Theorem scutcut 33922

Description: Cut properties of the surreal cut operation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scutcut	⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem scutcut

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		scutval 33921	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})))
2		conway 33920	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)}))
3		riotacl 7230	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)}) → (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
4	2, 3	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
5	1, 4	eqeltrd 2839	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
6		sneq 4568	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → {𝑦} = {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)})
7	6	breq2d 5082	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ↔ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)}))
8	6	breq1d 5080	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → ({𝑦} <<s 𝐵 ↔ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))
9	7, 8	anbi12d 630	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → ((𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
10	9	elrab 3617	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
11		3anass 1093	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
12	10, 11	bitr4i 277	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))
13	5, 12	sylib 217	1 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃!wreu 3065  {crab 3067  {csn 4558  ∩ cint 4876   class class class wbr 5070   “ cima 5583  ‘cfv 6418  ℩crio 7211  (class class class)co 7255   No csur 33770   bday cbday 33772   <<s csslt 33902   |s cscut 33904

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5205  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3or 1086  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rmo 3071  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-pss 3902  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-tp 4563  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-int 4877  df-iun 4923  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-tr 5188  df-id 5480  df-eprel 5486  df-po 5494  df-so 5495  df-fr 5535  df-we 5537  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-ord 6254  df-on 6255  df-suc 6257  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-riota 7212  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259  df-mpo 7260  df-1o 8267  df-2o 8268  df-no 33773  df-slt 33774  df-bday 33775  df-sslt 33903  df-scut 33905

This theorem is referenced by:  scutcl  33923  scutbday  33925  scutun12  33931  slerec  33940  sltrec  33941  cofcut2  34018  cofcutr  34019  cofcutrtime  34020