Theorem mgcval 33371

Description: Monotone Galois connection between two functions 𝐹 and 𝐺. If this relation is satisfied, 𝐹 is called the lower adjoint of 𝐺, and 𝐺 is called the upper adjoint of 𝐹.

Technically, this is implemented as an operation taking a pair of structures 𝑉 and 𝑊, expected to be posets, which gives a relation between pairs of functions 𝐹 and 𝐺.

If such a relation exists, it can be proven to be unique.

Galois connections generalize the fundamental theorem of Galois theory about the correspondence between subgroups and subfields. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Apr-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mgcoval.1	⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉)
mgcoval.2	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)
mgcoval.3	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉)
mgcoval.4	⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊)
mgcval.1	⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊)
mgcval.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset )
mgcval.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mgcval	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑉,𝑦   𝑥,𝑊,𝑦   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦   𝑥,𝐺,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐻(𝑥, 𝑦)   ≤ (𝑥, 𝑦)   ≲ (𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem mgcval

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mgcval.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊)
2		mgcval.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset )
3		mgcval.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset )
4		mgcoval.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉)
5		mgcoval.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)
6		mgcoval.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉)
7		mgcoval.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊)
8	4, 5, 6, 7	mgcoval 33370	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ Proset ∧ 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) → (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))})
9	2, 3, 8	syl2anc 596	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))})
10	1, 9	eqtrid 2812	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))})
11	10	breqd 5122	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ 𝐹{⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}𝐺))
12		fveq1 6884	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
13	12	adantr 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
14	13	breq1d 5121	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦))
15		fveq1 6884	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝑔‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
16	15	adantl 487	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑔‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
17	16	breq2d 5123	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦)))
18	14, 17	bibi12d 348	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)) ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
19	18	2ralbidv 3231	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
20		eqid 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))} = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}
21	19, 20	brab2a 5756	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹{⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
22	5	fvexi 6899	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
23	4	fvexi 6899	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
24	22, 23	elmap 8875	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
25	23, 22	elmap 8875	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ↔ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴)
26	24, 25	anbi12i 640	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴))
27	26	anbi1i 636	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))) ↔ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))
28	21, 27	bitr2i 279	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))) ↔ 𝐹{⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}𝐺)
29	11, 28	bitr4di 292	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3081   class class class wbr 5111  {copab 5175  ⟶wf 6536  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7419   ↑_m cmap 8830  Basecbs 17291  lecple 17339   Proset cproset 18370  MGalConncmgc 33363

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7422  df-oprab 7423  df-mpo 7424  df-map 8832  df-mgc 33365

This theorem is used by:  mgcf1  33372  mgcf2  33373  mgccole1  33374  mgccole2  33375  mgcmnt1  33376  mgcmnt2  33377  dfmgc2lem  33379  dfmgc2  33380  mgccnv  33383  pwrssmgc  33384  nsgmgc  33785