P. 181 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 18001-18100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	natpropd 18001	If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same natural transformations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Nat 𝐶) = (𝐵 Nat 𝐷))
Theorem	fucpropd 18002	If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same functor categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 FuncCat 𝐶) = (𝐵 FuncCat 𝐷))
8.1.10  Initial, terminal and zero objects of a category
Syntax	cinito 18003	Extend class notation with the class of initial objects of a category.
class InitO
Syntax	ctermo 18004	Extend class notation with the class of terminal objects of a category.
class TermO
Syntax	czeroo 18005	Extend class notation with the class of zero objects of a category.
class ZeroO
Definition	df-inito 18006*	An object A is said to be an initial object provided that for each object B there is exactly one morphism from A to B. Definition 7.1 in [Adamek] p. 101, or definition in [Lang] p. 57 (called "a universally repelling object" there). See dfinito2 18025 and dfinito3 18027 for alternate definitions depending on df-termo 18007. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ InitO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ {𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑐)∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑎(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑏)})
Definition	df-termo 18007*	An object A is called a terminal object provided that for each object B there is exactly one morphism from B to A. Definition 7.4 in [Adamek] p. 102, or definition in [Lang] p. 57 (called "a universally attracting object" there). See dftermo2 18026 and dftermo3 18028 for alternate definitions depending on df-inito 18006. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ TermO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ {𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑐)∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑏(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑎)})
Definition	df-zeroo 18008	An object A is called a zero object provided that it is both an initial object and a terminal object. Definition 7.7 of [Adamek] p. 103. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ZeroO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ((InitO‘𝑐) ∩ (TermO‘𝑐)))
Theorem	initofn 18009	InitO is a function on Cat. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ InitO Fn Cat
Theorem	termofn 18010	TermO is a function on Cat. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ TermO Fn Cat
Theorem	zeroofn 18011	ZeroO is a function on Cat. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ZeroO Fn Cat
Theorem	initorcl 18012	Reverse closure for an initial object: If a class has an initial object, the class is a category. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	termorcl 18013	Reverse closure for a terminal object: If a class has a terminal object, the class is a category. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	zeroorcl 18014	Reverse closure for a zero object: If a class has a zero object, the class is a category. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (ZeroO‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	initoval 18015*	The value of the initial object function, i.e. the set of all initial objects of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (InitO‘𝐶) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑎𝐻𝑏)})
Theorem	termoval 18016*	The value of the terminal object function, i.e. the set of all terminal objects of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (TermO‘𝐶) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑏𝐻𝑎)})
Theorem	zerooval 18017	The value of the zero object function, i.e. the set of all zero objects of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ZeroO‘𝐶) = ((InitO‘𝐶) ∩ (TermO‘𝐶)))
Theorem	isinito 18018*	The predicate "is an initial object" of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝐼𝐻𝑏)))
Theorem	istermo 18019*	The predicate "is a terminal object" of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑏𝐻𝐼)))
Theorem	iszeroo 18020	The predicate "is a zero object" of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (ZeroO‘𝐶) ↔ (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))))
Theorem	isinitoi 18021*	Implication of a class being an initial object. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑂𝐻𝑏)))
Theorem	istermoi 18022*	Implication of a class being a terminal object. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑏𝐻𝑂)))
Theorem	initoid 18023	For an initial object, the identity arrow is the one and only morphism of the object to the object itself. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂𝐻𝑂) = {((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑂)})
Theorem	termoid 18024	For a terminal object, the identity arrow is the one and only morphism of the object to the object itself. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂𝐻𝑂) = {((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑂)})
Theorem	dfinito2 18025	An initial object is a terminal object in the opposite category. An alternate definition of df-inito 18006 depending on df-termo 18007. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ InitO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (TermO‘(oppCat‘𝑐)))
Theorem	dftermo2 18026	A terminal object is an initial object in the opposite category. An alternate definition of df-termo 18007 depending on df-inito 18006. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ TermO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (InitO‘(oppCat‘𝑐)))
Theorem	dfinito3 18027	An alternate definition of df-inito 18006 depending on df-termo 18007, without dummy variables. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ InitO = (TermO ∘ (oppCat ↾ Cat))
Theorem	dftermo3 18028	An alternate definition of df-termo 18007 depending on df-inito 18006, without dummy variables. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ TermO = (InitO ∘ (oppCat ↾ Cat))
Theorem	initoo 18029	An initial object is an object. (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
Theorem	termoo 18030	A terminal object is an object. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶) → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
Theorem	iszeroi 18031	Implication of a class being a zero object. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (ZeroO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))))
Theorem	2initoinv 18032	Morphisms between two initial objects are inverses. (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐵)) → 𝐹(𝐴(Inv‘𝐶)𝐵)𝐺)
Theorem	initoeu1 18033*	Initial objects are essentially unique (strong form), i.e. there is a unique isomorphism between two initial objects, see statement in [Lang] p. 58 ("... if P, P' are two universal objects [...] then there exists a unique isomorphism between them.". (Proposed by BJ, 14-Apr-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴(Iso‘𝐶)𝐵))
