Theorem wemoiso2 8018

Description: Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wemoiso2	⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑅,𝑓   𝐴,𝑓   𝑆,𝑓   𝐵,𝑓

Proof of Theorem wemoiso2

Dummy variable 𝑔 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑆 We 𝐵)
2		isof1o 7360	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝑓:𝐴⟶1-1onto𝐵)
3		f1ofo 6860	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴⟶1-1onto𝐵 → 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝐵)
4		forn 6827	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝐵 → ran 𝑓 = 𝐵)
5	2, 3, 4	3syl 19	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → ran 𝑓 = 𝐵)
6		vex 3458	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
7	6	rnex 7954	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ran 𝑓 ∈ V
8	5, 7	eqeltrrdi 2873	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
9	8	ad2antrl 741	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
10		exse 5616	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → 𝑆 Se 𝐵)
11	9, 10	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑆 Se 𝐵)
12	1, 11	jca 521	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → (𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 Se 𝐵))
13		weisoeq2 7395	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 Se 𝐵) ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑓 = 𝑔)
14	12, 13	sylancom 600	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑓 = 𝑔)
15	14	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ((𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → 𝑓 = 𝑔))
16	15	alrimivv 1963	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∀𝑓∀𝑔((𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → 𝑓 = 𝑔))
17		isoeq1 7354	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)))
18	17	mo4 2594	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑓∀𝑔((𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → 𝑓 = 𝑔))
19	16, 18	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∃*wmo 2565  Vcvv 3454   Se wse 5607   We wwe 5608  ran crn 5657  ⟶ontowfo 6562  ⟶1-1ontowf1o 6563   Isom wiso 6565

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5396  ax-un 7781

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5551  df-po 5564  df-so 5565  df-fr 5609  df-se 5610  df-we 5611  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-co 5665  df-dm 5666  df-rn 5667  df-res 5668  df-ima 5669  df-iota 6518  df-fun 6566  df-fn 6567  df-f 6568  df-f1 6569  df-fo 6570  df-f1o 6571  df-fv 6572  df-isom 6573

This theorem is used by:  finnisoeu  10229