Theorem tz7.44lem1 8378

Description: The ordered pair abstraction 𝐺 defined in the hypothesis is a function. This was a lemma for tz7.44-1 8379, tz7.44-2 8380, and tz7.44-3 8381 when they used that definition of 𝐺. Now, they use the maps-to df-mpt 5184 idiom so this lemma is not needed anymore, but is kept in case other applications (for instance in intuitionistic set theory) need it. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tz7.44lem1.1	⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tz7.44lem1	⊢ Fun 𝐺

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐻

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐻(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem tz7.44lem1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funopab 6558	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥)))
2		fvex 6882	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥)) ∈ V
3		vex 3460	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4		rnexg 7885	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → ran 𝑥 ∈ V)
5		uniexg 7725	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran 𝑥 ∈ V → ∪ ran 𝑥 ∈ V)
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ ran 𝑥 ∈ V
7		nlim0 6408	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ Lim ∅
8		dm0 5898	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
9		limeq 6360	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom ∅ = ∅ → (Lim dom ∅ ↔ Lim ∅))
10	8, 9	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim dom ∅ ↔ Lim ∅)
11	7, 10	mtbir 325	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ Lim dom ∅
12		dmeq 5881	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → dom 𝑥 = dom ∅)
13		limeq 6360	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom 𝑥 = dom ∅ → (Lim dom 𝑥 ↔ Lim dom ∅))
14	12, 13	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (Lim dom 𝑥 ↔ Lim dom ∅))
15	14	biimpa 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ Lim dom 𝑥) → Lim dom ∅)
16	11, 15	mto 199	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ Lim dom 𝑥)
17	2, 6, 16	moeq3 3677	. . 3 ⊢ ∃*𝑦((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))
18	1, 17	mpgbir 1821	. 2 ⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))}
19		tz7.44lem1.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))}
20	19	funeqi 6544	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 ↔ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))})
21	18, 20	mpbir 233	1 ⊢ Fun 𝐺

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   ∨ wo 858   ∨ w3o 1098   = wceq 1562   ∈ wcel 2144  ∃*wmo 2566  Vcvv 3456  ∅c0 4287  ∪ cuni 4867  {copab 5164  dom cdm 5649  ran crn 5650  Lim wlim 6349  Fun wfun 6517  ‘cfv 6523

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5258  ax-pr 5392  ax-un 7720

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3or 1100  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-nf 1806  df-sb 2093  df-mo 2568  df-eu 2598  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-pss 3926  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-tr 5210  df-id 5544  df-eprel 5549  df-po 5557  df-so 5558  df-fr 5602  df-we 5604  df-xp 5655  df-rel 5656  df-cnv 5657  df-co 5658  df-dm 5659  df-rn 5660  df-ord 6351  df-lim 6353  df-iota 6479  df-fun 6525  df-fv 6531

This theorem is referenced by: (None)