Theorem dfgrlic3 48623

Description: Alternate, explicit definition of the "is locally isomorphic to" relation for two graphs. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jun-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfgrlic2.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
dfgrlic2.w	⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐻)
dfgrlic3.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
dfgrlic3.j	⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
dfgrlic3.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑣)
dfgrlic3.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐻 ClNeighbVtx (𝑓‘𝑣))
dfgrlic3.k	⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∣ (𝐼‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑁}
dfgrlic3.l	⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐽 ∣ (𝐽‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑀}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfgrlic3	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝐺,𝑣   𝑓,𝐻,𝑣   𝑣,𝑉   𝑓,𝑋   𝑓,𝑌   𝑔,𝐺,𝑖,𝑗,𝑓,𝑣   𝑥,𝐺   𝑔,𝐻,𝑖,𝑗   𝑥,𝐻   𝑖,𝐼,𝑥   𝑖,𝐽,𝑥   𝑖,𝐾   𝑔,𝑋,𝑗,𝑣   𝑖,𝐿   𝑔,𝑀,𝑖,𝑗   𝑥,𝑀   𝑔,𝑁,𝑖,𝑗   𝑥,𝑁   𝑖,𝑋   𝑖,𝑌,𝑗,𝑔,𝑣

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐼(𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝐽(𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝐾(𝑥,𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝐿(𝑥,𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝑀(𝑣,𝑓)   𝑁(𝑣,𝑓)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑓,𝑔,𝑖,𝑗)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑖,𝑗)   𝑋(𝑥)   𝑌(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem dfgrlic3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brgrlic 48617	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ≠ ∅)
2		n0 4306	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻))
3	1, 2	bitri 277	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻))
4		dfgrlic2.v	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5		dfgrlic2.w	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐻)
6		dfgrlic3.n	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑣)
7		dfgrlic3.m	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐻 ClNeighbVtx (𝑓‘𝑣))
8		dfgrlic3.i	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
9		dfgrlic3.j	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
10		dfgrlic3.k	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∣ (𝐼‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑁}
11		dfgrlic3.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐽 ∣ (𝐽‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑀}
12	4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11	isgrlim2 48596	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ V) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))
13	12	el3v3 3464	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))
14	13	exbidv 1942	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))
15	3, 14	bitrid 285	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1561  ∃wex 1800   ∈ wcel 2143   ≠ wne 2958  ∀wral 3077  {crab 3415  Vcvv 3455   ⊆ wss 3905  ∅c0 4286   class class class wbr 5101  dom cdm 5648   “ cima 5651  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6520  ‘cfv 6521  (class class class)co 7396  Vtxcvtx 29204  iEdgciedg 29205   ClNeighbVtx cclnbgr 48431   GraphLocIso cgrlim 48589   ≃_𝑙𝑔𝑟 cgrlic 48590

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1816  ax-4 1830  ax-5 1931  ax-6 1988  ax-7 2029  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5247  ax-nul 5257  ax-pow 5323  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7718

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1564  df-fal 1574  df-ex 1801  df-nf 1805  df-sb 2092  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3416  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5102  df-opab 5164  df-mpt 5183  df-id 5543  df-xp 5654  df-rel 5655  df-cnv 5656  df-co 5657  df-dm 5658  df-rn 5659  df-res 5660  df-ima 5661  df-suc 6352  df-iota 6477  df-fun 6523  df-fn 6524  df-f 6525  df-f1 6526  df-fo 6527  df-f1o 6528  df-fv 6529  df-ov 7399  df-oprab 7400  df-mpo 7401  df-1st 7970  df-2nd 7971  df-1o 8437  df-map 8810  df-vtx 29206  df-iedg 29207  df-clnbgr 48432  df-isubgr 48474  df-grim 48491  df-gric 48494  df-grlim 48591  df-grlic 48594

This theorem is referenced by:  grilcbri2  48624