| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 181 of 500) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30900) |
(30901-32423) |
(32424-49930) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | resssetc 18001 | The restriction of the category of sets to a subset is the category of sets in the subset. Thus, the SetCat‘𝑈 categories for different 𝑈 are full subcategories of each other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Homf ‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (Homf ‘𝐷) ∧ (compf‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (compf‘𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | funcsetcres2 18002 | A functor into a smaller category of sets is a functor into the larger category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 Func 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐸 Func 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | setc2obas 18003 | ∅ and 1o are distinct objects in (SetCat‘2o). This combined with setc2ohom 18004 demonstrates that the category does not have pairwise disjoint hom-sets. See also df-cat 17576 and cat1 18006. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘2o) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 1o ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | setc2ohom 18004 | (SetCat‘2o) is a category (provable from setccat 17994 and 2oex 8402) that does not have pairwise disjoint hom-sets, proved by this theorem combined with setc2obas 18003. Notably, the empty set ∅ is simultaneously an object (setc2obas 18003), an identity morphism from ∅ to ∅ (setcid 17995 or thincid 49557), and a non-identity morphism from ∅ to 1o. See cat1lem 18005 and cat1 18006 for a more general statement. This category is also thin (setc2othin 49591), and therefore is "equivalent" to a preorder (actually a partial order). See prsthinc 49589 for more details on the "equivalence". (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘2o) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∅ ∈ ((∅𝐻∅) ∩ (∅𝐻1o)) | ||
| Theorem | cat1lem 18005* | The category of sets in a "universe" containing the empty set and another set does not have pairwise disjoint hom-sets as required in Axiom CAT 1 in [Lang] p. 53. Lemma for cat1 18006. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ≠ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∩ (𝑧𝐻𝑤)) ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))) | ||
| Theorem | cat1 18006* | The definition of category df-cat 17576 does not impose pairwise disjoint hom-sets as required in Axiom CAT 1 in [Lang] p. 53. See setc2obas 18003 and setc2ohom 18004 for a counterexample. For a version with pairwise disjoint hom-sets, see df-homa 17935 and its subsection. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ Cat [(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏][(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ] ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 (((𝑥ℎ𝑦) ∩ (𝑧ℎ𝑤)) ≠ ∅ → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)) | ||
| Syntax | ccatc 18007 | Extend class notation to include the category Cat. |
| class CatCat | ||
| Definition | df-catc 18008* | Definition of the category Cat, which consists of all categories in the universe 𝑢 (i.e., "𝑢-small categories", see Definition 3.44. of [Adamek] p. 39), with functors as the morphisms (catchom 18012, elcatchom 49522). Definition 3.47 of [Adamek] p. 40. We do not introduce a specific definition for "𝑢-large categories", which can be expressed as (Cat ∖ 𝑢). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ CatCat = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(𝑢 ∩ Cat) / 𝑏⦌{〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑏〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (𝑥 Func 𝑦))〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), (𝑣 ∈ (𝑏 × 𝑏), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) Func 𝑧), 𝑓 ∈ ( Func ‘𝑣) ↦ (𝑔 ∘func 𝑓)))〉}) | ||
| Theorem | catcval 18009* | Value of the category of categories (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑈 ∩ Cat)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 Func 𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) Func 𝑧), 𝑓 ∈ ( Func ‘𝑣) ↦ (𝑔 ∘func 𝑓)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), · 〉}) | ||
| Theorem | catcbas 18010 | Set of objects of the category of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑈 ∩ Cat)) | ||
| Theorem | catchomfval 18011* | Set of arrows of the category of categories (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 Func 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | catchom 18012 | Set of arrows of the category of categories (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝑋 Func 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | catccofval 18013* | Composition in the category of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) Func 𝑧), 𝑓 ∈ ( Func ‘𝑣) ↦ (𝑔 ∘func 𝑓)))) | ||
