P. 181 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 18001-18100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	initorcl 18001	Reverse closure for an initial object: If a class has an initial object, the class is a category. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	termorcl 18002	Reverse closure for a terminal object: If a class has a terminal object, the class is a category. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	zeroorcl 18003	Reverse closure for a zero object: If a class has a zero object, the class is a category. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (ZeroO‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	initoval 18004*	The value of the initial object function, i.e. the set of all initial objects of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (InitO‘𝐶) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑎𝐻𝑏)})
Theorem	termoval 18005*	The value of the terminal object function, i.e. the set of all terminal objects of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (TermO‘𝐶) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑏𝐻𝑎)})
Theorem	zerooval 18006	The value of the zero object function, i.e. the set of all zero objects of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ZeroO‘𝐶) = ((InitO‘𝐶) ∩ (TermO‘𝐶)))
Theorem	isinito 18007*	The predicate "is an initial object" of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝐼𝐻𝑏)))
Theorem	istermo 18008*	The predicate "is a terminal object" of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑏𝐻𝐼)))
Theorem	iszeroo 18009	The predicate "is a zero object" of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (ZeroO‘𝐶) ↔ (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))))
Theorem	isinitoi 18010*	Implication of a class being an initial object. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑂𝐻𝑏)))
Theorem	istermoi 18011*	Implication of a class being a terminal object. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑏𝐻𝑂)))
Theorem	initoid 18012	For an initial object, the identity arrow is the one and only morphism of the object to the object itself. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂𝐻𝑂) = {((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑂)})
Theorem	termoid 18013	For a terminal object, the identity arrow is the one and only morphism of the object to the object itself. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂𝐻𝑂) = {((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑂)})
Theorem	dfinito2 18014	An initial object is a terminal object in the opposite category. An alternate definition of df-inito 17995 depending on df-termo 17996. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ InitO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (TermO‘(oppCat‘𝑐)))
Theorem	dftermo2 18015	A terminal object is an initial object in the opposite category. An alternate definition of df-termo 17996 depending on df-inito 17995. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ TermO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (InitO‘(oppCat‘𝑐)))
Theorem	dfinito3 18016	An alternate definition of df-inito 17995 depending on df-termo 17996, without dummy variables. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ InitO = (TermO ∘ (oppCat ↾ Cat))
Theorem	dftermo3 18017	An alternate definition of df-termo 17996 depending on df-inito 17995, without dummy variables. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ TermO = (InitO ∘ (oppCat ↾ Cat))
Theorem	initoo 18018	An initial object is an object. (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
Theorem	termoo 18019	A terminal object is an object. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶) → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
Theorem	iszeroi 18020	Implication of a class being a zero object. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (ZeroO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))))
Theorem	2initoinv 18021	Morphisms between two initial objects are inverses. (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐵)) → 𝐹(𝐴(Inv‘𝐶)𝐵)𝐺)
Theorem	initoeu1 18022*	Initial objects are essentially unique (strong form), i.e. there is a unique isomorphism between two initial objects, see statement in [Lang] p. 58 ("... if P, P' are two universal objects [...] then there exists a unique isomorphism between them.". (Proposed by BJ, 14-Apr-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴(Iso‘𝐶)𝐵))
Theorem	initoeu1w 18023	Initial objects are essentially unique (weak form), i.e. if A and B are initial objects, then A and B are isomorphic. Proposition 7.3 (1) of [Adamek] p. 102. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝐵)
Theorem	initoeu2lem0 18024	Lemma 0 for initoeu2 18027. (Contributed by AV, 9-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷)) ∧ ((𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾)(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)((𝐵(Inv‘𝐶)𝐴)‘𝐾)) = (𝐺(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)((𝐵(Inv‘𝐶)𝐴)‘𝐾))) → 𝐺 = (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾))
Theorem	initoeu2lem1 18025*	Lemma 1 for initoeu2 18027. (Contributed by AV, 9-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐴) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾) ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷))) → ((∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷)) → 𝐺 = (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾)))
Theorem	initoeu2lem2 18026*	Lemma 2 for initoeu2 18027. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾) ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷))) → (∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) → ∃!𝑔 𝑔 ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷)))
Theorem	initoeu2 18027	Initial objects are essentially unique, if A is an initial object, then so is every object that is isomorphic to A. Proposition 7.3 (2) in [Adamek] p. 102. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))
Theorem	2termoinv 18028	Morphisms between two terminal objects are inverses. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐵)) → 𝐹(𝐴(Inv‘𝐶)𝐵)𝐺)
Theorem	termoeu1 18029*	Terminal objects are essentially unique (strong form), i.e. there is a unique isomorphism between two terminal objects, see statement in [Lang] p. 58 ("... if P, P' are two universal objects [...] then there exists a unique isomorphism between them.". (Proposed by BJ, 14-Apr-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴(Iso‘𝐶)𝐵))
Theorem	termoeu1w 18030	Terminal objects are essentially unique (weak form), i.e. if A and B are terminal objects, then A and B are isomorphic. Proposition 7.6 of [Adamek] p. 103. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝐵)
8.2  Arrows (disjointified hom-sets)
Syntax	cdoma 18031	Extend class notation to include the domain extractor for an arrow.