Theorem	initoeu1w 18034	Initial objects are essentially unique (weak form), i.e. if A and B are initial objects, then A and B are isomorphic. Proposition 7.3 (1) of [Adamek] p. 102. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝐵)
Theorem	initoeu2lem0 18035	Lemma 0 for initoeu2 18038. (Contributed by AV, 9-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷)) ∧ ((𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾)(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)((𝐵(Inv‘𝐶)𝐴)‘𝐾)) = (𝐺(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)((𝐵(Inv‘𝐶)𝐴)‘𝐾))) → 𝐺 = (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾))
Theorem	initoeu2lem1 18036*	Lemma 1 for initoeu2 18038. (Contributed by AV, 9-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐴) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾) ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷))) → ((∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷)) → 𝐺 = (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾)))
Theorem	initoeu2lem2 18037*	Lemma 2 for initoeu2 18038. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾) ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷))) → (∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) → ∃!𝑔 𝑔 ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷)))
Theorem	initoeu2 18038	Initial objects are essentially unique, if A is an initial object, then so is every object that is isomorphic to A. Proposition 7.3 (2) in [Adamek] p. 102. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))
Theorem	2termoinv 18039	Morphisms between two terminal objects are inverses. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐵)) → 𝐹(𝐴(Inv‘𝐶)𝐵)𝐺)
Theorem	termoeu1 18040*	Terminal objects are essentially unique (strong form), i.e. there is a unique isomorphism between two terminal objects, see statement in [Lang] p. 58 ("... if P, P' are two universal objects [...] then there exists a unique isomorphism between them.". (Proposed by BJ, 14-Apr-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴(Iso‘𝐶)𝐵))
Theorem	termoeu1w 18041	Terminal objects are essentially unique (weak form), i.e. if A and B are terminal objects, then A and B are isomorphic. Proposition 7.6 of [Adamek] p. 103. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝐵)
8.2  Arrows (disjointified hom-sets)
Syntax	cdoma 18042	Extend class notation to include the domain extractor for an arrow.
class doma
Syntax	ccoda 18043	Extend class notation to include the codomain extractor for an arrow.
class coda
Syntax	carw 18044	Extend class notation to include the collection of all arrows of a category.
class Arrow
Syntax	choma 18045	Extend class notation to include the set of all arrows with a specific domain and codomain.
class Homa
Definition	df-doma 18046	Definition of the domain extractor for an arrow. (Contributed by FL, 24-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ doma = (1st ∘ 1st )
Definition	df-coda 18047	Definition of the codomain extractor for an arrow. (Contributed by FL, 26-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ coda = (2nd ∘ 1st )
Definition	df-homa 18048*	Definition of the hom-set extractor for arrows, which tags the morphisms of the underlying hom-set with domain and codomain, which can then be extracted using df-doma 18046 and df-coda 18047. (Contributed by FL, 6-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Homa = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑐) × (Base‘𝑐)) ↦ ({𝑥} × ((Hom ‘𝑐)‘𝑥))))
Definition	df-arw 18049	Definition of the set of arrows of a category. We will use the term "arrow" to denote a morphism tagged with its domain and codomain, as opposed to Hom, which allows hom-sets for distinct objects to overlap. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Arrow = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ∪ ran (Homa‘𝑐))
Theorem	homarcl 18050	Reverse closure for an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	homafval 18051*	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ({𝑥} × (𝐽‘𝑥))))
Theorem	homaf 18052	Functionality of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝐵 × 𝐵)⟶𝒫 ((𝐵 × 𝐵) × V))
Theorem	homaval 18053	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = ({⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩} × (𝑋𝐽𝑌)))
Theorem	elhoma 18054	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 ↔ (𝑍 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))))
Theorem	elhomai 18055	Produce an arrow from a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹)
Theorem	elhomai2 18056	Produce an arrow from a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, 𝐹⟩ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
Theorem	homarcl2 18057	Reverse closure for the domain and codomain of an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	homarel 18058	An arrow is an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ Rel (𝑋𝐻𝑌)
Theorem	homa1 18059	The first component of an arrow is the ordered pair of domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 → 𝑍 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
Theorem	homahom2 18060	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))
Theorem	homahom 18061	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))
Theorem	homadm 18062	The domain of an arrow with known domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (doma‘𝐹) = 𝑋)
Theorem	homacd 18063	The codomain of an arrow with known domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (coda‘𝐹) = 𝑌)
Theorem	homadmcd 18064	Decompose an arrow into domain, codomain, and morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐹 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
Theorem	arwval 18065	The set of arrows is the union of all the disjointified hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ∪ ran 𝐻
Theorem	arwrcl 18066	The first component of an arrow is the ordered pair of domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	arwhoma 18067	An arrow is contained in the hom-set corresponding to its domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐻(coda‘𝐹)))
Theorem	homarw 18068	A hom-set is a subset of the collection of all arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	arwdm 18069	The domain of an arrow is an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (doma‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	arwcd 18070	The codomain of an arrow is an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (coda‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	dmaf 18071	The domain function is a function from arrows to objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (doma ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵
Theorem	cdaf 18072	The codomain function is a function from arrows to objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (coda ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵
Theorem	arwhom 18073	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐽(coda‘𝐹)))
Theorem	arwdmcd 18074	Decompose an arrow into domain, codomain, and morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐹 = ⟨(doma‘𝐹), (coda‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
8.2.1  Identity and composition for arrows
Syntax	cida 18075	Extend class notation to include identity for arrows.