| Theorem | catcco 18014 | Composition in the category of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋 Func 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌 Func 𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | catccatid 18015* | Lemma for catccat 18017. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (idfunc‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | catcid 18016 | The identity arrow in the category of categories is the identity functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | catccat 18017 | The category of categories is a category, see remark 3.48 in [Adamek] p. 40. (Clearly it cannot be an element of itself, hence it is "𝑈 -large".) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
| Theorem | resscatc 18018 | The restriction of the category of categories to a subset is the category of categories in the subset. Thus, the CatCat‘𝑈 categories for different 𝑈 are full subcategories of each other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (CatCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Homf ‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (Homf ‘𝐷) ∧ (compf‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (compf‘𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | catcisolem 18019* | Lemma for catciso 18020. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Inv‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ◡((◡𝐹‘𝑥)𝐺(◡𝐹‘𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹((𝑋 Full 𝑌) ∩ (𝑋 Faith 𝑌))𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑅–1-1-onto→𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐹, 𝐺〉(𝑋𝐼𝑌)〈◡𝐹, 𝐻〉) | ||
| Theorem | catciso 18020 | A functor is an isomorphism of categories if and only if it is full and faithful, and is a bijection on the objects. Remark 3.28(2) in [Adamek] p. 34. Note that "catciso.u" is redundant thanks to elbasfv 17128. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ ((𝑋 Full 𝑌) ∩ (𝑋 Faith 𝑌)) ∧ (1st ‘𝐹):𝑅–1-1-onto→𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | catcbascl 18021 | An element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 18026. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | catcslotelcl 18022 | A slot entry of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 18026. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | catcbaselcl 18023 | The base set of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 18026. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | catchomcl 18024 | The Hom-set of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 18026. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Hom ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | catcccocl 18025 | The composition operation of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 18026. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (comp‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | catcoppccl 18026 | The category of categories for a weak universe is closed under taking opposites. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | catcfuccl 18027 | The category of categories for a weak universe is closed under the functor category operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑋 FuncCat 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
The "category of extensible structures" ExtStrCat is the category of all sets in a universe regarded as extensible structures and the functions between their base sets, see df-estrc 18031. Since we consider only "small categories" (i.e. categories whose objects and morphisms are actually sets and not proper classes), the objects of the category (i.e. the base set of the category regarded as extensible structure) are all sets in a universe 𝑢, which can be an arbitrary set, see estrcbas 18033. Generally, we will take 𝑢 to be a weak universe or Grothendieck universe, because these sets have closure properties as good as the real thing. If a set is not a real extensible structure, it is regarded as extensible structure with an empty base set. Because of bascnvimaeqv 18029 we do not need to restrict the universe to sets which "have a base". The morphisms (or arrows) between two objects, i.e. sets from the universe, are the mappings between their base sets, see estrchomfval 18034, whereas the composition is the ordinary composition of functions, see estrccofval 18037 and estrcco 18038. It is shown that the category of extensible structures ExtStrCat is actually a category, see estrccat 18041 with the identity function as identity arrow, see estrcid 18042. In the following, some background information about the category of extensible structures is given, taken from the discussion in Github issue #1507 (see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/1507 18042): At the beginning, the categories of non-unital rings RngCat and unital rings RingCat were defined separately (as unordered triples of ordered pairs, see dfrngc2 20545 and dfringc2 20574, but with special compositions). With this definitions, however, Theorem rngcresringcat 20586 could not be proven, because the compositions were not compatible. Unfortunately, no precise definition of the composition within the category of rings could be found in the literature. In section 3.3 EXAMPLES, paragraph (2) of [Adamek] p. 22, however, a definition is given for "Grp", the category of groups: "The following constructs; i.e., categories of structured sets and structure-preserving functions between them (o will