class doma
Syntax	ccoda 18032	Extend class notation to include the codomain extractor for an arrow.
class coda
Syntax	carw 18033	Extend class notation to include the collection of all arrows of a category.
class Arrow
Syntax	choma 18034	Extend class notation to include the set of all arrows with a specific domain and codomain.
class Homa
Definition	df-doma 18035	Definition of the domain extractor for an arrow. (Contributed by FL, 24-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ doma = (1st ∘ 1st )
Definition	df-coda 18036	Definition of the codomain extractor for an arrow. (Contributed by FL, 26-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ coda = (2nd ∘ 1st )
Definition	df-homa 18037*	Definition of the hom-set extractor for arrows, which tags the morphisms of the underlying hom-set with domain and codomain, which can then be extracted using df-doma 18035 and df-coda 18036. (Contributed by FL, 6-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Homa = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑐) × (Base‘𝑐)) ↦ ({𝑥} × ((Hom ‘𝑐)‘𝑥))))
Definition	df-arw 18038	Definition of the set of arrows of a category. We will use the term "arrow" to denote a morphism tagged with its domain and codomain, as opposed to Hom, which allows hom-sets for distinct objects to overlap. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Arrow = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ∪ ran (Homa‘𝑐))
Theorem	homarcl 18039	Reverse closure for an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	homafval 18040*	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ({𝑥} × (𝐽‘𝑥))))
Theorem	homaf 18041	Functionality of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝐵 × 𝐵)⟶𝒫 ((𝐵 × 𝐵) × V))
Theorem	homaval 18042	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = ({⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩} × (𝑋𝐽𝑌)))
Theorem	elhoma 18043	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 ↔ (𝑍 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))))
Theorem	elhomai 18044	Produce an arrow from a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹)
Theorem	elhomai2 18045	Produce an arrow from a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, 𝐹⟩ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
Theorem	homarcl2 18046	Reverse closure for the domain and codomain of an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	homarel 18047	An arrow is an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ Rel (𝑋𝐻𝑌)
Theorem	homa1 18048	The first component of an arrow is the ordered pair of domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 → 𝑍 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
Theorem	homahom2 18049	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))
Theorem	homahom 18050	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))
Theorem	homadm 18051	The domain of an arrow with known domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (doma‘𝐹) = 𝑋)
Theorem	homacd 18052	The codomain of an arrow with known domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (coda‘𝐹) = 𝑌)
Theorem	homadmcd 18053	Decompose an arrow into domain, codomain, and morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐹 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
Theorem	arwval 18054	The set of arrows is the union of all the disjointified hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ∪ ran 𝐻
Theorem	arwrcl 18055	The first component of an arrow is the ordered pair of domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	arwhoma 18056	An arrow is contained in the hom-set corresponding to its domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐻(coda‘𝐹)))
Theorem	homarw 18057	A hom-set is a subset of the collection of all arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	arwdm 18058	The domain of an arrow is an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (doma‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	arwcd 18059	The codomain of an arrow is an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (coda‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	dmaf 18060	The domain function is a function from arrows to objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (doma ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵
Theorem	cdaf 18061	The codomain function is a function from arrows to objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (coda ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵
Theorem	arwhom 18062	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐽(coda‘𝐹)))
Theorem	arwdmcd 18063	Decompose an arrow into domain, codomain, and morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐹 = ⟨(doma‘𝐹), (coda‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
8.2.1  Identity and composition for arrows
Syntax	cida 18064	Extend class notation to include identity for arrows.
