enqbreq2 - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

	Intuitionistic Logic Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > enqbreq2		GIF version

Theorem enqbreq2 7730

Description: Equivalence relation for positive fractions in terms of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2013.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
enqbreq2	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → (𝐴 ~_Q 𝐵 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((1^st ‘𝐵) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐴))))

**Proof of Theorem enqbreq2**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		1st2nd2 6413	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (N × N) → 𝐴 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝐴), (2^nd ‘𝐴)⟩)
2		1st2nd2 6413	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (N × N) → 𝐵 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩)
3	1, 2	breqan12d 4147	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → (𝐴 ~_Q 𝐵 ↔ ⟨(1^st ‘𝐴), (2^nd ‘𝐴)⟩ ~_Q ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩))
4		xp1st 6403	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (N × N) → (1^st ‘𝐴) ∈ N)
5		xp2nd 6404	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (N × N) → (2^nd ‘𝐴) ∈ N)
6	4, 5	jca 306	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (N × N) → ((1^st ‘𝐴) ∈ N ∧ (2^nd ‘𝐴) ∈ N))
7		xp1st 6403	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (N × N) → (1^st ‘𝐵) ∈ N)
8		xp2nd 6404	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (N × N) → (2^nd ‘𝐵) ∈ N)
9	7, 8	jca 306	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (N × N) → ((1^st ‘𝐵) ∈ N ∧ (2^nd ‘𝐵) ∈ N))
10		enqbreq 7729	. . 3 ⊢ ((((1^st ‘𝐴) ∈ N ∧ (2^nd ‘𝐴) ∈ N) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝐵) ∈ N ∧ (2^nd ‘𝐵) ∈ N)) → (⟨(1^st ‘𝐴), (2^nd ‘𝐴)⟩ ~_Q ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩ ↔ ((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((2^nd ‘𝐴) ·_N (1^st ‘𝐵))))
11	6, 9, 10	syl2an 289	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → (⟨(1^st ‘𝐴), (2^nd ‘𝐴)⟩ ~_Q ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩ ↔ ((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((2^nd ‘𝐴) ·_N (1^st ‘𝐵))))
12		mulcompig 7704	. . . 4 ⊢ (((2^nd ‘𝐴) ∈ N ∧ (1^st ‘𝐵) ∈ N) → ((2^nd ‘𝐴) ·_N (1^st ‘𝐵)) = ((1^st ‘𝐵) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐴)))
13	5, 7, 12	syl2an 289	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → ((2^nd ‘𝐴) ·_N (1^st ‘𝐵)) = ((1^st ‘𝐵) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐴)))
14	13	eqeq2d 2250	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → (((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((2^nd ‘𝐴) ·_N (1^st ‘𝐵)) ↔ ((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((1^st ‘𝐵) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐴))))
15	3, 11, 14	3bitrd 214	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → (𝐴 ~_Q 𝐵 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((1^st ‘𝐵) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐴))))

Colors of variables: wff set class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1402 ∈ wcel 2209 ⟨cop 3712 class class class wbr 4131 × cxp 4774 ‘cfv 5380 (class class class)co 6088 1^st c1st 6376 2^nd c2nd 6377 Ncnpi 7645 ·_N cmi 7647 ~_Q ceq 7652

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 623 ax-in2 624 ax-io 721 ax-5 1500 ax-7 1501 ax-gen 1502 ax-ie1 1546 ax-ie2 1547 ax-8 1557 ax-10 1558 ax-11 1559 ax-i12 1560 ax-bndl 1562 ax-4 1563 ax-17 1579 ax-i9 1583 ax-ial 1587 ax-i5r 1588 ax-14 2212 ax-ext 2220 ax-coll 4248 ax-sep 4251 ax-nul 4261 ax-pow 4313 ax-pr 4348 ax-un 4580 ax-setind 4686 ax-iinf 4737

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 1011 df-tru 1405 df-fal 1408 df-nf 1514 df-sb 1816 df-eu 2089 df-mo 2090 df-clab 2225 df-cleq 2231 df-clel 2234 df-nfc 2381 df-ne 2421 df-ral 2533 df-rex 2534 df-reu 2535 df-rab 2537 df-v 2823 df-sbc 3052 df-csb 3148 df-dif 3222 df-un 3224 df-in 3226 df-ss 3233 df-nul 3521 df-pw 3690 df-sn 3715 df-pr 3716 df-op 3718 df-uni 3936 df-int 3971 df-iun 4014 df-br 4132 df-opab 4194 df-mpt 4195 df-tr 4232 df-id 4440 df-iord 4513 df-on 4515 df-suc 4518 df-iom 4740 df-xp 4782 df-rel 4783 df-cnv 4784 df-co 4785 df-dm 4786 df-rn 4787 df-res 4788 df-ima 4789 df-iota 5340 df-fun 5382 df-fn 5383 df-f 5384 df-f1 5385 df-fo 5386 df-f1o 5387 df-fv 5388 df-ov 6091 df-oprab 6092 df-mpo 6093 df-1st 6378 df-2nd 6379 df-recs 6580 df-irdg 6645 df-oadd 6695 df-omul 6696 df-ni 7677 df-mi 7679 df-enq 7720

This theorem is used by: (None)

W3C validator