always be the composition of functions and idA will always be the identity function on A): ... (b) Grp with objects all groups and morphisms all homomorphisms between them." Therefore, the compositions should have been harmonized by using the composition of the category of sets SetCat, see df-setc 17985, which is the ordinary composition of functions. Analogously, categories of Rngs (and Rings) could have been shown to be restrictions resp. subcategories of the category of sets. BJ and MC observed, however, that "... ↾cat [cannot be used] to restrict the category Set to Ring, because the homs are different. Although Ring is a concrete category, a hom between rings R and S is a function (Base`R) --> (Base`S) with certain properties, unlike in Set where it is a function R --> S.". Therefore, MC suggested that "we could have an alternative version of the Set category consisting of extensible structures (in U) together with (A Hom B) := (Base`A) --> (Base`B). This category is not isomorphic to Set because different extensible structures can have the same base set, but it is equivalent to Set; the relevant functors are (U`A) = (Base`A), the forgetful functor, and (F`A) = { <. (Base`ndx), A >. }". This led to the current definition of ExtStrCat, see df-estrc 18031. The claimed equivalence is proven by equivestrcsetc 18060. Having a definition of a category of extensible structures, the categories of non-unital and unital rings can be defined as appropriate restrictions of the category of extensible structures, see df-rngc 20534 and df-ringc 20563. In the same way, more subcategories could be provided, resulting in the following "inclusion chain" by proving theorems like rngcresringcat 20586, although the morphisms of the shown categories are different ( "->" means "is subcategory of"): RingCat-> RngCat-> GrpCat -> MndCat -> MgmCat -> ExtStrCat According to MC, "If we generalize from subcategories to embeddings, then we can even fit SetCat into the chain, equivalent to ExtStrCat at the end." As mentioned before, the equivalence of SetCat and ExtStrCat is proven by equivestrcsetc 18060. Furthermore, it can be shown that SetCat is embedded into ExtStrCat, see embedsetcestrc 18075. Remark: equivestrcsetc 18060 as well as embedsetcestrc 18075 require that the index of the base set extractor is contained within the considered universe. This is ensured by assuming that the natural numbers are contained within the considered universe: ω ∈ 𝑈 (see wunndx 17108), but it would be currently sufficient to assume that 1 ∈ 𝑈, because the index value of the base set extractor is hard-coded as 1, see basendx 17131. Some people, however, feel uncomfortable to say that a ring "is a" group (without mentioning the restriction to the addition, which is usually found in the literature, e.g., the definition of a ring in [Herstein] p. 126: "... Note that so far all we have said is that R is an abelian group under +.". The main argument against a ring being a group is the number of components/slots: usually, a group consists of (exactly!) two components (a base set and an operation), whereas a ring consists of (exactly!) three components (a base set and two operations). According to this "definition", a ring cannot be a group. This is also an (unfortunately informal) argument for the category of rings not being a subcategory of the category of abelian groups in "Categories and Functors", Bodo Pareigis, Academic Press, New York, London, 1970: "A category A is called a subcategory of a category B if Ob(A) ⊆ Ob(B) and MorA(X,Y) ⊆ MorB(X,Y) for all X,Y e. Ob(A), if the composition of morphisms in A coincides with the composition of the same morphisms in B and if the identity of an object in A is also the identity of the same object viewed as an object in B. Then there is a forgetful functor from A to B. We note that Ri [the category of rings] is not a subcategory of Ab [the category of abelian groups]. In fact, Ob(Ri) ⊆ Ob(Ab) is not true, although every ring can also be regarded as an abelian group. The corresponding abelian groups of two rings may coincide even if the rings do not coincide. The multiplication may be defined differently.". As long as we define Rings, Groups, etc. in a way that 𝐴 ∈ Ring → 𝐴 ∈ Grp is valid (see ringgrp 20158) the corresponding categories are in a subcategory relation. If we do not want Rings to be Groups (then the category of rings would not be a subcategory of the category of groups, as observed by Pareigis), we would have to change the definitions of Magmas, Monoids, Groups, Rings etc. to restrict them to have exactly the required number of slots, so that the following holds 𝑔 ∈ Grp → 𝑔 Struct 〈(Base‘ndx), (+g‘ndx)〉 𝑟 ∈ Ring → 𝑟 Struct 〈(Base‘ndx), (+g‘ndx), (.r‘ndx)〉 | ||
| Theorem | fncnvimaeqv 18028 | The inverse images of the universal class V under functions on the universal class V are the universal class V itself. (Proposed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn V → (◡𝐹 “ V) = V) | ||
| Theorem | bascnvimaeqv 18029 | The inverse image of the universal class V under the base function is the universal class V itself. (Proposed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (◡Base “ V) = V | ||
