enqbreq2 - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

	Intuitionistic Logic Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > enqbreq2		GIF version

Theorem enqbreq2 7540

Description: Equivalence relation for positive fractions in terms of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2013.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
enqbreq2	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → (𝐴 ~_Q 𝐵 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((1^st ‘𝐵) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐴))))

**Proof of Theorem enqbreq2**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		1st2nd2 6319	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (N × N) → 𝐴 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝐴), (2^nd ‘𝐴)⟩)
2		1st2nd2 6319	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (N × N) → 𝐵 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩)
3	1, 2	breqan12d 4098	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → (𝐴 ~_Q 𝐵 ↔ ⟨(1^st ‘𝐴), (2^nd ‘𝐴)⟩ ~_Q ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩))
4		xp1st 6309	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (N × N) → (1^st ‘𝐴) ∈ N)
5		xp2nd 6310	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (N × N) → (2^nd ‘𝐴) ∈ N)
6	4, 5	jca 306	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (N × N) → ((1^st ‘𝐴) ∈ N ∧ (2^nd ‘𝐴) ∈ N))
7		xp1st 6309	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (N × N) → (1^st ‘𝐵) ∈ N)
8		xp2nd 6310	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (N × N) → (2^nd ‘𝐵) ∈ N)
9	7, 8	jca 306	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (N × N) → ((1^st ‘𝐵) ∈ N ∧ (2^nd ‘𝐵) ∈ N))
10		enqbreq 7539	. . 3 ⊢ ((((1^st ‘𝐴) ∈ N ∧ (2^nd ‘𝐴) ∈ N) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝐵) ∈ N ∧ (2^nd ‘𝐵) ∈ N)) → (⟨(1^st ‘𝐴), (2^nd ‘𝐴)⟩ ~_Q ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩ ↔ ((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((2^nd ‘𝐴) ·_N (1^st ‘𝐵))))
11	6, 9, 10	syl2an 289	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → (⟨(1^st ‘𝐴), (2^nd ‘𝐴)⟩ ~_Q ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩ ↔ ((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((2^nd ‘𝐴) ·_N (1^st ‘𝐵))))
12		mulcompig 7514	. . . 4 ⊢ (((2^nd ‘𝐴) ∈ N ∧ (1^st ‘𝐵) ∈ N) → ((2^nd ‘𝐴) ·_N (1^st ‘𝐵)) = ((1^st ‘𝐵) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐴)))
13	5, 7, 12	syl2an 289	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → ((2^nd ‘𝐴) ·_N (1^st ‘𝐵)) = ((1^st ‘𝐵) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐴)))
14	13	eqeq2d 2241	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → (((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((2^nd ‘𝐴) ·_N (1^st ‘𝐵)) ↔ ((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((1^st ‘𝐵) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐴))))
15	3, 11, 14	3bitrd 214	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (N × N)) → (𝐴 ~_Q 𝐵 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝐴) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐵)) = ((1^st ‘𝐵) ·_N (2^nd ‘𝐴))))

Colors of variables: wff set class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1395 ∈ wcel 2200 ⟨cop 3669 class class class wbr 4082 × cxp 4716 ‘cfv 5317 (class class class)co 6000 1^st c1st 6282 2^nd c2nd 6283 Ncnpi 7455 ·_N cmi 7457 ~_Q ceq 7462

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 617 ax-in2 618 ax-io 714 ax-5 1493 ax-7 1494 ax-gen 1495 ax-ie1 1539 ax-ie2 1540 ax-8 1550 ax-10 1551 ax-11 1552 ax-i12 1553 ax-bndl 1555 ax-4 1556 ax-17 1572 ax-i9 1576 ax-ial 1580 ax-i5r 1581 ax-13 2202 ax-14 2203 ax-ext 2211 ax-coll 4198 ax-sep 4201 ax-nul 4209 ax-pow 4257 ax-pr 4292 ax-un 4523 ax-setind 4628 ax-iinf 4679

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 1004 df-tru 1398 df-fal 1401 df-nf 1507 df-sb 1809 df-eu 2080 df-mo 2081 df-clab 2216 df-cleq 2222 df-clel 2225 df-nfc 2361 df-ne 2401 df-ral 2513 df-rex 2514 df-reu 2515 df-rab 2517 df-v 2801 df-sbc 3029 df-csb 3125 df-dif 3199 df-un 3201 df-in 3203 df-ss 3210 df-nul 3492 df-pw 3651 df-sn 3672 df-pr 3673 df-op 3675 df-uni 3888 df-int 3923 df-iun 3966 df-br 4083 df-opab 4145 df-mpt 4146 df-tr 4182 df-id 4383 df-iord 4456 df-on 4458 df-suc 4461 df-iom 4682 df-xp 4724 df-rel 4725 df-cnv 4726 df-co 4727 df-dm 4728 df-rn 4729 df-res 4730 df-ima 4731 df-iota 5277 df-fun 5319 df-fn 5320 df-f 5321 df-f1 5322 df-fo 5323 df-f1o 5324 df-fv 5325 df-ov 6003 df-oprab 6004 df-mpo 6005 df-1st 6284 df-2nd 6285 df-recs 6449 df-irdg 6514 df-oadd 6564 df-omul 6565 df-ni 7487 df-mi 7489 df-enq 7530

This theorem is referenced by: (None)

W3C validator