Theorem scutcut 33995

Description: Cut properties of the surreal cut operation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scutcut	⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem scutcut

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		scutval 33994	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})))
2		conway 33993	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)}))
3		riotacl 7250	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)}) → (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
4	2, 3	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
5	1, 4	eqeltrd 2839	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
6		sneq 4571	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → {𝑦} = {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)})
7	6	breq2d 5086	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ↔ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)}))
8	6	breq1d 5084	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → ({𝑦} <<s 𝐵 ↔ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))
9	7, 8	anbi12d 631	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → ((𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
10	9	elrab 3624	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
11		3anass 1094	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
12	10, 11	bitr4i 277	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))
13	5, 12	sylib 217	1 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  ∃!wreu 3066  {crab 3068  {csn 4561  ∩ cint 4879   class class class wbr 5074   “ cima 5592  ‘cfv 6433  ℩crio 7231  (class class class)co 7275   No csur 33843   bday cbday 33845   <<s csslt 33975   |s cscut 33977

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5209  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352  ax-un 7588

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rmo 3071  df-reu 3072  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3717  df-csb 3833  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-pss 3906  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-tp 4566  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-int 4880  df-iun 4926  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-mpt 5158  df-tr 5192  df-id 5489  df-eprel 5495  df-po 5503  df-so 5504  df-fr 5544  df-we 5546  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-ima 5602  df-ord 6269  df-on 6270  df-suc 6272  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fn 6436  df-f 6437  df-f1 6438  df-fo 6439  df-f1o 6440  df-fv 6441  df-riota 7232  df-ov 7278  df-oprab 7279  df-mpo 7280  df-1o 8297  df-2o 8298  df-no 33846  df-slt 33847  df-bday 33848  df-sslt 33976  df-scut 33978

This theorem is referenced by:  scutcl  33996  scutbday  33998  scutun12  34004  slerec  34013  sltrec  34014  cofcut2  34091  cofcutr  34092  cofcutrtime  34093