| Syntax | cestrc 18030 | Extend class notation to include the category ExtStr. |
| class ExtStrCat | ||
| Definition | df-estrc 18031* | Definition of the category ExtStr of extensible structures. This is the category whose objects are all sets in a universe 𝑢 regarded as extensible structures and whose morphisms are the functions between their base sets. If a set is not a real extensible structure, it is regarded as extensible structure with an empty base set. Because of bascnvimaeqv 18029 we do not need to restrict the universe to sets which "have a base". Generally, we will take 𝑢 to be a weak universe or Grothendieck universe, because these sets have closure properties as good as the real thing. (Proposed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Mar-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ ExtStrCat = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑢〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑢, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), (𝑣 ∈ (𝑢 × 𝑢), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((Base‘𝑧) ↑m (Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣))), 𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣)) ↑m (Base‘(1st ‘𝑣))) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓)))〉}) | ||
| Theorem | estrcval 18032* | Value of the category of extensible structures (in a universe). (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((Base‘𝑧) ↑m (Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣))), 𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣)) ↑m (Base‘(1st ‘𝑣))) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑈〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), · 〉}) | ||
| Theorem | estrcbas 18033 | Set of objects of the category of extensible structures (in a universe). (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | estrchomfval 18034* | Set of morphisms ("arrows") of the category of extensible structures (in a universe). (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | estrchom 18035 | The morphisms between extensible structures are mappings between their base sets. (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elestrchom 18036 | A morphism between extensible structures is a function between their base sets. (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | estrccofval 18037* | Composition in the category of extensible structures. (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((Base‘𝑧) ↑m (Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣))), 𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣)) ↑m (Base‘(1st ‘𝑣))) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓)))) | ||
| Theorem | estrcco 18038 | Composition in the category of extensible structures. (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | estrcbasbas 18039 | An element of the base set of the base set of the category of extensible structures (i.e. the base set of an extensible structure) belongs to the considered weak universe. (Contributed by AV, 22-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) → (Base‘𝐸) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | estrccatid 18040* | Lemma for estrccat 18041. (Contributed by AV, 8-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ( I ↾ (Base‘𝑥))))) | ||
| Theorem | estrccat 18041 | The category of extensible structures is a category. (Contributed by AV, 8-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
| Theorem | estrcid 18042 | The identity arrow in the category of extensible structures is the identity function of base sets. (Contributed by AV, 8-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = ( I ↾ (Base‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | estrchomfn 18043 | The Hom-set operation in the category of extensible structures (in a universe) is a function. (Contributed by AV, 8-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑈 × 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | estrchomfeqhom 18044 | The functionalized Hom-set operation equals the Hom-set operation in the category of extensible structures (in a universe). (Contributed by AV, 8-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | estrreslem1 18045 | Lemma 1 for estrres 18047. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), · 〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | estrreslem2 18046 | Lemma 2 for estrres 18047. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), · 〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · ∈ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘ndx) ∈ dom 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | estrres 18047 | Any restriction of a category (as an extensible structure which is an unordered triple of ordered pairs) is an unordered triple of ordered pairs. (Contributed by AV, 15-Mar-2020.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), · 〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ↾s 𝐴) sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐺〉) = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐴〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐺〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), · 〉}) | ||
