Theorem coaval 18236

Description: Value of composition for composable arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
homdmcoa.o	⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)
homdmcoa.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)
homdmcoa.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
homdmcoa.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))
coaval.x	⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
coaval	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩)

Proof of Theorem coaval

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 ℎ are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		homdmcoa.o	. . 3 ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)
2		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (Arrow‘𝐶) = (Arrow‘𝐶)
3		coaval.x	. . 3 ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)
4	1, 2, 3	coafval 18232	. 2 ⊢ · = (𝑔 ∈ (Arrow‘𝐶), 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ (Arrow‘𝐶) ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ ∙ (coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩)
5		homdmcoa.h	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)
6	2, 5	homarw 18214	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑌𝐻𝑍) ⊆ (Arrow‘𝐶)
7		homdmcoa.g	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))
8	6, 7	sselid 3929	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Arrow‘𝐶))
9		fveqeq2 6892	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐹 → ((coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔) ↔ (coda‘𝐹) = (doma‘𝑔)))
10	2, 5	homarw 18214	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ⊆ (Arrow‘𝐶)
11		homdmcoa.f	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
12	11	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
13	10, 12	sselid 3929	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → 𝐹 ∈ (Arrow‘𝐶))
14	5	homacd 18209	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (coda‘𝐹) = 𝑌)
15	12, 14	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (coda‘𝐹) = 𝑌)
16		simpr 490	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → 𝑔 = 𝐺)
17	16	fveq2d 6887	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (doma‘𝑔) = (doma‘𝐺))
18	7	adantr 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))
19	5	homadm 18208	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍) → (doma‘𝐺) = 𝑌)
20	18, 19	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (doma‘𝐺) = 𝑌)
21	17, 20	eqtrd 2796	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (doma‘𝑔) = 𝑌)
22	15, 21	eqtr4d 2799	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (coda‘𝐹) = (doma‘𝑔))
23	9, 13, 22	elrabd 3647	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → 𝐹 ∈ {ℎ ∈ (Arrow‘𝐶) ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)})
24		otex 5434	. . . 4 ⊢ ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ ∙ (coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩ ∈ V
25	24	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ ∙ (coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩ ∈ V)
26		simprr 785	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → 𝑓 = 𝐹)
27	26	fveq2d 6887	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → (doma‘𝑓) = (doma‘𝐹))
28	5	homadm 18208	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (doma‘𝐹) = 𝑋)
29	12, 28	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (doma‘𝐹) = 𝑋)
30	29	adantrr 730	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → (doma‘𝐹) = 𝑋)
31	27, 30	eqtrd 2796	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → (doma‘𝑓) = 𝑋)
32	16	fveq2d 6887	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (coda‘𝑔) = (coda‘𝐺))
33	5	homacd 18209	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍) → (coda‘𝐺) = 𝑍)
34	18, 33	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (coda‘𝐺) = 𝑍)
35	32, 34	eqtrd 2796	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (coda‘𝑔) = 𝑍)
36	35	adantrr 730	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → (coda‘𝑔) = 𝑍)
37	21	adantrr 730	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → (doma‘𝑔) = 𝑌)
38	31, 37	opeq12d 4841	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
39	38, 36	oveq12d 7436	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → (⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ ∙ (coda‘𝑔)) = (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍))
40		simprl 783	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → 𝑔 = 𝐺)
41	40	fveq2d 6887	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → (2nd ‘𝑔) = (2nd ‘𝐺))
42	26	fveq2d 6887	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → (2nd ‘𝑓) = (2nd ‘𝐹))
43	39, 41, 42	oveq123d 7439	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ ∙ (coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓)) = ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹)))
44	31, 36, 43	oteq123d 4848	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹)) → ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ ∙ (coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩ = ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩)
45	8, 23, 25, 44	ovmpodv2 7576	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( · = (𝑔 ∈ (Arrow‘𝐶), 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ (Arrow‘𝐶) ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ ∙ (coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩) → (𝐺 · 𝐹) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩))
46	4, 45	mpi 21	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {crab 3413  Vcvv 3451  ⟨cop 4590  ⟨cotp 4592  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7418   ∈ cmpo 7420  2^nd c2nd 7998  compcco 17433  dom_acdoma 18188  cod_accoda 18189  Arrowcarw 18190  Hom_achoma 18191  comp_accoa 18222

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7749

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-ot 4593  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7421  df-oprab 7422  df-mpo 7423  df-1st 7999  df-2nd 8000  df-doma 18192  df-coda 18193  df-homa 18194  df-arw 18195  df-coa 18224

This theorem is used by:  coa2  18237  coahom  18238  arwlid  18240  arwrid  18241  arwass  18242