ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  dftpos3 GIF version

Theorem dftpos3 5959
Description: Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 4409. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
dftpos3 (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧})
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Proof of Theorem dftpos3
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 relcnv 4765 . . . . . . . . . 10 Rel dom 𝐹
2 dmtpos 5953 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = dom 𝐹)
32releqd 4480 . . . . . . . . . 10 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ Rel dom 𝐹))
41, 3mpbiri 166 . . . . . . . . 9 (Rel dom 𝐹 → Rel dom tpos 𝐹)
5 reltpos 5947 . . . . . . . . 9 Rel tpos 𝐹
64, 5jctil 305 . . . . . . . 8 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹))
7 relrelss 4911 . . . . . . . 8 ((Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹) ↔ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
86, 7sylib 120 . . . . . . 7 (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
98sseld 3009 . . . . . 6 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V)))
10 elvvv 4459 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩)
119, 10syl6ib 159 . . . . 5 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩))
1211pm4.71rd 386 . . . 4 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹)))
13 19.41vvv 1827 . . . . 5 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹))
14 eleq1 2145 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹))
15 df-br 3812 . . . . . . . . 9 (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹)
16 vex 2615 . . . . . . . . . 10 𝑥 ∈ V
17 vex 2615 . . . . . . . . . 10 𝑦 ∈ V
18 vex 2615 . . . . . . . . . 10 𝑧 ∈ V
19 brtposg 5951 . . . . . . . . . 10 ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧))
2016, 17, 18, 19mp3an 1269 . . . . . . . . 9 (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧)
2115, 20bitr3i 184 . . . . . . . 8 (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧)
2214, 21syl6bb 194 . . . . . . 7 (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧))
2322pm5.32i 442 . . . . . 6 ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧))
24233exbii 1539 . . . . 5 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧))
2513, 24bitr3i 184 . . . 4 ((∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧))
2612, 25syl6bb 194 . . 3 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧)))
2726abbi2dv 2201 . 2 (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧)})
28 df-oprab 5595 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧)}
2927, 28syl6eqr 2133 1 (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧})
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 102  wb 103   = wceq 1285  wex 1422  wcel 1434  {cab 2069  Vcvv 2612  wss 2984  cop 3425   class class class wbr 3811   × cxp 4399  ccnv 4400  dom cdm 4401  Rel wrel 4406  {coprab 5592  tpos ctpos 5941
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 577  ax-in2 578  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-13 1445  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2065  ax-sep 3922  ax-nul 3930  ax-pow 3974  ax-pr 4000  ax-un 4224
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 922  df-tru 1288  df-fal 1291  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1688  df-eu 1946  df-mo 1947  df-clab 2070  df-cleq 2076  df-clel 2079  df-nfc 2212  df-ne 2250  df-ral 2358  df-rex 2359  df-rab 2362  df-v 2614  df-sbc 2827  df-dif 2986  df-un 2988  df-in 2990  df-ss 2997  df-nul 3270  df-pw 3408  df-sn 3428  df-pr 3429  df-op 3431  df-uni 3628  df-br 3812  df-opab 3866  df-mpt 3867  df-id 4084  df-xp 4407  df-rel 4408  df-cnv 4409  df-co 4410  df-dm 4411  df-rn 4412  df-res 4413  df-ima 4414  df-iota 4934  df-fun 4971  df-fn 4972  df-fv 4977  df-oprab 5595  df-tpos 5942
This theorem is referenced by:  tposoprab  5977
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator