Theorem scutval 33921

Description: The value of the surreal cut operation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scutval	⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Proof of Theorem scutval

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssltex1 33908	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		ssltss1 33910	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ No )
3	1, 2	elpwd 4538	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 No )
4		df-br 5071	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ <<s )
5	4	biimpi 215	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ <<s )
6		ssltex2 33909	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
7		elimasng 5985	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐵 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝐴}) ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ <<s ))
8	1, 6, 7	syl2anc 583	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝐴}) ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ <<s ))
9	5, 8	mpbird 256	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝐴}))
10		riotaex 7216	. . 3 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})) ∈ V
11		breq1 5073	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ↔ 𝐴 <<s {𝑦}))
12		breq2 5074	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → ({𝑦} <<s 𝑏 ↔ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵))
13	11, 12	bi2anan9 635	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵) → ((𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏) ↔ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)))
14	13	rabbidv 3404	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵) → {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} = {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
15	14	imaeq2d 5958	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵) → ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}) = ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)}))
16	15	inteqd 4881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵) → ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)}))
17	16	eqeq2d 2749	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵) → (( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}) ↔ ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})))
18	14, 17	riotaeqbidv 7215	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵) → (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})) = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})))
19		sneq 4568	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → {𝑎} = {𝐴})
20	19	imaeq2d 5958	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ( <<s “ {𝑎}) = ( <<s “ {𝐴}))
21		df-scut 33905	. . . 4 ⊢ |s = (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No , 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))
22	18, 20, 21	ovmpox 7404	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝐴}) ∧ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})) ∈ V) → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})))
23	10, 22	mp3an3 1448	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝐴})) → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})))
24	3, 9, 23	syl2anc 583	1 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  {crab 3067  Vcvv 3422  𝒫 cpw 4530  {csn 4558  ⟨cop 4564  ∩ cint 4876   class class class wbr 5070   “ cima 5583  ‘cfv 6418  ℩crio 7211  (class class class)co 7255   No csur 33770   bday cbday 33772   <<s csslt 33902   |s cscut 33904

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-int 4877  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fv 6426  df-riota 7212  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259  df-mpo 7260  df-sslt 33903  df-scut 33905

This theorem is referenced by:  scutcut  33922  scutbday  33925  eqscut  33926  scutun12  33931  scutf  33933  scutbdaylt  33939