Theorem coahom 18274

Description: The composition of two composable arrows is an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
homdmcoa.o	⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)
homdmcoa.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)
homdmcoa.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
homdmcoa.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
coahom	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))

Proof of Theorem coahom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		homdmcoa.o	. . 3 ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)
2		homdmcoa.h	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)
3		homdmcoa.f	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
4		homdmcoa.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))
5		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐶)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	coaval 18272	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩)
7		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐶)
8	2	homarcl 18232	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
9	3, 8	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
10		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
11	2, 7	homarcl2 18239	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
12	3, 11	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
13	12	simpld 500	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
14	2, 7	homarcl2 18239	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍) → (𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
15	4, 14	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
16	15	simprd 501	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
17	12	simprd 501	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
18	2, 10	homahom 18243	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
19	3, 18	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
20	2, 10	homahom 18243	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍) → (2nd ‘𝐺) ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍))
21	4, 20	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝐺) ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍))
22	7, 10, 5, 9, 13, 17, 16, 19, 21	catcocl 17888	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹)) ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍))
23	2, 7, 9, 10, 13, 16, 22	elhomai2 18238	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))
24	6, 23	eqeltrd 2864	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ⟨cop 4838  ⟨cotp 4861  ‘cfv 6558  (class class class)co 7443  2^nd c2nd 8024  Basecbs 17416  Hom chom 17468  compcco 17469  Catccat 17867  Hom_achoma 18227  comp_accoa 18258

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-ot 4862  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566  df-ov 7446  df-oprab 7447  df-mpo 7448  df-1st 8025  df-2nd 8026  df-cat 17871  df-doma 18228  df-coda 18229  df-homa 18230  df-arw 18231  df-coa 18260

This theorem is used by:  coapm  18275  arwass  18278