Theorem mgcval 33647

Description: Monotone Galois connection between two functions 𝐹 and 𝐺. If this relation is satisfied, 𝐹 is called the lower adjoint of 𝐺, and 𝐺 is called the upper adjoint of 𝐹.

Technically, this is implemented as an operation taking a pair of structures 𝑉 and 𝑊, expected to be posets, which gives a relation between pairs of functions 𝐹 and 𝐺.

If such a relation exists, it can be proven to be unique.

Galois connections generalize the fundamental theorem of Galois theory about the correspondence between subgroups and subfields. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Apr-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mgcoval.1	⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉)
mgcoval.2	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)
mgcoval.3	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉)
mgcoval.4	⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊)
mgcval.1	⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊)
mgcval.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset )
mgcval.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mgcval	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑉,𝑦   𝑥,𝑊,𝑦   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦   𝑥,𝐺,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐻(𝑥, 𝑦)   ≤ (𝑥, 𝑦)   ≲ (𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem mgcval

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mgcval.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊)
2		mgcval.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset )
3		mgcval.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset )
4		mgcoval.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉)
5		mgcoval.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)
6		mgcoval.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉)
7		mgcoval.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊)
8	4, 5, 6, 7	mgcoval 33646	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ Proset ∧ 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) → (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))})
9	2, 3, 8	syl2anc 596	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))})
10	1, 9	eqtrid 2810	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))})
11	10	breqd 5119	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ 𝐹{⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}𝐺))
12		fveq1 6915	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
13	12	adantr 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
14	13	breq1d 5118	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦))
15		fveq1 6915	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝑔‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
16	15	adantl 487	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑔‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
17	16	breq2d 5120	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦)))
18	14, 17	bibi12d 348	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)) ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
19	18	2ralbidv 3230	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
20		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))} = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}
21	19, 20	brab2a 5752	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹{⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
22	5	fvexi 6930	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
23	4	fvexi 6930	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
24	22, 23	elmap 8937	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
25	23, 22	elmap 8937	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ↔ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴)
26	24, 25	anbi12i 640	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴))
27	26	anbi1i 636	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))) ↔ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
28	21, 27	bitr2i 279	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))) ↔ 𝐹{⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}𝐺)
29	11, 28	bitr4di 292	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080   class class class wbr 5108  {copab 5173  ⟶wf 6562  ‘cfv 6566  (class class class)co 7451   ↑_m cmap 8885  Basecbs 17431  lecple 17479   Proset cproset 18516  MGalConncmgc 33639

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-fv 6574  df-ov 7454  df-oprab 7455  df-mpo 7456  df-map 8887  df-mgc 33641

This theorem is used by:  mgcf1  33648  mgcf2  33649  mgccole1  33650  mgccole2  33651  mgcmnt1  33652  mgcmnt2  33653  dfmgc2lem  33655  dfmgc2  33656  mgccnv  33659  pwrssmgc  33660  nsgmgc  34067