Theorem wemoiso2 7864

Description: Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wemoiso2	⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑅,𝑓   𝐴,𝑓   𝑆,𝑓   𝐵,𝑓

Proof of Theorem wemoiso2

Dummy variable 𝑔 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 483	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑆 We 𝐵)
2		isof1o 7234	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
3		f1ofo 6761	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝐵)
4		forn 6729	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → ran 𝑓 = 𝐵)
5	2, 3, 4	3syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → ran 𝑓 = 𝐵)
6		vex 3445	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
7	6	rnex 7806	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ran 𝑓 ∈ V
8	5, 7	eqeltrrdi 2847	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
9	8	ad2antrl 725	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
10		exse 5571	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → 𝑆 Se 𝐵)
11	9, 10	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑆 Se 𝐵)
12	1, 11	jca 512	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → (𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 Se 𝐵))
13		weisoeq2 7267	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 Se 𝐵) ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑓 = 𝑔)
14	12, 13	sylancom 588	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑓 = 𝑔)
15	14	ex 413	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ((𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → 𝑓 = 𝑔))
16	15	alrimivv 1930	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∀𝑓∀𝑔((𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → 𝑓 = 𝑔))
17		isoeq1 7228	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)))
18	17	mo4 2565	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑓∀𝑔((𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → 𝑓 = 𝑔))
19	16, 18	sylibr 233	1 ⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105  ∃*wmo 2537  Vcvv 3441   Se wse 5561   We wwe 5562  ran crn 5609  –onto→wfo 6464  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6465   Isom wiso 6467

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5238  ax-nul 5245  ax-pr 5367  ax-un 7630

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2887  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rmo 3350  df-reu 3351  df-rab 3405  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3727  df-csb 3843  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4268  df-if 4472  df-pw 4547  df-sn 4572  df-pr 4574  df-op 4578  df-uni 4851  df-br 5088  df-opab 5150  df-mpt 5171  df-id 5507  df-po 5521  df-so 5522  df-fr 5563  df-se 5564  df-we 5565  df-xp 5614  df-rel 5615  df-cnv 5616  df-co 5617  df-dm 5618  df-rn 5619  df-res 5620  df-ima 5621  df-iota 6418  df-fun 6468  df-fn 6469  df-f 6470  df-f1 6471  df-fo 6472  df-f1o 6473  df-fv 6474  df-isom 6475

This theorem is referenced by:  finnisoeu  9949