Theorem tz7.44lem1 8338

Description: The ordered pair abstraction 𝐺 defined in the hypothesis is a function. This was a lemma for tz7.44-1 8339, tz7.44-2 8340, and tz7.44-3 8341 when they used that definition of 𝐺. Now, they use the maps-to df-mpt 5157 idiom so this lemma is not needed anymore, but is kept in case other applications (for instance in intuitionistic set theory) need it. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tz7.44lem1.1	⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tz7.44lem1	⊢ Fun 𝐺

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐻

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐻(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem tz7.44lem1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funopab 6524	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥)))
2		fvex 6844	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥)) ∈ V
3		vex 3437	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4		rnexg 7846	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → ran 𝑥 ∈ V)
5		uniexg 7687	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran 𝑥 ∈ V → ∪ ran 𝑥 ∈ V)
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ ran 𝑥 ∈ V
7		nlim0 6374	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ Lim ∅
8		dm0 5869	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
9		limeq 6326	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom ∅ = ∅ → (Lim dom ∅ ↔ Lim ∅))
10	8, 9	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim dom ∅ ↔ Lim ∅)
11	7, 10	mtbir 325	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ Lim dom ∅
12		dmeq 5852	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → dom 𝑥 = dom ∅)
13		limeq 6326	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom 𝑥 = dom ∅ → (Lim dom 𝑥 ↔ Lim dom ∅))
14	12, 13	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (Lim dom 𝑥 ↔ Lim dom ∅))
15	14	biimpa 478	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ Lim dom 𝑥) → Lim dom ∅)
16	11, 15	mto 199	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ Lim dom 𝑥)
17	2, 6, 16	moeq3 3655	. . 3 ⊢ ∃*𝑦((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))
18	1, 17	mpgbir 1807	. 2 ⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))}
19		tz7.44lem1.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))}
20	19	funeqi 6510	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 ↔ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))})
21	18, 20	mpbir 233	1 ⊢ Fun 𝐺

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 397   ∨ wo 854   ∨ w3o 1092   = wceq 1548   ∈ wcel 2121  ∃*wmo 2543  Vcvv 3433  ∅c0 4264  ∪ cuni 4841  {copab 5137  dom cdm 5621  ran crn 5622  Lim wlim 6315  Fun wfun 6483  ‘cfv 6489

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-10 2154  ax-11 2170  ax-12 2191  ax-ext 2713  ax-sep 5221  ax-nul 5231  ax-pr 5365  ax-un 7682

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-or 855  df-3or 1094  df-3an 1095  df-tru 1551  df-fal 1561  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2075  df-mo 2545  df-eu 2575  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2937  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3066  df-rab 3394  df-v 3435  df-dif 3888  df-un 3890  df-in 3892  df-ss 3902  df-pss 3905  df-nul 4265  df-if 4458  df-pw 4534  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4842  df-br 5076  df-opab 5138  df-tr 5183  df-id 5516  df-eprel 5521  df-po 5529  df-so 5530  df-fr 5574  df-we 5576  df-xp 5627  df-rel 5628  df-cnv 5629  df-co 5630  df-dm 5631  df-rn 5632  df-ord 6317  df-lim 6319  df-iota 6445  df-fun 6491  df-fv 6497

This theorem is referenced by: (None)