| Theorem | funcestrcsetclem1 18048* | Lemma 1 for funcestrcsetc 18057. (Contributed by AV, 22-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (Base‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | funcestrcsetclem2 18049* | Lemma 2 for funcestrcsetc 18057. (Contributed by AV, 22-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | funcestrcsetclem3 18050* | Lemma 3 for funcestrcsetc 18057. (Contributed by AV, 22-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | funcestrcsetclem4 18051* | Lemma 4 for funcestrcsetc 18057. (Contributed by AV, 22-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | funcestrcsetclem5 18052* | Lemma 5 for funcestrcsetc 18057. (Contributed by AV, 23-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Base‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (Base‘𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋𝐺𝑌) = ( I ↾ (𝑁 ↑m 𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | funcestrcsetclem6 18053* | Lemma 6 for funcestrcsetc 18057. (Contributed by AV, 23-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Base‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (Base‘𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑁 ↑m 𝑀)) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐻) = 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | funcestrcsetclem7 18054* | Lemma 7 for funcestrcsetc 18057. (Contributed by AV, 23-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑋)‘((Id‘𝐸)‘𝑋)) = ((Id‘𝑆)‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | funcestrcsetclem8 18055* | Lemma 8 for funcestrcsetc 18057. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋𝐺𝑌):(𝑋(Hom ‘𝐸)𝑌)⟶((𝐹‘𝑋)(Hom ‘𝑆)(𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | funcestrcsetclem9 18056* | Lemma 9 for funcestrcsetc 18057. (Contributed by AV, 23-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐸)𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐸)𝑍))) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑍)‘(𝐾(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(comp‘𝐸)𝑍)𝐻)) = (((𝑌𝐺𝑍)‘𝐾)(〈(𝐹‘𝑋), (𝐹‘𝑌)〉(comp‘𝑆)(𝐹‘𝑍))((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐻))) | ||
| Theorem | funcestrcsetc 18057* | The "natural forgetful functor" from the category of extensible structures into the category of sets which sends each extensible structure to its base set, preserving the morphisms as mappings between the corresponding base sets. (Contributed by AV, 23-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐸 Func 𝑆)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | fthestrcsetc 18058* | The "natural forgetful functor" from the category of extensible structures into the category of sets which sends each extensible structure to its base set is faithful. (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐸 Faith 𝑆)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | fullestrcsetc 18059* | The "natural forgetful functor" from the category of extensible structures into the category of sets which sends each extensible structure to its base set is full. (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐸 Full 𝑆)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | equivestrcsetc 18060* | The "natural forgetful functor" from the category of extensible structures into the category of sets which sends each extensible structure to its base set is an equivalence. According to definition 3.33 (1) of [Adamek] p. 36, "A functor F : A -> B is called an equivalence provided that it is full, faithful, and isomorphism-dense in the sense that for any B-object B' there exists some A-object A' such that F(A') is isomorphic to B'.". Therefore, the category of sets and the category of extensible structures are equivalent, according to definition 3.33 (2) of [Adamek] p. 36, "Categories A and B are called equivalent provided that there is an equivalence from A to B.". (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘ndx) ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝐸 Faith 𝑆)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝐸 Full 𝑆)𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑖 𝑖:𝑏–1-1-onto→(𝐹‘𝑎))) | ||
| Theorem | setc1strwun 18061 | A constructed one-slot structure with the objects of the category of sets as base set in a weak universe. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) → {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑋〉} ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | funcsetcestrclem1 18062* | Lemma 1 for funcsetcestrc 18072. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑋〉}) | ||
