Theorem wemoiso2 7953

Description: Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wemoiso2	⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑅,𝑓   𝐴,𝑓   𝑆,𝑓   𝐵,𝑓

Proof of Theorem wemoiso2

Dummy variable 𝑔 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 482	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑆 We 𝐵)
2		isof1o 7298	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
3		f1ofo 6807	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝐵)
4		forn 6775	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → ran 𝑓 = 𝐵)
5	2, 3, 4	3syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → ran 𝑓 = 𝐵)
6		vex 3451	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
7	6	rnex 7886	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ran 𝑓 ∈ V
8	5, 7	eqeltrrdi 2837	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
9	8	ad2antrl 728	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
10		exse 5598	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → 𝑆 Se 𝐵)
11	9, 10	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑆 Se 𝐵)
12	1, 11	jca 511	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → (𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 Se 𝐵))
13		weisoeq2 7331	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 Se 𝐵) ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑓 = 𝑔)
14	12, 13	sylancom 588	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝑓 = 𝑔)
15	14	ex 412	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ((𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → 𝑓 = 𝑔))
16	15	alrimivv 1928	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∀𝑓∀𝑔((𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → 𝑓 = 𝑔))
17		isoeq1 7292	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)))
18	17	mo4 2559	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑓∀𝑔((𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑔 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → 𝑓 = 𝑔))
19	16, 18	sylibr 234	1 ⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∃*wmo 2531  Vcvv 3447   Se wse 5589   We wwe 5590  ran crn 5639  –onto→wfo 6509  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6510   Isom wiso 6512

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rmo 3354  df-reu 3355  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-po 5546  df-so 5547  df-fr 5591  df-se 5592  df-we 5593  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-f1 6516  df-fo 6517  df-f1o 6518  df-fv 6519  df-isom 6520

This theorem is referenced by:  finnisoeu  10066