Theorem mgcval 33598

Description: Monotone Galois connection between two functions 𝐹 and 𝐺. If this relation is satisfied, 𝐹 is called the lower adjoint of 𝐺, and 𝐺 is called the upper adjoint of 𝐹.

Technically, this is implemented as an operation taking a pair of structures 𝑉 and 𝑊, expected to be posets, which gives a relation between pairs of functions 𝐹 and 𝐺.

If such a relation exists, it can be proven to be unique.

Galois connections generalize the fundamental theorem of Galois theory about the correspondence between subgroups and subfields. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Apr-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mgcoval.1	⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉)
mgcoval.2	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)
mgcoval.3	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉)
mgcoval.4	⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊)
mgcval.1	⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊)
mgcval.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset )
mgcval.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mgcval	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑉,𝑦   𝑥,𝑊,𝑦   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦   𝑥,𝐺,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐻(𝑥, 𝑦)   ≤ (𝑥, 𝑦)   ≲ (𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem mgcval

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mgcval.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊)
2		mgcval.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset )
3		mgcval.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset )
4		mgcoval.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉)
5		mgcoval.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)
6		mgcoval.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉)
7		mgcoval.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊)
8	4, 5, 6, 7	mgcoval 33597	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ Proset ∧ 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) → (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))})
9	2, 3, 8	syl2anc 596	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))})
10	1, 9	eqtrid 2807	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))})
11	10	breqd 5113	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ 𝐹{⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}𝐺))
12		fveq1 6889	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
13	12	adantr 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
14	13	breq1d 5112	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦))
15		fveq1 6889	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝑔‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
16	15	adantl 487	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑔‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
17	16	breq2d 5114	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦)))
18	14, 17	bibi12d 348	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)) ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
19	18	2ralbidv 3226	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
20		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))} = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}
21	19, 20	brab2a 5745	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹{⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
22	5	fvexi 6904	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
23	4	fvexi 6904	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
24	22, 23	elmap 8906	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
25	23, 22	elmap 8906	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ↔ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴)
26	24, 25	anbi12i 640	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴))
27	26	anbi1i 636	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))) ↔ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
28	21, 27	bitr2i 279	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))) ↔ 𝐹{⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}𝐺)
29	11, 28	bitr4di 292	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076   class class class wbr 5102  {copab 5166  ⟶wf 6539  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7424   ↑_m cmap 8854  Basecbs 17396  lecple 17444   Proset cproset 18475  MGalConncmgc 33590

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7755

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3848  df-ss 3897  df-dif 4046  df-in 4090  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-iota 6497  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7427  df-oprab 7428  df-mpo 7429  df-map 8856  df-mgc 33592

This theorem is used by:  mgcf1  33599  mgcf2  33600  mgccole1  33601  mgccole2  33602  mgcmnt1  33603  mgcmnt2  33604  dfmgc2lem  33606  dfmgc2  33607  mgccnv  33610  pwrssmgc  33611  nsgmgc  34013