Theorem dfgric2 48708

Description: Alternate, explicit definition of the "is isomorphic to" relation for two graphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.) (Revised by AV, 5-May-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfgric2.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)
dfgric2.w	⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)
dfgric2.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐴)
dfgric2.j	⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfgric2	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≃𝑔𝑟 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑔,𝑖   𝐵,𝑓,𝑔,𝑖   𝑖,𝐼   𝑓,𝑋   𝑓,𝑌

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐼(𝑓, 𝑔)   𝐽(𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑖)   𝑉(𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑖)   𝑊(𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑖)   𝑋(𝑔, 𝑖)   𝑌(𝑔, 𝑖)

Proof of Theorem dfgric2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brgric 48705	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≃𝑔𝑟 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
2		n0 4306	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵))
3	1, 2	bitri 278	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≃𝑔𝑟 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵))
4		vex 3458	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
5		dfgric2.v	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)
6		dfgric2.w	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)
7		dfgric2.i	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐴)
8		dfgric2.j	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐵)
9	5, 6, 7, 8	isgrim 48675	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ V) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖))))))
10		eqcom 2769	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) ↔ (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))
11	10	ralbii 3110	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))
12	11	anbi2i 634	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖))) ↔ (𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))
13	12	exbii 1877	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖))) ↔ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))
14	13	anbi2i 634	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)))) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))
15	9, 14	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ V) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))
16	4, 15	mp3an3 1478	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))
17	16	exbidv 1950	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))
18	3, 17	bitrid 286	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≃𝑔𝑟 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1102   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1808   ∈ wcel 2142   ≠ wne 2957  ∀wral 3078  Vcvv 3454  ∅c0 4285   class class class wbr 5108  dom cdm 5660   “ cima 5663  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6535  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7412  Vtxcvtx 29357  iEdgciedg 29358   GraphIso cgrim 48668   ≃_𝑔𝑟 cgric 48669

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5555  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-suc 6366  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7984  df-2nd 7985  df-1o 8451  df-map 8824  df-grim 48671  df-gric 48674

This theorem is used by:  gricbri  48709  gricushgr  48710  ushggricedg  48720  isubgrgrim  48722