| Theorem | funcsetcestrclem2 18063* | Lemma 2 for funcsetcestrc 18072. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | funcsetcestrclem3 18064* | Lemma 3 for funcsetcestrc 18072. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | embedsetcestrclem 18065* | Lemma for embedsetcestrc 18075. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | funcsetcestrclem4 18066* | Lemma 4 for funcsetcestrc 18072. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (𝐶 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | funcsetcestrclem5 18067* | Lemma 5 for funcsetcestrc 18072. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝑋𝐺𝑌) = ( I ↾ (𝑌 ↑m 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | funcsetcestrclem6 18068* | Lemma 6 for funcsetcestrc 18072. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑌 ↑m 𝑋)) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐻) = 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | funcsetcestrclem7 18069* | Lemma 7 for funcsetcestrc 18072. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑋)‘((Id‘𝑆)‘𝑋)) = ((Id‘𝐸)‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | funcsetcestrclem8 18070* | Lemma 8 for funcsetcestrc 18072. (Contributed by AV, 28-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝑋𝐺𝑌):(𝑋(Hom ‘𝑆)𝑌)⟶((𝐹‘𝑋)(Hom ‘𝐸)(𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | funcsetcestrclem9 18071* | Lemma 9 for funcsetcestrc 18072. (Contributed by AV, 28-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝑆)𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝑆)𝑍))) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑍)‘(𝐾(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(comp‘𝑆)𝑍)𝐻)) = (((𝑌𝐺𝑍)‘𝐾)(〈(𝐹‘𝑋), (𝐹‘𝑌)〉(comp‘𝐸)(𝐹‘𝑍))((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐻))) | ||
| Theorem | funcsetcestrc 18072* | The "embedding functor" from the category of sets into the category of extensible structures which sends each set to an extensible structure consisting of the base set slot only, preserving the morphisms as mappings between the corresponding base sets. (Contributed by AV, 28-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑆 Func 𝐸)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | fthsetcestrc 18073* | The "embedding functor" from the category of sets into the category of extensible structures which sends each set to an extensible structure consisting of the base set slot only is faithful. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑆 Faith 𝐸)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | fullsetcestrc 18074* | The "embedding functor" from the category of sets into the category of extensible structures which sends each set to an extensible structure consisting of the base set slot only is full. (Contributed by AV, 1-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑆 Full 𝐸)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | embedsetcestrc 18075* | The "embedding functor" from the category of sets into the category of extensible structures which sends each set to an extensible structure consisting of the base set slot only is an embedding. According to definition 3.27 (1) of [Adamek] p. 34, a functor "F is called an embedding provided that F is injective on morphisms", or according to remark 3.28 (1) in [Adamek] p. 34, "a functor is an embedding if and only if it is faithful and injective on objects". (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑥〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑆 Faith 𝐸)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹:𝐶–1-1→𝐵)) | ||
| Syntax | cxpc 18076 | Extend class notation with the product of two categories. |
| class ×c | ||
| Syntax | c1stf 18077 | Extend class notation with the first projection functor. |
| class 1stF | ||
| Syntax | c2ndf 18078 | Extend class notation with the second projection functor. |
| class 2ndF | ||
| Syntax | cprf 18079 | Extend class notation with the functor pairing operation. |
| class 〈,〉F | ||
| Definition | df-xpc 18080* | Define the binary product of categories, which has objects for each pair of objects of the factors, and morphisms for each pair of morphisms of the factors. Composition is componentwise. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ ×c = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ V ↦ ⦋((Base‘𝑟) × (Base‘𝑠)) / 𝑏⦌⦋(𝑢 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (((1st ‘𝑢)(Hom ‘𝑟)(1st ‘𝑣)) × ((2nd ‘𝑢)(Hom ‘𝑠)(2nd ‘𝑣)))) / ℎ⦌{〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑏〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), ℎ〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (𝑏 × 𝑏), 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)ℎ𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ (ℎ‘𝑥) ↦ 〈((1st ‘𝑔)(〈(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))〉(comp‘𝑟)(1st ‘𝑦))(1st ‘𝑓)), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(〈(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))〉(comp‘𝑠)(2nd ‘𝑦))(2nd ‘𝑓))〉))〉}) | ||
| Definition | df-1stf 18081* | Define the first projection functor out of the product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 1stF = (𝑟 ∈ Cat, 𝑠 ∈ Cat ↦ ⦋((Base‘𝑟) × (Base‘𝑠)) / 𝑏⦌〈(1st ↾ 𝑏), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (1st ↾ (𝑥(Hom ‘(𝑟 ×c 𝑠))𝑦)))〉) | ||
| Definition | df-2ndf 18082* | Define the second projection functor out of the product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 2ndF = (𝑟 ∈ Cat, 𝑠 ∈ Cat ↦ ⦋((Base‘𝑟) × (Base‘𝑠)) / 𝑏⦌〈(2nd ↾ 𝑏), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (2nd ↾ (𝑥(Hom ‘(𝑟 ×c 𝑠))𝑦)))〉) | ||
