Theorem coahom 18222

Description: The composition of two composable arrows is an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
homdmcoa.o	⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)
homdmcoa.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)
homdmcoa.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
homdmcoa.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
coahom	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))

Proof of Theorem coahom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		homdmcoa.o	. . 3 ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)
2		homdmcoa.h	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)
3		homdmcoa.f	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
4		homdmcoa.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))
5		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐶)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	coaval 18220	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩)
7		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐶)
8	2	homarcl 18180	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
9	3, 8	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
10		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
11	2, 7	homarcl2 18187	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
12	3, 11	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
13	12	simpld 500	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
14	2, 7	homarcl2 18187	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍) → (𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
15	4, 14	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
16	15	simprd 501	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
17	12	simprd 501	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
18	2, 10	homahom 18191	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
19	3, 18	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
20	2, 10	homahom 18191	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍) → (2nd ‘𝐺) ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍))
21	4, 20	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝐺) ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍))
22	7, 10, 5, 9, 13, 17, 16, 19, 21	catcocl 17836	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹)) ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍))
23	2, 7, 9, 10, 13, 16, 22	elhomai2 18186	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))
24	6, 23	eqeltrd 2861	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ⟨cop 4590  ⟨cotp 4592  ‘cfv 6531  (class class class)co 7412  2^nd c2nd 7989  Basecbs 17364  Hom chom 17416  compcco 17417  Catccat 17815  Hom_achoma 18175  comp_accoa 18206

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-ot 4593  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7990  df-2nd 7991  df-cat 17819  df-doma 18176  df-coda 18177  df-homa 18178  df-arw 18179  df-coa 18208

This theorem is used by:  coapm  18223  arwass  18226