Theorem tz7.44lem1 8391

Description: The ordered pair abstraction 𝐺 defined in the hypothesis is a function. This was a lemma for tz7.44-1 8392, tz7.44-2 8393, and tz7.44-3 8394 when they used that definition of 𝐺. Now, they use the maps-to df-mpt 5192 idiom so this lemma is not needed anymore, but is kept in case other applications (for instance in intuitionistic set theory) need it. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tz7.44lem1.1	⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tz7.44lem1	⊢ Fun 𝐺

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐻

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐻(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem tz7.44lem1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funopab 6571	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥)))
2		fvex 6894	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥)) ∈ V
3		vex 3457	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4		rnexg 7898	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → ran 𝑥 ∈ V)
5		uniexg 7738	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran 𝑥 ∈ V → ∪ ran 𝑥 ∈ V)
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ ran 𝑥 ∈ V
7		nlim0 6421	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ Lim ∅
8		dm0 5910	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
9		limeq 6372	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom ∅ = ∅ → (Lim dom ∅ ↔ Lim ∅))
10	8, 9	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim dom ∅ ↔ Lim ∅)
11	7, 10	mtbir 326	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ Lim dom ∅
12		dmeq 5893	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → dom 𝑥 = dom ∅)
13		limeq 6372	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom 𝑥 = dom ∅ → (Lim dom 𝑥 ↔ Lim dom ∅))
14	12, 13	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (Lim dom 𝑥 ↔ Lim dom ∅))
15	14	biimpa 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ Lim dom 𝑥) → Lim dom ∅)
16	11, 15	mto 200	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ Lim dom 𝑥)
17	2, 6, 16	moeq3 3674	. . 3 ⊢ ∃*𝑦((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))
18	1, 17	mpgbir 1827	. 2 ⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))}
19		tz7.44lem1.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))}
20	19	funeqi 6557	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 ↔ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))})
21	18, 20	mpbir 234	1 ⊢ Fun 𝐺

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860   ∨ w3o 1100   = wceq 1568   ∈ wcel 2141  ∃*wmo 2563  Vcvv 3453  ∅c0 4285  ∪ cuni 4871  {copab 5172  dom cdm 5661  ran crn 5662  Lim wlim 6361  Fun wfun 6530  ‘cfv 6536

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1571  df-fal 1581  df-ex 1808  df-nf 1812  df-sb 2095  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-pss 3924  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-tr 5218  df-id 5556  df-eprel 5561  df-po 5569  df-so 5570  df-fr 5614  df-we 5616  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-ord 6363  df-lim 6365  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fv 6544

This theorem is referenced by: (None)