| Definition | df-prf 18083* | Define the pairing operation for functors (which takes two functors 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐷 and 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐸 and produces (𝐹 〈,〉F 𝐺):𝐶⟶(𝐷 ×c 𝐸)). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 〈,〉F = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ ⦋dom (1st ‘𝑓) / 𝑏⦌〈(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ 〈((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥), ((1st ‘𝑔)‘𝑥)〉), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (ℎ ∈ dom (𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦) ↦ 〈((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘ℎ), ((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑔)𝑦)‘ℎ)〉))〉) | ||
| Theorem | fnxpc 18084 | The binary product of categories is a two-argument function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ ×c Fn (V × V) | ||
| Theorem | xpcval 18085* | Value of the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑋 × 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (𝑢 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (((1st ‘𝑢)𝐻(1st ‘𝑣)) × ((2nd ‘𝑢)𝐽(2nd ‘𝑣))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝐾𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ (𝐾‘𝑥) ↦ 〈((1st ‘𝑔)(〈(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))〉 · (1st ‘𝑦))(1st ‘𝑓)), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(〈(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))〉 ∙ (2nd ‘𝑦))(2nd ‘𝑓))〉))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐾〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), 𝑂〉}) | ||
| Theorem | xpcbas 18086 | Set of objects of the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 × 𝑌) = (Base‘𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | xpchomfval 18087* | Set of morphisms of the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-Mar-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑢 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (((1st ‘𝑢)𝐻(1st ‘𝑣)) × ((2nd ‘𝑢)𝐽(2nd ‘𝑣)))) | ||
| Theorem | xpchom 18088 | Set of morphisms of the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐾𝑌) = (((1st ‘𝑋)𝐻(1st ‘𝑌)) × ((2nd ‘𝑋)𝐽(2nd ‘𝑌)))) | ||
| Theorem | relxpchom 18089 | A hom-set in the binary product of categories is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ Rel (𝑋𝐾𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | xpccofval 18090* | Value of composition in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Mar-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝐾𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ (𝐾‘𝑥) ↦ 〈((1st ‘𝑔)(〈(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))〉 · (1st ‘𝑦))(1st ‘𝑓)), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(〈(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))〉 ∙ (2nd ‘𝑦))(2nd ‘𝑓))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | xpcco 18091 | Value of composition in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐾𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉𝑂𝑍)𝐹) = 〈((1st ‘𝐺)(〈(1st ‘𝑋), (1st ‘𝑌)〉 · (1st ‘𝑍))(1st ‘𝐹)), ((2nd ‘𝐺)(〈(2nd ‘𝑋), (2nd ‘𝑌)〉 ∙ (2nd ‘𝑍))(2nd ‘𝐹))〉) | ||
| Theorem | xpcco1st 18092 | Value of composition in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐾𝑍)) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘(𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉𝑂𝑍)𝐹)) = ((1st ‘𝐺)(〈(1st ‘𝑋), (1st ‘𝑌)〉 · (1st ‘𝑍))(1st ‘𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | xpcco2nd 18093 | Value of composition in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐾𝑍)) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉𝑂𝑍)𝐹)) = ((2nd ‘𝐺)(〈(2nd ‘𝑋), (2nd ‘𝑌)〉 · (2nd ‘𝑍))(2nd ‘𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | xpchom2 18094 | Value of the set of morphisms in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑀, 𝑁〉𝐾〈𝑃, 𝑄〉) = ((𝑀𝐻𝑃) × (𝑁𝐽𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | xpcco2 18095 | Value of composition in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑀𝐻𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑁𝐽𝑄)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃𝐻𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑄𝐽𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐾, 𝐿〉(〈〈𝑀, 𝑁〉, 〈𝑃, 𝑄〉〉𝑂〈𝑅, 𝑆〉)〈𝐹, 𝐺〉) = 〈(𝐾(〈𝑀, 𝑃〉 · 𝑅)𝐹), (𝐿(〈𝑁, 𝑄〉 ∙ 𝑆)𝐺)〉) | ||
| Theorem | xpccatid 18096* | The product of two categories is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Id‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝑇) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 〈(𝐼‘𝑥), (𝐽‘𝑦)〉))) | ||
| Theorem | xpcid 18097 | The identity morphism in the product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Id‘𝐷) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘〈𝑅, 𝑆〉) = 〈(𝐼‘𝑅), (𝐽‘𝑆)〉) | ||
| Theorem | xpccat 18098 | The product of two categories is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ Cat) | ||
| Theorem | 1stfval 18099* | Value of the first projection functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐶 1stF 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = 〈(1st ↾ 𝐵), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1st ↾ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)))〉) | ||
| Theorem | 1stf1 18100 | Value of the first projection on an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐶 1stF 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝑃)‘𝑅) = (1st ‘𝑅)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |