Theorem coahom 18165

Description: The composition of two composable arrows is an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
homdmcoa.o	⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)
homdmcoa.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)
homdmcoa.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
homdmcoa.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
coahom	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))

Proof of Theorem coahom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		homdmcoa.o	. . 3 ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)
2		homdmcoa.h	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)
3		homdmcoa.f	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
4		homdmcoa.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))
5		eqid 2762	. . 3 ⊢ (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐶)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	coaval 18163	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩)
7		eqid 2762	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐶)
8	2	homarcl 18123	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
9	3, 8	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
10		eqid 2762	. . 3 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
11	2, 7	homarcl2 18130	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
12	3, 11	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
13	12	simpld 500	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
14	2, 7	homarcl2 18130	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍) → (𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
15	4, 14	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
16	15	simprd 501	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
17	12	simprd 501	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
18	2, 10	homahom 18134	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
19	3, 18	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))
20	2, 10	homahom 18134	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍) → (2nd ‘𝐺) ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍))
21	4, 20	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝐺) ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍))
22	7, 10, 5, 9, 13, 17, 16, 19, 21	catcocl 17779	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹)) ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍))
23	2, 7, 9, 10, 13, 16, 22	elhomai2 18129	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))
24	6, 23	eqeltrd 2862	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ⟨cop 4593  ⟨cotp 4595  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7417  2^nd c2nd 7989  Basecbs 17307  Hom chom 17359  compcco 17360  Catccat 17758  Hom_achoma 18118  comp_accoa 18149

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-ot 4596  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7420  df-oprab 7421  df-mpo 7422  df-1st 7990  df-2nd 7991  df-cat 17762  df-doma 18119  df-coda 18120  df-homa 18121  df-arw 18122  df-coa 18151

This theorem is used by:  coapm  18166  arwass  18169