class Ida
Syntax	ccoa 18076	Extend class notation to include composition for arrows.
class compa
Definition	df-ida 18077*	Definition of the identity arrow, which is just the identity morphism tagged with its domain and codomain. (Contributed by FL, 26-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Ida = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ ⟨𝑥, 𝑥, ((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥)⟩))
Definition	df-coa 18078*	Definition of the composition of arrows. Since arrows are tagged with domain and codomain, this does not need to be a quinary operation like the regular composition in a category comp. Instead, it is a partial binary operation on arrows, which is defined when the domain of the first arrow matches the codomain of the second. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ compa = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (Arrow‘𝑐), 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ (Arrow‘𝑐) ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩(comp‘𝑐)(coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩))
Theorem	idafval 18079*	Value of the identity arrow function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ⟨𝑥, 𝑥, ( 1 ‘𝑥)⟩))
Theorem	idaval 18080	Value of the identity arrow function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑋, ( 1 ‘𝑋)⟩)
Theorem	ida2 18081	Morphism part of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = ( 1 ‘𝑋))
Theorem	idahom 18082	Domain and codomain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋))
Theorem	idadm 18083	Domain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (doma‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	idacd 18084	Codomain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (coda‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	idaf 18085	The identity arrow function is a function from objects to arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼:𝐵⟶𝐴)
Theorem	coafval 18086*	The value of the composition of arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ · = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ ∙ (coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩)
Theorem	eldmcoa 18087	A pair ⟨𝐺, 𝐹⟩ is in the domain of the arrow composition, if the domain of 𝐺 equals the codomain of 𝐹. (In this case we say 𝐺 and 𝐹 are composable.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺dom · 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (coda‘𝐹) = (doma‘𝐺)))
Theorem	dmcoass 18088	The domain of composition is a collection of pairs of arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ dom · ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
Theorem	homdmcoa 18089	If 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 and 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑍, then 𝐺 and 𝐹 are composable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺dom · 𝐹)
Theorem	coaval 18090	Value of composition for composable arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩)
Theorem	coa2 18091	The morphism part of arrow composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐺 · 𝐹)) = ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹)))
Theorem	coahom 18092	The composition of two composable arrows is an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))
Theorem	coapm 18093	Composition of arrows is a partial binary operation on arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ · ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	arwlid 18094	Left identity of a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( 1 ‘𝑌) · 𝐹) = 𝐹)
Theorem	arwrid 18095	Right identity of a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 · ( 1 ‘𝑋)) = 𝐹)
Theorem	arwass 18096	Associativity of composition in a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 · 𝐺) · 𝐹) = (𝐾 · (𝐺 · 𝐹)))
8.3  Examples of categories
8.3.1  The category of sets
Syntax	csetc 18097	Extend class notation to include the category Set.
class SetCat
Definition	df-setc 18098*	Definition of the category Set, relativized to a subset 𝑢. Example 3.3(1) of [Adamek] p. 22. This is the category of all sets in 𝑢 and functions between these sets. Generally, we will take 𝑢 to be a weak universe or Grothendieck universe, because these sets have closure properties as good as the real thing. (Contributed by FL, 8-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ SetCat = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑢⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑢, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), (𝑣 ∈ (𝑢 × 𝑢), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓)))⟩})
Theorem	setcval 18099*	Value of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), · ⟩})
Theorem	setcbas 18100	Set of objects of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (Base‘𝐶))