Theorem dfgrlic3 48570

Description: Alternate, explicit definition of the "is locally isomorphic to" relation for two graphs. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jun-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfgrlic2.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
dfgrlic2.w	⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐻)
dfgrlic3.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
dfgrlic3.j	⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
dfgrlic3.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑣)
dfgrlic3.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐻 ClNeighbVtx (𝑓‘𝑣))
dfgrlic3.k	⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∣ (𝐼‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑁}
dfgrlic3.l	⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐽 ∣ (𝐽‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑀}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfgrlic3	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝐺,𝑣   𝑓,𝐻,𝑣   𝑣,𝑉   𝑓,𝑋   𝑓,𝑌   𝑔,𝐺,𝑖,𝑗,𝑓,𝑣   𝑥,𝐺   𝑔,𝐻,𝑖,𝑗   𝑥,𝐻   𝑖,𝐼,𝑥   𝑖,𝐽,𝑥   𝑖,𝐾   𝑔,𝑋,𝑗,𝑣   𝑖,𝐿   𝑔,𝑀,𝑖,𝑗   𝑥,𝑀   𝑔,𝑁,𝑖,𝑗   𝑥,𝑁   𝑖,𝑋   𝑖,𝑌,𝑗,𝑔,𝑣

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐼(𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝐽(𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝐾(𝑥,𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝐿(𝑥,𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝑀(𝑣,𝑓)   𝑁(𝑣,𝑓)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑓,𝑔,𝑖,𝑗)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑖,𝑗)   𝑋(𝑥)   𝑌(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem dfgrlic3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brgrlic 48564	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ≠ ∅)
2		n0 4296	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻))
3	1, 2	bitri 277	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻))
4		dfgrlic2.v	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5		dfgrlic2.w	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐻)
6		dfgrlic3.n	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑣)
7		dfgrlic3.m	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐻 ClNeighbVtx (𝑓‘𝑣))
8		dfgrlic3.i	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
9		dfgrlic3.j	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
10		dfgrlic3.k	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∣ (𝐼‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑁}
11		dfgrlic3.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐽 ∣ (𝐽‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑀}
12	4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11	isgrlim2 48543	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ V) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))
13	12	el3v3 3453	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))
14	13	exbidv 1931	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))
15	3, 14	bitrid 285	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1550  ∃wex 1789   ∈ wcel 2132   ≠ wne 2947  ∀wral 3066  {crab 3404  Vcvv 3444   ⊆ wss 3895  ∅c0 4276   class class class wbr 5090  dom cdm 5636   “ cima 5639  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6505  ‘cfv 6506  (class class class)co 7381  Vtxcvtx 29132  iEdgciedg 29133   ClNeighbVtx cclnbgr 48378   GraphLocIso cgrlim 48536   ≃_𝑙𝑔𝑟 cgrlic 48537

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1805  ax-4 1819  ax-5 1920  ax-6 1977  ax-7 2018  ax-8 2134  ax-9 2142  ax-10 2165  ax-11 2181  ax-12 2202  ax-ext 2724  ax-sep 5236  ax-nul 5246  ax-pow 5312  ax-pr 5380  ax-un 7703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 857  df-3an 1097  df-tru 1553  df-fal 1563  df-ex 1790  df-nf 1794  df-sb 2081  df-mo 2556  df-eu 2586  df-clab 2731  df-cleq 2744  df-clel 2827  df-nfc 2901  df-ne 2948  df-ral 3067  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3405  df-v 3446  df-sbc 3736  df-csb 3844  df-dif 3898  df-un 3900  df-in 3902  df-ss 3912  df-nul 4277  df-if 4471  df-pw 4547  df-sn 4573  df-pr 4575  df-op 4579  df-uni 4856  df-iun 4941  df-br 5091  df-opab 5153  df-mpt 5172  df-id 5531  df-xp 5642  df-rel 5643  df-cnv 5644  df-co 5645  df-dm 5646  df-rn 5647  df-res 5648  df-ima 5649  df-suc 6337  df-iota 6462  df-fun 6508  df-fn 6509  df-f 6510  df-f1 6511  df-fo 6512  df-f1o 6513  df-fv 6514  df-ov 7384  df-oprab 7385  df-mpo 7386  df-1st 7955  df-2nd 7956  df-1o 8421  df-map 8794  df-vtx 29134  df-iedg 29135  df-clnbgr 48379  df-isubgr 48421  df-grim 48438  df-gric 48441  df-grlim 48538  df-grlic 48541

This theorem is referenced by:  grilcbri2  48571