scalars. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 1 ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvs1 20887 | Scalar product with the ring unity. (ax-hvmulid 31102 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 1 · 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vcl 20888 | The zero vector is a vector. (ax-hv0cl 31099 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 0 ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vlid 20889 | Left identity law for the zero vector. (hvaddlid 31119 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 0 + 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vrid 20890 | Right identity law for the zero vector. (ax-hvaddid 31100 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 0 ) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vid 20891 | Identity equivalent to the value of the zero vector. Provides a convenient way to compute the value. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑋 + 𝑋) = 𝑋 ↔ 0 = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vs 20892 | Zero times a vector is the zero vector. Equation 1a of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (ax-hvmul0 31106 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvs0 20893 | Anything times the zero vector is the zero vector. Equation 1b of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (hvmul0 31120 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 · 0 ) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsmmulgdi 20894 | Distributive law for a group multiple of a scalar multiplication. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (.g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑁 ↑ (𝐶 · 𝑋)) = ((𝑁𝐸𝐶) · 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopnelem1 20895 | Lemma 1 for lmodfopne 20897. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ + = · ) → 𝑉 = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopnelem2 20896 | Lemma 2 for lmodfopne 20897. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ + = · ) → ( 0 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopne 20897 | The (functionalized) operations of a left module (over a nonzero ring) cannot be identical. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2008.) (Revised by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 1 ≠ 0 ) → + ≠ · ) | ||
| Theorem | lcomf 20898 | A linear-combination sum is a function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐼⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐼⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻):𝐼⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lcomfsupp 20899 | A linear-combination sum is finitely supported if the coefficients are. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐼⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐼⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻) finSupp 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvnegcl 20900 | Closure of vector negative. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑁‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |