Theorem dfgrlic3 48501

Description: Alternate, explicit definition of the "is locally isomorphic to" relation for two graphs. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jun-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfgrlic2.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
dfgrlic2.w	⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐻)
dfgrlic3.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
dfgrlic3.j	⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
dfgrlic3.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑣)
dfgrlic3.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐻 ClNeighbVtx (𝑓‘𝑣))
dfgrlic3.k	⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∣ (𝐼‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑁}
dfgrlic3.l	⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐽 ∣ (𝐽‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑀}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfgrlic3	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝐺,𝑣   𝑓,𝐻,𝑣   𝑣,𝑉   𝑓,𝑋   𝑓,𝑌   𝑔,𝐺,𝑖,𝑗,𝑓,𝑣   𝑥,𝐺   𝑔,𝐻,𝑖,𝑗   𝑥,𝐻   𝑖,𝐼,𝑥   𝑖,𝐽,𝑥   𝑖,𝐾   𝑔,𝑋,𝑗,𝑣   𝑖,𝐿   𝑔,𝑀,𝑖,𝑗   𝑥,𝑀   𝑔,𝑁,𝑖,𝑗   𝑥,𝑁   𝑖,𝑋   𝑖,𝑌,𝑗,𝑔,𝑣

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐼(𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝐽(𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝐾(𝑥,𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝐿(𝑥,𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑗)   𝑀(𝑣,𝑓)   𝑁(𝑣,𝑓)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑓,𝑔,𝑖,𝑗)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑣,𝑓,𝑔,𝑖,𝑗)   𝑋(𝑥)   𝑌(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem dfgrlic3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brgrlic 48495	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ≠ ∅)
2		n0 4294	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻))
3	1, 2	bitri 275	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻))
4		dfgrlic2.v	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5		dfgrlic2.w	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐻)
6		dfgrlic3.n	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑣)
7		dfgrlic3.m	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐻 ClNeighbVtx (𝑓‘𝑣))
8		dfgrlic3.i	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
9		dfgrlic3.j	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
10		dfgrlic3.k	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∣ (𝐼‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑁}
11		dfgrlic3.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐽 ∣ (𝐽‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑀}
12	4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11	isgrlim2 48474	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ V) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))
13	12	el3v3 3439	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ↔ (𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))
14	13	exbidv 1923	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))
15	3, 14	bitrid 283	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐺 ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 𝐻 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑗(𝑗:𝑁–1-1-onto→𝑀 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐾–1-1-onto→𝐿 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑗 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 2933  ∀wral 3052  {crab 3390  Vcvv 3430   ⊆ wss 3890  ∅c0 4274   class class class wbr 5086  dom cdm 5625   “ cima 5628  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6492  ‘cfv 6493  (class class class)co 7361  Vtxcvtx 29082  iEdgciedg 29083   ClNeighbVtx cclnbgr 48309   GraphLocIso cgrlim 48467   ≃_𝑙𝑔𝑟 cgrlic 48468

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pow 5303  ax-pr 5371  ax-un 7683

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rab 3391  df-v 3432  df-sbc 3730  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-nul 4275  df-if 4468  df-pw 4544  df-sn 4569  df-pr 4571  df-op 4575  df-uni 4852  df-iun 4936  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-mpt 5168  df-id 5520  df-xp 5631  df-rel 5632  df-cnv 5633  df-co 5634  df-dm 5635  df-rn 5636  df-res 5637  df-ima 5638  df-suc 6324  df-iota 6449  df-fun 6495  df-fn 6496  df-f 6497  df-f1 6498  df-fo 6499  df-f1o 6500  df-fv 6501  df-ov 7364  df-oprab 7365  df-mpo 7366  df-1st 7936  df-2nd 7937  df-1o 8399  df-map 8769  df-vtx 29084  df-iedg 29085  df-clnbgr 48310  df-isubgr 48352  df-grim 48369  df-gric 48372  df-grlim 48469  df-grlic 48472

This theorem is referenced by:  grilcbri2  48502