Theorem dfgric2 49216

Description: Alternate, explicit definition of the "is isomorphic to" relation for two graphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.) (Revised by AV, 5-May-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfgric2.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)
dfgric2.w	⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)
dfgric2.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐴)
dfgric2.j	⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfgric2	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≃𝑔𝑟 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉⟶1-1onto𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑔,𝑖   𝐵,𝑓,𝑔,𝑖   𝑖,𝐼   𝑓,𝑋   𝑓,𝑌

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐼(𝑓, 𝑔)   𝐽(𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑖)   𝑉(𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑖)   𝑊(𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑖)   𝑋(𝑔, 𝑖)   𝑌(𝑔, 𝑖)

Proof of Theorem dfgric2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brgric 49213	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≃𝑔𝑟 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
2		n0 4303	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵))
3	1, 2	bitri 278	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≃𝑔𝑟 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵))
4		vex 3458	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
5		dfgric2.v	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)
6		dfgric2.w	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)
7		dfgric2.i	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐴)
8		dfgric2.j	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐵)
9	5, 6, 7, 8	isgrim 49183	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ V) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉⟶1-1onto𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖))))))
10		eqcom 2770	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) ↔ (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))
11	10	ralbii 3112	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))
12	11	anbi2i 635	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖))) ↔ (𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))
13	12	exbii 1881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖))) ↔ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))
14	13	anbi2i 635	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓:𝑉⟶1-1onto𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)) = (𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)))) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉⟶1-1onto𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))
15	9, 14	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ V) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉⟶1-1onto𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))
16	4, 15	mp3an3 1480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉⟶1-1onto𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))
17	16	exbidv 1956	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉⟶1-1onto𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))
18	3, 17	bitrid 286	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≃𝑔𝑟 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉⟶1-1onto𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼⟶1-1ontodom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ∀wral 3080  Vcvv 3454  ∅c0 4281   class class class wbr 5106  dom cdm 5655   “ cima 5658  ⟶1-1ontowf1o 6554  ‘cfv 6555  (class class class)co 7440  Vtxcvtx 29601  iEdgciedg 29602   GraphIso cgrim 49176   ≃_𝑔𝑟 cgric 49177

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7772

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-suc 6383  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-f 6559  df-f1 6560  df-fo 6561  df-f1o 6562  df-fv 6563  df-ov 7443  df-oprab 7444  df-mpo 7445  df-1st 8022  df-2nd 8023  df-1o 8501  df-map 8874  df-grim 49179  df-gric 49182

This theorem is used by:  gricbri  49217  gricushgr  49218  ushggricedg  49228  isubgrgrim  49230