class Ida
Syntax	ccoa 18065	Extend class notation to include composition for arrows.
class compa
Definition	df-ida 18066*	Definition of the identity arrow, which is just the identity morphism tagged with its domain and codomain. (Contributed by FL, 26-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Ida = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ ⟨𝑥, 𝑥, ((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥)⟩))
Definition	df-coa 18067*	Definition of the composition of arrows. Since arrows are tagged with domain and codomain, this does not need to be a quinary operation like the regular composition in a category comp. Instead, it is a partial binary operation on arrows, which is defined when the domain of the first arrow matches the codomain of the second. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ compa = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (Arrow‘𝑐), 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ (Arrow‘𝑐) ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩(comp‘𝑐)(coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩))
Theorem	idafval 18068*	Value of the identity arrow function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ⟨𝑥, 𝑥, ( 1 ‘𝑥)⟩))
Theorem	idaval 18069	Value of the identity arrow function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑋, ( 1 ‘𝑋)⟩)
Theorem	ida2 18070	Morphism part of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = ( 1 ‘𝑋))
Theorem	idahom 18071	Domain and codomain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋))
Theorem	idadm 18072	Domain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (doma‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	idacd 18073	Codomain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (coda‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	idaf 18074	The identity arrow function is a function from objects to arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼:𝐵⟶𝐴)
Theorem	coafval 18075*	The value of the composition of arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ · = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ ∙ (coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩)
Theorem	eldmcoa 18076	A pair ⟨𝐺, 𝐹⟩ is in the domain of the arrow composition, if the domain of 𝐺 equals the codomain of 𝐹. (In this case we say 𝐺 and 𝐹 are composable.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺dom · 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (coda‘𝐹) = (doma‘𝐺)))
Theorem	dmcoass 18077	The domain of composition is a collection of pairs of arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ dom · ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
Theorem	homdmcoa 18078	If 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 and 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑍, then 𝐺 and 𝐹 are composable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺dom · 𝐹)
Theorem	coaval 18079	Value of composition for composable arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩)
Theorem	coa2 18080	The morphism part of arrow composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐺 · 𝐹)) = ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹)))
Theorem	coahom 18081	The composition of two composable arrows is an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))
Theorem	coapm 18082	Composition of arrows is a partial binary operation on arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ · ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	arwlid 18083	Left identity of a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( 1 ‘𝑌) · 𝐹) = 𝐹)
Theorem	arwrid 18084	Right identity of a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 · ( 1 ‘𝑋)) = 𝐹)
Theorem	arwass 18085	Associativity of composition in a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 · 𝐺) · 𝐹) = (𝐾 · (𝐺 · 𝐹)))
8.3  Examples of categories
8.3.1  The category of sets
Syntax	csetc 18086	Extend class notation to include the category Set.
class SetCat
Definition	df-setc 18087*	Definition of the category Set, relativized to a subset 𝑢. Example 3.3(1) of [Adamek] p. 22. This is the category of all sets in 𝑢 and functions between these sets. Generally, we will take 𝑢 to be a weak universe or Grothendieck universe, because these sets have closure properties as good as the real thing. (Contributed by FL, 8-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ SetCat = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑢⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑢, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), (𝑣 ∈ (𝑢 × 𝑢), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓)))⟩})
Theorem	setcval 18088*	Value of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), · ⟩})
Theorem	setcbas 18089	Set of objects of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (Base‘𝐶))
Theorem	setchomfval 18090*	Set of arrows of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))
Theorem	setchom 18091	Set of arrows of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝑌 ↑m 𝑋))
Theorem	elsetchom 18092	A morphism of sets is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌))
Theorem	setccofval 18093*	Composition in the category of sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓))))
Theorem	setcco 18094	Composition in the category of sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹))
Theorem	setccatid 18095*	Lemma for setccat 18096. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ( I ↾ 𝑥))))
Theorem	setccat 18096	The category of sets is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	setcid 18097	The identity arrow in the category of sets is the identity function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = ( I ↾ 𝑋))
Theorem	setcmon 18098	A monomorphism of sets is an injection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝑀𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋–1-1→𝑌))
Theorem	setcepi 18099	An epimorphism of sets is a surjection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Epi‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 2o ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐸𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋–onto→𝑌))
Theorem	setcsect 18100	A section in the category of sets, written out. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐺 ↔ (𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 ∧ 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑋 ∧ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝑋))))